| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Yeah, that was easily the best fisting scene I've ever seen.
Though in general, I agree that it's done for the spectacle of it, and not because it's something that's particularly arousing to the person getting fisted.
|
04-13-13 12:26pm
|
Reply
27
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
The point of taking photos doesn't really have to be to allow collectors to download them. If nothing else, photos make for much better promotional material than videos. They're much easier to distribute freely (a fact that pirates take advantage of), and you can use them as part of your website design (especially on the front page of the site). Not to mention the ability to use them to make advertisements with (from banner ads to preview pages). The truth is that the majority of video sites that make their own exclusive content (as opposed to licensing it from someone else) shoot at least some photos to go along with it, and there's a reason for that.
|
04-13-13 11:57am
|
Reply
28
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Makes perfect sense once you realize it's a self-fulfilling prophecy/feedback loop. The policy on photos means that people who prefer photos to videos aren't going to join in the first place, so when they survey their members on whether they prefer videos or photos, their members are going to overwhelming say videos.
Basically, it sounds like the photos on the site are more about people who like just looking at them as opposed to people who like collecting them. I don't really see a problem with that as long as you can know that ahead of time.
|
04-13-13 01:30am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yeah, the tech is there at this point, it's just that no one has fully put it all together, and then there's the price factor.
|
04-08-13 04:30pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Don't we all?
|
04-08-13 04:29pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Only if you tell it to.
|
04-08-13 06:42am
|
Reply
32
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
They do have 1080 on every video that's in HD. The bitrate isn't as high as some people would like, but it's there.
Other than that, I do agree with your basic points.
|
04-07-13 11:06pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree with this. It's possible (but pretty expensive) to put, for lack of a better word, moving fuckable parts on a life-sized doll right now. The only thing it's missing is some kind of AI/programming to control the parts (which shouldn't take long). Once someone does that, it's just about the cost coming down.
|
04-07-13 10:27pm
|
Reply
34
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
Belthazar's Reply
Yeah, it looks like they've lowered it again to the point of being worthless now. Which sucks.
|
04-07-13 09:34pm
|
Reply
35
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
If the special were a few dollars lower, I'd actually consider it anyway. Mainly because there not being any download links doesn't mean you can't actually download scenes from the site, if you're resourceful enough.
|
04-01-13 05:52pm
|
Comment
36
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
03-30-13 11:39pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
37
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
I'm looking at it right now (I can still log in from an old membership) and I see two videos every day for the past week.
And to answer your question: I think when reviewing a site you should include all scenes that the site gives you access to.
|
03-24-13 10:13am
|
Reply
38
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Review
I believe that the two videos a day include the solo masturbation videos. If you're only counting boy/girl and girl/girl videos, then it would be 2 a week (one b/g for Twisty's Hard, one g/g for When Girls Play).
|
03-24-13 09:44am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
There are some girls that I just like to hear talk and have their brain picked. For the ones that don't, there's always fast forwarding.
|
03-22-13 08:05pm
|
Reply
40
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I feel like it's just the nature of the people that join sites like these and like them. They want to "please their mistress" so much that they are more than eager to do things like this for them.
|
03-22-13 10:47am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with the people that have said an attractive woman is an attractive woman even when she's pregnant. It doesn't specifically turn me on, though.
|
03-21-13 09:40pm
|
Reply
42
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Is it just me, or does this seem to be more common with dominatrix sites than any other type of site?
|
03-21-13 09:38pm
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I basically only join large sites, so it becomes nearly impossible to download everything there. So I focus on the good stuff, and then work my way outward/downward.
|
03-19-13 03:16pm
|
Reply
44
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
Which is why I would love to find a way to access their video content without joining their site. The idea that this place might have been that, even if I had to pay an extra fee on top of the normal membership, might have been enough to get me to join.
|
03-16-13 09:36pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably around a quarter to a half, varying dependent on whether I have actual work to do on the internet.
|
03-16-13 08:59am
|
Reply
46
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
Thank you, that is what I was looking for. I might just join here instead of my next VB subscription, just to take a look at it.
|
03-16-13 08:58am
|
Reply
47
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
The reason I'm asking is because I'm already a member at Videobox, and I wanted to know if VideosZ is worth a subscription in addition to/following that. I'm intrigued by the access to Hustler (which is a studio whose content I want, but whose website I do not want to join), but the idea of it being behind a three month paywall when I only wanted to join for a month is disappointing.
|
03-15-13 08:39pm
|
Reply
48
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Review
How much content would you say is here that isn't on Videobox?
|
03-15-13 03:53pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
French accents get me every single solitary time.
|
03-15-13 03:51pm
|
Reply
50
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think that when they decide to license, they probably don't get to choose whether or not they get HD, whomever they're licensing it from does. For example, it looks like they've just started uploading scenes from Teen Fidelity/Porn Fidelity, but all those scenes are in standard definition, even though at least some of them are available in high definition on that site.
|
03-09-13 11:19pm
|
