| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
326
|
Fanny's Net
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You get about 50 archive clips in AVI format that are from the early days of her site before 2004 that each run about 1 to 3 minutes followed by hundreds of clips in WMV format that range anywhere from 2 to 5 minutes
-In the gallery section you get hundreds of accompanying photo sets, most on the same theme of the vids, that are real pics and not vidcaps
-Except for the archive clips, all vids and pic sets are already zipped for easy downloading
-Site navigation is simple and straightforward |
| Cons: |
-I downloaded the suggested codec to view the older archive clips but still couldn't view them
-Although all the WMV clips are zipped for quick download, I didn't like the fact that you couldn't stream any of them to preview
-Except for a handful of clips back in 2004 when she had some girl/girl, all of Fanny's vids are with older men or solo and I would have liked more variety of partners and themes
-There isn't much variation between clips or over time, so the format got a bit stale for me |
| Bottom Line: |
Labeled as another of the Wild Rose Network's "Stars", I figured I'd find a quality site on par with the others I have reviewed. As expected, I found hundreds of videos and pictures all of good quality, but beyond that I have to say I was rather disappointed in this site.
Most of the picture and video sets include either solo action or straight sex with 1 to 3 men at a time. Some of her older videos had lesbian scenes, but none were to be found among the more recent content. The guys she has sex with are usually about the same age as her and while a young stud found his way in here and there, there was very little variation in the content at all.
One of the aspects I really didn't like about Fanny's site was that it was always trying to sell me something. When I first entered I got a pop-up with a page of links called "Big Butt Mania". It wasn't a big deal by itself, but in the "Friends" section all I found was a similar list covering all types of niche content. While popups and link lists of this type are still common on free sites, on a member site I found it in very poor taste.
In the end I just wasn't impressed with the content, although there is a lot of it. If you're a fan of mature women over 50 and have a pantyhose or foot fetish you could find much to love here, but for the more general enthusiast looking for something unique I just didn't find enough reason to join. As part of the full network access you can give it a try but otherwise I'd pass on this one. |
|
04-24-07 10:50pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
327
|
FC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Markus's Reply
No, not really. ;)
|
04-18-07 06:34am
|
Reply
328
|
FC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Markus's Review
The fact that it includes hardcore is a bad thing?
|
04-17-07 05:53pm
|
Reply
329
|
Femdom Time
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Thanks much for the recommendations dude! I'll check them out and let you know what I think. Many thanks for thinking of my niches! :)
|
10-30-07 12:57pm
|
Comment
330
|
Femdom Time
(0)
|
|
04-05-07 11:37am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
331
|
Fire Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
marquis58401's Comment
I can't speak to how things have been going there in the last 6 months or so since I was a member, but I can offer a view from more recently than 4 years ago. Updates were pretty stagnant about a year ago, so I'd say that the problem goes back at least that long. The content is still pretty decent if you take each video as a stand alone product, but I never felt like it created the story he advertised in the tour pages. Hopefully someone can fill in the story of the last few months to learn more about the site's status since it is very unique.
|
01-29-07 08:27pm
|
Comment
332
|
Flexi Fetish Girls
(0)
|
|
10-11-07 12:23pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
333
|
Garden Of Eden
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
LOL! You are quite right about that roseman! Do I hear $12.95? ;)
|
03-11-07 07:50am
|
Comment
334
|
Geek Girls Online
(0)
|
|
01-04-08 01:08pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
335
|
Geek Girls Online
(0)
|
Reply of
PixieGGO's Reply
Glad to hear the site is prospering and I'm already planning to check back in after a few months to see what's new. I really want to see sites lik this succeed, especially for those of us who are tired of the same old crap repackaged a hundred different ways. Creativity is a great thing...and damn sexy! ;)
|
12-19-07 06:56pm
|
Reply
336
|
Geek Girls Online
(0)
|
Reply of
AthenaHollow's Reply
Thanks for the reply! I was very excited to check out the site and was eager to write a review, but then realized that my lower score might be interpreted that I didn't like it. Nothing could be further from the truth however and if you read my review I think that comes through....I hope! The sky is the limit for your site, at least for me. ;)
|
12-01-07 09:05pm
|
Review
337
|
Geek Girls Online
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The site currently features 8 models each with at least one high res picture set
-Pictures are viewable in your browser via a Flash interface which made navigating each set easy without having to resize anything
-The place is a complete geek haven with a forum to interact with other members as well as the girls who are smarter than your average porn performers
-The site has a low cost as well as a discount for subscribing for a whole year, so you can afford to keep your membership active |
| Cons: |
-As you would expect with a brand new site, the amount of content is low with only picture sets, softcore content, and no videos
-Besides the good interface for viewing pictures, I found the navigation confusing and I think the girls and their content could be organized better
-I have no doubt that some would refer to these girls as "homely" or even "ugly", an opinion I do not subscribe to, but suffice it to say this site isn't for everyone
-Separate sign up for membership and the forum |
| Bottom Line: |
When I first saw this site listed on TBP I was very excited and couldn't wait to join up since I've been waiting for site like this for a long time. I have found it to be less than my expectations, but that's largely because of completely unrealistic expectations! What remains is the beginning of a promising site that has some issues but nowhere to go but up.
Navigating the site is fairly easy, but only because there isn't a whole lot to the site apart from the picture sets. I found it confusing most of the time and hope they upgrade it in the future. I did find the Flash slideshow to be very well done and simple to use.
If you are even reading this review chances are good that the site's theme is appealing, but it bears spelling out that there are many who would dislike this site only because it wasn't designed to appeal to them. The picture sets are high quality and if you don't like the subject then don't join. I wish there were videos and some hardcore content here, but softcore lovers will be happy with the tasteful photosets.
In the end, I think it's a site worth maintaining a membership to as long as the theme of the site is of interest. Much of my score is based on potential which should be taken into account. If it goes well I think it could fill a very neglected niche in the world of porn for many years to come, but one that won't ever have mass appeal. So, if you are at all intrigued I'd say go for at least the one month for $10 and see what it becomes. |
|
11-26-07 06:40pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
338
|
Geek Girls Online
(0)
|
Reply of
AthenaHollow's Reply
Hey Athena!
Thanks for responding to my comment and love to see a webmaster replying on any post. I'm looking forward to checking the site out, but of course know that any good non-corporate site is going to start off small. Can't wait!
-SD
|
10-30-07 03:32pm
|
Comment
339
|
Geek Girls Online
(0)
|
|
10-26-07 12:09pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
340
|
Girls For Matures
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Ok, will do! In retrospect it might have seemed like I was saying you didn't respond personally to comments, which I wasn't saying at all. I just figured you might be dealing with countless requests with the site being so new. For example, a guy that likes women with a pirate hook on their left hand and an artificial right leg who has sex only with bald men who have hairy backs and is asking why the heck PU or TBP doesn't represent his fetish. ;) And if anyone really does have that fetish, my sincere apologies! :)
|
02-02-07 01:39pm
|
Reply
341
|
Girls For Matures
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Cool beans! The idea about letting users post questions for other members to answer is awesome and probably one of the main things I would have asked about first. I see great things on the horizon and when I have one of those question thingys, I'll let you know. ;) Many thanks and rock on!
|
02-02-07 01:11pm
|
Reply
342
|
Girls For Matures
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Thanks for the compliment and I'm glad to do it. I've always gotten frustrated with review sites because, although they do great things, it's hard to find views that represent different types of users. So, when PU came along and I was already a big fan of TBP, I had to do it! :)
By the way, if we ever have a question or want to make a suggestion where we feel we'll get a real response from an admin, what's the best way to do that? I imagine you are getting a lot of "suggestions" flooding in like adding sites and users demanding their favorite niche be addressed, but as the site settles in I know I'll have questions about how to find different content. Maybe in the end that's not what PU is for and I know you guys already go above and beyond, but it often comes to mind and I'm naturally curious.
If you have any thoughts on that, let me know. Otherwise, I'll assume you are busy finding more good porn!
|
02-02-07 12:53pm
|
Review
343
|
Girls For Matures
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Excellent video quality (Divx/mp4)
-Large number of exclusive clips with no restrictions on downloads
-A wide variety of girls and matures
-Video archive isn't limited to pairs who only appear with each other; most women have multiple partners in different clips
-If you remain a member after the trial, you can add other mature sites to your membership for free |
| Cons: |
-Videos are cut into segments and some are very short
-All clips only feature one girl and one mature at a time
-No other content besides the videos
-Site design is plain and uninspired |
| Bottom Line: |
I signed up for the trial and although I did cancel after the 3 days, I was able to download a TON of content with minimal effort and was very pleased. The site is VERY bare bones without frills, but that's not necessarily a bad thing since it is also straightforward and easy to use.
The videos are cut into segments which is easier for dial up users, but makes downloading for high speed a bit of a pain. There aren't any pictures and only one vidcap per set, and nothing about the girls themselves. One drawback is that the girls don't speak english and the setup for each scene is a bit campy. In one video they are trying to create the idea of a dressing room at a salon when it's clearly just a room in a big house they rented with a curtain hung at one end.
Despite the setup, however, I found many of the scenes very erotic and the majority of the girls to be sexy. I find women in their 30s and 40s with imperfect bodies to be very sexy as long as they know how to use them, which these girls do. Some videos are much shorter than 25 minutes which is noted on the TBP review, but as you look through the site you'll see that the same two girls have multiple videos together with different setups and roles.
Bottom Line: If you are only into big breasts, blondes, and tight bodies then this site is not for you. However, if you want a lot of downloadable content without DRM and the idea of young and older lesbians together gets you going, I would definitely recommend the site |
|
02-02-07 12:33pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
344
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
That helps quite a bit! Many thanks for the info and the response! I appreciate it.
|
05-01-07 08:05pm
|
Reply
345
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review! Since you have a lot of experience with Euro sites, do you know which one(s) have a lot of Veronica Vanoza content? I'm especially in the market for videos of her when she had short (and I do mean SHORT) hair, but any content works for me! I'm not usually into this type of site since I enjoy amateur more, but Veronica is a fav and I'd like to join the one site that has the most content. Thanks in advance and love the reviews!
|
05-01-07 05:07pm
|
Reply
346
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
Hey King,
Thanks for the clarification and if I had taken more time with the site I would have known about the limited videos, but sometimes it's nice to read a review and know that before ever hitting a site in the first place. Thanks for your review and the warning!
-SD
|
04-05-07 11:26am
|
Reply
347
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Review
Hey King,
I'll admit I don't know much about the site you reviewed, but a lot of what you wrote wasn't really clear to me. For example, what is a Dev8 site? Why should I beware of the trial? I really didn't know what you were saying. Could you take a minute and add some more? I'd really appreciate it!
-SD
|
04-04-07 06:44pm
|
Reply
348
|
Goddess Heather
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks for the feedback Khan since I, like everyone else here, is learning as we go what's approprite to comment on and what's not. Personally I've tried to limit my replies to sites I've honestly thought of joining and offering comments mostly on sites where I was a member but longer than 6 months ago. Hopefully that's appropriate.
As for the "low priority" comment, it says on TBP that Heather's site is low priority and I made an assumption about what that meant. I had the idea in my head that it had to do with site traffic, but I'll admit right now that I had absolutely no basis for that conclusion. So, I apologize if that's untrue.
|
01-31-07 01:28pm
|
Comment
349
|
Goddess Heather
(0)
|
|
01-31-07 12:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
350
|
Goddess Heather
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
As with another site that got a 100 rating, my reply to the review was a bit critical of it getting such a high score. In this case, the site hasn't even been given an express review on TBP which means it's likely a low priority site. That said, the site does look intrguing and I wish she had a limited full access trial which almost always hooks me in to niche sites that interest me. Her price isn't too bad, especially since the tour indicates above average picture quality in her sets. Bottom line? This kind of review has absolutely no effect on my decision about joining because it's written by someone with a huge bias. Perhaps that bias is well earned, but it doesn't really help the rest of us.
|
01-31-07 12:29pm
|
