Review
2
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
67.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Easy navigation, well labeled update schedules, no hidden costs, real amateurs, and a solid amount of back cataloged updates are all excellent pros about this site. It is just ok and could really be something outstanding in the future. |
| Cons: |
I was very irritated to see the same woman repeated in certain updates with very little difference in the scenes. All the scenes follow the same formula which gets boring. It goes talk, toys, bj, standing on the side of the bed, doggie, anal, facial. I agree with other reviewers except I also find that the male actor is blurred out. I'm not annoyed about the guy needing the blur but it does become distracting, especially when it appears/disappears over the girls naughty parts simply because they dont know how to shoot the video from better angles and it takes me out of the moment watching the video. Would like there to be other males doing the fucking (for variety) and would like to see some creativity to the updates/girls/locations/camera angles/positions. |
| Bottom Line: |
Its great for about a month, or until you get bored. If you like the girls on the update pages a little bit its not worth it, if you think they are really hot then it is. This site feels like it is made for the man doing the fucking, he is doing the exploiting, filming, talking, everything, and it would be interesting if they brought back girls to get degraded more/worse if they are updated/featured again, or if the guy made faces about the girls behind there backs, or fucked in a different location then that one bed, and maybe without showing the lighting equipment in the background. I like the pro/am style but it gets boring after the two months that I've been a member. |
|
08-06-08 03:39am
Replies (3)
|
