Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
MMM100.net
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
-A very thorough and easy navigation system that allow users to find almost anything on the site.
-Their choice of performers seems more geared toward promoting amateurs and up & comers rather than established stars.
-They like to film their videos in a wide variety of locations from beautiful beaches to your basic porn bedroom.
-Many the perfomers have a progression of scenes from basic nudes to the more hardcore stuff.
-updates come at least every 2 days.
-Videos can be downloaded as a single file in wmv
with an avergage resolution of 640x360 but their newer videos now come in HD as well. |
Cons: |
I put some asteriks on some of the cons because, although they weren't a problem for me, they might be to some people.
**As far as I can tell, all the scenes involve the use of condoms.
**Navigation may be possible in a couple of languages but the content is mostly all French and Spanish with no English subtitles.
**Most of the performers are French and Spanish which explains the above spoken language con.
-Male performers are not necessarily established stars which can be a turn off.
-Although many of the girls/women appearing on this site also appear on explcite. On this site they have chosen to go for an amateurish look rather than a glamourous one.
-There is a good percentage of the girls that sport some obvious tattoos. |
Bottom Line: |
I'm French Canadian so the fact that most of the dialogue is in French was not a turn off for me but the opposite. That could be a problem for some but then again most Eastern European sites have either no dialogue, basic English or some Russian.
This site may appeal more to people that prefer their models to be more natural looking with very little artificial embellishements and don't mind condoms in their sex scenes. That last one is very important because I know that it's a big sticking point for some.
**Their credit card processor is cgbilling.com and I had never heard of them before this but I have no complain. |
|
10-08-10 08:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
127
|
Society SM
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Access to 4 other sites with one membership.
-Nearly 250 models to chose from a surprisignly
varied choice of models which a large portion of them are well known pornstars.
-site offers at least 4 new scenes per month.
-Over 350 scenes to choose from.
-Navigation from one site to the next is only a click away. |
Cons: |
-scenes are broken down in sections so no way to download a complete video.
-There is no separate section for pics & videos so you have to check every page to find the ones that contain the video and the ones with pics.
-Most of the content involves one man trying to make the girl cum often using only his hands or a vibrator. That can get repetitious quite fast. |
Bottom Line: |
I must confess that I didn't really want to join this site/network but somehow I thought that joining this site would give me access to the one that I really wanted and the main reason why I didn't want to join is because of the amazing review rear admiral did. He hit on all the key points.
I suspect that our score differ in large part because I don't think a site that offers videos only in sections deserves a score of 90 and above
If a sites chooses to offer videos then they should at the very least be downloadable as complete scenes.
I found that the camera angles in the videos was often focusing in the wrong place and I would have wanted more intereaction with the performer and more girl on girl BSDM. |
|
08-07-10 09:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
128
|
Huge Strapon Lesbians
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-They currently have 76 scenes(all dated).
-They update with one new scene per week.
-Access to 6 other sites.
-Movies can be downloaded in parts or whole.
-Videos com in 640 & 1920 WMV as well as 640 MP4.
-You can use a download manager.
-The performers are all identified with their proper name.
-The toys used do match the name of the site.
-Photosets can be downloaded in zip format. |
Cons: |
-The only way to search for a scene is by it's date, the type sex (vag/anal) and it's score.
-Although you get 6 other sites. Only 3 of those may still be updating with new content.
-The photosets have a resolution of 1200 x 800 but they appear more like teaser material than an actual desire to satisfy their customer.
-The price is pretty steap for what you get.
-Older content on the other sites is of poor quality and looks very dated. |
Bottom Line: |
This site belongs to the same people that own norestfortheass or they use the same director locations and performers. I was a recent member of N.R.F.T.A so the similarities in content, performers and styly is obvious. I can't prove it but I think they saw an opportunity to make more money by stopping to update content on one or more of their network and creating this new site with that content. I would have prefered paying a couple of dollars more and getting this content with my norestfortheass membership.
I think that only brutal dildos and maybe Sasha Rose are still updating but the prior is again content that could and should have been added to the N.R.F.T.A network and not this one.
If you like Girl/Girl action with huge toys that penetrate vaginas and anus than you will be satified.
To be avoided with anyone looking for serious passion between the performers. Some were able to portray it but most missed theboat. |
|
06-25-10 08:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
129
|
Teens 3some
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-53 videos (avg 20 mins).
-Access to a network of 12 exclusive sites and another 15 non-exclusive.
-peformers are about 18-25yrs old.
-The main theme is group sex with an emphasis on anal and dp's.
-This site offers some rare hardcore scenes from some mostly lesbian performers.
-videos are wmv, and can be downloaded in low, medium or hi-quality.
-You can also stream medium quality videos in a flash player.
-Photosets contain in average 140 pictures and can be downloaded whole in zip format. |
Cons: |
-The network only contains about 3-4 good sites.
-Identifying the performers requires alot of patience and some research.
-Like Gag-N-Gape the videos are too short and there is an amateurish look to them.
-The updates are infrequent. |
Bottom Line: |
This site suffers from the same afflictions as Gag-N-Gape in that the producers have some good looking girls that have never done hardcore or are just at their beginning, and because of the lack of production in lighting, makeup and cameran work. We are reduce to average quality
porn.
I like this site for the same reason that I like
Gag-N-Gape. This is one of the few sites if not the only one where certain performers have done hardcore sex. The fact that it's anal of Dp is that much better.
The price of 30$ for the network acces is pretty good even if most of the others are that great. |
|
11-04-08 07:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
130
|
Score Videos
(0)
81.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+You get access to Score HD as well as Score to Go.
+There are over 2000 videos to choose from.
+You can download the videos in MP4 and WMV and basic resolution is 854x480.
+They truly have a variety of models to choose from which are based on age and body type.
+Their content goes back at least a decade and further for some models so that could be a plus for some fans.
+They update with about 2 new scenes per week. |
Cons: |
-None of the scenes are tagged so you can't do a search by keyword.
-They have a lot of older content that hasn't aged well.
-A portion of their content is also availbale on Score HD and the quality is better on that site than here.
-Many of their models that may be your type.
-You can only see the dates of the updates on selected pages so a search by model name will not tell you when the scene was shot or when it was uploaded.
-Part of the content as a synopsis but another part is phtotsets of the scene so you ahev to scroll through a bunch of pages to see what's inside the video. |
Bottom Line: |
*I can see the logic for why Score chose to combine this site with Score HD but in some ways that is a disadvantage to this site because the quality is superior at Score HD and since they both share content then that makes this site's content obsolete. That's only part of their problem because they have a large percentage of older content (production wise) where the quality is rather poor and that clashes even more with their newer stuff. I mean it's kind of nice to offer members stuff made in 90's but if you don't remaster it then it's almost worthless to download except for nostalgia sake.
*There are still a lot of decent suff here but it won't be in HD and you'll have to do a lot of digging to find it. Mind you that is part of the fun so I didn't really mind all that much. Of course I might have had a different opinion if the site had many thousands of videos to go through.
*There are plenty of things they could do to improve the site but the first one is that they should have only one site called Score videos where all the sites send their stuff once it's no longer available for download on these sites. Having two sites offering identical stuff is redundant as well as time consumming. Of course having only one site would mean that the site would have a lot more content and since they don't tag their scenes and navigation is almost non-existant then that would require them to serioulsy improve this new site or suffer the conseqences of displeased customers. Having only one site would require that they have both an HD section as well as a regular one so that membes only intereested in HD content wouldn't wase their time going through content they never plan to view or download.
**The bottom line is that this would probably be a better stand alone site but would anyone join this site if it didn't also offer HD content?** |
|
11-18-12 07:26am
Replies (3)
|
Review
131
|
Deauxma Live
(0)
81.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Deauxma is a hot 50+ women who loves to have sex on screen and isn't affraid to go hardcore.
-There are 56 videos which can be downloaded in MP4 640x480 765kbps and WMV 720x480 1253kbps.
-All content is dated and they update at least once a week.
-You get access to their cam shows and they have the schedule so that you know when to log in.
-You get access to 7 other sites.
-You can stream past cam shows in a flash player(quality is not the greatest but that may be par with most cam shows) |
Cons: |
-The biggest drawback for Deauxma's site is that you can get most of her videos by joining her other site deauxma.net and for less money. I can't say if quality is similar as on this site.
-Many of the videos are short version of a larger scene. you can purchase the complete scene in her store.
-There are 100 photosets but you can't download them as a complete zip file.
-Deauxma has large implants and that may turn off some people that are looking for a natural looking milf. |
Bottom Line: |
-Here we have another promissing solo model site that does some good things and still manages to screw up some really important things. The first is photosets. If you are going to offer photos them make sure members can download them as a complete zip files. Otherwise you are only alienating possible members. The other is in regards to videos. If you have a site with videos then make sure they are complete scene and not clips. I understand the need to make more money by selling the complete scene seperately but it would be much better to film some scene for the site and some for the dvd's.
This way more people will want to buy the dvd because they know what to expect in the dvd.
-If you are a fan of Deauxma and want to get more than what you ahve found eselwhere then this should be a good deal. Specially if the other peformer whithin this network also appeal to you.
**To be avoided by anyone who's joined Deauxma's other site. There isn't enough new stuff to warrant the investment. I also wonder why she still has 2 sites. All it's doing is splitting the income since almost no one will join both sites and some may pick the les expensive one. |
|
07-17-11 11:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
132
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
81.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Almost 700 videos & pics sets availablew for download.
-A good selection of performers that cover most body types.
-Most videos can be downloaded in quicktime, WMV,
Flash and MP4(HD is available in a couple of format as well).
-They upgraded the quality of many of their older videos(see cons).
-Access to the dff network with one membership. |
Cons: |
-Site no longers update regularly.
-Many of the updates are older scenes that had an upgrade in video quality or offer more video formats.
-Some of the updates is leased content.
-Some of the updates is content taken from their other sites.
- |
Bottom Line: |
Part of my score is based on the fact that this site doesn't really update with a significant amount of new content as much as re-release older scenes in better video quality or offer different video formats. I appreciate the work that goes into taking older videos and cleaning and reformating them but these should not be the bulk of new updaates. I believe a site survives on new content and not on 5yrs old scenes.
Another annoying thing is their use of content from their other sites passed of as new and the addition of some leased material.
The only thing that saves them from getting a worse score is the fact that I think many people starting to surf for porn can still find many excellent scenes on this site but most returning members should be weary of downloading content they already have at least once. |
|
01-06-11 07:48pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
133
|
Hard Fuck Tales
(0)
81.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Updated: |
06-18-11 09:27am (Update History)
Reason: I rejoined the site and I find that their updates have slowed.
|
Pros: |
-Acces to 5 other sites with one membership.
-All the girls are popular newbies in the porn world.
-All videos come in 3 formats: iphone 480x320,
standard AVI 1024x576, and HD MKV 1280x720.
-You can stream the videos in Flash.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a single zip file.
-Content is dated.
-You can use a download manager but are limited to only 2 and sometimes 3 downloads at a time. |
Cons: |
-This is a very small site with only 24 videos.
-They now appear to only update with one new video every month.
-Some of the content on the other site might have limited appeal.
-Many performers have the same first name only. The people behind this site have simply added a number to their first name ie: Lena 8, Lera 5 and so forth.
-You can only download about 2 videos at a time and you cannot surf within the site or network until one of the downloads is complete. |
Bottom Line: |
-This was a small site within a network of 5 other sites in January and at the time I gave it an 85 for potential but the network has not gotten better but worse. Most of the other sites except for pickupgilrs almost never update.
The theme of the videos are mini gangbangs with one girl and 3 guys. Anal in all of them with most getting a dp.
-The first 8 videos were all shot outside and that is consistent with content shot in the summer or early fall while the most recents are all inside and that makes sense as it is winter overthere.
-The 35$ join price may be a little too high for what you will get.
-It's hard to say if this is now a network worth joining because of the update schedule. In January I would have said yes but now it's not so clear. You should only join for what you will find on this site and the others within the network and not for what might be coming up in future updates. |
|
01-01-11 08:09am
Replies (2)
|
Review
134
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
81.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Nearly 200 scenes.
-Authentic Grandma looking performers.
-They have both BG/GG scenes.
-Video download options are among the best on the net with WMV and H.264 both at different levels of quality from low to high.
-Photosets can be downloaded whole in zip format.
-Immediate acess to 30 sites from the 21Sextury |
Cons: |
-The fact that most of their performers truly look like grandmas can be a serious turn off.
-The new network is a little slower than the original (They may still be in the beta stage). |
Bottom Line: |
I didn't join LustyGrandmas but got access with my pix and video membership. I did download a couple of scene, but this truly isn't one of my fetishes. Many of the older performers really look like grandmas. They are much older than a typical cougar, they have higher body fat, many have sagging breast, many have greying hair, and to be honest most are way past their prime and quite a few never had one.
If the above body type appeals to you then this is your site. For the others I'd recommend a quick visit. I'm more of the later so my score is in part because of my lack of interest in this site.
Of course you get quite a few other great sites with your membership so even if this one doesn't appeal to you. The fact that many of the others in the network do might be a great incentive to join. I've noticed that you don't get the same access with each membership so I recommend you always take a look at which site come wqith the mebership and then pick that site knowing you want the other in the network. |
|
01-30-10 08:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
135
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+Huge network of sites catering to fans of young Eastern European models.
+More than 2800 videos and photosets to choose from.
+You can stream all videos online or you can download them in a variety of format from WMV, FLV and MKV .
+They added High Definition videos in 2011 so you have about 300 or more HD videos.
+Photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file and resolution is 960x1440.
+All content is dated and they appear to add one new scene every 2 days.
+The members section is well designed and it's easy to find scenes using tag words, site name or the model's name.
+The TBP/PU discount of 19.95$ is amazing. |
Cons: |
-I find that a large percentage of the content added in the last 4 months is subpar to what TMW used to offer.
-The vast majority of the sites are dead so content is either months old or more likely years old. The only sites that seem to still be adding new content are Teen Sex Movs, Teen Sex Mania, Creampie Angel and Anal Angel.
-They keep adding new sites to the network but this isn't a positive thing because the content on those sites can be quite good so having only a few scenes and then none drives me crazy.
-They have significantly dropped the number of anal scenes since June.
-A percentage of the content is leased material that is available on many other sites.
-They have advertising for other sites on all their pages. |
Bottom Line: |
*Let me first say that a lot of what I'm about to write amy be negative but only for returning members and not for anyone just joining this network. Anyone just joining this network will more than get his money's worth. If you're a past member and want to join again then please pay attention to the following information prior to doing so. I was last a member in July of this year and even at that time. I was finding that some of the newer content was not all that good. You can imagine my surprise when I joined again last week and found that now almost all the content is like that.
*The first thing you should know is that if you are into anal then you will want to avoid the network for any new anal scenes. I did the math and they only added 19 anal scenes between June and September while they added 38 anal scenes between Feb and May. Those numbers are a lot worse when you consider that they only added 2 anals since July 21. Anal isn't for everybody so hearing that TMW replaced those anal scenes with standard b/g scenes should be great news but many of the scenes that replaced those anal ones tend to often be badly shot, not well lit, and the action is not very hot. also I'm not so sure that the content is as recent as it could be. The most obvious reason for me saying that is that the latest update dated Oct 5 for their anal-angels site is a scene that was released in March of this year on another site. The girl is cute as always but the scene is not well shot and it's frankly not very good.
*I don't know if I'm correct but my gut feeling is that the syphilis outbreak which hit Europe really hard coupled with Russia pretty much banning production of porn in that Country have significantly affected the ability of TMW to offer a higher quality product. I checked and many of the girls that have appeared on TMW are from Russia so that can't be good for business. The economy still being where it is must also be a huge factor and then you still have content thieves. I think TMW had very little already for release and when they started to run out of scenes then they started looking for content providers that had some unreleased material or had decent prices on already relased stuff and that's what you are now seeing.
*I don't know what the futur holds for this network. I hope they turn things around because it was a great network. All I know is that I won't be returing again until I see serious chnages in their content. of course that is going to be hard since their brand new site is just as bad as their old one so no way of knowing what is new on the network.
**My score is based solely on the fact that I'm a returning member who doesn't like their new stuff. Otherwise the score would be in the 90's. |
|
10-06-12 10:04pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
136
|
Oldje
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+They have exclusif content from a niche that's not well represented on the net.
+They have an very good selection of female European performers.
+The sex scenes are well filmed and the males do a pretty decent job considering their age.
+They have 352 videos but only the last 32 are in a single file. All the others are broken into 2 or more files.
+Video resolution is at least 720x404 for more than 100 videos and the last 32 are now 1280x720.
+They appear to still be updating with new content. |
Cons: |
-They no longer offer class3some as a bonus site and that is too bad because it was a nice addition considering the high cost of the site.
-They don't offer any model info whatsoever so it requires a lot of research to find the names to go with most videos.
-They don't date their content so it's very hard to know the update schedule.
-They have photos but the quality is mostly poor and they often appear to be out of order. Not to mention that you have to download each pic one by one since they aren't in a complete zip file.
-There is no navigation except the page number or the ability to jump all the way to the beginning or the end of the pages.
-There's music in their videos and that can be a plus but I found at certain times to be distracting.
-The first 100 videos are only offered in Real media so not very good news. |
Bottom Line: |
*This is a pretty decent site with content that is good to excellent but is dragged down by all the negative things that could easily be fixed if they bothered with it. They don't have a lot of male performers to choose from but the ones they have do a better than average job and there appears to be some good chemistry with the female performers which seems hard to believe when you consider the age difference between the males and the females.
*There's dialogue in some of the videos and it's normally in English. It's more often a miss because English is not the language that these people speak but it's not awful. The music is a little annoying. It's not too loud because that would make it almost impossible to watch the videos with the sound on. Mind you I wouldn't be sad if it disapeared. I think just the natural sounds of the performer is more than enough for the viewers anyway.
*I like that they are now offering their videos in a single file and that the resolution is also increased to 1280x720. Now if someone can start entering the names of the models in the database and put dates on their content then they'll have improved on most key issues.
**If you want to watch old men have sex with much younger women than this is probably the best site for that. They even have a few anal scenes as well so if that is one of your fetishes then you'll find a few videos. Be advised that it may not be in the description of the scene so you'll have to either download all the videos or check out the photos to find those scenes.
***Of course if you don't want to watch old guys have sex with very young women than avoid this site. Especially now since they no longer offer class3some and that site had mostly yojg women with younger men.*** |
|
05-07-12 06:57am
Replies (13)
|
Review
137
|
Brutal Fisting
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+All exclusif content.
+All videos can be downloaded in WMV or MP4 and they offer HD 1920x1080 content for all of them.
+You can download all photosets as a complete zip file and resolution is 1200x800.
+You get access to 8 other sites
+They have a good selection of models and this is the only place you'll see them do this type of content.
+Content is all dated. |
Cons: |
-They only update about twice per month so it's still a small site with only 44 videos.
-Only two of the other sites are still updating.
-They have a pretty awful preview section and that makes it hard to get a good feeling of what's available inside. |
Bottom Line: |
*This is a pretty extreme fetish so the number of performers willing to do it is rare but these guys still manage to hire certain girls that you wouldn't expect to be doing this and to appear like they enjoy it. Even more when you consider that 15 of them also do anal fisting which is even more extreme.
*The videos are well shot so you aren't limited to only a few angles during the action. That's appreciated during the penetration because you get to see the face of the performer and that adds to the heat of the scene. They also like to shoot from various positions and that's a plus.
*The one thing they need to work on is updating more often.*
**Since this type of fetish is pretty exteme then I can only recommend it to those that are into it. If you enjoy teach me fisting then you should enjoy this one.** |
|
03-27-12 10:46am
Replies (3)
|
Review
138
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+They have the first anals of many girls just starting in porn.
+You can download videos on mobiles devices in iPad, PSP and 3GP format.
+You can download videos in Mpeg4, Mpeg and WMV and these format are all offered in standard and HD format. HD resolution is 720p and 1080p.
+You can download the photosets as a complete zip file and pic resolution is 1300x975.
+You get access to the Mofo network which offers you 12 extra sites.
+You can search for all videos in the network using keywords.
+They show you the 12 upcoming updates. |
Cons: |
-Because all the videos are shot in POV style then you're limited to only a few possible shots.
-I found that some of the videos had an amateur look to them with out of focus shots and bad lighting.
-The pics are quite nice but they have one of the biggest watermark I have ever seen. I calculate that it's about 1/10th the size of the image and it's white and blue.
-The models are cute but I really wish they would have used makeup to cover the skin blemishes and pimples on some of the models.
-The site is brand new with only 16 videos so unless you want videos from the other sites then you will be a little disapointed in the content. |
Bottom Line: |
*I joined the site mainly because they had the first and only anal of Jessie Rodgers. I'm not disapointed because her's is one of the best on the site. This is such a new site that it's hard to tell if they'll always shoot in POV style or if they'll change as time goes by. The site is less than a month old so I'm willing to give them a break for now.
*I hope they go with a cameran and performer so that we aren't limited to only a few possible shots and better camera angles during the action.
There are some really good sites in the network so that's a major plus for anyone joining this site since it gives you access other types of porn than just anal.
**I recommend this site to anyone looking for first anals fro newbies and doesn't mind POV style porn.
|
|
12-13-11 09:34am
Replies (2)
|
Review
139
|
Naughty At Home
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Desirae is a hot blond all natural woman in her 40`s who does vaginal and anal sex.
-The site has restarted updating with new photos and videos.
-There are over 150 videos at the moment.
-There are over 300 photosets(see cons).
-Desirae also post info on her blog?journal |
Cons: |
-All the videos are filmed using a tripod or an handheld camera so it's always the same shots with the same angles.
-Many of the videos have little scenarios like fucking my boss and so forth but they were all with her husband. It's pretty obvious because of the above con.
-She does have many photosets but you can only download them pic by pic. She does not offer them as a single zip file.
-Only the new content is dated and that's 4 videos. |
Bottom Line: |
-I have had my eye on Desirae's site for many years and I thought that now would be a good time to try it since I'm in solo model site mode.
Desirae is an attractive 40 years old woman with an active sex drive and knows how to play to the camera. There is clearly a lot of great things to like about this type of site for anyone that likes or at least doesn't mind videos filmed in POV or tripod only.
-The biggest problem for me is that I don't like POV and tripod only porn. I find that it's too limiting to the viewer because there are only so many different ways to film a scene using those 2 methods. It also makes believing any scenario porn impossible because it's filmed in such a way that the fantasy is ruined.
-Desirae mentions that she recently got divorced so that could explain why she stopped updating and some of the recent changes on the site.
-My score is based on what the site offers and not what I took from it. |
|
07-03-11 12:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
140
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-All exclusif content.
-You get access to 9 other sites.
-Content is dated.
-Videos can be downloaded in quicktime, mpeg and WMV.
-You can stream videos in low, medium or high quality flash.
-Photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file. (res: 2464 x 1643) over 100 pics per set |
Cons: |
-Site is tiny with only about 30 videos and photosets.
-They update about once a week but one week you get the photoset and the next week you get the video.
-The sites other than this one all use the same models but the name may be different from site to site and the action is often similar for each model so it can get repetitious. |
Bottom Line: |
-I've had my eye on Abigaile which is the name spunky bee is more commonly known under, since she first came onto the porn scene in 2009. She has worked for a couple of other sites but this is the only site that offers so much content.
-The only reason I joined this site is because it's the only one that offers so many sites under the tonybucks banner. This would be a poor stand alone site and frankly all of them would be in this category. There simply isn't enough content to justify such a high join price.
-My score is based on the fact that you get access to so many other sites but I found that the content on the other sites to be similar from one site to the next and they all use the same models in each of the other sites.
-Be advised that the content for most sites is your typical boyfriend/girlfriend type of sex with pussy penetration only. Very few models do anal so anal fans might want to avoid joining. |
|
03-20-11 09:43am
Replies (2)
|
Review
141
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-They have over 2000 videos to choose from.
-They have a good breakdown of the content in each video so that it makes it easy to find all the videos with that particular niche.
-Content is dated.
-They update with at least one new video a day.
-They have one of the largest selection of models to chose from.
-Most of the videos can be downloaded in low, medium and high quality. Since I only downloaded the medium ones then those appear for the most part to be 480x360.
**you get access to club seventeen(see con)** |
Cons: |
**You get access to club seventeen with your membership but since club seventeen is a pics only site and this is it's video equivalent then you arent really getting 2 sites for one membership.
-Many of their models are not under the name we know them so it requires a lot morte research to find content and identify it.
-A large part of their older content isn't very good.
-Difficult to tell how much of their content is available elsewhere but I did find a couple of their videos on videobox without looking too hard. |
Bottom Line: |
-I found a few videos that are worth keeping but the percentage of them versus the total amount available is quite tiny. I'm not disapointed that I joined but I don't think it's site that I'll ever join again.
-The site should satisfy those who enjoy a wide variety of sex scenes from solo, lesbian and hardcore starring the same model. I found that many of their models appear in more than one video doing different type of sex scene. |
|
03-07-11 07:38pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
142
|
Girls Got Cream
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-They have some of the best looking Russian and Eastern European girls.
-All the models are in their teens to early 20's.
-Approximately 158 videos(wmv format).
-The videos are DRM free.
-Each video as a watermark but it's on the bottom left of the screen and I personaly had to go rewatch a video to notice that it was there.
-Download speed are quite good and I didn't see any restrictions.
-This is a creampie fetish site with more than 1/3 of the scenes involving anal creampies. |
Cons: |
-This is another gonzo only style of site so be forewarned that if you want a plot of any kind of foreplay. You won't find it here.
-The price is too high for what's offered.
-Not all the models names are those we know them by(not unusual with Russian sites but annoying nonetheless).
-The action becomes monotonous because of the gonzo style.
-They are still updating but they don't date their videos and updates don't seem to follow any known schedule.
-I didn't mind the watermark because it's located on the bottom left of the screen. My eyes don't really go there normally so I actually oberlooked it. That said I know that some of you that dislike them.
-They have pics but you can't download them in a single file. You have to download each pic one by one. Each scene contains anything from 300 to over 500 photos(resolution is 853x1280). |
Bottom Line: |
-I could not recommend this site at the current price. If you like the content then you should join the Teen core club network. It's more expensive but you'll get acces to 14 other sites with very similar content as this one.
-Some of the girls are really beautiful and you just can't believe all the nasty stuff they are willing to do. They should invest some money into getting a makeup artist and hairstylist.
That would help make the girls even hotter than they are.
-I wish they would add actual foreplay to their videos. This is pure gonzo with sex that's by the number. I still think they have somekind of checklist that they mark off as the scene progresses.
***on a side note about Teen core club***
My membership was ending today and when I went to cancel. They offered me another month at
25$. I took the offer so I will be able to see how often they update. |
|
08-01-09 09:28am
Replies (12)
|
Review
143
|
Try Teens
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-They've got some of the most beautiful young Russian women I've seen.
-Many of the performer are just beginning and that gives thema a certain innocent charm.
-Certain of the girls on this site perform some hard sex that you can't find anywhere else.
-They currently have 144 videos.
-Download speeds are quite good and I didn't find any download restrictions.
-The main theme of this site is anal and gaping.
-No DRM but they have watermarks. I didn't have a problem with them because it's on the bottom left of the screen. I actually noticed it after I had first said that they didn't have any. |
Cons: |
-Although they have beautiful Russian girls they don't invest enough in making them look hot. A makeup artist and hairstylist would help a lot.
-The action is all gonzo. No dialogue, nudity within seconds, no foreplay unless you consider a blow job foreplay, gagging, drooling, intense anal, gaping, weird sex position.
-Although they have pics. You can't download photosets in one file. You have to download each pick individualy.
-The updates aren't dated so there is no real way to tell how old some videos are.
-The price is way too high for overall content.
-The performers name are not necessarily what they are on other sites or what you know them. |
Bottom Line: |
-I would not recommend that anyone join this site at the current price. I got access by joining Teen core club and that't how I would recommend you should go.
-This site frustrates me a lot because here you have gorgeous young women and all you can do is use the old gonzo formula. Almost all of the videos are identical. You feel like they are using a checklist and once one action is done they move to the next.
-You get the feeling that the producers watched a few Max Hardcore movies. They may not be as hard but they come close on some videos.
-This site like most of the other ones in the network it belongs to could go a long way in improving their content if they dropped the all gonzo concept and focused more on heat. Try to add actual foreplay. Try using different male performers.
I found this site a while ago and I find that it's great when it comes to identifying Russian or East European girls: russianrealitysites.com |
|
07-31-09 07:36pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
144
|
No Rest For The Ass
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Access to a network of 9 sites.
-Models are all in their teens to early 20's.
-A good selection of body types.
-They currently have 60 scenes.
-All scenes can be streamed or downloaded.
-Movie downloads are wmv with basic resolution at 640x480, hi-def at 1280x720 and they also offer true hi-def 1920x1080 for some of the scenes.
-Some of the scenes can downloaded to an ipod format
-You can download photosets in a zip format. There are about 200+ pictures per set and resolution is usually 853x1280
-The sex tends to be leaning toward the extreme.
The majority of it is anal with quite a few dp's and dap's included.
-Navigation with the site or withing the network is very easy. |
Cons: |
-This site like all the others in the network permits only one download at a time. You can navigate but do not try to downalod more than one scene.
-It takes about 20-30 minutes to download a regular version scene and about an hour for a hi-def scene.
-The sex is extreme and may not appeal to some people. A DP is one thing but a DAP is more circus act then anuthing else.
-Updates are sporadic and therefore difficult to anticipate. They seem to update once to twice per month.
-The models names will require a little research since they may not be what you know them under. |
Bottom Line: |
If you can overlook the one scene download at a time and like your sex a little extreme than this site will deliver. I'd say that for the most part that the network will deliver as well.
A major improvement would be to allow for more than one dowload at a time and accelerate the download speed. 30 minutes for regular scene and an hour for an hi-def one is a major problem.
I'd like to see a proper schedule for their updates or make them on the same day each month.
This is a good network of sites for those that join, download the content and then leave. I don't think it's worth more than a one month membership. More so since some of the sites don't have a lot of content and updates aren't the greatest. |
|
06-30-09 07:41pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
145
|
Dildo And Fisting
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Access to a network of 9 sites.
-The models are in their teens to early 20's.
-The model selection is quite good with a wide range of body types to choose from
-Navigation within the site and network is easy.
-The sex is raunchy and quite extreme.
-The talking is mostly or all in English.
-Scenes can be downloaded or streamed.
-The downnloads are either regular definition with a 16:9 aspect ratio, 640x480 and 2000 bitrate while hi def is 16:9 ratio, 1280x720 and 6000bitrate
-Photosets can be downloaded in a zip file.
-They currently have 37 scenes |
Cons: |
-The biggest drawback to this site and all other in the network is that you can only download one scene at a time. You can still navigate but you cannot open any other downloads. The average download time is about 20-30 minutes per scene.
-The sex may be a little too raunchy for some peoples taste.
-The model's name are not necessarily the one we know her under. |
Bottom Line: |
-The score would be much higher if it weren't for the "only one" download at a time.
-I thought that they might have improved that since the last time one of us reviewed them but alas they haven't.
-The content for the site is quite good with an emphasis on anal sex with either toys, penises, hands or all of the above.
-I was rather suprised to see what some of the models did on this site since their prior works was far more softcore. (I'm not complaining).
-The price is reasonable for the full access to the network(32.95US).
-The rest of the network is a mixture of hit and miss, but when thy hit they do a very good job. |
|
06-29-09 08:01pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
146
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Access to 10 sites with the main themes being anal, IR, Oral sex, and creampies.
-All videos are downloadable has single files or broken down for people with slower internet acess.
-Download speed is excellent with no maximum per day.
-Peformers are all young with looks ranging form cute to drop dead gorgeous.
-All pefformers are either Russians or Eastern European.
-They have pictures sets of all scenes and resolution is quite good. |
Cons: |
-The price is quite high at about 50$.
-Although you get access to all the sites from main one. It requires logging back on each time you visit a new site, and to make things worse since you have to type a recognition code each time. I found myself unable to log one because the system would not recognize the code.
-They don't seem to follow a specific calendar
when it comes to updating their sites.
-You do get 10 sites, but I'd say only about 5 are any good.
-The sex scenes are mostly all the same, and that becomes repetitious in the end.
-Performers remain the same from one site to the next, but their names keep changing. |
Bottom Line: |
*If your a fan of Sineplex or Sinsational movies than you should be quite happy with these sites since many of their performers started on one of these sites.
*They have some gorgeous girls that you'd never believe would do porn.
*If one performer appeals to you and you want to see her do appear in one of the above mentioned scenes ie: IR or anal then you almost have to choose teencore club since she may perform anal on only one of their site.
*I'd wish they would drop the price by about 10$
*I'd also wish that the performers would keep the same name from site to site.
*Updates should be dated and a calendar made available to Members.
A good tool to help identify a performer on teencore club is this www.russianrealitysites.com |
|
04-03-08 07:01pm
Replies (10)
|
Review
147
|
WCP Club
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif and it's dated.
+You get access to 95 dvd or 565 scenes.
+They offer more than 400 models that showcase different ethnicities and age groups.
+One of the few sites that has all interracial content.
+You can use a download manager.
+Videos can be downloaded in 3 format from low to high def. Resolution for SD is 720x404 and HD is 1280 x 720. |
Cons: |
-Downloads speeds are really bad becasue a 500MB scene takes about 5 to 8 minutes to download.
-You only get access to a tiny portion of the entire WCP library.
-No clue what their update schedule is because I haven't seen one new dvd in the last 8 days.
-They don't update with a complete dvd but add scenes over many days.
-Surfing the site is not easy because the back button always brings you the main page and you lose your search options.
-For some reason their pages down resize to fit the screen so you have to scroll left to right to see everything.
-Part of all their pages are dedicated to advertising. |
Bottom Line: |
*This is the second site owned by Manica Media that I have joined and both have the same cons mentioned above. Luckily this site has one thing the other didn't have and it's that their content can only be found on streaming sites so joining this one is a great deal on that front. Of course the downside for anyone wanting to download all their movies is that one month is not likely to be enough unless download speeds increase. I don't need hyper speed but it shouldn't take 5 minutes to download a video.
*I'm a huge fan of West Coast movies so getting access to part of their library is good news but it also really sucks that you only get access to a small part of it. If they at least added 2 or more movie per week then I would be happy but if this site does what Pinko did then I don't expect to see any new movie while I'm a member. I'm not even sure if they will add a new one each week. They certainly haven't done so since I've been a member.
*They should take some time and do some major tweaking to their site design. I shouldn't have to scroll left and right to see everything, the most recent stuff should always be on the main page, you should be able to use the back button from any page to the previous one as opposed to be sent to the main all the time and I shouldn't have to push out of the way a window to cam sites. You want to advertise cam shows then do it on a separate page.
**If you like hardcore interracial porn and you don't mind staying more than one month(that or you are only looking for part of the library) then you should be happy with this site. Of course you also have to be okay with the cons.** |
|
01-15-14 11:33am
Replies (4)
|
Review
148
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+They currently have 147 videos.
+The majority of the models are unknowns and this is possibly the only video they will shoot.
+All the models are in their late teens to early 20's and most of them are quite beautiful.
+All the videos can be downloaded in WMV and the resolution is 720x480.
+They update with at least one new video a week. |
Cons: |
-You must remain a member for at leat 2 months before you can stream or download the HD videos and that at the full price. They only offer a reduction in price for members that have been active for more than 3 months.
-The videos are all shot in an hotel room and the lighting is not always adequate.
-The person filming the scenes lacks imagination so the bulk of the videos are all shot in the same way so they all have the same flaws and they all shot using the same caera angles.
-Most of the models are atractive but a good percentage of them have more than one tatoo.
-There are no pics whatosever.
-The content is not dated
-The site's navigation is beyond awful. You can only move by selecting a page on the bottom of the site or clicking on the model which always reverts to the first page of the site.
-The male in the videos is never seen above the chest so that also limts the possible shots. |
Bottom Line: |
*This is my second vist in less than a year and I think it will be my last. This is sad because the site manages to hire some really attractive young women that are willing to do hardcore porn but the guys shooting the porn is incompetent and all the sites flaws get more annoying with each visit so that it makes the experience less appealing now than when I was last a member.
*A very annoying thing is that the bulk of the videos aren't identified so you have to do some research before downloading them so that you can at least put the model's name on the file. Then there's the awfull navigation system that does not allow you to go back to where you were once you click on a particular page since the system always returns to the first page regardless of where you were on the site.
*You would think that a video that's not shot in POV or with a tripod would manage not to look as though it was but you'd be wrong because this is exactly how most of the videos look like on this site. The guy shooting the videos manages to always use the same angles and positions in the videos so that they actually look like they are shot in a POV style or filmed using a tripod.
*I can understand a site wanting to reward their long term members by offering HD videos to those that stick with the site for more than one month but if you're going to do that then make sure the second month is half the price. Otherwise it makes the site one of the most expensive one on the net when it comes to HD content.*
**If you want to see some unknown attractive young women have hardcore sex and don't care too much about the camera angles and the lighting then you should be very happy with this site. If camera angles, lighting and variety in shots is important than stay away.** |
|
03-04-12 06:41pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
149
|
Little Caprice
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Little Caprice is such a cute innocent looking girl that it's hard to believe she does hardcore porn.
-The content is all exclusif and this is the only site other than Woodman where she does anal.
-There are 86 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and they are all 1280x720 in resolution.
-You get access to 4 other sites. |
Cons: |
-The site is a little slow to surf and hell when it comes to downloading videos. It took me over 2 hours to download one HD video.
-They don't date their content so no sure way of verifying if and when they update except to say that TBP had 70 videos listed for them October 2010 and they now have 86 videos.
-There are over 100 photosets and resolution is is at least 1600x1067 but you can only download them pic by pic. You can't downalod photosets as a single zip file.
-I consider only 2 of the 4 sites included to be a good match for people that might enjoy this one and one of those is no longer updating with new content.
-There`s a forum where Caprice answers members but after reading a few post from her then all I can say is why bother. Theres nothing personal in her replies `to the popint that you don`t know if it`s her or the guys who manage the site. |
Bottom Line: |
-This is another solo model site that does some good things but drops the ball on key features that would rise it above mediocre. I think it`s important for any site to date their content so that new members know when to expect new stuff. If you are going to offer photos then make sure these can be downloaded as a complete photoset zip file. Attaching your site to other models site is only good if this adds to the overall quality and quantity. A bad site isn`t made beter if you add 3 other bad site to it all you have is more crap than you add before.
-If you are a fan of Little Caprice and want to collect as much as you can from her porn work then you have to join this site. For all others then it`s a question of whether she and some of the other girls have enough appeal to make the expenditure worth it. |
|
07-15-11 07:08pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
150
|
Carol Cox
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-All exclusif content.
-Carol is an attractive 30 to 40 year old woman whose pretty kinky and loves group action, girl girl and lots and lots of man juice.
-She appears to still be updating.
-You get access to the wild rose network which currently includes over 90 sites.
-You get both videos and pics.
-Videos are filmed by a third party so very little POV and tripod shots. |
Cons: |
-Navigation is one of the biggest drawback for the site because it's hard to find what you are looking for. certain of the videos & photosets can be found in more than one location so you have to be carefull not to download the same thing twice.
-Some of the pics sets do not have accompanying video.
-Some may find that most videos are short since they average about 15 minutes.
-The quality of the videos varies a lot. I found some that were 720x480 but I also found some at 320x240.
-You do get access to many other sites but I found that only 5 to 10% are worth looking at.
**I don't thinks pics sets can be downloaded as a complete file. At least I didn't see where you could on the site. |
Bottom Line: |
-You can tell that Carol likes what she does and doesn't mind that you know it. She's attractive and that's a plus. I just wish there was more content to be found. I think I found 187 videos but because navigation is so screwed up then there's a good chance that there are duplicates.
-If you like milfs with a kinky side then this site and a couple of others in the network should meet you expectation.
-My suggestion for anyone thinking about giving this site a try is to pick the 3 day trial. It's unlikely that you'll need more than that to find and dowload what you like. Be advised that the standard pop up join option is for 24.95$. You have to scroll a litle lower to get the special 9.95$ price. |
|
06-24-11 06:38pm
Replies (0)
|