| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Joymii's Reply
Nice to hear from the company :)
As for the connectivity, I checked today and your "updates" page shows now properly (I mean at a very decent speed).
Think this article sums up very well the situation: http://arstechnica.com/information-techn...-break-online-video/
As for the quality, the fact that I couldn't have a proper peek at your recent updates wasn't helping I presume.
You seem to have very decent looking models recently :)
I don't really have favorites. Though I must say I used to love Michael Sandberg's vids.
You should bring him back (as it looks like he's not making anymore videos) and let him shoot a longer feature with the models he used to work with on a regular basis.
Let me "somehow" disagree with the "one vid per week".
Now that I can really look around, it's: 3 for July, 2 for June and 3 for May which isn't exactly 1 a week (you used to have 4/5 per month couple years ago).
Thanks for your answer! I'll probably join back when I have more free time to spend on watching lovely models :)
|
08-03-13 10:21am
|
Comment
2
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
07-24-13 03:06am
Replies (3)
|
Review
3
|
Joy Mii
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- exclusive content
- (very) good looking models
- regular updates
- each pictures set has its corresponding movie
- crystal-clear HD vids (WMV / MOV)
- handheld encodes
- up to 5MP pictures in excellent quality |
| Cons: |
- navigation could be improved
- models "bios" are lacking real portraits and a proper index |
| Bottom Line: |
joymii is one of the first attempts at making a X-Art look-a-like alternative, by the makers of Femjoy.
What is it, in a few words ? Hardcore done in an artistic, intimate way. Read : no closeups in your face all the time, no constant speak...
So let's get to the point : is it a success ?
Almost.
Don't get me wrong, this is a very good site with very few flaws.
The main drawback is : as of today, it is yet another X-Art site, nothing more, nothing less.
So if you like the aforementioned site, then you will most likely enjoy this one.
The other "issue", for me, is the navigation. It is quite complete yet sketchy. You can't :
- filter the updates per month, year
- easily find a model without browsing all of them
What are the differences from its main competitor you'd ask ?
It's a pro site, content-speaking (not that X-Art isn't, far from that) but the atmosphere seems rather dull in comparison and the setting is often "dry".
Of course not everyone looks for that kind of ambiance, so you might enjoy this one better in the end.
It's also a pro site, design-speaking. And there, it surpasses its main competitor with few more features, like a more evolved rating system.
In the end, is it worth your money ?
If you like what you see as a guest on the site, then yes, you'll like what's inside as the only thing lacking is the download feature. |
|
05-18-12 12:58pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
4
|
Querro
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I was the one who asked that site to be listed here.
It was on my subscribe list, mostly because of its Femjoy look'n feel and because I had some hopes for their vids.
I can't write a proper review right now, but it's an average site, at least for me. I'd rate it 65/70. Not that it's bad, but there's nothing outstanding here.
Too much Photoshop on some pics.
Not enough vids and they're not that good, too amateurish.
It's a one year old site, with a regular update (a vid or a pics' set) once every two days (usually). So don't expect a lot of content.
In the end, that's just another softcore site.
|
10-05-10 04:25pm
|
Reply
5
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
You're talking about Nikita getting nude in Prague ?
So far, that's the only set showing public nudity I've seen and that's clearly not the focus of this site.
But you can find many pictures taken outdoor.
|
06-15-10 05:30pm
|
Review
6
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The girls. Many are hot and not seen everywhere.
- Some nice erotic closeups.
- Constant updates rate : 3 pics' sets and 1 vid per week.
- Navigation : minimal yet complete.
- Models list. |
| Cons: |
- Pics quality : too much noise on many of them.
- Vids quality : bad compression, too many artifacts on the 1080p vids (both wmv & mov).
- No models' bio. |
| Bottom Line: |
I won't lie, I've seen better. But I've also seen worse.
There's a lot of room for improvement, but they're on the good side.
My biggest concern is the technical quality of both the pics and the vids.
The pics have a lot of noise, even the ones taken on a sunny environment.
It's clearly not a call for abusing of Photoshop, but they should really get a better equipment.
The vids are 1080p indeed, but that's the only HD thing here. They offer Windows & Quicktime formats, but both of them have artifacts and light compression issues.
The best thing here is the girls. Many of them are hot and new to me.
The atmosphere is good too, on both the pics and the vids.
I'd put them between Femjoy & X-Art. It's an erotic site with an explicit touch.
The navigation is minimal yet complete. You can easily find everything you're looking for, even though there's no models' bio.
Each model has her own page that lists every set/vid she did. But they miss a direct link to it on the sets/vid's page.
In the end, it's an average site. If you're looking for fresh girls, you can give it a go.
Each set has about 30-40 pics (few of them have more) and a vid lasts around 5mn.
The speed is good and I've yet to experiment limitations.
There's not many updates per week, but I'd rather keep it this way than seeing many bulk updates per day.
Now if you care about your pics being noise-free and your vids being crystal-clear, you'll be disappointed. |
|
06-15-10 07:32am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
7
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Yes, you're right (about your opinion) : it has merit even though I don't share it at all, and exactly for the reasons you're expressing ;)
I think the less make-up there is the better it is. I usually avoid Met-Art because of the generic quality it brings : they're on quantity side instead of the quality one.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that M-A is bad, but it really has nothing special.
That's what I like about Femjoy, that "Girl Next Door" feeling you're speaking about.
And more specifically, the artistic side they bring rather than the erotic one.
If I come back here, that's because they know how to picture nude girls without using artificial elements like make-up, toys...
And watching at the videos, I can clearly see that they enjoy being nude in front of the camera.
But indeed that's also a personal point of view, to each his/her hown :)
|
08-12-09 02:39am
|
Reply
8
|
Zemani
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Zemani is quite an average site in my opinion and I share the feeling of the reviewer.
The best thing about it is the models. A lot of them are really cute, have a natural feeling and most of them aren't pornly-shaved : it's nice to see a bit of pubic hair from time to time ;)
The biggest downside is the pictures' quality. They really need to improve in that department : a lot of weird sets & many blurry pictures (and no, not an artist blur).
Don't join for the videos either : you'll easily forget them after seeing them.
70/100
|
08-12-09 02:15am
|
Reply
9
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Well, it's 19,95$/mo (or 99,95$/yr) if you come from PU/TBP. And that's a pretty good deal if you like HA.
Now if you hit the "Join" button directly from HA, then the monthly price is... 39,95$ (and 150$ for a year). I wouldn't consider joining HA at this price.
|
12-08-08 04:27am
|
Comment
10
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
09-04-08 06:52am
Replies (3)
|
|
