Another great review from a fellow TS lover. I'm not really in to this content and your score plus comments keep me pretty much the same in my ideals. But, a great review and I think I saw a site on TBP which is shemales on shemales recently that looked okay, but I've always pretty much been in to the solo TS sites. However, if I do seek any hardcore stuff, it is TS with TS or males with TS. However, I like the males to do the screwing in males with TS content. Hope you can give us some more TS site reviews, I enjoy and respect your insights on TS sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive content updating for at least approximately 4 years or more (read cons to understand why I had to ballpark this). Scenes and shoots are mostly European models showcasing themselves doing gymnastics, posing, and dancing while demonstrating flexibility.
- Newest videos from present to mid 2014 are .MP4 at 1920x1080 at ~10,000 kbps. Then they go .AVI at 1280x720 at ~2,034 kbps for about a year (give or take). The oldest updates are .AVI at 712x400 at ~796 kbps.
- Newer photos are ~2000x1333 and available via zip downloads. Older photos are ~1200x800 with only some available via zip downloads. I cannot tell an exact date when these begin or end to be available via zip.
- Updates come once a week on Fridays with either a photo set or a video. IMHO, this is not bad considering it is a small niche site.
- Majority if not all models have real gymnast and/or flexibility. There is no models faking this here.
- All models will at least be topless or pantyless or completely nude.
Cons:
- Terrible website design. It seriously looks like it could be from the late 1990's or early 2000's. It's just a blue background with updates.
- Navigation is extremely underwhelming. There is a sidebar that showcases update date and what was updated. However, this stops at a random date with much more content offered and never knowing when that content was updated on. On the main page (not the sidebar), each update is non-dated but contains a picture still and name of the model. It does not even say if it is a photo set or a video.
- When viewing an update, there is no date and the page shows thumbnails of the photo set broken in to multiple pages. If there is a zip available, it is on the top of the 1st page only. At the bottom of the page, the video update link is present.
- Sometimes a update on the main page will be both a photo set and video update and sometimes it's either or. This really makes it hard to know if you are getting all the updates correctly.
Bottom Line:
Flexy Teens may be an extremely hard site to look at and to navigate. However, this is really the only terrible thing about this site. The actual content involved is everything one wants when deciding to venture in to this niche.
The content can range in how dirty the scene gets according to the model. All models are truly flexible and most can actually do extremely flexible gymnastics. Settings tend to be what looks like a studio with a solid or multi-colored back drape sometimes containing props. These props can be mirrors, bar stools, chairs, sofas, desks, and some other things. The lighting is extremely well done and everything looks professional enough. Outfits range from real gymnast style get-ups like tightly colored spandex to regular every day clothes. Earlier updates have some of the models wear a small mask covering the eyes but these are an extremely small percentage. The studio appears to be the same one used for most updates but real efforts are made to change the look of the studio for each update.
The actual videos really look good in clarity. There is a small non-intrusive watermark in the corner of each video. The newer 1920x1080 videos are really clear without any grain at all. I cannot find one thing to complain about the actual video quality of these videos. The 1280x720 videos are quite decent as well. I don't really have many complaints about the quality of these videos for the most part. The first dozen or so 1280x720 updates when they changed from the lower resolution videos are not as good as the others. However, what can one expect when the switch happens and the encoder is learning. The older videos are pretty terrible but that's expected.
The first video update of a model is usually the model doing gymnastic poses but moving on quickly to do another flexible pose. It's more of a dancing video showcasing flexibility with fluid motions. However, certain models will only go so far as to how much they undress during these scenes. It really all depends and I would say more than half get completely nude or show their pussies. I've never came across a model stay completely dressed. The camera tends to be more stagnant during these kind of scenes with minimal zooms. These scenes tend to be on the shorter side, ranging from 5 minutes to 15 minutes long. But, it makes sense for this content to stay shorter because there are only so many dancing poses a model can do.
The second update of a model tends to be a bit more slow. Meaning, the model tends to do flexible poses but staying in this pose long enough for multiple zooms and/or angles. However, not all updates follow this example. Many models just update themselves doing scenes like the first update multiple times. I would say about half of the updates follow two different styles of scene updates. When the model is doing a more slow paced multiple pose scene for the update, the amount of dirty can vary with the model. Some will show their pussies and preform extreme spreading while touching themselves. Many will not do this. I only came across a handful of scenes where a model uses a sexual toy or actually masturbates during these poses. The videos are usually around the same length as the first updates at 5 minutes to 15 minutes.
The photography involved with the updates are accompanying sets to the video scenes. Meaning, the setting, outfits, and poses are the same as each update. These are not stills of the video but actual photo sets. I found little to none airbrushing or additional alters to the photos. There is a non-intrusive watermark in a certain corner not obstructing anything. Pretty much all updates tend to showcase anywhere from 450 to 300 photos each set. It's a shame that not all updates are available to download via zip.
A small number of models return for more than 2 updates (2 video scenes and 2 photo sets). If a model does return for more, then the content varies from the one of two types of updates I described earlier.
Flexy Teens truly does tend to be on the lighter side when it comes to content. Many models will get completely nude and spread themselves allowing for close-ups ranging to the extreme but there are a large number of models who will not. Don't expect much masturbation with or without toys or hardcore to be in the majority here. Many models may fondle themselves a bit but a model never gets too intimate. However, this still does not mean a scene can't be intimate. The site gets mostly attractive models that are true to the niche and captures them doing what the site is offering. It does seem to be one of the premier sites offering genuine flexible gymnast woman with well toned bodies willing to get nude on some level for the public. It's truly a sight to see if anyone is interested in this type of content. However, it's not the content that drops the points but the poor web design and navigation to actually get the content. I would recommend the site for anyone venturing in to this niche
Honestly, if I were just trying out this stuff I would recommend a Thai ladyboy site such as Shemale.asia (Ladyboy 69) or Ladyboy Ladyboy. Like Messmer said, the asian shemales tend to look more feminine and they are my favorite. This site, Franks, has a nice mix of models so it's a good place to get your toes wet. But, if you are looking for less asian or less of a mix in ethnicity, I would think Shemale Club or Brazilian Transsexuals would be better. Just like sites without shemales, it's all about what u like...solo or hardcore, mix, type of models, yadda yadda...you know the drill :)
If you or anyone is interested in more sites, you or they can always drop me an email...I don't mind :)
Yes you did! I have to admit my favorite models come from Thailand and Japan when it comes to TS models. The aggressor thing u speak of is called a 'top' in the gay or TS world. It basically means they only give sex and do not receive. I find that most Thai models tend to be 'bottoms' (receive sex) but American and South American seem to have more tops. I mean this when it comes to TS and a male having sex. I'm not really a huge fan of any hardcore TS porn involving a Transsexual and a male. No way if the TS is giving it to the male and even if the TS is receiving from the male. I've just never really liked it. I'm really just in to the solo stuff..I guess you could say I'm the same way as it feels different for me...I don't want to say 'wrong' cause that's the wrong word (no pun intended). I just can't think of a term to describe the feeling. I've always considered TS material as a fetish for me, I really cannot see myself in real life going through with a sexual encounter with one and I still find myself attracted to females and their figures. I guess you could say my favorite TS models are 'ultra-feminine' looking ones, so I guess that plays a part of my heterosexuality. I still cannot explain it though when it goes 'downstairs though'...It's too difficult to explain!
Anyways, if you are still interested in delving in to some TS material, I can try to sway u in a direction..I know it may have just been a brief moment interest but I am definitely surprised you enjoyed any material in this realm :O It's cool though, like you say, us humans can really surprise anyone and themselves when it comes to things they are attracted to sexually... :)
np :) I hope I was not too thorough...I'm like 1 out of 2 or 3 PU's that enjoy this niche so I get a bit overexcited when I get to respond and talk about this stuff lol...thanks for letting me talk about it :)
I can answer your question, rearadmiral. In Thailand, the culture surrounding 'The Third Sex' AKA Transsexuals is much more accepting. There are large sections in Bangkok and Pattaya that include strips in red light districts that are Transsexual themed bars. So, many work at these bars and usually escort from there as well as a means to get money for their transition. With that said, the stigma is not as existent in their society so many are accepted as who they are. Therefore, Thailand is kind of a 'safe haven' for Transsexuals because not only can they make money but be accepted a lot easier too. Of course, not all work in these bars and if they don't, they can find more legitimate jobs and 'blend in' easier because of acceptance. On a side not, I've heard that some of the most prestigious plastic surgeons reside and work out of Thailand that do boob and SRS surgery and it can clearly be seen in the models from there.
When it comes to South America, it is very similar to Thailand. Especially in Brazil and I think Argentina is more tolerant as well. I do know Brazil is very accepting of Transsexuals and Gay culture. Therefore, this makes the people who want to transition easier to do because the worries of harassment and/or physical harm will be lessened. Think of it this way, it's much easier for a man or women to be openly gay in San Fransisco right? Think of it as the same for these areas, hence the more Transsexual in those areas.
However, to elaborate, there is plenty of Transsexuals from the USA, Canada, Japan, Philippines, and Europe (and I'm sure other parts of the world too). But, they are probably significantly less than in the areas mentioned before. I'm speculating, but I'm guessing with more stigma attached to being a Transsexual in those areas and acceptance, many would rather not model for a site in fear or other reasons because of being known or 'caught'. While I'm guessing about this, I do know cultures of the USA, Canada, and most of Europe are less accepting of Transsexuals. However, there are sites that are geared to TS models from the USA/Canada in Shemale Yum and Shemale Strokers. There are models from other parts but the majority of the models on those sites are North American.
Hope that helps your question, thanks for the feedback and positivity!
messmer! Since when did you stray in to the TS niche?? lol :) I never knew you had any interest in these models. I'm interested in what you think of the niche? I always knew we both had a thing for older aged models but I never really knew you liked the TS stuff. I'd be delighted to talk about some things if you like.
As far as the sound goes, yeah the videos do get degraded around 2007 and I find a lot of technical things wrong with these videos. I did not have much issues with sound from the recent videos but I may have missed some because I rarely get a chance to play sound because of others in the household. This is a great thing to mention for others though in case they are interested because if you are in to sound, then having problems with it is unacceptable!
Thanks for the feedback as well, I appreciate any compliments from you buddy!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Exclusive and non-exclusive content of transsexual models in mostly solo stripping and masturbation action but also POV sex.
- No DRM.
- Newest videos look decent at 1280 X 720 at ~4,250 kbps. Videos usually downgrade around 2007 and the years before to 640 X 480 or lower. However, one scene is re-encoded every week to look better.
- Photos are well done around 1280 X 800 resolution. They are all available via zip format or in-browser viewer.
- Site design and navigation are quality. Everything is easy to find and easy on the eyes. No broken links and file names are relevant to the video or photo downloads.
- Updates once a week with about 4 to 5 video and photo sets but also a scene from other Grooby sites. Plus, the re-encoded video is updated once a week as well.
- Model index with search options is a great attribute to the site. Also, a tagging system is in place for users to add their own tags for scenes.
- There is a site forum for questions, concerns, or general chat.
Cons:
- Extremely slow download speeds at any time of the day. I was averaging around 350 kbps when downloading one file and even slower if downloading more the one. It's obvious that there is a cap set at 350.
- Remember the site name when joining this site. Meaning, the site is Franks personal site and is really catering to his own escapades. While the users are taken in to consideration, the style of the scenes tend to be for his own personal experiences.
- Updating the way it does on one day may eliminate a user from not receiving a whole week of updates if they only signed up for one month.
- Photography is well done but the resolution is a bit small for 2011.
- Updating scheme may bother some but is in accordance to all Grooby sites (more in bottom line).
- A bit on the expensive side at $35. However, I believe the reasoning is that TS porn is considered a specialized niche so take it as you want.
Bottom Line:
Frank's TGirl World is a transsexual site catering to showcasing the escapades of the site's owner, Frank. He is the cameraman, photographer, and I think editor for the site. Therefore, one better like his style before joining which I will explain later. In addition, the model list has become quite extensive over time and some are exclusive to his site only but many are showcased on the other Grooby specialty sites or other company sites. Basically, think of this site as a mash up of transsexuals from all over the world featuring only Frank and the model in sessions.
This brings me to what is in the scenes. Usually, the first update of a model consists of a scene with a small interview or random questions. However, a language barrier is usually present with the Thai Ladyboys or the South American models. Take it for what it is. Then, the model will strip and various sections including positions of the body will be showcased with long shots and close ups. However, a common turn off (or turn on?) is that he has a groping problem. Frank has a tendency to want to grab a body part while holding the camera which reinforces that the scenes are made for his pleasure. Plus, sometimes you can even see Frank in a mirror. But, these acts have cut back in comparison to the older content but can still be prevalent. Anyways, after some stripping and body shots in various ways, the model is usually given a dildo of some sort and masturbates with it until the end, with no cumshot for the conclusion. But, sometimes some POV sex is involved but this content is usually within the next update. There is always a photo set with the same outfit and most of the content matching this scene as well.
This brings me to the second update of a model if there is one which 90% (maybe more) of the time there is. The second update is usually in a different setting and outfit. The start usually consists of a model stripping just like the first update. Then, the model will once again have her body showcased in various shots and positions. However, after this, the model will usually masturbate without a dildo or be shot in a extremely poorly edited hardcore POV scene with Frank. To clarify 'poorly edited', I mean it is not a true hardcore scene. You get some random positions for like a minute, then cut to another, then maybe another. Meaning, it is not a true and lightly edited hardcore scene but just random shots of some blowjobs or penetration in various positions for a short while. However, these scenes usually always end with a cumshot by the model and mostly all will feature various camera angles and/or positions. This is a nice touch and I commend Frank for these shots. But, these cumshots are usually edited in very quick at the end and the actual masturbation may only be prevalent for a few moments before the cumshot. So, no build up may occur to the conclusion which can hurt the sensuality of the scene. Also, each one of these updates has a matching photo set as well. So, if a model has updates after these two, the new updates will follow this same format again. Meaning, maybe the first updates of a model was in 2007. So, in 2010, the same update scheme would be used again.
So, each scene usually follows a format. But, each scene with different models at least change in appearance with locations and outfits. Many are in just a hotel room (mostly the Thai updates) but that is standard. But, the technical aspects are usually very good. Lighting is well done and the right shots are taken. It's the editing that irks me and the personal touch Frank takes when creating a scene. But, many may find this style to be what they want so I have to take that in to consideration. Just be clear before you join that that is what you get.
I kind of went in to this site thinking the model index Frank would be taking the 'cream of the crop' from all the other Grooby sites but this is not always the case. While I believe he usually picks the models from the other sites that are more 'promising', he also finds some his self and showcases them. However, when it comes to the 'World' part, the models are primarily from South America and Thailand. The North American and European (or other parts) models are definitely in the minority. So, if you like the look of the models from these locations, then you will like the site's model index.
Overall, the site to me is seen as pretty standard. Frank picks some really sexy models to shoot but flaws the scenes with quick editing, groping, talking, and not a large variety in world location for models as advertised. However, the shots are nice, well lit, include gorgeous models, different camera angles for certain shots, and lots of updates. So, it is all about weighing your options before joining the site. If one likes POV style hardcore shots, a personal edge to the scenes, South American and Thai models, the update scheme while not minding slower downloads and/or wishy washy edits then the site will cater to you.
I totally agree with DVD sites...I really don't join these kind of sites because I've always found them to be entirely interested in quantity over quality. It is almost a guarantee once a update is made on those sites that they are forgotten about and kept in the archives...it is a shame though, any type of site should be looking for any way to attract more customers (and especially repeat customers).
Oh and to clarify for others since you mentioned it, so far it appears that one video gets re-mastered every time the site updates as a separate update with the actual updates.
It appears as of a few weeks ago, older sets are now being re-encoded. I have yet to d/l one yet but if I review the site, I'll let a few know how they look. If anyone is interested, I can reply with the info as well.
These models are quite stunning! I like Misti on the preview page...woo she is hot. Interesting review and a site I'll add to my favorites for consideration later on :) Thanks for the heads up. Take care.
Thanks for the review after seeing a few machine sex at a mature site I just reviwed and being intrigued. I found that the site I was at was a contraption (sp?) that showed vaginal penetration without the whole buttox and ball banging a hardcore B/G close-up would show and it was great to say the least. How are the machines here when it comes to this? Plus, as you said with the orgasms, these machines appear to get these models off most of the time. Very good distinction when it comes to a lot of softcore sites with the model attempting to get off herself; or with help. Thanks for the review and with an 87 as a score (and you being a valued trusted member), I think I'll have to add this site to my list. Thanks again.
you stated that 'when this came out, you had to check it out'. So, are you a ex-member/current member? I'd love to see your thoughts in a different review for the site. If not, let me know if you need to know anything else about the site, I can go in to more detail (those bottom lines are not enough words for me and I can go to even more detail sometimes but have to edit them down).
As for your comment on screwing each other with these, they actually have with a few sets! I mean, really, they actually managed to get a few inches inside these girls. Talk to ya later.
Yeah it is really eccentric and different than anything I've really seen. As I said in the review, I really thought the girls were gonna be taking the scenes with zero seriousness which would result in garbage. But, they do a good job of mix and mashing the seriousness with fun which creates some interesting and well done scenes. Thanks for the kind words about the review and let me know if you need any more information about it, I am still a current member for a little bit.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive content of real females portraying anime style futanari or shemales in both videos and photos.
- No DRM protection.
- No Download limit.
- Updates often, usually twice a week with either a photo shoot or a video.
- Price is decent at $16.95 for a one month stay and goes down in price afterwards.
- Videos are available in WMV format (720 X 480, ranging from 984 to 2004 kbps) and quicktime MOV format for download only. At the time of the review, there are currently 32 different videos.
- Pictures are in an average resolution at 1000 X 667, with one of the most non-intrusive watermark I've seen (it's extremely small). At the time of the review, there are currently 35 shoots totaling about 2,950 photos.
- Diary entries for dated updates with a small captioned story describing the scene.
- Model bio page with some comments describing the model and stats such as height, weight, boob size, and cock size.
Cons:
- Photo sets are not available in easy zip format for downloading.
- Photo sets are accompanying photos of the videos. While they are true shoots, they are almost identical in terms of location, content, and outfits of the videos.
- Site navigation is a bit dreadful, while once you figure it out you can find the content easy, but there is a 10-15 minute learning curve to find it.
- No bonus features or scenes at all.
- No forum for communication. This would be a perfect feature for user input in to the scenes because it is so fantasy based.
- Model index bio page is nice but there are no links to their content from there, an easy model index would really help navigation.
Bottom Line:
Futanaria portays real female models as dick girls in anime style futanari ("new-half, shemale") scenes. The penises are obviously fake and stay true to the anime style by being extremely exaggerated. Yes, these prosthetics are so big that they can usually suck them. Plus, they are actually molded quite well and look quite real. They do not look like just pieces of plastic attached to the model. Also, staying true to the anime style, these prosthetic penises actually shoot a load and boy, do they shoot a lot. If you have ever seen futanari style or even anime hentai, the ejaculations are usually largely exaggerated. This place stays true to those type of cumshots with them spurting massive amounts of white substance. But, they do go in to the cornfactor by giving some models in sets this extremely large boob vest. I know that they are trying to stay somewhat true to anime because a lot of anime girls have extremely large breasts, these 'boob vests' bring in too much humor and corniness that it actually destroys some sets in my opinion. But, they actually spray 'milk' which may add to the fantasy.
A large perk of the site that I was pleasantly surprised was the attractiveness of the models. I really thought that models that were willing to be involved with this type of site would be far in between, they actually picked up a few hotties. While there is not a huge index, the site does contain 9 with bios and a few new ones without one up yet. I'd say around 10-12 at the time of this review. The models do a pretty good job at acting and are really in to the scenes which is a plus. I really thought they would be laughing and doing a poor job doing these scenes, but they are actually quite erotic.
The videos vary in content with some solo masterbation scenes and girl on girl. A large plus for the site is they take certain themes and do a good job at portraying them. Some examples are a wedding night with two futanari girls, mud wrestling, and geishas having sex. The sex is always with two girls with the fake cocks and they do have sex with these massive cocks. The videos, while being a bit low in bitrate, actually look pretty good in terms of low grain and average lighting. While they are a bit amatuerish in style, there is no extreme jiggling of the camera or a lot of chitter chatter amongst the camera man and model.
The photos are average. I can't say they are the best or the worst I have ever seen. They could be a bit larger but the watermark is almost non-existant. Since they are accompanying sets, they are almost identical to the videos so you get almost the same content.
This site is strictly fantasy based and actually interesting if you are a fan of anime style porn and would like to see it portrayed in real life. The props are well made, the models are in to the scenes, and can actually be highly erotic. It's the technical stuff that kills this site such as no zips, bad navigation, below average res of photos, and bitrate of vids.
Yeah after visiting the preview on this site it's totally Halloween style goth girls. I found this out when I rented a lot of DVD's awhile ago that the authentic stuff is only found a few places (which PinkPanther says). Most people think to just put a woman's hair with some bright color and a nose ring equals punk/goth...mpmffg
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive content featuring gynecology type videos and photos with some extra stuff not in english but subtitles are in videos.
- Extra stuff includes Nurses doing naughty things in videos and photos, a few doctor and nurse sex scenes, nurse lesbian scenes, pregnant women exams, behind the scenes candids, and different 'fetish' type content.
- Newer videos are in great quality (WMV: 1280 X 720, 5000 kbps) available in whole files and split (if split, 720 X 404, 2000 kbps), while older videos are in lower quality only available in split files (WMV:720 & 640 X 360, 1600 kbps; AVI: 720 X 404, 1600 kbps; 384 X 288, 850 kbps).
- Photos available in zip format in high resolution (2000 X 1328) in newer sets while older sets are lower resolutions (1100 X 731 and 1000 X 664).
- No DRM protection.
- No download limit.
- Active forum but it's dated in style.
- Updates every other day but they are parts of videos and photos, averages to about 3 different girl's exams a month.
Cons:
- Expensive at $29.95 a month. Plus they want you to pay an extra $19.95 to get access to older photo and video archives. Why charge more for old and crap quality content is beyond me.
- Some of the extra areas have no zip format available for easier downloading.
- Forum is this old looking board that's pretty hard to navigate. It's basically set up to say comments and maybe reply, but it is actually quite active.
- Subtitles can be a bit bad but it is not too drastic, they are basically just the doctor and nurse giving instructions and asking for things.
- There is also a chat program but no one is ever on, I wouldn't utilize this but it's worth mentioning for everyone else.
- Let's be honest here, content can get a bit 'dry' because the strive for realism is quite high, so the sexuality is a bit low in terms of the girl in the videos.
Bottom Line:
Gyno X is catering to anyone with a medical fetish or who want to see some attractive models showing their goods from top to bottom. Basically, you get to see an exam of suprisingly mostly attractive woman in a fake gynecology exam that strives to make realism a huge factor in their content. However, the strive for realism is so high, it creates some dull and monotone scenes that will bore the average user just trying to see something different. The updates come often and the site holds about 62 different models available for the initial charge and maybe about 60 or 70 more if you want to pay the extra charge for more content.
The videos and photos are great in quality with the newer content and average to substandard with the older stuff. The photos contain a lot photos (in the 300 to 900+ range) within the zips and is about the same in content as the videos. The main content is a realistic gyno exam usually involving a male doctor and female nurse (this can switch with a female doctor and nurse or just a female nurse). They do it all here, from measuring the model, pressure readings, speculums, breast exams, anal exams, heartbeats, and so on. Now I'm nowhere near an expert in this field so I don't know if anything is contrived but you can tell some things are obviously put in place to make the scene obviously not completely real. Besides the fact that the usual doctor I've seen on some old n' young sex sites, some things are just out of place. For instance, the girl will do a pee sample but piss in a huge beaker and spray it everywhere and the douche's are basically a enlarged turkey baster. However, the setting is quite real. They have the gyno chair for spreading, the walls are white, and there is equipment with devices everywhere. It adds to the realism these scenes bring but they can get a sense of feeling too real. But, most scenes can be downloaded in parts if you find certain things to 'dry' and would rather not even view them. While I may find this a bit too much personally, I do commend the creators for giving a true sense of realism and the strive to make them this way. They have definently completed this goal and I cannot knock them too much for that. But, I need to stress this point to others who may have seen other speculum type scenes or hospital stuff, these scenes spurt almost no sense of sexuality at all. While they do have a segment where they 'take readings' while the doctor fingers the model too see if everything is 'alright' when they are in a sexual state, everything else is a step by step attempt at recreating a true gyno exam.
The largest plus that I can stress is that they do have some attractive models and you get to see these models from head to toe in great close ups and in ways I've never seen displayed before. I went in to this site after seeing a few speculum scenes from other sites and wanting more but left this site with a sense that it was a bit too much. Interesting site but probably not for the masses.
I've been looking for a quality HJ site for awhile and this one looks promising. The models are British which I believe I only have a few videos of these types of models. The videos look to have good stats. However, the videos and pics appear to be POV which tends to be the common trait amongst HJ sites. Plus, dirty talk appears to be the theme. Can anyone comment on this and agree or disagree? Plus, how is the model selection? If anyone has some knowledge of British models, are these models strictly amateurs or are they known stars? Any other various info would be greatly appreciated as well. Last but not least, if anyone has knowledge of the niche and can recommend any other HJ sites that may be better, I'm all eyes (or ears?). Thanks for your time.
Valid points you offer but I can guarantee NO women want random thieves to enter their home and have forced sex with them. While the fantasy is there and having knowledge of psychology (it's my work field), this fantasy is often over played by men and has a coined term called the 'Rape Myth'. I won't delve in to the actual studies much here, but many studies show that many men think women want forced sex upon them, when in reality, an extermely low (and I do mean extremely) amount of women actually want this. I don't want to get in to an argument or anything, but actual research has shown to not coincide with what you just said :( But, like all things, I'm sure some do but from a psychologist perspective, I do often agree with large research studies that have been pubilished and properly done. Interesting comment though.
I totally understand the fetish/fantasy aspect of the site. I just feel that the whole forced sex thing or 'rape fantasy' is truly different and strange, almost wrong.
Does anyone else feel the idea here is borderline simulated rape scenes? From the tour, it does seem that the girls are more willing than forced but the whole masked intruder entering home and ending up having sex thing seems a bit too far. I'm sure there is no forced sex here but the concept seems borderline to me. I always thought 'rape-like' porn was illegal, but I could be mistaken. Just seems weird to me, what are all of your thoughts about the site?
Yo,
I don't doubt your negative experience with the site. However, is this site really free? I don't see any free sites really here on PU. also, while I have no particular interest to join this site, this is a place for reviews. Can you give others a better clue as to what the site has to offer even if it does not live up to it's reputation. This would be better suited as a comment for the site than a review.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
