Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Exclusive content of mostly Amateur girls masturbating until they reach authentic orgasm.
- Content explores the realist orgasms you can find with focus on contractions, writhing, suddle noises, and facial gestures.
- HD movies available in HD mp4 (1280 X 720 with ~5,000 kbps), HI-Q mp4 and Wmv, med-q Wmv and m4v with roughly 400 videos available in HD.
- Updates at least one video daily.
- No DRM.
- Site navigation is quite straight forward.
- Site design is easy on the eyes and sleek enough.
- My IFM section includes total downloaded overall, amount downloaded that day for download limit monitoring, login dates and times, and you can select server for greater speeds.
- Active forum.
- Model index with some good info like age, where the model is from, favorite books, favorite music, favorite cinema, and a few random words they want.
Cons:
- Most models are attractive but do not expect the majority to be fake and plastic barbie dolls. Most models are women you see on a daily basis at like a grocery store enjoying their bodies. Plus, some are so called 'hipsters' and may not shave and so on.
- There is a focus on showcasing 'genuine orgasms in a tasteful way' which I agree with but some content can be considered too artsy which results in low lighting, static cameras, and non-preferred views.
- The attempt to make models the most comfortable as they can be results in real orgasm but mostly in one position and not a huge amount of camera presence.
- Model index is labeled as 'artists' which the artists are considered the models in the scenes, which can actually be hard to find and may be overlooked.
- Most videos are split up as seperate updates and makes for daily updates but repetitive content.
- 6 GB download limit.
- no pictures or screens but understandable to an extent due to comfort level attempts.
Bottom Line:
This site dedicated to showcasing authentic female orgasms. The site delivers in this aspect because I rarely saw any of the fake moans and non-movement you see on many sites that are supposably showcasing female masturbation to orgasm. These girls here actually writh and contract while making noises no one would ever expect to come out of a female mouth which is exactly what happens with a real female orgasm if you have witnessed one first hand. You won't get the classic porn 'ohhs' and 'ahhs' here, but full out chest turning red and dolphin noise making orgasms; all caught on video for you.
However, with that said there are some things that detracts from the site. For one, the sites dedication to real orgasm does not mean lighting has to be so dark. A female does not need to be in darkness to achieve full orgasm and many of the studio videos are filmed in extremely low lighting. However, I do understand the camera presence may detract from comfortableness so the camera may stay a bit static for the shoot. This does not bother me as much as the lighting but keep in mind about the static camera which mostly stays overhead looking down on the model, usually full body shots. But, I will admit that many videos will end up going to other angles eventually which is a nice touch and improvement but it is not always present.
The sites models are overall nice but I believe you have to be a fan of amateur models to fully enjoy the content. Personally, many of the models to me were just too average looking and detracted from my overall fantasy. However, there are some gems present in the bunch even for the most jaded. However, I cannot stress this enough if you are thinking about joining.
There is a few different types of content present. You have studio made content, home made content, interviews, lesbian footage, and 'diary' footage. The studio and home made footage are quite self explanatory. However, interviews and diary footage can be a bit different. This footage usually involves none to very little nudity and a lot of talking. The lesbian footage is quite erotic but the model selection reminds me of what real lesbians mostly look like. They are usually quite hipster with shorter hair and less shaving but are actually extremely passionate. An interesting difference in content that may be enjoyed by others.
Overall, the sites focus is well played and you will get what you are looking for, the real female orgasm. However, the site does fall short in regards to the overall delivery. Attempts at changing location turn in to artsy settings and the overall location is just a static, poorly lighted bedroom. But, I can give justification for some of these aspects due to the site trying to make these models the most comfortable to reach full and real orgasm. However, some footage seems to go a bit too far with the lighting, static camera, and setting. All-in-all, you will get a lot of great footage and they are probably the best at authenticity.
TBP facts sheet states 54+ videos and photo shoots. About how many are there now? Are the photo shoots screen caps or proper photos? Are the photos available via zip? You say a select number of models on site, does this mean many are returns for seperate scenes? Can you guesstimate how many different models there actually are? Is there a model index on the site navigation and design? Hmm, any other information would be great....Thanks for your time.
I hope this site stays updating, it looks like it may be a premier site for hardcore ladyboy porn. So far, all the top of the line models I've seen on their premier site are being used here which is a really high plus. However, I have noticed this company has a trend of creating side projects that stops updating only after about 6 months to a year. It's unfortunate because I've found this company's content to be top of the line when it comes to many aspects. The site has just started so it's really early to tell if it will be a side project with only a few updates but it will be a disapointment if it is. Plus, I think the sites that are no longer updating should become bonus sites for the company or lower in price....just my opinion.
I put yes but rarely....there was a time when I posted almost daily for a few months but lately I've been so busy that when I stumble upon a thread that interest me, I'm usually too late and feel like I'd be beating a dead horse with a contribution...However, I still find times when a thread is recent enough and interests me, then I post something. I do enjoy the forum though, it was the main thing for awhile that kept me here and still has a large role in activeness on the site to this day.
I have mixed feelings about this. I think maybe a statement on the tour around the teaser trailer should mention something like 'compilation trailer includes updated and soon to come content'. However, I don't believe the trailer should discredit the whole site when it comes to the site in general. Don't get me wrong, I do think this tactic is a bit misleading without saying something beforehand, but if only the teaser trailer was included I would say this would make the site extremely shady. But, there are so many other options in the tour to get a better picture about the site including past updates and upcoming updates, the site offers actually more previews of the actual content than what many sites actually offer on their tour. I think you do have a good argument though but I don't think it's as dramatic as 'bait and switch' tactics. My 2 cents...
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Exclusive and non-exclusive content of Latina TS models in solo and hardcore.
- Updates every two days.
- No DRM.
- Order shoots by date or alphabet.
- Site design is good, plenty of niches and model qualities to choose from.
- Videos include plenty of options. Quicktime: 500 X 281. Real media: 280 X 156. Mp4: 640 X 480. 3 diff WMV formats: (Low: 320 X 180, Med: 500 X 284, High: 1280 X 720; ~3,150 kbps). Older videos highest is 640 X 480, ~2,000 kbps.
- Extras include random drawings, information on clubs around the world that are TS friendly, agenda or gossip (kinda like a blog, no longer updated as of 10/13/2007), and escorts list.
- Message board with active webmaster, appears to take requests.
- Newest pics available in 1600 x 1600, 1200 x 1200, and 1024 x 102 with slide show. Older sets usually average 900 X 675. All available via zip with a non-intrusive watermark.
- Free webcam access for webmasters private shows.
- Model list does include thumbnails and some info.
Cons:
- Random username and password set up.
- Older quality is non exclusive (Also from Shemale-Club).
- Lower quality in movies from 05/14/2008 and 10/26/2007. Before that it is extremely low quality at 352 x 288.
- Lower quality in pics in earlier sets.
- Poor navigation for model list index and getting to the index. It's actually under 'Extras' but should be a main tab to click on. Model list index does not contain all content, one has to go to the 'all movies' section to get all the movies because they are not all in the index.
- Penty of 'Behind The Scenes' videos used as regular updates. Also, as of late, poor quality FLV (Flash) only videos of the webmasters private webcam video casts are included as regular updates.
- Sometimes only screencaps available for video scenes or vice versa.
- Models' info including stats, escort number, cock size, and location may have info on the model or not. Basically, it's a gamble and who knows how updated or correct escort numbers are.
Bottom Line:
Latina Tranny is a TS model site operated and mostly shot by TS model, Nicole Montero (Nikki). It has been running for several years with the newer content containing exclusive only content while older content before roughly December 2007 include both exclusive and non-exclusive content. Lately, the site appears to have taken the turn in to becoming more of a solo model site of Nikki with some updates of her friends.
The videos on the site are great quality when it comes to how they look, at least from 05/14/2008. The are quite sharp and have great lighting. Nikki does a great job with the camera and gets quality shots most people want. Before that, only smaller sized videos with lower bitrates are available and sometimes only in parts which may or may not be shot by Nikki. As far as what is included in the content varies. Most of the content are solo shoots with the model stripping and masturbating. However, a huge negative with these solo shoots is the majority of these shoots stop before cumshots. Therefore, there is no real climax to the shoots and they tend to just end abruptly with no actual 'real' finish. I've always found this to be a large negative when shooting solo TS content. However, there are some great hardcore scenes which include Nikki with other models, men, and other TS models. I've found the scenes with Nikki and other TS models to be a bit less 'professional' in terms that the shoots usually include lots of dialogue (even interviews) and a bit more spontaneous sessions. The good thing is these scenes usually end with proper endings unlike most of the solo shoots.
The site stands out more as a photo shoot site. The are far more photo sets than videos. As of 08/18/2008 all pics can be available in the highest res at 1600. The shoots by Nikki are extremely well done. I will admit that she has a keen eye for photography and gets the shots that most TS fans want. This includes long shots mixed in with close ups and not a whole lot of repetitive shots that create huge sets with the same picture over n' over again. The settings tend to change, whether they are outdoors, in a studio, or being in a home. However, remember that not all these sets are exclusive and many are available at Shemale-Club around December 2007 and earlier.
Overall, the site has a lot to offer but fails to deliver in terms of exactly what many TS fans want in solo video shoots and quality updates. While it is great that the site updates every two days which is higher for a TS site, many of these updates include short BTS clips, interviews, or poor quality webcam shoots. Also, many photoshoots have no video. However, the site does include many positives that many TS sites do not include with Nikki being interactive with members and maybe even doing requests. Plus, the technical aspects such as video and photo quality are a huge plus. But, I just can't give a site a huge score when they are lacking what many want to see with TS content, the cumshot.
After reading the current TBP review at 82, I decided to take a look at the tour. After looking at the tour, the site seemed quite promising. The model is hot and I actually would not mind seeing more of her....However, I then looked at the TBP facts sheet. 640 X 480 res with grainy picture and highest res of pics at 1024? Ew. Then I checked out WittyGuy's review and noticed even more, there are no zips and the site just recently started updated at 640 x 480 (about a year ago?)...Oh man. Just like WittyGuy commented about the site being Amateur, I can agree to some extent that I should expect less quality...but still, 640 X 480 and 1024 res for pics with no zip downloads for sets? I hate it when I really want to join a site but something so simple just as technical things stray me away. It's amazing that TBP would judge this site an 82 with this aspect but it is what it is, I'd have to go with WittyGuy's review as a better sum for score...and I think he was being quite kind in that score as well.
I find it weird that the Americans here are disregarding football when it comes to sports. Ummm...football is like the largest sport worldwide, while I know it's not extremely popular in the USA I find it strange that this is what is said by the few from the USA about the World Cup. While I do not watch football from the usa or from other countries in the off seasons of the World Cup, I do watch the World Cup. I do not know much about the actual sport and the individual players or countries' teams, I do know the countries listed in the poll are usually pretty popular to win. I've enjoyed watching Germany play in the past and know their team is usually a contender; plus I usually root for them during the cup. I may not be of German descent, I do enjoy their football team so I'm picking them to win.
Thanks brother, that is a very gracious comment. You are not to shabby yourself lol :) I've been lurking around lately, usually stalking down the next site I can join because my funds are limited and I'm looking for a lil' variation without getting burned :) Glad to see that you are still around and I really do appreciate the comment, that was an extremely polite thing to do!
Yes, once again I have an interest in a site but still need/want some info if any PU's have experienced the site or know anything about it. So, feel free to reply about anything if you can help me out even if this comment has a older date because chances are I have not joined yet. Therefore, I'm probably still looking for info if there is no review up yet. I will really appreciate it and thanks for your time if you do comment.
Thanks for the prompt response and details. That helped me out a bunch. D/l limits stinks but I'm actually quite used to them, thanks for the warning though. Thanks again, appreciate it.
How real are the orgasms here? I mean, I know many can still be acted/fake or embelished but how would you personally rate them? I think this may be an interesting site and someone very different to what I'm used to.
Ah man I had no idea it was basically implemented in to the same virtua girl software. Thanks for this info, I think this will help anyone who is interested in the new cards this 'site' has to offer. I think they are doing the right thing by implementing this as a basic addition to the already virtua girl software present. I appreciate the prompt response and detailed info, this helps me understand what is going on with desk babes and their content. I think I may actually check out these cards :)
Ah no shit? Is it like the virtua girl scenes with two or more girls but with more explicit stuff? Did you buy scenes or did you do the monthly subscription with a scene a day? I really like the virtua girl strip scenes because I can add music to them and it seems they are constantly improving the program with new additions. A question as well, since u said it's not only girl/girl stuff, with the solo stuff do you still get the strip dancing as well or is it just straight in to the kissing, fingering, and toying stuff? Thanks for the response and info, I appreciate it.
I think the addition to what appears to be lesbian scenes to the Virtua Girl lineup (what I believe this site is) is kind of a waste. I don't mind lesbian scenes but I always say Virtua Girl as a unique way of watching women strip on your desktop, seeing regular sex scenes seems pointless IMHO. But, who knows it could be interesting. Anyone actually got any of these scenes and can comment? I'd love to hear others thoughts on the matter.
I'm in the same boat as a lot of you. I download and horde a lot but my intentions are to eventually view everything I have once. Even if it involves fast forwarded through most of it or skipping through sets fast, I still make an attempt to view everything. On the other hand, I do download everything when I join a site, even if it does not interest me much. So, I guess I horde too. I was a cross roads as to which to actually choose but eventually chose 'no' because while I may horde, I do have intentions of viewing everything at least once.
I use a an external HD plugged directly in to a PS3 via USB to watch videos and photos. I never have a problem with pics but a few videos do not decode correctly. This usually are a few WMVs and AVI files. However, for the most part, I have great success and can enjoy vids on a 42 inch LCD. This is usually why I look for at least 1280 X 720 or higher sized files with a decent bitrate.
Yeah the mosaics don't bother me much. I mean I would not complain if they took them away lol :) But, I have a skewed outlook anyways because I find Japanese women to be the most attractive females in the world, so I think my threshold for dealing with mosaics is higher. This site was worth it at $29.95 because of their library and offer of WMV videos. WMV are almost non-existant in JAV sites which usually offer AVI files. Most of these AVI files are not supported through the PS3 media player, while most if not all WMV's are. That was one of my major perks of wanting to join this site. But, I wont pay $40 for the site, that's for sure.
Weird you mention interviews because that was one of the favorite things I liked about the site. The fact that most were interviewed by a woman which made a better atmosphere in my opinion and the teasing the models would do. As far as the 'more is better' thing, I dunno if I'm right. I'm just throwing it out there :) I think it makes sense but I think it might be a combo of that and the fact that almost every site does it as well. It's probably a huge factor that most sites do it that the directors/producers feel the need to do it to so they are not the odd ones out. I have to agree that I'm sure that the masses must enjoy dildos or that there are just not enough of the majority complaining about it that they must think that this is what the masses want.
I have to agree on the price. Up until a few months ago, this site was the regular $29.95 and was always on my list to join. After the price bump, I have deleted it from my list to join and will stick to the other JAV sites like J Sex Network and SexAsian18.
Ah yes, the dildo routine. I liked this site because of the stray away from mostly all that. I remember even seeing some machine use. I have to say you are probably right when it comes to dildos. I think that just most producers/directors probably just think a models use of only fingers does not give enough 'umpff' to the content. Therefore, the result is bringing in toys. However, I've always thought that the simple use of fingers shows much more erotism amongst models because they are using their own technique in such a simple way to get themselves off. But, back to what I said, I think a lot of makers of porn tend to see more as better and toys are the solution in the eyes of them :( Stinks but it is what it is I guess.
Thanks for the review. Does the site name have anything to do with the content? I'm not really sure where they are going with it but I'm guessing that these are supposed to be models' first time? Or...something else? Or, is it just a gonzo hardcore site? Just interested...
I am trying to get to the bottom of this. I recently became a member after talking to the webmistress about the site. She claims the site is different with this response:
the review on The best porn is from like 2007, 3 years old...
LatinaTranny has exclusive content for almost 3 years now, with updates every other day with no fail...
so yes we are different than shemale-club and exclusive.....
any questions please lemme know
Nicole.
After becoming a member, I do recognize some extremely old material as the same content that shemale club offers from like 3 years ago and beyond. However, during this time as well there seems to be exclusive content as well. From what I can tell, the site is associated with Shemale Club while being different in its own. I think during the first few years, this site was updating exclusive content by Nicole while updating updates that shemale club was offering as well. But, at about 2-3 years ago all the content became exclusive. I have gone through the recent and not so recent updates and Shemale Club and Latina Tranny. I have not found any content that was updated here as well as Shemale Club for some time. Therefore, I think the site is less of a clone but more of a site in its own right but older updates had exclusive and non-exclusive updates. Hope this may help and clear up some things.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
