| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yeah, I've never really understood why people tend to be so against change, it really doesn't make sense. But that's how it is sometimes. I hope people get over it, because I do like Naughty America as a company and would love to see them shake things up a bit. And I guess I meant to imply that mainstream porn is filled with women with fake breasts (i.e. the Vivid/Wicked/Digital Playground/Adam & Eve/etc. of the world). But there are a bunch of websites out there that aren't nearly as bad. But let me put it to you this way, Brazzers has 9 different sites dedicated exclusively to large breasts (and only one of them cares whether they are real or not):
Big Tits at Work
Big Tits at School
Big Tits in Sports
Baby's Got Boobs
Mommy's Got Boobs
Racks and Blacks
Bustyz
Busty and Real
Jug Fuckers
Now I will admit that some of those sites probably don't update anymore, but that's still more than a third of their network dedicated to large breasts.
|
05-13-09 10:17pm
|
Reply
252
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Honestly, I love Naughty America, but I completely agree that the biggest mark against it is that, in the end, it is the same scene over and over again with different actors and slightly different scenarios. But the problem becomes that when you get as big as they have probably gotten, your members come to expect a certain type of scene, and when you start to deviate from it, they get upset. And they get vocal about it. I can bring up two examples that apply to Naughty America in particular.
The first is when they brought out Naughty Flipside in 2007, which I would argue was their attempt at making alt-type porn. They scenes were, at worst about the same quality as their other scenes, but the members never got into it, and site only lasted for about 3 months before they stopped updating it.
The second is a lot more recent. Around late October/early November, they started to release scenes shot with a fixed-position camera (i.e. home-video style). I was a member on their forums at that point, and there was a huge outrage about it. People saying that this wasn't what they signed up for, that they hated it, etc. If you look at the reviews for those scenes, they say the same thing. So they tried to compromise by only putting the home video styles scenes on their own special category (the general Naughty America site) and having those scenes come out in addition to their normal 13 scenes shot regular style per week. But people still didn't stop complaining. They didn't stop until the producers agreed to stop doing it altogether.
So, in the end, while complacency is probably a large part of it, I think part of the problem is that the larger sites have become so big that they can't really experiment or change things up on a larger scale, because they get a backlash from the members who like things the way they are (and let's be honest, if they didn't like things the way they were, they wouldn't be members in the first place). Smaller sites have the ability to be more nimble, but when it comes to large networks, it's almost a "Damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation.
P.S. - Also, give me a site that isn't specifically small or naturally breasted specific that isn't drowning in fake breasts. The entire porn world is drowning in fake breasts, this is just a microcosm of that. And at least they aren't as bad about it as Brazzers.
|
05-13-09 12:49pm
|
Reply
253
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Did you try the Ass Masterpiece scenes? I'm pretty sure each one of those has a tease before the start of the actual fucking/sucking (they may not all have full nudity, though). As for everything else, it's hard to do a tease when you're trying to do scenario-based porn. What pseudo-real life sexual situations can you think of where the girl stands there naked for a minute or two before getting down to business?
|
05-08-09 12:44am
|
Reply
254
|
Naughty America Mobile
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
That sucks. That's one thing I'm gonna have to remember when people ask me about switching from Android to Apple, so thanks for telling me.
|
10-19-12 05:36pm
|
Reply
255
|
Naughty America Mobile
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Technically, the site isn't stream-only, even though all the downloads say "stream". It's just that because it's a phone, when you click the mp4 link it automatically tries to stream it instead of downloading it. If you long-press the link from your regular browser, you should be given the opportunity to download it. At least that works on Android.
|
10-18-12 10:49pm
|
Reply
256
|
Naughty America Mobile
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
Last time I checked, not all the scenes were available on the mobile site. Pretty much all the newer ones are, but the older ones are hit-or-miss because the videos weren't made in a format that plays on most cell phones.
|
10-12-12 02:27pm
|
Reply
257
|
Naughty Bookworms
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I'd start with the shows featuring Allie Haze and Monique Alexander, as they seemed to be pretty receptive to our efforts. It's gonna take me a while to remember any specific ones to recommend.
|
10-24-12 11:25am
|
Reply
258
|
Naughty Bookworms
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I loved those shows, and I was one of the reasons they deviated from the "formula". Me and a few other people would basically make it our job to engage the models and have them do anything other than sexual things (until near the end of the show, so people could get their payoffs). When it worked well, it was some of the most fun I've had on the internet.
|
10-21-12 05:13pm
|
Reply
259
|
Naughty Bookworms
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
You're right, they stopped doing their specific ones a while ago.
|
10-20-12 09:36am
|
Reply
260
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
The sad part about all of this is that New Sensations actually does still shoot good content nowadays (if you get the chance, check out their newest DVDs), but they website is just so out of date that it's ridiculous.
|
07-23-13 07:34pm
|
Reply
261
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Reply
Yup. No one has said how long the contract is supposed to last, but I believe it's been in effect for about the past 3-4 months. She still has scenes she shot for other companies that haven't been released yet, though, so you'll probably still see some of her in other places for the next few months.
|
12-29-12 12:27am
|
Reply
262
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
Good review. To add a little bit of info, Holly Michaels is signed an exclusive contract with them a few months ago, which is why she appears so much on the site.
|
12-28-12 07:52pm
|
Comment
263
|
Perfect Fucking Strangers
(0)
|
|
08-16-12 02:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
264
|
Pornographic Love
(0)
|
|
06-04-12 09:18am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
265
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I agree that Abella Anderson is sexy, but I'm pretty sure she's not natural.
|
06-29-11 06:39am
|
Reply
266
|
Reality Junkies
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
This was a site that was on my list of future sites to join, but I'm seriously going to have to rethink that now. Thanks for the heads up.
|
07-13-12 05:49pm
|
Reply
267
|
Reality Junkies
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Good review. I was already interested in joining this site at some point, but your review has convinced me to make this the next site I join (especially with the discount they offer).
|
05-01-12 09:27am
|
Reply
268
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I wouldn't go that far (just unsubscribing and not saying anything). I'd find other ways to say what I wanted to that aren't the comments section. Maybe to a general customer service e-mail account, or saying something to them on Twitter. I'd definitely find a way to let them know that I think their content is slipping, but I think you're right that the comment section might not be the best place to do it, specifically when it refers to the talent in the scene.
|
04-20-13 08:11pm
|
Reply
269
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I joined this site a few months ago for a month (and even wrote a review on it).
As far as comparing the two sites, I think that Reality Kings has more variety (both ethnically with their Round and Brown site, and in the fact that they shoot in Europe, Florida, and California so they have a wider variety of women). But I generally preferred the navigation at Naughty America (I know some people have trouble with it, but if you know that many of the pages are controlled by JavaScript and that the back button will take you to the last page you loaded, and not the last page in the list you were thumbing through, then I find it really easy to get around), and I don't really like the pseudo-reality setups that many of RKs sites use. So I would say that I prefer Naughty America, but not by that much.
|
11-21-12 06:01pm
|
Reply
270
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
That would explain why I never hit it the day I downloaded about 20GB. It'd be interesting to see what the actual limit is (70GB per week? 50GB every 5 days?), but not interesting enough to make me pay for a membership to find out.
|
11-19-12 04:50pm
|
Reply
271
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Unlike the other two people, I downloaded about 20GB in a day, and was never got any warnings about hitting any limit or was slowed down at all. And as you can tell from my comment, I'm more recent than the other two. And a reply to my comment says that they didn't hit it until 60GB.
|
09-21-12 01:42pm
|
Reply
272
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Moleman2040's Comment
I know good and well that I went above 12 GB in a period of about 6 hours and never got cut off, so this is just really weird. I'm not sure I've ever seen a site impose a download limit on some members but not on others.
|
07-27-12 06:41pm
|
Reply
273
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
noche's Reply
I feel like 60gb is a pretty fair cap, to be honest. That's a ton of data to be moving in a small amount of time. 99% of people are probably never gonna hit that.
|
06-08-12 08:50pm
|
Review
274
|
Reality Kings
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Very good streaming media player (time-coded screen shots, jump-to links)
-Huge library of 6K+ videos
-Lots of variety in content |
| Cons: |
-Huge HD file sizes, and not enough download options (1080p mp4, SD mp4, SD wmv, mobile) for even newer videos
-Confusing site navigation
-Bad actor tagging/actor pages
-Small photo sizes (600px by 900px)
-Page and site layout seems dated |
| Bottom Line: |
The first thing that I noticed when I joined the site was the breadth of videos that they had. Not just the amount (the over 6000 basically exclusive videos is a large number and impressive in and of itself), but the variety of the selection as well. If you like European women, there's two sites dedicated to that. Black or Latina women? Each get their own site. Teens get two sites. MILFs get a couple as well. Big asses? There's a site for that. Lesbian sex? That too. Basically, as long as your taste runs somewhere along the general line that is mainstream porn, there's gonna be something here for you, and not just a small amount of it either.
Which brings me to my first negative point: Finding that content is not as easy as it should be. When I first join a site, the first thing I do is look for videos of actresses that I know I already like. When you do that here, there's no guarantee that all you'll actually find all the scenes that feature that actress. The first problem is that, for two of the sub-sites in particular, the tags are inconsistent and occasionally incomplete. One of the sites' (In the VIP) issue is that they basically tag every girl in the scene, even if they aren't the girls having intercourse in that scene. The other (Money Talks) only tags the last girl in the scene, even though there is usually more than one part of the scene that contains sex, so you have to hope that someone in the comments below the scene can identify the other girls so you can find them. Even beyond that issue, when you try going to the individual actor pages, it will only show you the most recent 9 scenes. There's a link on the bottom of the actor page if they have more than 9 scenes to help you find the rest, but my first couple times that happened I kinda glanced over that link and didn't realize it was there. It just all seemed a little confusing, and there has to be a way they can make it easier.
That confusion also extends to the general layout of the site. The whole thing looks like it was developed around 2007-2008 and hasn't been updated since, which is ages in internet time. This seems most evident on the page for each scene, which are tab based and reload each time you click on one of the tabs. This would make sense in the past, when not everyone had high-speed internet and you just wanted to get the entire page loaded as fast as possible, but nowadays everything should should all be loaded on one page, and I shouldn't, for example, have to leave the streaming video page just to go back to the preview page to look for other scenes featuring the same actress. Another small issue I have is with the way the top layout bar works. When you click the part that says home from watching a scene, it only takes you back to the home page of the sub-site that that scene is from, not back to the main homepage, which you get to by clicking the logo instead. Clicking the favorites tab works the same way. This was something else that I didn't notice at first and took me a while to figure out, when it really didn't need to.
Once you find a scene you want to watch, there are many ways to enjoy it. The best way is the site's Flash video player, which is pretty much the best I've seen on any website. At the bottom of the video is a scrolling group of thumbnails, and clicking any of these takes you to the specific point in the video that that thumbnails is from. Right above that are links that take you to specific sex acts in the scene (blowjob, cunnilingus, etc). Both of these make it incredibly easy and fast to get to exactly the part that you want to see. The download options are relatively standard, but the 1080p sizes are huge (2-4 GB per scene), and the next option down is only slightly better than SD. They would benefit greatly from having a 720p option like many other sites do, that would be a nice balance between size and video quality. There's also a picture gallery, but the pictures are pretty small (900x600), and many times the whole set seems more like screenshots than actual photographs.
Even though this was my first time joining the site, Reality Kings content is some of the earliest internet porn that I ever watched, as I first obtained a high speed connection in 2001 and proceeded to download nearly everything I could get my hands on. A lot has changed about porn and the internet and internet porn in the past decade, and a lot of companies have come and gone, but they have stuck around and blossomed. After having joined, while I think the content is still generally top class, the website itself is falling behind the times a bit, and in need of an update.
Also, while there has been talk in other reviews and comments of a download limit, I downloaded about 16GB worth of video over the course of about 2-3 hours and was never cut off from browsing or downloading. |
|
04-23-12 02:06am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
275
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
|
04-22-12 01:18am
Replies (3)
|
|
