I end up here at least 2x a day. When I'm watching tv and so on I have my laptop exactly where the name describes, on my lap! So, whenever I'm home this site is up in a tab and 6 inches in front of me (amongst other sites). That being said, I suppose it's even more than a times thing! :)
I just joined this place cause I had some xtra change lying around and it was cheap. I stumbled upon it and joined just to join but I dunno it if it exclusive. Anyone been here that can let me know? There are a lot of models from the UK so I'm guessing it's based from there. Any thoughts or ideas would be great.
I suppose you are right but this site has some downright hags :) I am quite open to all women and I even don't mind some more of the 'ugly' women going at it or you could even say plain janes. This site has a lot of beautiful older women and plain janes. However, I lump these two categories in terms of attractiveness together because I think they both have great qualities that most can agree on. I am not trying to sound superficial but I understand that concept of others finding certain qualities better than others. As I think I said in a post on the forum, I think the overall consensus of men know what an attractive woman is and can agree on what a total hag is. Were talking about porn here and I'm not gonna get in to personality cause that's a whole diff concept. For example, a plain jane can be totally hot to me cause she is totally down to earth and a playboy bunny can be totally disgusting to me because she's a downright bitch. However, in porn, I wanna see the playboy bunny and not the plainer jane if I have a choice. And by looking at anilos, I see this concept being put in to the place. That site looks great as far as the content is and I think they are on a great pace to give this place a run for their money. So I guess what I'm trying to say is if the standards were lifted just a little, I'd prolly give this a low score in the 90's, maybe it's opinion based but it's just how I feel. However, I prolly would deduct points if they went out and got these 20 something 'milfs' I see on all these other 'mature' sites. Maybe, if they would just not worry about updating so much, they can find better quality models. And by the way, I don't mind a 'lesser' attractive model being thrown in to the mix every once in awhile, just not daily :)
Sounds absolutely stupid and pointless. However, I really have no intentions on joining this one soon but thanks for the heads up for sure. I like pics just as equal to vids and implementing this is outrageous imho.
Hey,
In response to your question about the cumshots with those girls, I went to the solo scenes of each girl and checked and found that those do not as of the date of my review. I understand that these models are a bit more expensive (I have heard this rumor too) but I would suggesr checking out this for a take on updating with quality and quantity: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=596
I know this is only a selected few of this communities' take and in comparison to the rest of the population, but I have come to trust all these users opinions and I think that this is how the majority wants their stuff done. My suggestion that I think would make the site 10x better would be to eliminate those first videos (or add them in combination) styles of just an interview and strip to a whole strip tease then masterbation to cumshot video for 1 update. Also, almost all the better quality sites tell the user that the model could not cum due to whatever reason in their discriptions so they get a heads up. Solo she male videos that are not shot till cumshots are pointless is porn in my honest opinion, that's like watching a female doing toyplay without any orgasm (even if it's faked). I hope this may help and I'm looking forward to improvements this site may offer. As I said before, this site could be something great and I want it to succeed. Also, in response to walnut, I never told him he shouldn't join the site, I gave him some info on the video conditions and he blew them out of proportion :( Also, after going back to the videos last night to find which do and don't cum, I noticed my 50%+ statement may have been a bit skewed, but we are talking about only the 3rd video style which is the true masterbation videos. If we included the 1st and 3rd, it's well over 50%. Thanks for your time.
I understand that this is a new site and is exlusively shemales from Japan. I really want to love this site, believe me, I am a lover of Japanese women, female or she-male. I actually do like this site, the price is high right now and I know that all your sites are the same price with the others being around a lot longer. As for the point that I said that every video cuts off is a lie. I mentioned that the majority do cut off before a cumshot (Anzu, Kaede, Tsugumi, Emiru, Hime, Mana, Maria, Miki, Miki B, Mizuki B, Reina, Sakura, Simone). I do understand that this can be due to hormones and so on, but it can be disapointing in a solo scene. These are just solo scenes that I mentioned but I do know that there are quite a few of the handjobs and blowjobs that end this way as well. The hardcore videos are done well, catering to the masses and is great at this site. I just don't like this excuse about not being able to get a cumshot for a shoot each time. At $35, which is quite high to others, this should not be a problem. Plus, I can throw out about 4-5 other she male masterbation and hardcore sites that can get this everytime at a price that is much lower. Yes, the strictly only japan shemales is absolutely great, HUGE HIGH FIVE to this. I love this aspect and I want to seriously give you a great mention for this. However, with only vid caps for the pictures and lacking video direction plus the cut offs, I found the site a bit lacking. I'm not gonna say that I won't join this site at a later date and that it won't ever improve (and I'm glad you are taking things in to consideration) but right now at that time of the review, I think the score is justified.
As I said in the review, there is about an average of 3 videos per model and there is a certain trend. In the first video, the model just does a interview and strips, usually just showing herself hard and some close ups. The second one is usually a interview again, stripping, then the model gives the camera man a bj or a handjob. However, most of the time (about 50 to 65%%), the video cuts off before a cumshot. The third, which is mostly a solo scene, is a masterbation scene with the model. But, once again (maybe 50 to 65%), the model masterbates but the video cuts off before a cum shot. As I said before, not every model cums and if this webmaster wants to go in depth and have me tell them which videos don't I can tell you which ones if they want to get down to the nitty gritty.
There are no mosiacs here, however, the videos are shot in japan. The camera man is japanese and the language spoke is japanese. The videos are actually not bad, they are shot in an amateur POV style with the solos and blowjobs. But, the hardcore is not POV and an outside person is brought in. The hardcore scenes are actually quite good but are not a whole lot but they site is still relativity new. I think they do a new hardcore scene every Friday weekly with like a solo/bj scene on monday. However, the solos and blowjobs are unsatisfying to me because they rarely end in cumshots. So, basically, a little more than 1/2 of the videos are a quick interview in japanese, a strip, maybe some masterbation, a bj, but then they get cut off abruptly. While the models are mostly great, just seeing them strip is a bit boring for me. But, they are all truly Japanese and the videos are exclusive. Hope this helps, if you want any other details let me know.
You know now that I read your message a bit more clearly, are you saying maybe I should start at teen dreams or atk galleria then come here or only cuties? I went to that teen dreams site and it looks like it has goo gobs of content, I think I might get overwhelmed (that can be a good thing too :]). But, to further my understanding, do you mean teen dreams and atk galleria have even less content than these two?
Isn't it safer to say that P2P ripped off their videos from here? :) But, in all honesty, you mention that bukkake is a huge genre but what does this site not carry that you can get anywhere else? I guess I'm also a bit confused as to what is considered mainstream in the bukkake genre? My knowledge of this genre is not huge, however, it is not totally limited I'm just confused as to what is considered non-mainstream? Maybe to help others in this review you can attempt to distinguish this a bit more clearer.
Thanks for the great reply and in depth detail. It's quite clear from all you trustworthy members I should start with InFocus and eventually go to this site. I've seen some reviews for those other sites you mention and I'm sure I will eventually whet my appetite at those sites but I just got a rebate card for $20 so it was basically a toss up between the 19.95 sites :)
What are the better qualities in comparison for InFocus to this one? I see that InFocus is primarily solo and this one has some harder stuff. Just wondering what your opinion is?
I want to delve in to the world of Euro Babes that is a bit more harder than the euro photo stuff I've been to before (met, etc.). After reading all these positive reviews and going to the site, I am getting reeled in. However, I'm not totally on the boat yet. I see there are plenty of negative comments. It's like a clear seperation between the two. Good reviews/bad comments. Also, all these reviews/comments tend to be quite older (6+ months). Therefore, I have some questions to people who have been here recently or are current members.
1. How's the variety? I'm looking for solo and hardcore. Girl/Girl is okay but not my biggest thing.
2. Mentions of problems with vista. Still? It's my primary computer's OS.
3. Is this a good place to start considering the price and content?
Demand for quick updates affects quality plus niche
Hello,
I joined this site earlier in the month after scanning good reviews from others here. However, when it comes to the quanity of the site which is great, the quality of the models tends to be affected imho. But, I do know that the niche of real mature models gets in the way of finding a lot of models because of reasons I'll get in to some other time. Therefore, I have to say that the models here that I find attractive are far in between the lousy ones. I'm thinking the demand for new models and quick updates is the culprit. Don't get me wrong, this site does A LOT of things right and is near perfect in all those aspects. Also, I understand quick updates is very attractive to customers. I just have to say, a lot of these models look like they weren't even attractive in their teens, 20's, or even now. I feel I have an okay eye for natural, mature women and I know women can blossom even more as time goes on but c'mon...Does anyone else agree or what. I think updating less here would get more quality models, which I think this place needs.
I'm gonna do a new review pretty soon for this site but the videos seem to be the same as the older ones. Same WMV and MPEG formats at the. They look okay I suppose but def not up to par with what I've seen on plenty of other sites.
Hey,
man I didn't even notice you could go to the model index without a subscription. Thanks. And yes, these models look great so far. No doubt though, this site is on it's way to become something great! Thanks for the quick reply man.
Yeah after visiting the preview on this site it's totally Halloween style goth girls. I found this out when I rented a lot of DVD's awhile ago that the authentic stuff is only found a few places (which PinkPanther says). Most people think to just put a woman's hair with some bright color and a nose ring equals punk/goth...mpmffg
Great review. I have a question as far as being comparable to the other mature sites out there. I joined all over 30 earlier this month and I like the site so far... (review later) but I have noticed between the attractive ones, a lot are unattractive. Is it the same thing here? How wide spread are the truly attractive models in comparison to the unattractive. I know attractiveness varies between most people but I think you may get my drift in my example?
Hard choice but I went with celeb because when I see them on tv I'm always wondering what it would be like to see them in the buff, and doing the nasty as well! I suppose I'm not the only one out there cause those celeb sex tapes sales go up the roof. The others are interesting choices but I dunno, seeing my ex would probably just solidfy how much of a whore she really is which would be great.. :), close friend would be awkward, neighbor would be interesting (prolly runner up choice), high school crush (which one?) would be great for the reunion chat! haha, no seriously, that might be interesting, however, in my experience so far, I have found about 3 out of 5 of my crushes from high school are not nearly as hot as I thought they were at that time nowadays (weird huh?).
I'll have to go with Asia on this one. Japanese porn scenes trump European and North american even with the mosiac. I think they put way more time in to fulfulling fantasies and the scenes are not always just the, kiss, strip, bj, eat out, missionary, doggy, top, then cumshot routine I always see in Europe and USA. Also, shemales from Asia are 10x better than the majority of South American/North American models. My 2 cents.
After looking at several videos and pictures of the years, I cannot say that bondage or S&M is for me. As having a degree in psychology, I do understand the mix mashing of sex and violence as a turn on for some (in a scientific approach). However, for me the association just does not work for me. Hell, even in the light 'domination' department in straight sex videos when the male tends to be overly aggressive usually turns me off. But, I have noticed more n' more that an aggressive female can be a bit of a turn on as long as they do it properly. I dunno how I can describe properly, maybe being aggressive but discreet at the same time. I dunno if others can understand what I'm talking about fully cause I cannot think of a better description at this time. Although, any form of leather/whips/etc. and beating others up just does not do it for me...
ah I see, well I'm mostly in to solo ladyboy scenes with some occasional hardcore. Is that what this site pretty much is? ah, and a femboy is usually a shemale who takes hormones and has those small hormone titties but has not got fake tits. Also, they can look more on the masculine side (don't get it confused with a cross dresser) but this is only sometimes and it's nothing as masculine as like facial hair or something like that. Hope that helps and thanks for the input.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
