Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
Aria Giovanni
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review! I loved Aria's site when I was member, but the lack of hardcore kept me from renewing. Her lesbian content isn't even really hardcore, so I'm not sure that what she does is even porn. She's a beautiful woman and perhaps her "softcore only" status makes her classier, but as you pointed out that's not why many of us join sites like this.
|
04-24-07 07:59pm
|
Reply
402
|
Real Tampa Swingers
(0)
|
Reply of
OUMarcus's Review
Does she have short hair in all of the content? And what about any of her shoots or scenes with other girls; do they have short hair? Can you tell I'm looking for content with short hair? ;)
|
04-24-07 07:34pm
|
Comment
403
|
Claudia Marie
(0)
|
|
04-24-07 07:24pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
404
|
Sexy Cassia
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
What does HC mean?
|
04-24-07 06:15pm
|
Comment
405
|
Seska
(0)
|
|
04-20-07 07:42pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
406
|
Porn Multi Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
I agree with marquis 100% There is absolutely no reason they would need that information, even to supposedly varify credit card info. You did absolutely the right thing.
|
04-20-07 06:43pm
|
Reply
407
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
That's a good point about joining to show support for the ban! And I'd really like to think it was the reviews here on the site that had something to do with it. So, we'll just say that it was us and celebrate! Ding, Dong, DRM is Gone! DRM is Gone! DRM is Gone! Ding, Dong, Ding, the Wicked DRM is Gone! ;)
|
04-20-07 07:27am
|
Comment
408
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
|
04-19-07 10:04pm
Replies (9)
|
Comment
409
|
Wife Switch
(0)
|
|
04-18-07 07:45pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
410
|
FC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Markus's Reply
No, not really. ;)
|
04-18-07 06:34am
|
Comment
411
|
Diddylicious
(0)
|
|
04-17-07 07:51pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
412
|
FC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Markus's Review
The fact that it includes hardcore is a bad thing?
|
04-17-07 05:53pm
|
Reply
413
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Heck, I've gone through the tour page and would give it a higher rating than this guy based solely on that! If he hadn't mentioned the other site I might have let it go, but that plus the fact that Twistys usually gets a very good rating makes me suspicious of the motive here. If there isn't a rule against promoting other sites in a review, perhaps there should be...at least when it's to this degree.
|
04-17-07 05:51pm
|
Reply
414
|
K Package Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Markus's Review
If you can't think of a "Con" per se, can you think of any ways the site could be improved? I think that's what folks are looking for in reviews.
|
04-17-07 05:44pm
|
Reply
415
|
Wild Rose Network
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Thanks for the heads up! Was it every site or just some of them?
|
04-16-07 06:28pm
|
Reply
416
|
Wild Rose Network
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Hey rose-dude!
I did decide to give it a go and will report back as soon as I've had sufficient contact time. ;)
-SD
|
04-16-07 07:18am
|
Reply
417
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I find it hard to land when there's a forest, but a landing strip makes for an easy approach. ;)
|
04-16-07 07:16am
|
Reply
418
|
Kitty Karsen
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Review
Great review fellow dude! And since I see that you joined recently, welcome to the site! I think you'll like it and I look forward to your next reviews. :)
|
04-15-07 06:30pm
|
Comment
419
|
Wild Rose Network
(0)
|
|
04-15-07 06:20pm
Replies (5)
|
Comment
420
|
Naughty Nerd
(0)
|
|
04-13-07 07:07pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
421
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
raystar's Comment
I haven't joined this site since I'm not into a 100% goth site, but I've been told there is some non-goth content. Do you know if that is true?
|
04-13-07 04:04pm
|
Reply
422
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I'll take smaller and real over big and fake every time!
|
04-11-07 09:11am
|
Comment
423
|
Raunchy Raven
(0)
|
|
04-09-07 11:20am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
424
|
Lesbo Trick
(0)
|
Reply of
Levchik's Reply
Hey Levchik,
I appreciate the comment and will do my best to uphold the fine standards to which I have been dedicated. :) Seriously, it's nice to hear the compliment.
Thanks,
SD
|
04-08-07 08:45am
|
Reply
425
|
N/A
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
I think it's fair to ask that people who would judge others by a trust rating be limited to those who have provided some reviews of their own. If nothing else, this demonstrates that it's not easy to write a review and if you limited it to people with a score of 5 they'd be more aware of that fact. I think my original suggestion was a score of 10, but I agree 5 would be more reasonable and at least 1 as uscue suggested. I don't think it's fair for someone to register and then waltz into the site saying they don't trust anybody by voting no.
I really like the anonymous comment section for no votes because "I just didn't like something they wrote" isn't a valid reason for voting no. There are plenty of valid reasons, but I think the member getting voted down deserves to know what it was.
|
04-07-07 01:23pm
|