Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site features 25 episodes that run approximately 40 to 45 minutes in length, so you get plenty of each girl
-The quality of the videos is very good, they can be streamed in your browser with three different quality settings, and can be run full screen in Windows Media format
-You get real pictures with each video episode, not vidcaps, numbering at least 100 per episode which are of very high quality
-The site comes included with Mega Site Pass, so you get full network acess for under $10
Cons:
-Although the pictures are downloadable, there aren't any options like zip files so you'd have to download them one at a time
-None of the videos from the site can be downloaded, only streamed in a browser window
-Even though it's advertised as a reality site, like most others out there it's not very believable and the acting is terrible (which may not be a problem for you)
-The scenario varies little from one episode to the next, so it can get repetitive very fast
Bottom Line:
The good news about this site is that it features real teens, has great sex scenes, and decent quality videos and pictures. You have three levels of quality to choose from when you stream the video, you can view it as seven 6 minute clips or a 40 minute full video, and you get anywhere from 100 to 200 real photos (not vidclips) that can be downloaded.
Unfortunately, from there it's pretty much all downhill since you can only stream the video content, the pictures don't have zip options, and there's only 25 episodes, none of which are dated. So, short of downloading the pics manually all you'll come away from the site with is a handful of pics and your memories of the videos.
I can honestly say that I enjoyed the videos since the girls are real teans and very sexy. If you include the fact that the site only costs about $10 for a month including a network's worth of content you may get some limited enjoyment out if it. Some of the girls are recognizable from their own teen sites, which could be either good or bad depending on your view.
The scenario is the same for each video: A camera guy and a sexy girl pick up an unsuspecting teen for some softcore modeling. Of course that's not how it ends since the girls end up doing hardcore and the girl ends up getting no money for her trouble.
In the end the only reason to end up at this site is as part of a Mega Site Pass membership. I had an enjoyable day watching the vids, but without the network it isn't worth the money.
I think it's fair to ask that people who would judge others by a trust rating be limited to those who have provided some reviews of their own. If nothing else, this demonstrates that it's not easy to write a review and if you limited it to people with a score of 5 they'd be more aware of that fact. I think my original suggestion was a score of 10, but I agree 5 would be more reasonable and at least 1 as uscue suggested. I don't think it's fair for someone to register and then waltz into the site saying they don't trust anybody by voting no.
I really like the anonymous comment section for no votes because "I just didn't like something they wrote" isn't a valid reason for voting no. There are plenty of valid reasons, but I think the member getting voted down deserves to know what it was.
I'm not sure that comments would necessarily make the trust ratings less anonymous as long as the comments were anonymous as well.
You can say you think people take a no rating too personally, but you haven't had anyone say they didn't trust somethong you wrote on here which does feel personal. I agree I'm probably taking it too hard when I get a negative rating, but when you try to make a review as unbiased as possible it can be personal when someone essentially says you failed, especially when it's so easy and anonymous to do so.
I also agree that in most cases a negative trust rating is because of overly biased reviews like giving a site a 50 or a 100, but I haven't done either and I have had 4 negative trust ratings for reasons I can't explain. It's fine if someone doesn't like your review, but to anonymously indicate you are untrustowrthy basically sucks.
In the end, I think the trust ratings were started for a reason and the alternative of no trust ratings is even less appealing. However, that doesn't mean a person doesn't feel bad if even one person labels them as untrustworthy.
I just noticed this site come across the new listings on TBP and although I've never heard of it before apparently it's been open for about a year. Charley is quite sexy to me, crossing some of my favorite genres of BBW, Goth, and short hair! That might not seem that exciting to most, but my one beef with goth girls has often been how overly thin they are. I know being thin and goth are often seen as the norm, but I have always found it hard to believe there weren't any cruvaceous girls who enjoyed the goth look.
As for the site in particular, the main page doesn't sport that many photos or a tour that I noticed. I don't ask for a lot of freebies, but at least one gallery and even the most brief video clip is usually required for me to think about joining. She also seems to have two price tiers and you only get multiple web shows with the higher priced membership. If the shows are private or very intimate I can see the higher price or if she just wants to offer a cheaper non-webshow option, but without a tour it's really hard to decide which option I'd choose.
If there are any members or former members of her site I'd love to hear from you...of from Charley herself!
I know I'm feeling frustrated with the "No" trust votes I've been getting lately, going up from 2 to 4 just overnight. I don't mind someone having a beef at all....if you don't trust me that's fine, but I'd like to know what it is that makes a particular user not trust me particularly if there's something I can do to address their concern. Am I not discussing a certain feature? Is there a misunderstanding? I work very hard to make my reviews fair and if I have a bias I state it up front.
I guess some kind of comment section would be good, but for now if anyone thinks my reviews are bad PLEASE send me a message or post a reply saying why and what I could do better! I take a lot of pride in my reviews and want them to be helpful.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The videos on the site can be streamed in your browser (including the option to go full screen)at three different levels of quality (150K, 340K, and 512K)
-Each episode contains an interview, a solo masturbation session, and a full sex scene with the last available as one video or a series of 3 minute clips
-The accompanying photos sets are real, not vidcaps, and are of very high quality
-The girls are all young, attractive, and very into the sex scenes (despite the claims of being shy)
Cons:
-None of the videos from the site can be downloaded, which is really unforgiveable these days
-The episodes aren't dated, so you have no idea how often the site is updated if at all
-There are a good number of photos, but without zip options it would take forever to download them all
-The amount of content is very low in comparision with other network sites making it only worthwhile if purchased with the Mega Site Pass. By itself I consider the site very poor and not worth the time or money.
Bottom Line:
This is the second site I've reviewed for the Mega Site Pass network and, if nothing else, I can definitely praise the video quality of the sites I've viewed so far. The main downside with many of the sites however is a lack of downloadable videos which is unfortunately the case here.
Like countless others, this site portrays itself as "reality" which usually means it's less than believable. Even though I suspect the episodes are completely staged the sceranrios were surprisingly well done and actually entertaining. The girls are attractive and young which fits with the idea of trying to be the next big pornstar.
Each episode begins with an interview lasting around 5 minutes, supposedly Day 1 of the girls' tryouts, where they meet the director of the porn company. The director chats with the girl and usually tells her to "sex herself up" if she gets a callback. The second day then proceeds with a solo shoot where the girl usually poses for pics and does some masturbation for about 15 minutes. Last, you get Day 3 which includes a full sex scene lasting anywhere from 20 to 30 minutes.
Right now the site has only 17 episodes and while I enjoyed them, the fact that the updates aren't dated makes me wonder if that's all they'll ever be. The lack of downloads makes it difficult to recommend this site, although the network access makes it worth checking out but only as an add-on, not a main attraction. By itself, I'd definitely skip this one for better content elsewhere.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The viewing options are numerous since you can stream each episode in your browser at three different levels of quality and go full screen
-You also get great downloading options since you can DL each episode as one long clip at two different quality settings
-I accessed the site through the Mega Site Pass network which costs under $10 a month, so the price is certainly right
-You get a mix of real pictures, some vidcaps, and some solo shots with each video that are of fairly good quality
Cons:
-The "encounters" are all very staged and many of the girls don't appear likely to have children, but that may not be a problem for you if you don't care about believability
-Except for the first couple episodes all the "photos" are vidcaps and although the quality is decent you can't download them as a zip
-Episodes aren't dated, so you have no idea how often the site is updated or even if it is updated
-There's nothing original about this site, so look elsewhere if creativity is your thing
Bottom Line:
I recently joined Mega Site Pass and this is the first of its network sites I've reviewed. I'm a big fan of "older" pornstars who are often described as MILFs even if they're only in the their mid 20s to 30s or don't even have any kids. Usually the scenarios stretch my ability to believe the storylines even though they are offered as "reality," but unless it's totally ridiculous I can usually get in the proper mood.
As of this review, site has 34 episodes that last anywhere from 20 to 30 minutes. Each one can be streamed as 3 minute clips or as a complete video with 3 quality settings available, two of which can be downloaded to your hard drive. The quality is pretty decent and you certainly aren't without options.
The first couple of episodes seemed to be original for the site, including real pictures of both solo and sex content. However, thereafter the photos are replaced by vidcaps and the videos seem much more generic, possibly even being scenes from features. Most of the girls are pros and the focus is more about them as deprived housewives than anyone's mother.
By itself this site is unremarkable with its greatest assets being good quality videos, sexy glamour pornstars, and plenty of viewing and downloading options. Alone I probably wouldn't bother but when accessed through Mega Site Pass it's a passable part of a greater whole. My score thus reflects the site itself and not the network access since without it I don't think this site is worth the money.
Does the site say you can download videos? If not you probably can't, although sometimes if you right click you can "Save Target As...". Just a thought.
Thanks for the kind words and for letting me know I didn't go over the top...well, at least not too over the top!
The one thing I forgot to mention: I wonder if perhaps you should let users with less than 10 reviews be exempt from the trust ratings. I've seen a few too many never get to their rookie reviewer badge because they get jumped all over by "no" votes on their trust rating because they haven't learned the ropes just yet. I know you wanted to discourage people from coming in, writing a couple terrible or biased reviews, and then splitting. I think that's worked very well, but it could be going to far in the other direction and well intentioned folks making a couple missteps may hightail in out of here.
Anyway, it's just a thought. As I said last time, I'm quite sure I wouldn't have done better than you guys have by a long shot if our positions were reversed and you've done very well with every new feature. I'm glad to be a part of it and my "bully pulpit" is once again closed...for the time being. ;)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A unique concept very different from "catfighting" sites since the majority of girls seem very into the matches and really wrestle to get their "reward"
-Every match is followed by a "winner fucks the loser" segment with real domination and very hot sex with a strap-on
-Most women run the spectrum from average bodies to very well toned, without masculine looking bodybuilders, and maintains an amateur feel
-Videos can be downloaded in Real or Windows Media formats and pics aren't vidcaps
Cons:
-The older vid and pic files are very segmented, although through you can select which ones you want and have them combined into a zip automatically
-When you login you have to enter a verification code each time, so you can't have your info saved for quick entry
-Most of the girls are "into it" and in the majority of the matches you can tell the girls are getting very turned on by the action. However, in others it's clearly for the paycheck.
-Some could find the wrestling scenario repetitive
Bottom Line:
Before joining I was skeptical becuase I'm not a wrestling fan which is clearly the site's focus. I was however very interested in the type of girls featured since many have short hair which happens to be my biggest fetish. The quality appeared excellent and compared to the other sites operated by the same company this was the one least associated with hard BDSM.
I can now say after joining that it's just about the best money I ever spent on porn and I'm quite sure I'll be remaining a subscriber after my first month is over. The inital price is just over $20 a month, but after that you can switch to a longer membership that brings the price down below $15 a month.
As another reviewer stated, it's more a wrestling site with sex than a sex site with wrestling. However, in the best scenes the frustration of the loser and the satisfaction of the winner makes for some very steamy sexual tension that explodes at the end of each match. The competition factor is also cool as the site keeps track of stats and has the girls ranked, leaving you wanting to know what will happen next.
If you've read my previous reviews you know I am very tough on sites but this is clearly an elite one that has grown and deserves a very high rating. Every site has room for improvement, but I'm very impressed with the effort that goes into the matches and the creativity it strives for throughout. If you like young fit lesbians or any kind of competition, I would definitely give this site a try.
I've checked out site like this before and not been especially impressed with the torture themes, but I've been reluctant to criticize any of them since I'm quite sure some people find this kind of thing very sexy. I was initially intrigued by the world of FemDom because I dislike how women are portrayed on most porn sites as total airheads who'll do anything to get fucked.
The only problem I have is that FemDom seems to just go to the other extreme by "punishing" men or other women who fit the traditional scenarios. Is there such a thing as a site with strong women who like being powerful but not necessarily dominating? I'd love to see either that or scenarios where the man and woman (or multiple women) trade off roles throughout.
So, if anyone has heard of that I'd be very interested to hear about it. As for this site, if you are looking for light FemDom this doesn't appear to be where you'll find it. Most of the scenes seem very extreme which as I said at the beginning is surely just the thing for some folks. I just wish I was one of them!
I'll definitely go with the DRM thing the others have mentioned, especially when it isn't noted up front. But for me it's videos and if the quality lags behind what's shown in the tour I get really peeved. The other thing would be no interaction with members but as others have said here (and I agree) that should really be considered a cherry on top when you get it.
Thanks for the clarification and if I had taken more time with the site I would have known about the limited videos, but sometimes it's nice to read a review and know that before ever hitting a site in the first place. Thanks for your review and the warning!
I'll admit I don't know much about the site you reviewed, but a lot of what you wrote wasn't really clear to me. For example, what is a Dev8 site? Why should I beware of the trial? I really didn't know what you were saying. Could you take a minute and add some more? I'd really appreciate it!
If you are only looking for so-called "young" girls, you are definitely missing out. Older women (which many classify as anyone over 22 for reasons I can't explain) are the spice of life! ;)
I see from your signup date that you just recently joined, so I'd suggest looking around the site a little while first before posting many reviews. To give such a high score people really want to see why you liked it that much, so a little more detail would have been ideal. However, I don't like to scare new folks off either so I do hope you hang around.
I appreciate the nice words on the review and it definitely sounds like I came in during a major changeover! And I certainly know what you mean about addressing lighting and other things while the art is underway! I'll drop you a line since I'd love to see how things turned out to get the full effect you both intended.
It's great to see Webmasters interacting with users on here!
I would say that SheMuscles had the most erotic and explicit sex themes of any similar sites, but there are muscle girl sites like Land of Venus, Sexy Muscular Women, and The Female Physique that I would say are related. All of them are in the database here and at TBP, so check 'em out and if you join any please do a review!
I appreciate all the thought that went into the raffle and the reasons for eliminating the point bonuses which makes perfect sense. So, I am not complaining since you had a very good reason for changing things as you did. However, I would point out that there are legitimate ways of contributing to the site that don't include reviews that now seem to go much less rewarded. I think I'm a prime example of someone who has a limited budget and can't join that many sites to review but still put a lot (at least as much as I could) into the site. My concern as a result of the changes would be that those with lots of money to spend on sites or who join large networks so they can review a large number of sites at once would benefit the most. My point totals dropped by half since I haven't done as many reviews as some others although I think I have been one of the top contributors.
All that said, I know changes needed to be made and I know why you made the changes you did. It's not like I could have done better in your place, but I did think it worthwhile to offer my view on the changes. Regardless, the site is growing and changing which can only be to the good. Thanks for listening to my ramblings! ;)
Regardless of the outcome, I think it's great how hard you guys are trying to make this a vibrant site. And even though I expressed some skepticism, I'm definitely rooting for it to succeed.
One thing I did want to ask about was taking away points folks had earned from the previous system, especially taking away bonuses that users used to get for earning badges. I can't say I was happy to log in yesterday to see my point total dropped (as well as my ranking) but I know that you must have felt it was the right thing to do.
Thanks for all the efforts and for keeping us informed.
I'll certainly give it some time to grow on me, but my initial reaction isn't really positive. I think it might encourage participation although the lure of money might cause certain people to assign random user trust ratings for example just to get more tickets. I'm quite sure the site will be more active though so we'll have to see.
Nice review! Is it possible that there is a technical issue with the videos? Since there's no DRM it made me wonder, but I've certainly been on sites that only allow streaming and I don't know why they do it. I suppose it's to protect your product and hopefully it'll change as the site grows.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
