I am getting a better understanding and can agree to an extent on how you feel about a mature woman dressed in glam. However, the main point I'm getting at is that is like 1/4, if not less of the content on this site is glamour; so I don't understand how this can be a such a huge setback for you. I'd say more than half of the photos are featuring the women in everyday clothes. Isn't that what you want? (confused).
I am not trying to give you a hard time at all. But, I am just trying to understand your scoring for the site. A site that mixes up content with solo, lesbianism, and hardcore should be more praised, even if the solo content is what you want mostly. I just don't see how this is a negative aspect of a site and worthy of points being reduced.
Right on with the only commenting on only photography. However, I only think doing this will be a set back for your reviews in the future to not include some info on them. But, to each it's own.
But, to sum it up, I don't think I'm going to fully understand the scoring of this review without some more clarification about as to why certain aspects are cut down. However, these are opinion based reviews and just because I don't understand or fully agree with the review does not mean I am right. Thanks for your time.
This site is in the same company as Ladyboy Gold. Do they do the same thing and only let you download zipped photo sets after being a member for more than a month? Plus, can you give me any info about the size of the pictures and the videos? Any info would be great. Thanks.
I'm a bit confused as far as the mainstream glam remark? Maybe just the elegant ladies category but I found more than half the outfits to be regular attire worn to the mall or them doing regular household chores. I think there is a superior mix of glam with different outfits. Plus, there is a lot of working woman attire (I.E.: secretary) which I would never qualify as glamour at all.
I do agree with the fact that not all models are beauties. I think this is due to the site trying to update so much quickly that they cannot pick and choose quality models for updates. But, with talks about this with messmer and others, one person's gem of a woman can be another person's hag.
I'm not trying to ridicule or be negative, but I dislike the fact that this review had no comment about the videos. It's not fair for the site which has both quality photography and videography to only be judged on your opinion of the quality of photography. But, this is just my opinion.
To move on, while personally I think the score is a bit low, I just can't figure out why the score is so low. 77 is a bit average for this site in my opinion. All I can see for the reason that the site is scored a bit lower than I think is because you think there is too much glamour photos, it features hardcore plus solo, and not all the models are hot? Interesting.
Thanks for the review and welcome to PU. I hope to see more reviews soon. Take care.
I noticed you said that it is probably not the best in the ladyboy niche but I will go out on a limb and say it is. This site and it's clone site (shemale.asia) is the best place for ladyboy content in terms of quantity and quality of models with the best video quality as well. While the photography resolution size could be a bit higher, the actual photography is extremely crisp and well lighted. The people creating this content make these ladyboys look like true glamour models (you have to remember, most of these ladyboys on these sites are off the street and work in bars).
While you do mention that there is not a lot of hardcore, this site within the company is a site specializing in solo ladyboy content. There is a site within the company called Extreme Ladyboys which focuses on hardcore. I hope you did not give away too many points for this.
Thanks for the review and hope to see more TS sites reviewed by you later, it's always nice to have another member join with similar tastes.
Thanks to everyone who has responded and gave me advice pertaining to join the site. After reading the replies, I went back to the preview and noticed that it is split up. Dunno if I am cool with that. Due to the info provided above and what I know already, I think I'll do a month's stay down the line. Thanks again.
I have never joined this site. The new 2.0 review boasts a huge score at 95. However, I have read comments the past few months about the site going downhill. Also, I don't remember seeing the discount before? As a first time member, what's the verdict on joining this site at this discounted price? Any opinions and comments are welcome.
I don't think it's entirely true at all. But I do have an interesting thing to think about. I remember hearing awhile ago that caucasian women who have sex with black men in porn has their 'value' go down considerably. I don't know if this is true. However, I wonder if something like this can happen for an ebony model who has sex with white men in porn. I wonder if their pay would go down once they go back to 'all ebony' porn? Would be interesting to know in my opinion.
But, that's a bit off topic. When it comes to porn I think ebony women are under represented in terms of true stardom. There are plenty of extremely hot ebony models but I think their chances to make it to the top are limited. That's kind of what I meant in terms of under par. However, I can see how it may have been a poor choice of words.
I dunno what it means to be in top anymore (maybe a contract star for vivid, wicked?) but when I go around and ask my buds who their favorite ebony porn star is, I usually get blank stares. But, most of my friends probably don't browse internet based porn so that could be bias to begin with. I dunno, what is everyone thoughts?
I was wandering through the preview and noticed that while this site has a lot of bukkake based dvd's, but it has some mainstream stuff as well? Just wondering if anyone with a bit if experience as a member can give me an idea of the amount they have, whether it's just a minority within the site or if it's a good mix. Thanks.
I just want to give a follow up to anyone that may be interested in hearing the results.
It appears the customer service set-up was messed up on Grooby's end with failing messages back to yahoo accounts. However, once they realized this, they immediately created an email service that works with yahoo and promptly gave me my access. Plus, due to what I would call a minor set back due to timing, they even gave me 2 weeks longer access because of the problem. Therefore, I highly trust the company when it comes to customer satisfaction and the tickets are definitely worth it in my opinion.
Thanks a bunch for the info, as never being a member before and with your info provided, I believe I shall add it to the list. Once again, appreciate the detailed response.
I have emailed customer service twice thus far with no response as of yet. I purchased the bronze plan for 5 tickets and I am trying to use one ticket to gain access to the shemale yum site. It has been about 4 days since my initial email. So far, I don't find it excellent nor regular communication thus far, I would expect maybe a 24 hour wait or a 48 hour wait at max. 72 hours plus appears to be quite slow in my opinion.
Anyways, you appear to want to help so what steps should I take next? I have emailed customerservice@grooby.com twice and followed the necessary steps to get a ticket activated but still no response. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
After posting a comment about the tickets, I forgot that customer service needs to be contacted to activate a ticket. And well, customer service was contacted about activating a ticket several days ago and I have yet to get a response. So, let's see how long I have to wait and I will give an update as to how long it takes. That is if this even works. I hope this does not end up turning ugly and having to attempt to get my money back...
Of course, buying a long term plan is bad for any site in terms of not liking the site, isn't it? These tickets just provide a means to join each site or one site for a lot cheaper because Grooby hardly ever strays away from $35 a month for one of their sites (unless new, then they give a discount for about 1-2 months). As far as updating goes, I believe this company is one, if not the longest running company ever for shemale content and I really don't see them to stop updating any time soon. But, you never know.
Yeah, I really wish they made something like a cubic zirconia plan which was cheaper than the other plans, it really took a lot of indecision to come up wit the go ahead to actual fork over $125. But, I really did want to check out shemale yum and re-join shemale japan so I figured that at the least, I can join these two sites again down the road with the tickets to get updates after a few months.
I don't know how many are aware that this company, Grooby, provides discounted tickets for purchase which lowers the cost of these sites profoundly. Here is how it works:
There are three plans that give you discounts which offers a certain number of 'tickets' which allows you to join their wide variety of sites at any time for a one month non-recurring membership. These tickets have no time limit as far as when you can use a ticket for a site. They are purchased as a flat rate price with a certain amount of tickets which go down in price per site as you pay more. I just purchased the bronze plan which gives 5 tickets at $25 per site, which is $10 off each site than the usual price if just joining for a month, recurring or non-recurring. They can be purchased through CCBill or other ways and all you do is email support and tell them which site you want to use a ticket for with your username and password, then they give you access.
Slow download rates for me, if you can't even get the content then I think all the other technical aspects become borderline moot or just add to the site being even more garbage. I almost put 'other' and added the fact when filenames are oddly named such as "ASJ-4003-500.avi", so you have to rename every damn file so you know what you downloaded. However, to even get to this point, you have to be able to download the file first so that's why I put slow download speeds.
This was a poll to go hand in hand with the messmer post that went to 100+ replies a few months ago. Guess it finally made it's way here after awhile. One of the main arguments in that discussion was that maybe younger folk would be more in to the big tittied fake breast look than older folk. I made this to see if maybe that would be true. So far, it appears most are loving all natural and maybe that argument could be wrong, at least so far.
Me, I am younger and am not turned off by fake tits. However, I am strange when it comes to fake breasts. On porn stars, I really don't care. However, I only know a few women personally who have gotten fake breasts (and out of the few, most was due to the fact that they just wanted huge fake tits to impress) and I found them revolting. I suppose this was basically to flaunt their bodies as the sole purpose and it pissed me off. But, I do understand that some and most women do it for esteem issues and themselves etc etc. So, maybe in my little fantasy world of porn, I like them but in real life I believe I am not in to them as much. All-in-all though, I think I like just about everything porn can offer so I'm not surprised big tittied porn stars do not turn me off, but neither do small tittied natural stars as well.
As far as surgeries are going, from what I can see on models is that they get to the breasts from the arm pit so that's where the scar is now and you don't get any scars in the breasts area visually. However, I still see women getting tit jobs with scars there, so I'm guessing the procedure to go through the arm pits must be far more expensive or maybe carry more health risks? I don't see why any women would not go through the arm pits these days....
No joke it is in Italian and lol? $75? Let's smoke some more crack when we make a pay porn site :) Especially what appears to be a candid upskirt site, how good can the quality be lol?
As pointed out above, POV can display great HJ, BJ, and Cowgirl scenes. However, the static camera pisses me off when compared to a revolving (not too much though) camera that a scene without POV provides. I believe the POV scene was actually enthralling to me at first because it did provide that fantasy like atmosphere that it's happening to myself. However, too many POV scenes nowadays has the male model grunt, even talk, move his hands in to the scenes, and so on which kills this fantasy. Plus, after seeing so many of these POV scenes, I feel it is more of a gimmick than actually a well shot scene. Yes, seeing a model's ass bounce up in down is great in POV but once the position switches it stinks IMHO.
It appears the site will finally get an official review from our friends at TBP. It says the date is still TBA, but I can't wait to see the new thoughts about the site. I am about to join really soon here, as I believe it may be the best place to get genuine older ladies with the best quality of content. Now, I have not joined yet but based on previews, chats with others, and the stats, it may even excel All Over 30. Can't wait to see what the official score from TBP will give!
Ah, I totally overlooked the video stats on TBP and you are completely right. It would be a probably a one time stay so the updates are not a huge issue for me. You said going back, so you have been a member, how was the billing processor when you were a member before? I am extremely nervous about this myself with a certain past experience straying away from the usual suspects. I trust your judgement and with your experience with the photo quality combined with the average videos, thumbs up for one a month stay if the billing processor is non-problematic?
Totally agree with the acting at all quote. That's why I put acting ruins a scene solely based on the fact that usually when I tell a model is totally faking an orgasm or just downright bad at acting, the scene is ruined. I'm actually surprised so far that it appears that I'm the only one who put this. However, jd makes a great point as well that porn is kind of like a cartoon, therefore fantasy. So, if a model is acting well or 'the part' as you put it, then the scene will be better.
But, I think this comes down to what people want as 'acting' in their porn. I suppose it can be defined as just the downright demeanor of a model because the scene is fantasy to begin with, so therefore everything captured within the scene is acting to begin with. Or, it could even just be the part that the model is playing, such as innocence or aggressiveness. But, I suppose it could even be how sexually real the scene is compared to acting in terms of the model actually enjoying the actual sexual act within the scene. There probably are more definitions or examples, but I'd say all the above are valid.
However, in terms of this poll and how I personally potray 'acting' (probably mainly because I watch mostly solo scenes) is how sexually turned on the model is within the video in terms of realness. So, fake orgasms and so on, really ruin a scene for me.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
