| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
EroticShot's Review
Perhaps we could contact the webmaster(s) and suggest some new ideas. I find the softness and sweetness of their models to also be one of the compelling things about the site. They seem to cast mostly models that fit a classy, refined, yet sexy disposition. I know of few sites that do this.
For those that like OT, check out:
modelstied.com and James Bertoni's other sites, including triple-bbb.com (lower amount of content / tease is a bit harder / worth exploring)
Models of note that have sweet n sexy content:
sweetjuliette.com
kristencameron.com
jamiesxxxworld.com
-ES
|
12-28-08 09:11pm
|
Reply
2
|
iFriends
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
iFriends is just a massive site. If anyone knows of any good resources and/or ways/outside sites that sort models - I feel that this is their main weakness. It find it very hard to find a model that suits one's interests. There are also simply too many models that are using different names and posting repeat content under the duplicates.
It's worth the exploration for the HD content of their top producers, imho.
|
12-28-08 09:07pm
|
Review
3
|
iFriends
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of models here. TBP may miss the best part of this - which is that for many, many models you can download a lot of content from the HD libraries of each model.
For $10 per month you can get access to an HD membership account. Now - find the section where you can see the 'HD Showcase.' Click any model and you'll see that she offers you some videos and others she does not offer to you - they are private - you have to 'join' her fanclub to get access. IE you have to pay $25/30 to join her site to get the videos. There are somewhere near a thousand models (they don't tell you totals) that list content in the 'HD Showcase.' Each model will offer some videos - some offering hundreds - some offering only a few. This enables you to preview the model's HD content, download the videos that the model's give access to and thereafter join the model's site in full for other content - bio info, email, shows, other video and photo content. It's easily 10k HD videos available for download |
| Cons: |
Site navigation is awful. I disagree with other members here. I find the layout of this site beyond atrocious. You can't find anything without working for it.
In the HD Showcase, I haven't found a way to bookmark models that I like and/or to know which model pages I've been to. I truly have not found a good way other than painstaking time to find content that suits me. iFriends liability is that they have too much content - it's too hard to find in some cases - the really good content from the bad.
ALSO: Models use different aliases and repost the same content or similar content - sometimes with 10 or more different names - the same model. COnfusing and wastes time. |
| Bottom Line: |
iFriends has some hot little ladies, See:
Beautifulblake, big_boobie_coed, Bombshell-18, friendly-sweetie, hotjanessa, jerseygirl, onecuteme, rachelrain, sasha, sexonthebeach, teacheriscool, wisheddiamond...to start.
You do not need to be a fanclub member of the individual girls' sites to download much of their content - it is included in your HD Showcase membership. Models choose how much content they give access to - some give almost complete access.
Models do engage with the audience. People leave glowing reviews in feedback. Similar to other cam sites out there - there is an almost endless possibility here. You will almost certainly find interesting woman and men if you seek.
The key difference to iFriends is that they give you access to downloadable content - not replays of cam shows - but generally content that the model shoots and then posts - that's what I find compelling over other sites. You don't have to spend thousands to get it. Be careful of costs...it can be very easy to drop big bucks here without understanding what you are doing. |
|
12-24-08 06:37am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
4
|
Hot Wife Rio
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Friends, thanks for the support! I can't tell you how much time, I have spent reading the reviews of others...it's my turn to give back. I have at least 100 reviews to write...will take one bite at a time! Always respectful of my elders...do not fear! Community is everything...always open to feedback...thanks for the comments. I am definitely for real...aiming to help those who have spent time exploring sexuality and pornography as it is perhaps often that we seek externally for that which we strive for internally...it is to find the balance point wherein the external facilitates the overcoming, integrating, and inner fulfillment. That is ultimately my goal...to help pragmatically in small ways...the growth of others...through exploration of the many sites and range of content that many of us seek.
|
12-24-08 06:27am
|
Reply
5
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Mr. Fountain, thanks for your question..apology for the delayed response. I have joined a number of hardcore sites and found myself disappointed as the content is just too repetitive and non-sensual. Only Tease and a few other similar sites or fusion sites - like anything done by DDF - 1byday.com, femjoy and the like - have a more erotic approach to me that ultimately is more fulfilling. Just my tastes. I agree that the OT site has a massive amount of content. It's hard to really qualify - it's most likely thousands of videos and thousands of photosets. You really would need to spend a tremendous amount of time downloading to even crack into the content. They will let you download a lot of content - i don't remember a filter or site block in my time with OT. OT definitely does have a lot of repetition - same outfits, same sets - but their photographic work is consistently good. It's not world-class but doesn't strive to be.
The content at OS, OO, OM, and OC is highly, highly similar to the content at OT. Let's knock out Carla and Melanie first; these 2 sites are simply an assortment of each model's solo work. There is a fair amount of content at each - Carla has at least one hundred sets and Melanie is similar. They've each been photographed/videoed for a few years now - each month - they each will have 3-6 sets posted. I find Carla to be one of the most beautiful models on the net. She really seems to enjoy speaking with her audience... Melanie didn't do it for me...but that's me personally. They bot engage with the audience, speak to the camera, and open up in a playful, young-erotic sort of way. There is no or almost no dirty engagement...it's classic tease.
OS and OO are very similar to OT. The content generally does not repeat on OT. The content on secretaries and opaques is generally if not perhaps almost completely exclusive to those sites. Models recur between all sites. The volume of content on OO and OS is much smaller - a tenth at most of the OT site. However, that's still a lot of content. I would sum up - it's all about the visual - if you have a thing for the opaque or secretarial approach - you will enjoy the sites. If not...you have all the same models and scenarios more/less at the main site. I definitely find OT and its site family to be one of the best on the net.
|
12-24-08 06:21am
|
Review
6
|
Lora Craft
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Joined this under the $14.95 program (worked for me). Wanted to find new Eve Angel content - did find a little but nothing tremende. The models here and quality is excellent. This site has similar gals to those found on some of the other hc european model sites. Worth the $15, yes. Would not join again. |
| Cons: |
Limited in total size. |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn't take a lot home from this site before my membership expired. I wasn't blown away. Interesting niche content but nothing incredibly inspiring. A few good videos. Videos are 100-250megs each. Photosets available as zip files. |
|
12-21-08 11:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
7
|
Linsey's World
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Given no reviews - though I would add - I had been a member of Linsey's site a while back as part of the Scoreland.com membership loyalty program. Her videos here are actually very good - there are a good number of them. Worth it for those who are into her. Nothing tremende here - vids are 150-200 megs in size. Quality is decent - probably most is lifted straight from the Score archives and film crew. |
| Cons: |
a storefront for her work - not a true amateur / solo model site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Join the Scoreland.com group and pick this up as a bonus (added 1 site per month). |
|
12-21-08 11:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
8
|
Jenny Poussin VIP
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
OK fellow surfers - striving to be of service to you here. Things may have changed a bit since my time - wanted to share with you.
I have 2gigs in content from her site. I only have about 20 video files (perhaps I overlooked some) and certainly not 50 image sets. What I do have is definitely good quality in terms of its uniqueness. I would join again for updated content (if she's updating). Jenny is very sexy and very into what she provides.
Videos: Best vids are 150megs in size and 18 minutes in length - they go down from there. She's got a thing for being a doll type person - her outfits are fairly extravagent - perhaps she's Russian or E.European (english with but an accent). Focus of vids is POV style with ass/rear-end focus. She's very cute. She talks in the videos with a male camera-man. Therre is music in some of the vids. No hard-core that I have. Some of the vids are very, very sexy (watching now).
Photos - good quality, zips available. |
| Cons: |
Limited total volume of content. Camz? don't think so that I know. |
| Bottom Line: |
Jenny is a hot ticket with a smaller site than the likes of Anna Angel - but she's got one round booty and her videos will drive you mad if you allow yourself to get into them. She does get naked and shake her rear-end around. Breasts are most likely augmented. Her facial expression and sexiness is 9 out of 10. |
|
12-21-08 11:26am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
9
|
Jenny Poussin VIP
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Ace of Aces, we meet again! Hah! My nemesis!
You are in luck sir! In my JennyPouisinVIP folder is 1.8 gigs and 500 files. About 15 vid files I have - perhaps there were more - sizes raning from 50 to 150 megs. She's doing various things - dancing/stripping/indoor and outdoor. Quality if decent.
Zip files of images are available.
Her videos are entertaining and 7 out of 10 in terms of sexiness. She gets dressed up in every one - and she is definitely very into what she's doing - she really plays with the camera. There is music dubbed in that may be playing in the background - you hear her voice though - a lot is POV type. She makes a lot of eye-contact with the camera.
Worth it - but not a lot of content. Perhaps more now.
|
12-21-08 11:20am
|
Review
10
|
Hot Wife Rio
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Question: Does she deliver? Yes and no. Worth joining if you like her and are drawn to this genre? YES.
Rio is a milf/housewife type that really enjoys getting it on. She also has a strong fetish for lingerie and puckering/teasing/expressing the softer side of femininity. She is submissive in the dominance play - ie plays the seductress and submits herself to her lovers.
Videos: I have about 60 at 5gigs of content from when I joined - there were many more than I downloaded. Vids go to 300megs in size - quality varies with the majority of content (shot over the past few years) being of modest production value.
Photos: She has a lot of content - I dl'd with a program - don't know about zips. |
| Cons: |
Nav is old, site design is old. Quality varies. Irregular updates. |
| Bottom Line: |
Rio does what she does very well. This site is similar to Naughtyathome (desirae) or NaughtyAllie.com, Nikkijackson.com, and family.
IF you have a penchant for lingerie - you will NOT be disappointed as that's kind of her thing. The scenarios and videos are entertaining. Worth the join if you dig her looks.
You hear her voice - no cheesy model music. |
|
12-21-08 11:06am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
11
|
Hot Wife Rio
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
Throwing in - Rio is not the best out there in her category - but she is sexy and expresses that sexuality in a way that places her among the top. I was a member and would sign up again for recent content. Her vids range from about 25-300megs with newer content being of decent quality.
|
12-21-08 11:00am
|
Review
12
|
Foxy Anya
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
In reviewing sites, we want to think about the goals of that particular site compared to what it accomplishes or could be. As such, FoxyAnya excels in every way. This gal has built an extensive, large collection of content. My interest as you can see in other reviews is video - there are over 700 videos in my FoxyAnya folder - many in the 100meg range. I have 10 gigs of content from her site.
She is really into what she does - this is Hair and Nail Fetish. Throw in some sexy lingerie, vocal teasing, a little bit of hardcore, some toys, some guests and camshows, bloopers, water/bathing - etc - you've got an extensive site.
Videos - categories as above - 5 of them with 50-150 vids in each. There's enough content here to justify the price and a visit.
Photos - don't remember - believe there were quite a few. |
| Cons: |
A fair number of the videos were shot years ago and at low quality - we're talking 5-10 meg files. Her newer stuff - last 1-2 years is HD or similar. |
| Bottom Line: |
Like Anya and Hair/Nails - she's one of the best.
I rate this is site a 90 because she DELIVERS on what she promises the site to be. This gal has longer hair and nails than few out there. She's also very, very sexy in her interaction with you the viewer and her male/husband model that she works with.
She accomplishes what the site sets out to provide. |
|
12-21-08 10:57am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
13
|
Felicity Fey
(0)
|
|
12-21-08 10:46am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
14
|
Erica Campbell
(0)
|
|
12-21-08 10:41am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
15
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
|
12-21-08 10:33am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
16
|
Naughty At Home
(0)
|
|
12-21-08 10:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
17
|
Denise Milani
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Denise Milani is a special gal. She is a petite, busty superstar - who never, ever as of yet even goes topless.
Denise has a beautiful face and body, the likes of which there are few. She also has a warm and welcoming smile that place her in the elite model category.
Videos: As of my membership there were about 40-50 videos ranging from 40 megs to 187 megs in good quality. I believe on perhaps every vid - there is music playing. There are a few candid vids in Vegas where you can hear her voice - but very very few in which they are not simply providing Denise moving with the typical softcore movie sound (ie pop artists).
Photos: Photoshoots for Denise have 10-25 shots. They are cute, sexy, but not even softcore. I have about 500 photos from her site.
Unique Content - this is place the for her files.
No nudity. |
| Cons: |
She's a tease. |
| Bottom Line: |
Worth the $15 as there is a fair quality of video content. The content itself has decent production value.
Who knows if she'll ever provide more - right now - it's only Denise looking pretty and stripping down - no nudity. |
|
12-21-08 10:24am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
18
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
|
12-21-08 09:48am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
19
|
Club Austin Kincaid
(0)
|
|
12-21-08 09:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
20
|
Cam With Her
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
TBP provides a slighly negative review on this site - some of the facts are not correct. When I was a member, you could download over 500 archive videos ranging from 400megs to 3 megs - with a lot averaging 40-60 megs and 15-20 minutes in length.
Yes, Camwithher is about the camz and paying the models in per-minute fashion - but that was never my thing...never wanted to burn cash at that rate. I like ifriends.com (though their nav is awful - beyond pathetic) because you can download if you know how a lot of their HD content. Here, there's a link on the site for the Archive pages. There, you can get a lot of the archive content from some very beautiful models. Girls like Gisele, Nicole, Mia, and Carmen are actually internet celebs - look them up at flurl.com or break.com. They are super-hot.
Realize what you are getting here...not super production...it's to get vids of these specific models. I don't remember if there are pic sets available. |
| Cons: |
Quality is modest. Navigation is poor. Site will cut you off if you download too much too quickly - be careful. |
| Bottom Line: |
For archive cam videos of specific models - this is the only place to get them. Check out the models on other sites - you'll have 2-3 minute previews. Look for the Archive link within the site (if you join...it's actually easy to miss...you won't get the vids then...). |
|
12-21-08 09:38am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
21
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
This is a great note. I am more inclined towards her video content - hadn't noticed this. Good critique.
The production values of all of her content is fairly low-end - but damn - she's cute. What I love about her is the way she interacts and speaks...you don't have that kind of early 20's innocence in too many models - they all want it hard and now...Anna is content to be sexy and playful.
|
12-21-08 09:32am
|
Reply
22
|
Busty Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Hi Aces,
I was a member of this site Feb 2008. Enjoyed it was as well as BoobsDonna. If you develop a thing for either of these 2 models - join - but don't expect to be blown away. These are money making sites for the 2 models - not real interactive amateur sites. I would not join again due to limited and uninspiring content. Files at Busty Sonia are 20-70 megs - i dl'd 16 of them - perhaps missed a few. Seems like the sites were created by the pros...ie glossy glamour...but not much content underneath the hood.
|
12-21-08 09:26am
|
Comment
23
|
Polish Busty
(0)
|
|
12-21-08 09:23am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
24
|
Boobs.pl
(0)
|
|
12-21-08 09:20am
Replies (0)
|
Review
25
|
Anna Angel
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Anna is 1 sexy little number. I joined her site for the videos and amateurish quality. Many of the videos are shot with her and/or her friends playing around, dancing, then enjoying each other. Many videos are camshow types videos where she is typing, talking, then gets up and dances, striptease, then masturbates.
When I joined, she had over 10GB of video content and over 100 videos posted. She had a number of shoots with Faith of FaithExposed.com and Inbedwithfaith.com. The videos average around 50megs each with some as high as 200megs - timing 5-20 minutes.
Anna is super sexy and really charms up the camera. She just has a lot of fun and has an amazing body. |
| Cons: |
This isn't the greatest model site ever...it's just very good for a one-girl show. |
| Bottom Line: |
See if you can preview her and get a taste for her body, voice, and content. If you like a round booty and a girl that can move...you will not regret joining.
She's really cute and sexy - lots of video and photo content. |
|
12-21-08 09:18am
Replies (2)
|
