Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Exclusive content
- Average place for picture buffs
- Hit the 'femboy' niche well
Cons:
- Very limited video
- Low quality video
- No zip format for the pictures
- Updates are slower than most
- pictures are not the highest resolution
- Price is still a bit high at $15/month
Bottom Line:
This site was one of the first ladyboy sites I came across. I stumbled upon pictures of 'Schoolgirl O' and found she was exclusively only on this site (at least, I have not found here anywhere else). It has a simple design with a model list and update list with picture sets within them. It just looks so dated and there is minimal effort to make it look better over the obvious years it's been around.
The pictures are divided in to a few categories. There is the schoolgirl 'O' area, which is only about 7 sets involving solo and some TG/TG action. There is another section involving Talisha, a well known star on plenty of other sites, doing solo sets and I think one hardcore one. However, these seem to be some dated sets and I don't believe they will be updated ever. The next section is the other various ladyboys. They are updated scarcely, maybe once a week or so.
The ladyboys on this site are primarily femboys. Most tend to be on the borderline cross dressing side, appearing to be able to pull off a dayjob as men and ladyboy by night. However, in the mix, you can find some average to better looking ladyboys. The photographer (Captain Outrageous) tends to pride his ladyboys in not getting fake tits and being 'all-natural'. But, the models he gets just fall short to the really great looking femboys I've seen out there. They are photographed starting in clothing and usually end in full nudity. However, there are rarely pictures of cumshots which kills the whole point of solo sets.
The pictures are in lower res and are not in simple zip format. I actually had to download an image downloader to just make this site somewhat worth going to.
I just don't see this site as worth the price of admission. I could see maybe $9.95 to join and get some femboys added to your collection for one month, but at $15 it's just high and a hassle.
I was a trial member about 3 months ago and was completely dissapointed with the site when it came to download speeds. When it comes to this problem, I've really only had this problem with one other site to where I could complain. But, with this site and that one (the other was a non-affiliated site), I experienced very slow download speeds at about literally 35-75 kbps speeds. After reading TBP 2.0 review and no problems with tis, I am wondering if anyone else has had problems with this. I'm located in the Midwest of the USA and have rarely had problems in this aspect with a lot of sites over the years, so I cannot say my ISP is poor. I liked what I COULD get from the site and TBP reviewing a good score has interested me again but I can't see me joining at speeds like that. Any insight would be great, thanks.
I did a trial of this site a few months ago and my download speeds were out of control at like 40 kb/s using a manager and even just raw to test. This was even on off hours. I'm glad you maybe? got some better speeds than this but this was possibly the worst site that I have ever had when it came to download speeds.
I see, you are basing the maturity of a site on overall qualities including navigation, design, direction, search system, and so on? I cannot comment on how well all these aspects fit in to this particular site because I have never been a member. I understand where you are coming from, but I think the majority of users here use the term 'as the site matures' more in reference to 'as the site gets bigger'. So, that's why I made the comment with information about the amount of content the site has. Sorry for the miscommunication. Have a good one.
Hmmm...TBP says this site has like hundreds of models and thousands of scenes and photo sets. Don't quote me but I think the site is quite mature already. I've never been a member but it is high on list, most of the users that have wrote about this site have gave it high praise.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining the site gives access to a few other niche type sites including Cum Blast City, See Mom Suck, Over 40 Handjobs, Busty Direct, Teen Tugs, & few others.
- The site overall has a decent amount of content but I'm going to review the site as a network which contains plenty of handjob material with decent scenarios which are the essence of the network. I will elaborate in the bottom line.
- Content appears to be exclusive to the sites and network.
- No DRM protection.
- Photos are available to view or download in zip format.
- Navigation is straight forward and content is easy enough to find by showing updates viewed by date of update, rating, popularity, or name. Updates can also be viewed by a model index with the same views as above.
- Some other discounts to other sites not associated with the network can be used by clicking links on the site.
- Average scene descriptions with decent screen caps to know what kind of scene the video or photo will be when browsing.
Cons:
- Videos as a whole on the network vary and range from poor to below average. However, nothing is above average in this category. We are talking about 320 X 240 to 720 X 480, most with ~2,500 kbps bitrate.
- Photos are small as well with some being actual photo shoots to just screen caps from the videos. There are usually just a few dozen pics in a set and highest resolution is around 1000 X 668.
- Site design is bland and there is no attempt to really be a top tier site in this category. However, navigation is easy enough.
- Model selection can range to absolutely gorgeous to sub par. It just shows how the site is as a whole which equals wishy-washy selections.
- Overall, there is not a lot of content for the network. This actual site has the most with around 202 at this time of review. However, the other sites are averaged around 60 scenes with even some only as much as 4 or 5 scenes.
- Some scenes are on other sites within the same network sites and only update once a week.
Bottom Line:
First off, I want everyone to know that I am reviewing this site as a network. Therefore, I will review the sites in the handjob/blowjob niche because this is the main overall theme of this particular site and network.
Club Tug seems to be the main site of the network with a overall handjob theme as a whole. The scenes within this site vary from solo handjobs to group ones. I suppose I will say this next because it is the basis as to why I joined: these sites within this network are extremely niche orientated! Meaning, almost all the themes revolve around a story of a handjob or blowjob happening for a taboo reason, it is not just "hi, strip, handjob, cumshot, scene end" content. Therefore, the site has decent creativity which results in some steamy scenes. This site here has it all, from the little girl who gives her teacher a handjob to the stepmom giving her stepson a handjob before a big date so he's "relaxed". Overall, the directing is average and the dialogue can range from dirty/sexy to stupid/straightforward. Therefore, each scene has a life of its own which can range in theme and quality. It is by far not consistent which is its blessing and its curse.
Over 40 Handjobs is exactly how it is described. Like the other scenes in the network, it is theme oriented but features strictly older ladies. However, there are some scenes with a younger model who "catches" her giving a handjob and helps. But, it is mostly solo older models giving young men handjobs for some weird/taboo reason. Like the other scenes in the network, the acting varies and models do as well. I have seen some of the nicest natural older ladies to the old ones with the huge bolt-on titties. Looks range and it is all in the eyes of the beholder.
See Mom Suck is a site which features older ladies not only giving handjobs but blowjobs. Each scene usually consists of a younger model giving a blowjob, get "caught", and then the older model joins in for whatever reason and "teaches" the younger one how it's done. But, some scenes might just feature the older lady only without a younger lady, of course, blowing the young man for some taboo reason. The dynamic between the older and younger model can vary from great dialogue and sexy rapport to just overall embarrassing with one model outshining the other or them both just looking dumbfounded with poor acting. It all depends which brings me to the point I've made before, the consistency is well, non-existent.
Teen Tugs differs by bringing the younger model to the forefront only in a handjob scene. Sometimes it is a model by herself, with another, or even in a group. Of course, keeping with the overall theme, the handjobs usually occur with a taboo subject as to why she is doing it. This ranges from trying to get a good grade from a teacher to her getting revenge for a bad date from a friend. This is the newest of the sites and only contains a few dozen scenes.
Now that I've talked a little about a few of the network sites, I would like to comment on the overall stuff. Most of the models in this network are used again in each of the sites. So, when giving the tour to look at, if you like a most of the models on one site, then you are most likely to see them on all sites. Also, the themes tend to not vary. Therefore, if you have seen about a dozen types of scenes or reasons why they are giving a hj/bj, then it is usually repeated again with different models. So if you are in to theme orientated porn with a bit of a plot which results in quirky reasons why these models would be jerking or sucking some guy off, then you are at the right place. Therefore, that is what this network really is, theme oriented. You really have to be in to the reality type thing to appreciate the scenes offered here. This would probably be the main reason to join, as it was my main reason.
With that said, do not expect to be blown away by the content here. Yes, it has really steamy themes and decent models doing decent acting, but not all the time. Some editing can be poor and the dialogue excruciatingly bad which makes one wonder if any direction was done before a scene at all. Plus, the site Cum Blast City actually brings in a horrible fake penis which eventually squirts massive amounts of fake jizz on the models, but first makes them actually jerk and suck it like they are even remotely turned on. It creates this strange aura for the model which results in uncomfortable acting and cringe worthy scenes that are almost unbearable to watch. I avoided this site quickly and was pretty mad cause a lot of the better models participated in the site.
Overall, the network offers some great scenes that are niche orientated. The quality is low, so if you want to join, you better be ready for this. It's surely not for everyone and needs to be tweaked for the future. With the right changes, the network could produce really good niche and theme oriented scenes, but for now, only a selected few will be ready for the site.
Totally helps my mans Spencer! Good looking on the reply. Still looks like a nice site for schoolgirl uniforms and especially British women which I have none in my collection. Thanks for the reply and your time.
TBP reviewed the site and I'm getting a feel what the site has to offer with this review and the tour. Obviously, as Spencer stated, there are not going to be dildos up the ass with this content. However, do the models get fully nude with some spread shots? Or, is it extremely tame like something that Met-Art would have? If anyone has been a member lately and can add anything, I'd be extremely happy. Thanks for your time.
Interesting concept. While the actual 'crying' is possibly acting, has anyone actually seen the content and can comment on how well the acting is. Or, are the scenes actually quite real and is there 'acting' that maybe is not taking place? Any insight on the content would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
This is great news, let me know if you find anything out. I should have done this myself but I always check if anyone knows anything from here first. Webmasters/etc/etc usually always say, HD quality and HIGH res or something. They can never give a straight answer. At least, most of them :(
I love watching women dance being a fan of electronic. Adding masturbating may seem like a gimmick but somewhat innovative to an extent in content. Can anyone give me any info about the site in terms of basically anything, but primarily what can I expect with the material. Plus, what format are the videos in with the resolution size and bitrate or an opinion on how well these videos may look?
Ughh, thanks for pointing out this is a streaming site only. I was pretty excited at the content of this site after seeing the tour because it reminds me of the site College Fuck Fest which I rented a few DVD's back in the day when I rented stuff and enjoyed the content. But, I can't join a site that only streams, I'm a fan of downloading so I can watch at my leisure and especially now that my time to watch has diminished a lot lately. Thanks for the review.
lol at the ring toss being a naked dude with a woman throwing the ring on to his erect dick.
Interesting site but I think the price is a bit high for the amount of content you get. However, thanks for bringing a site that is qoute end quote, against the grain for anyone who may be interested.
I'm guessing DDF primarily uses Euro models? I'm am still quite a novice when it comes to these types of sites and I have a few questions.
I may be a jackass at reading but I am kinda confused about the 1byday site. Is this site part of the network?
What's the network's specialization? I know you say all is covered, so is there a good ratio of all the fetishes covered or would you say one type stands out the most?
Ah man I had no idea it was basically implemented in to the same virtua girl software. Thanks for this info, I think this will help anyone who is interested in the new cards this 'site' has to offer. I think they are doing the right thing by implementing this as a basic addition to the already virtua girl software present. I appreciate the prompt response and detailed info, this helps me understand what is going on with desk babes and their content. I think I may actually check out these cards :)
Ah no shit? Is it like the virtua girl scenes with two or more girls but with more explicit stuff? Did you buy scenes or did you do the monthly subscription with a scene a day? I really like the virtua girl strip scenes because I can add music to them and it seems they are constantly improving the program with new additions. A question as well, since u said it's not only girl/girl stuff, with the solo stuff do you still get the strip dancing as well or is it just straight in to the kissing, fingering, and toying stuff? Thanks for the response and info, I appreciate it.
I think the addition to what appears to be lesbian scenes to the Virtua Girl lineup (what I believe this site is) is kind of a waste. I don't mind lesbian scenes but I always say Virtua Girl as a unique way of watching women strip on your desktop, seeing regular sex scenes seems pointless IMHO. But, who knows it could be interesting. Anyone actually got any of these scenes and can comment? I'd love to hear others thoughts on the matter.
Anything know anything about this site? TBP states it is all exclusive and has a good WMV format in 1280 X 720, 4002. Yes, it does look like another 'girls with toys' site but..yeah yeah :)
I hate for you to think I'm a bit lazy (I admit I am) but what are the other network sites like in general? As in, what are the niches involved? I went to TBP and they said this site can be accessed by a network which I'm guessing is the network you joined but that's as far as I got. I hope I'm not being a burden :(
I never did join :( I have been trying to catch up with some finincial things and have not joined anything in a few months :( Still looks like an interesting site for this kind of content, it is on my list of sites to try.
I read the review and there are a few things I disagree with and agree with. The fact that the site is 'small' should not be put as a con because according to TBP facts, this site was launched around OCT 2008 and the TBP states there are more than 69 videos at that time, MargulisAZ states there are only 46 at his time of his review. Something is going on here because that's a lot of 'missing' shoots that should not be missed. Were these the broken links he was talking about? If so, this is unacceptable to have more han 20 missing videos not available for download. I have been a member of Gyno-X which appears to be a quite similar site and they update about the same plus in the same fashion and that is a premier site in this type of material so I don't think that should be a con in itself. Once a week is decent for a specialized niche.
MargulisAZ states that the site has spreading, speculums, gaping, etc. but the content needs more of this. I'm a bit confused because isn't this what this site is, so what is the other content that is being updating that would not constitute as being this kind of material?
As far as promising only 300 kbps these days for a single download means there is something wrong with the bandwith being provided for the site itself. That is extremely slow and I have joined plenty of Euro based servers that exceed this speed. It is a con and should be accepted as one.
I am interested in this type of content and never knew about this site until now, so consider me a potential customer. This is why I am asking these questions to both MargulisAZ and the webmaster who responded. Any more information pertaining to the questions I asked would be greatly appreciated. I am not taking sides because that's not my style. I just read the review plus the responses provided and proposed subjective questions for both of you to better help others and myself in understanding the site.
At the time of my review and membership, the type of Ladyboys that were used were not nearly in the prime as I felt the models from the main site were. Plus, the male models that were used were quite over the top in my opinion; with a guy who huffed and puffed too much and a guy wearing a latex suit while having sex. During this time, the focus of the models were primarily femboys and borderline crossdressers which are not my main fortay when it comes to model selection. While I know this is my opinion, this was the reasons why I did not give the site as much kudos as I did as the other sites within this company. But, this was over 6 months if not almost a year since my membership, so things may have changed since then. I will truthfully say as well, that shemale content involving hardcore is not my primary concern when it comes to shemale content and I may have bias as well when it comes to that as well.
However, I can say the sites within this company have some of the most crisp, great lighting, and wonderful quality when it comes to both the videos and photography. If you do want this, I can vouch for the site being great in this category. Plus, as with my concerns stated above, there are some great models here and content. But, I think the overall model selection was not superior and the male selection for hardcore was borderline horrendous that it swayed me away from the site.
One thing I can say, a 79 is actually an above average score for me and I do think the site is good. If you have anymore questions/concerns, I can go back and take a look at the content I have and give you more insight. Thanks for the kind words as well.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Decent to great quality videos
-Exclusive content
-Shemsle models range from femboy to feminine
-Exclusive models
Cons:
-Site navigation is average
-4 GB daily download limit
-Some concepts are a bit unsatisfying
Bottom Line:
Okay, to start off, this site is basically for people who are in to ladyboys and want some hardcore action. There are a few solo scenes but hardcore is the basis. As for the 'extreme' part in the title, there really isn't anything that I found overly hardcore, the closest thing I suppose to extreme would be food play.
As for the videos, they are in some decent quality. As for the content, well it just varies. I found some exclusive models I have not seen anywhere doing some great scenes. However, there are a lot of others I've seen doing okay footage. One of the things I just found unsatisfying and a bit lame, is a male star on this site who dresses as "The Shadow". He wears a skin tight nylon suit and goggles. He then proceeds to screw the ladyboys, I just found it a bit lame. It's give or take with the content here, I found like 25-50% of the scenes are really worth the watch. By the way, I added a bit more percentage out there because there are quite a bit of femboys, However, I don't feel these are the best, but I do know they are popular amongst others. But, I noticed a lot are not truly ultra femboys but more as crossdressing males that are shaved completely (not the small hormone titties, etc.).
The pics are usually stills of the shoots or just photo sets with no video to match. They are decent, not a huge factor and you may be disappointed as a picture buff. The res is okay and is available in zip format.
This site is free with other sites as a loyalty bonus with ladyboy-69, longmint, and the other exoticgold sites. You can also join as a regular member. However, I just never see this site as that. It seems to be a decent bonus site, I just never see it breaking through as a regular member site for the majority. Although, I do suggest you get this site as a pick for the bonus site if you have a chance, there is some good stuff here.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
