| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Spencer Nicks
(0)
|
Reply of
jdross's Review
Wow, this site is that old? I wonder if they've updated that much since? I saw one of her YouTube videos-she's about the sexiest thing I've ever seen.
|
08-14-21 05:35pm
|
Reply
2
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Doctor's Review
Yeah they have a massive archive but I even passed on them when they had a special sale of $9.99 for the first month.
Poses are boring and the girls usually start off naked as clothing and teasing are virtually non-existent.
|
07-22-20 09:19pm
|
Reply
3
|
Thickumz
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Yeah, 20 scenes is something to complain about.
|
11-08-19 05:19pm
|
Review
4
|
Digital Desire
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great looking girls with tons of content.
Poses are erotic displaying "worked up" girls in passion rather than smiling to the camera.
Low price. |
| Cons: |
Older sets (around pre-2009) are skimpy and lower quality.
The most disorganized high quality site I have ever seen. Even your own bookmarking touches don't totally play out-inexcuscable. |
| Bottom Line: |
This would be a 99-100 score for me if not for the downright shoddy interface of the site including sets not in date order. |
|
06-18-19 06:15am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
5
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Over the years I have purchased a subscription to your site a few times so I haven't been totally disappointed but I'm not totally wowed either. The girls are fine I'm just not onboard with the facial reactions. Yeah, they're real girl but they need to act like they're excited.
|
12-24-18 06:06pm
|
Review
6
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
I read an old review on this site that said the girls' looks ranged from "average to very attractive". I'd like him to point out the "average" girls. Not only are these models hot but many are exclusive to the site. Pose styles vary but are deceptively erotic. No updates? No problem-there are probably over 1500 sets available. |
| Cons: |
Suffers from a lot of repetitive poses that are the result of lazy photography and lazier editing. However there are so many pics in a set that said set is represented well. The $29.95 price tag seems high for a site that is apparently not updating but there is a slew of pics here. If you're a video fan go elsewhere. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have bought a subscription to this site five times but it should be noted that the last time resulted in me getting a refund. Many of the sets could not be accessed and the problems could be that the site has gone on a full autopilot after ceasing updates a while back. If you like mouthwatering girl next door Daisy Duke level woman who you don't see on other sites go for it, but beware of lack of site support. Before this last hiccup I would have rated Next Door Models a solid 90. |
|
05-30-18 07:05pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
7
|
Bikini Fanatics
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Low price of $9.99. There are quite a bit of fine models and a decent amount of content. |
| Cons: |
The time it takes to simply view a picture is hit or miss usually missing. It's one of those situations where you are waiting 10-30 seconds just for the pic to pop up. Many of the more explicit sets are not free and the charge for a 30 photo set runs around $25-$40 which is an insult to anybody's intelligence. |
| Bottom Line: |
Basically a waste of $9.99. They are catering to a slim niche of rich guys who are willing to shell out megabucks to look at some amatuers getting nasty. |
|
05-29-18 10:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
8
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Hot girls and a lot of them. Solid interface with high quality photos. |
| Cons: |
Many of the models are on the thin side but there's so many to choose from you have a decent share of bubble butts too. What lowers the rating for me is the static "posey" nature of the sets. The photos are explicit without being erotic. They severely lack the teasing aspect of The Only sites or the amazing "girls in ecstasy" format of Digital Desire. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nubiles is as boring as MetArt and joins it as two of the most overrated sites in the industry. |
|
05-29-18 10:05am
Replies (2)
|
Review
9
|
All Gravure
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful, young hot models with great bodies and tons of videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
Very mild stuff. The photo sets are heavy on posing and very light on the explicit side. This might be my favorite site if the models would just do a tease routine like the "Only Tease/Only Site" girls. They smile beautifully but that's about it. They are nice and not one bit naughty. There are few exceptions to this rule. The $40 price tag is ridiculous. The movies are too long and meandering as the girls are just having fun but not doing anything erotic. |
| Bottom Line: |
Knockout young beauties who are wasted in boring poses. What I wouldn't give to see these hotties in "Only Tease" photo sets. It's not worth close to $40. |
|
05-14-18 04:37am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
10
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Yeah, I gave FTV a lot of consistent business over the years but I am officially burned out on the site. I have interest in their MILF version but the archive is not nearly big enough.
|
02-01-18 04:36pm
|
Reply
11
|
Karups
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I found that Karups Older Woman was the better of the three Karup sites. For the record, all three were included in my last purchase but there still aren't enough stunners from Karups and Karups Private Collection.
|
01-22-18 05:26am
|
Review
12
|
Only All Sites
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Gorgeous women who actually start out clothed. Nothing is more boring than softcore sites who start and end fully nude. |
| Cons: |
Not as explicit as some customers would like. For someone like me who has purchased multiple subscriptions to the "Only" sites many of the models, I have seen too many times. |
| Bottom Line: |
As a many time user, I have become bored with the Only sites but that's due to my overuse of a great site. I wish they would create "Only Swimsuits". |
|
01-03-18 06:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
13
|
Karups
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
01-03-18 06:43pm (Update History)
Reason: I was wrong about a billing mishap
|
| Pros: |
A good amount of content, and some nice girls. |
| Cons: |
Still not as good as Digital Desire, and right there in the pack of softcore sites that haven't distinguished themselves from the rest. Too many "C+" and "C" girls. |
| Bottom Line: |
Too much at $29.95. The site has been around a while and has a lot of content but also has a lot of unspectacular models. |
|
01-03-18 10:38am
Replies (2)
|
Review
14
|
Wank It Now
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Some good looking girls, but a lot of familiar English faces from the "Only" sites and Art Lingerie. |
| Cons: |
The concept of hot ladies trying to get you to jerk off turned out to not be my cup of tea. As a picture oriented guy I could live with the screen caps but the still images were a lot of shots of virtually the same image (ex. three photos of a girl pulling off a shirt) and that redundancy was worse considering the set would sometimes have only 35 pics. |
| Bottom Line: |
A total waste of money with low-quality pics that didn't advance a scene and videos that just weren't erotic. As a connoisseur of softcore erotica for many years, this was one of the most disappointing purchases I ever made. |
|
08-09-17 08:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
15
|
All Gravure
(0)
|
Reply of
Twotails's Review
Good review. My main problem with the site was the lack of explicitness in many of the photo shoots. The cute girls were smiling a lot but very seldom gave erotic looks. $40 is very steep also.
|
08-09-17 07:55pm
|
Review
16
|
Morey Studio
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nice looking women, but by industry standards nothing earth shattering. Good size archive, and a low price ($12.95) |
| Cons: |
BORING, MORE BORING,MOST BORING. ZZZzzzzzz
One of the most consistently unerotic assortment of poses in the history of softcore glamour photography. Uninterested females in mostly standup poses take way too many pictures (photo redundancy runs rampant here) and take way too many uneventful pictures. |
| Bottom Line: |
How the powers that be at "The Best Porn" rate this site a "91" I'll never figure out.
OVERRATED |
|
06-07-17 04:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
17
|
Stiletto Girl
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful ladies and the best legs you'll ever see. |
| Cons: |
Some more daring galleries lately, but much of their archive is extremely tepid, featuring mouth watering legs posing on an outdoor bench for example. These static poses are just not erotic, even with the large assortment of perfect calves and legs at this site's disposal. |
| Bottom Line: |
Great beauties with absurdly developed legs are for the most part wasted in "G" Rated poses. |
|
06-04-17 09:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
18
|
FTV Girls
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Amazing models. Young girls with a lot of bubble butts. Large archive. |
| Cons: |
Older photo shoots lacking. As a photo lover not a lot of imagination used here and the always stressing of insertion at the end is just plain lazy. |
| Bottom Line: |
I prefer a softcore site more explicit then the excellent Only Tease (like Digital Desire) but I easily prefer Only Tease and their sister sites to FTV girls. I'm not a fan of glamour videos so I'm just talking about photos and I grow weary of the last third of the shoot devoted to uninspired insertion pics that also suffer from very little variation to the previous photo. The best looking young girls with great asses are for the most part semi-wasted. |
|
04-17-17 05:15am
Replies (2)
|
Review
19
|
XL Girls
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I thought I'd be getting less plumpers and more REALLY FINE women but "that might be on me"-the fact that that's my only "PRO" tells you what I think of the site. |
| Cons: |
Terrible, unwieldy interface that lists many galleries and movies contained in their other sites. Be wary of canceling as they don't send emails when you start and end your subscription. They are their own billing service, but at least they provide you with a toll free number (that provided static and unintelligible words the first two times I called). |
| Bottom Line: |
The plumpers were too plump for my my tastes and their handling of my subscription was beyond shady. Because I canceled within thirty minutes of calling ScoreGroup the lady said my cancellation wasn't in the system. She eventually canceled it for me and sent me a handmade email-How long have these guys been in business???? |
|
02-21-17 08:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
20
|
XX Cel
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Simply some great big tits, with a few that I would throw out for being too big, but not many. HIGHLY erotic girls with jaw dropping boobs. I mean you have to SEE these awesome things!!! |
| Cons: |
I'm a picture guy and this site doesn't have the inexhaustible amount of pic sets that others do, but the ones they do have pack plenty of punch. There is more then enough for a month of enjoyment. |
| Bottom Line: |
The best big boob site I have ever seen because it's the best collection of large breasted women I have every seen. It doesn't have the "virtually infinite" content of a "FemJoy" or a "Hegre Art" but it might last 2-3 months. |
|
12-27-16 07:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
21
|
Swimsuit Heaven
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Ridiculously sexy models in very erotic one piece swimsuits. The curves and butts on these girls are outrageous. Good amount of comment. |
| Cons: |
Unbelievably expensive. For $24.95 you have access to one year of content. Pay another $24.95 next month and you'll have access to two years of content. When it recurs in the third month you'll have full access but you'll still have the $24.95 recurring charge every month. A long time to wait for some of the juicy women you can't see. Pay $49.90 the first month and you'll get two years of access and only have to wait one month for full access. To get full access right away it'll cost you $199 and $24.95 a month after that. |
| Bottom Line: |
These woman are so "booty sweet" and sexy I would have accepted a $50.00 first time payment for full access, and $24.95 a month after that, but these guys are just too greedy.
EDIT: That basic membership leaves out some primo girls with a lot of sets you can't see right away. I would estimate that you get 15% of the site's overall content, and it might be less than that. These suckers are greedy.
EDIT: (2-22-16): Although I wavered on keeping this for a couple of months to get full access, I decided otherwise and canceled today. |
|
01-30-16 04:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
22
|
English MILF
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
She's sexy, cute and very erotic. Nice big ass, great legs, and a slim waist. The solo picture sets are very erotic, if not a bit short on pictures. |
| Cons: |
Not a lot of replay value. In an expired review on this site that was penned by "messmer" he commented on the 150 picture sets. That review was written in June of 2011 and four years later there are still 150 photo sets.
Skimpy sets. I usually praise "economical" sets, which get a lot done without 175 pictures, but these sets are too skimpy. I've already gone through 30 sets, and that was after "pre stimulation" looking at "Busty Brits".
The bonus sites of the same woman, "Daniella In Pantyhose" and "Lycra Ass" are not very good. A lot of screen caps.
The videos are uninspiring, particularly the softcore ones.
The $29.99 premium price tag suggests a lot more, including updates. I will immediately request a refund. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like the girl. It's the only reason I'm giving it a 65. They list an update on August 1st, and it's three rehashed "video stills".
There are a lot better sites with unending content out there for $29.99. Avoid this one. |
|
08-04-15 01:44am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
23
|
Showy Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Review
Plain and simple, most of the girls are too skinny, and not at the 18-19 year old "sweet spot".
|
05-22-15 06:31pm
|
Review
24
|
Hippie Goddess
(0)
63.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fine looking Hippie Bodies. Great tits. |
| Cons: |
Too many outdoor shots showing the girls running around doing a "new age" type of dance. The girls seem oblivious, but they don't seem turned on. They're expressing themselves soulfully, but it's not erotic.
That's not the case in a minority of sets, which show the girls super turned on writhing on the ground in very realistic LUST. Unfortunately, these gems are few and far between. NOT ENOUGH INDOOR SHOTS. |
| Bottom Line: |
Not enough turn on for the buck. Some of the best sets I've ever seen, but they occur infrequently. Some really sexy, fine girls are reduced to some not so hot movements outdoors. |
|
05-22-15 09:13am
Replies (0)
|
