| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
51
|
Girls Got Cream
(0)
|
|
11-30-09 09:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
52
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
CONS CONTINUED:
-There are many key terms for searching, but female orgasms is not one of them. I've asked Victor to add it and he said he's working on it.
-Most of the girls are not as young and gorgeous as at other sites. That would be OK if they were genuinely aroused, but most aren't. In some early videos, they have matted disgusting hair.
-Many of the recent videos are split into intro, main, and aftermath. I don't see the point of having to download 3 pieces when the intro and aftermath are very short, yet add significantly to the main video.
-Navigation problem: when you find a video by actress or title, you can't find out the action keywords, or what year it was made.
-They limit you to 5 gigs/day. Once, this caused me to be blocked for 24 hours, but for the most part, it isn't a problem.
-Although less than half of the videos have anal (which I could do without), Victor seems to love it and makes a big deal of a girl's first anal, also her first facial. I dislike the emphasis that this site puts on those, but YMMV. None of the anal was with condom, which makes it worse.
-In the early years, still photos appear to have been taken during video shoots, not separate modeling sessions. Generally, I find them much less erotic than those at other sites where there are separate sessions optimized for still shots. Also, there are typically just a handful of full body shots, then dozens and dozens of blowjob and facial shots. Not to my taste at all. There are way too many closeups in the still photos. Even when I find the actress quite attractive, in the early years of the site, usually I can't find a single still that I want to keep! In the last few years, stills went to 1600 pixels, and many are of better quality and some are more erotic. Still not as good as the stills on many sites.
|
11-20-09 03:21pm
|
Comment
53
|
Young Models
(0)
|
|
10-02-09 09:54am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
54
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
khf2004's Reply
Dear khf2004, I cannot find the message you sent me via PU. I don't know where to look for it, I guess. However, I did receive your message at my yahoo email, and replied there. Thanks for dealing with this issue!
|
09-29-09 03:04pm
|
Comment
55
|
Young Models
(0)
|
|
09-28-09 08:05pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
56
|
Young Libertines
(0)
|
|
09-28-09 07:51pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
57
|
Young Libertines
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
Cons continued because I ran out of room:
- Infrequent updates, about one/week while I was watching.
- The “top visited” and “top rated” lists are relatively useless: they list only 10 each (a mix of photosets and videos, so less than 10 in each category), and the number of ratings are low.
- Dialog is in Russian(?), and there are no subtitles.
(END OF CONS)
|
09-28-09 07:44pm
|
Comment
58
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
|
09-28-09 06:26pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
59
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I agree that it must be hard for a young woman to get aroused in front of a camera crew, lights, etc. especially if the stunt cock isn't attractive to her, and in any case is rushed and mechanical. I would be interested if you list specific videos or actresses representing "the most aroused females in porn ... in solo or girl/girl sets". Then I could take a look without sifting thru hundreds where they aren't aroused! I have been providing such lists in my reviews and I hope others will begin doing the same. Anyway, there are plenty of aroused young females in porn, but you have to look hard sometimes to find them. Again, see the lists in my reviews for some winners. As for your Viv Thomas tip, too bad my TeenDreams subscription has already expired.
|
08-28-09 12:50pm
|
Comment
60
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
|
08-24-09 07:19pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
61
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
My review, continued:
In valerie225-bg-2, stunt cock Jimmy (in about 80% of the videos) actually has some cuddly foreplay with her -- almost unheard of. In valerie268-bg-1, she gets going in CG and doesn't want to stop when Jimmy whispers "get off", so she makes Jimmy cum right after pulling out, while they're still in CG position. Wow, an orgasm from real arousal, not a forced facial! Hooray, Valerie!
leighlani-bg-1 and leighlani-bg-2 are outstanding. She has many, intense orgasms. She is a redhead, and her orgasmic flush is wonderful to behold, encompassing not only her chest but even around her upper back. Although both videos end in a facial, the guys (different in each vid) seem to cum in response to her final orgasm, not by jacking forever.
veronika-bg110 is a curvy babe who cums often and hard and long with a guy who is not a regular stunt cock. She is very responsive, and at one point when working up to yet another cum, and he stops, she says "I want to fuck you! What are you doing?"
sedona299-bg-1 seems young and innocent but overcome by her hornyness, just the way I like it. Many intense orgasms.
andi-bg-1 seems a real couple, and she cums hard and often. There is real affection and intimacy. Very nice despite a weak facial at the end.
jaelyn-bg-1 cums quickly but very intensely, and often. Guy cums over her navel right after pulling out, nice. Unfortunately the cameraman zooms in during her orgasm so we never get a clear view of her lovely shaking and writhing body during orgasm. Shame on him!
morgan285-bg-1 is a young, really hot, horny, innocent-seeming girl who says she has never done a BJ or had a guy cum in her mouth. Its likely an act, but well enough done that I found it all the more arousing.
arissa-bg-1 is a fun girl who doesn't seem jaded like most of the pro-ams on KarupsHA. She is gorgeous, thin, with a lovely tan. Although stunt cock Jimmy is all business as usual, Arissa's personality makes it fun. She cums a few times, and manages to get Jimmy to cum over her navel right after he pulls out, instead of jacking off on her face.
brandi2-bg-1 is petite, skinny, and maybe a little shy with a wonderful "I can't help cumming if you fuck me" vibe. She succeeds in making Jimmy cum over her butt, instead of a facial.
veronica248-bg-1 is a skinny natural babe with a buff guy who pulls out while he's coming.
veronique-bg-1 is a 19 year old, tiny, dark-skinned lovely who cums aplenty.
Others that are very good: ginger3-bg-6, maxine2-bg-1, sabrina3-bg-1.
I watched very few of the solo scenes, tho there are many more of those than of the boy-girl scenes. So if some PU members have examples of the best ones, please share a list! Andi-solo-1 has some lovely pussy contractions with a pocket rocket vibrator -- of course the damn cameraman moves away from her pussy, to her face, during her orgasm! Nevertheless, these were the best pussy contractions I found here (for better, InTheCrack or early BubbleGirls).
|
08-23-09 06:55pm
|
Reply
62
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
This is a continuation of the Cons part of my review that didn't fit in the box:
- Mediocre videography. Nearly all spend way too much time in closeups, so you can't see the lovely writhing body, and some are quite jerky (handheld camera with incompetent operator). The site policy seems to require that CG be recorded only from the back/butt of the girl, too often zoomed in. Many nice orgasms are lost with the girl facing away at the wall, with us seeing only her butt up close. Almost never do you see the girl from the front in CG. Worse, the girls are directed to twist around so the camera (behind them) can see their face. So they're not looking at their partner! Whoever thought this is a comfortable, much less erotic position for the girl? In mindy4-bg-1-HD, Mindy shudders wonderfully when she cums. However, in part D, the cameraperson zooms into her face three times, so we miss the wonderful pelvic shuddering, and instead see a blurry face (it was clearer with the whole body shot), sometimes with the wall in focus behind the face. Yikes, what was the cameraperson thinking?
- The cameraman likes to zoom in on the girl's face during orgasm. Now, when she has great pussy twitches all along (sometimes he lets us see a few of them), I find it incredibly frustrating to miss seeing the pussy twitching during the orgasm. Not that the face isn't beautiful during orgasm, but couldn't we please see the twitching pussy occasionally!! Better yet, have a second cameraperson and see both with instant replay! (Nubiles is another site with this problem. I've complained and they seemed to listen but I haven't seen any improvement.)
- Sound is very uneven, barely audible in some vids then breaks your eardrums in the next. Not only is it uneven from one video to another, but also within one video: apparently the microphone is in the camera, so as it gets closer to one person's face you hear them breathing loudly while you can hardly hear what the other person is saying.
|
08-23-09 06:53pm
|
Reply
63
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
I subscribed about a month ago, no problem logging in. I canceled as the end of the month neared, and again, no problem, got a confirmation email about my canceling, and it was easy. No suspicious activity on my credit card, either.
|
08-23-09 06:20pm
|
Comment
64
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
|
08-16-09 08:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
65
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Sounds right -- points taken!
|
07-31-09 04:37pm
|
Reply
66
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes, you warned me, and so did ramscrota. The site seemed so unusual I wanted to see it for myself. Once I get enough points that I can start to trust people, you'll be trusted for sure!
|
07-30-09 05:01pm
|
Reply
67
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I didn't spend much time with the photos, but I think they were pretty good within the philosophy of this site. Long dimension of photos were 800 px (early sets) to 2,000 pixels (recent sets). Photos were well lit, sharp, clear.
|
07-30-09 05:00pm
|
Reply
68
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the quick reply, messmer. Meanwhile, I looked at GOW's B/G trailers, and I love them. So I think I'll give it a go anyway. I assume that ramscrota's problem is a preference for more typical hardcore fastpaced banging, just what I don't like. But maybe ramscrota will comment, I hope.
|
07-28-09 06:19pm
|
Reply
69
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Hey, messmer, I am intrigued by your review of GOW. However, I mostly like b/g scenes, not so much g/g or solo. Ramscrota says "The BG scenes are pathetic". What do you have to say about the BG scenes (knowing my tastes from my profile, and the forum thread "against the grain"). What might be pathetic to some may be just my cup of tea. Thanks!
|
07-28-09 04:57pm
|
|
