Thanks for the review. It reflects a lot of my feelings on he site. First anal quest is definitely the flagship site here and double view doesn't even come close to the quality, however in my opinion the first anal quest site does make it a good deal.
I joined first anal quest a while back and just realized that this site comes as a bonus. I'll probably review it after I watch a few more clips and they update their database a bit more. Right now there are only 30 or so videos and they update about twice a month.
The two camera gimmick is nice and I installed and uninstalled the thing without a problem (no viruses yet :) It's basically a pov and a wide angle shot of the action. Personally I just left it in the wide angle, but it was nice to be able to switch around if I wanted. The whole two angles, means that the videos are larger and for me the streaming was a bit funky (slowed down, sound jumped around nothing too major)
Also don't expect amateur castings like Woodman, these girls have appeared on many other sites and a few of them are even on the FAQ site. There is a very brief interview dubbed in English and then the usual hardcore action, with a lot of anal.
Overall a decent site, but FAQ is definitely the site you should check out first. Together they are a great deal for fans of anal sex (you also get some DVD scenes so triple the fun :)
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- About 190 videos available as WMV (320x 240) or quicktime. A lot of the more recent scenes also available in HD (1200x 720).Very fast download speeds.
- Around 270 photo galleries with more or less 400 images each (1024px × 682px). No zipped files though.
- Good looking model, with a wonderful smile. She also has a bunch of different hairstyles and dresses up a lot. However, her back kinda put me off (her spine is very pronounced and looks kinda reptile like in some videos... only a few though)
- A decent variation of dildo, vibrator, strip and some photoshoot videos. But no sex scenes and no anal that I could find.
- Access to a whole network of 7 other solo girls and around 50 other websites.
- Really good HD in the more recent videos. The content is very good in terms of quality.
Cons:
- Although the site is a solo model type it doesn't really connect the girl to the audience. No forums or chats, no special request videos section or web-chats. It's good content but why not go the extra step and make it an interactive experience?
- It's only one model who doesn't have sex or do anal. How often can you see the same girl play with herself? On the positive side the network access compensates more than enough, offering access to many sites.
- Lack of a search function is bothersome at times. A category search (strip, play with self, roleplay, etc. ) would have helped.
- An update schedule would have also been nice.
- Many of the videos are cut after 12 minutes in several parts. This can get frustrating as you have to download 3 videos for one scene.
- Interviews with the girl would have made the site much better, helped us connect to her.
Bottom Line:
Overall the site is nice for a solo girl site. There is a lot of content and the model looks beautiful, especially with pony tails.
My main problem was that the site doesn't try to establish a connection between the users and the model. Solo sites work well when the girl responds to users, does videos that they ask her to do, chats with them and so on. Even something as simple as adding a brief interview at the beginning of each video would help. Having her say a few silly things about her week would make people feel closer and enjoy the site more, IMO.
Also in many of the videos the soundtrack covers her noises or she doesn't make any...this results in a somewhat awkward video. More natural sounds, maybe let her play with herself until she cums and record that...I think it would make for a much better site.
Finally, I feel like the girl used to look a lot better in the older videos, which is a shame since the HD is so crisp and nice, but this could be just me so no points off for that.
What I am taking points off are the lack of a search function, no photo zipped archives, no easy to access update schedule...small things that gather up to make for a slightly less than satisfying experience.
What brings the grade back up is that cute smile Kelly has in some videos, the slight awkwardness when she fingers herself and those huge, gorgeous eyes. A great model and a site that could be improved.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 95 videos with regular updates two or three times a month.
- Streaming in multiple formats, always very fast for me, even when not on the best internet.
- Well filmed scenes with a good mix of wide shots and closeup's on the girl's faces (especially when they first move into anal sex or if they really get into it)
- Good light and a nice mix of positions, action and location. Some scenes only have anal sex, some decently long shots of pussy eating and rimming, some scenes are filmed on the floor, some have couches or beds... you get the idea it's a pretty varied mix.
- Modern web page design, you can filter scenes by quite a few categories, the videos thumbnails auto play a preview when you hover over them, responsive mobile design. Everything you'd want in a modern site. The only big downside is that the model page is decent but shows models on the whole network, you can't see all the models that are on just on Elegant Anal
- Good looking models.
- Great photos.
Cons:
- Most of the models are pretty well known European actresses (Linda Sweet, Gina Gerson, Ivana Sugar) Not necessarily a con, but they have a certain look.
- While there is a nice variety in the video premise and location I believe all scenes are boy-girl. Don't expect gang bangs or threesomes, I didn't even see any toys being used.
- Some scenes are pretty short. The average is around 30-35 minutes, but for example the scene with Foxy Di and Martina Gold are each 19 minutes and there's a handful of other scenes that are around 25 minutes. No bonus behind the scenes footage or interviews or anything like that either.
- Quite a lot of ads, the first page when you log in is an ad you have to close, there are pretty big animated banners at the bottom of each page. Since I only had a streaming subscription I periodically would get a banner asking me to unlock downloads.
Bottom Line:
Let me start off by saying that I got access to this site through a streaming only subscription to babes.com, so I'm not sure how the download options work. It seems like it would be fine as they advertise unlimited downloads, but I can't comment on that. Speaking of streaming, if you're not sure and want to check the site out that's a pretty good option since it gives you access to pretty much everything with the only downside being a pretty big banner that pops up every time I logged in reminding me I should upgrade to download.
That said, the content here is pretty good. The models are really gorgeous and the filming style works pretty well overall. There are a lot of tracking shots, soft light and a nice balance of closeups and wide shots. I am also really impressed with the variation in locations, I don't believe any of the scenes are filmed in the same room. If you ever wanted to see anal sex scenes in a restaurant, barbershop, sauna or in a pool this site has you covered.
As far as action there's a decent amount of positions (partially due to the locations), every scene has at least several minutes of anal in a few positions and most also have some oral and vaginal sex. Unfortunately not a lot of ATM (26 scenes are tagged as such) and if they use toys it's very brief (3 scenes are tagged as using toys). There are also a decent amount of scenes that end with an anal creampie or the male model cumming on the girl's ass, which is a nice change compared to the standard facial. Unfortunately it's a bit hard to find these scenes since the tags are not always that accurate.
Another downside for me was that the set up is quickly brushed aside. Most scenes jump to the sex within 2 minutes, and the girls are completely naked within at most 4 minutes, which feels like a wasted opportunity. There are a lot of cute outfits that could be kept on or more slowly stripped off to add to the whole glamour side of the site, especially since a lot of the videos are only 30 minutes.
There is one particular scene with Linda Sweet where she is dressed as a business woman/ FBI agent and she slowly undresses while getting seduced by a con-man, keeping her stocking and garter belt on, it was a very well done scene that used the setup well. I wish there were more scenes in that style, it would have made the site stand out more when compared to Tushy, Hardx, Holed or 21naturals.
At the end of the day, that's probably the biggest downside, while well done there isn't anything that really stands out here. You can get more scenes at any of the sites I mentioned above, the models are pretty well known so you can see them do anal in other places and while there are some good scenes here I don't know if I can recommend it unless you're a big fan of anal glam porn and have seen the stuff other sites have.
I just tried their trial offer for 2 days and have to say I'm somewhat disappointed with some technical issues. First of all the trial only gives you access to streaming videos, but also the site doesn't have several videos they advertise in the join page (or maybe the trial doesn't give you access to them)
Also they will automatically subscribe you to extramoviez, without any warning or option to avoid a membership for them.
The scenes themselves are nice, but the cross-checked sale and the shady advertisement left me with a bad taste.
Not that many videos and they are all very softcore. The photos are better, more of them with images at 1066px × 1600px. However you will rarely see side nipple here... On the positive The girl is cute and she has different outfits for each scene. She also has some very large breasts that kinda kill the whole innocence angle, but I'm sure some people like big boobed teens...
The forums are dead so don't expect interesting conversations here.
The friends section offers a few nude big breasted women, but the other bonuses are more like links to the sign-up page of other sites...
All and all interesting softcore site but there are many, many much better ones.
I am just curious how much of the content contains anal scenes?
I have been looking for a few good clothed sex scenes and this site seems an interesting bonus.
Hmm... it might be one of my privacy settings on Firefox. I'll have to go and look through my add-ons and see if anything is in conflict. Sometimes I get this with sites that host adult content, just on the idea that some people have that porn=viruses.
Either way...any particular reason as to why you were disappointed with this website? The reviews seem pretty positive-ish...
When I tried to visit the site Firefox told me it was a dangerous page and I shouldn't visit it. Was it a fluke or is this site really dangerous in any way?
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Over 12,000 scenes, but I'm gonna hazard and say at least a few thousand of the old ones are not the best quality (480p). That said you still get well over 10,000 scenes.
- A lot of variety in the scenes, there's European pornstars shot by Rocco and Nacho Vidal, there's Le Wood and Manuel Ferrara and the unique style of Mike Adriano. Almost every scene has a different style and even if you don't like one director, there's enough variety to keep things interesting
- Frequent updates and you can even see what scenes are upcoming.
- Navigation is pretty awesome it works well both on phone and on the desktop and it's easy to find particular categories or a particular model.
- Some interesting exclusive features. A while back they did a whole vampire move series (Voracious), recently they released a "documentary" (I am Angela) as well as some more plot heavy movies. It's nothing too crazy and there's still plenty of sex, but still interesting and different.
Cons:
- Most videos are 1080p, I don't believe they offer any 4k videos if that's what you're looking for.
- While zipped photo galleries are available they are not the focus, some scenes don't have any photos of the sex, just glamour shots of the models, some have screen caps and some have only a handful of photos. It depends a lot on the director. I still found plenty of content, just don't expect great pics of every scene.
- Since a lot of content is from certain directors when someone leaves (Mike Adriano recently departed and only updates his own site at True Anal) there are no more updates in that style. Also not all scenes are available on here. Proxy Paige shot a lot of scenes that are not available here, same with Bryan Gozzling... sometimes it can be frustrating wondering if a scene from a certain director will be released here later or if you should join their site as well.
Bottom Line:
The strength of the site is the variety it offers, they hire a lot of different directors and also shoot their own exclusive content so in some ways it almost feels like you have a membership to a dozen sites with a dozen different flavors. Some directors seem focused on finding new talent and shooting intense scenes with them, others focus on all anal scenes and yet others go for fetish shoots. Digging through the archive you are bound to find something interesting from transsexual scenes to BBW to interracial to gang bangs, there's at least a handful of scenes in almost every niche (although sometimes there's only a handful of scenes... so if you're looking for a specific type of scene you might only find a few good matches).
The site also comes up on sale pretty often and I've often gotten a membership for 10 bucks around a holiday before. At that price it's 100% worth it.
All of that said, this site is not necessarily for everyone, they don't have a focus on HD, "passionate" sex in the style of Tushy or 21 natural. The scenes here are a bit more rough (not in a bad way, but don't expect a lot of soft lighting and sensuous action) and some scenes are a bit intense (think gapes and speculums, sloppy BJ's and a lot of ATM). They also don't do a lot of interviews, there are plenty of BTS scenes where they chat with the girls, but don't expect the long interviews from Woodman Casting or Backroom casting couch.
It really comes down to what kind of scenes you prefer, but if nothing else EvilAngel is a good place to check out as a way to try new directors and figure out what kind of scenes you prefer before joining their site directly.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A lot of content and frequent updates (Scenes : 6516, over 1000 DVD's and they seem to update scenes daily, sometimes two scenes in one day)
- Hardcore stuff here, a lot of DP, a lot of anal. Around 2500 anal scenes, Ass to mouth (1513), Around 1000 DP and around 50 double anal... pretty crazy stuff in here. Also a decent amount of tranny stuff and a surprising amount of Asian girls doing anal.
- A lot of good looking girls with a nice a mix of American and Russian cute girls like Chastity Lynn, Proxy Paige, Aspen Richardsen, Isabella Clark, etc. A lot of big name porn stars and several amateurs
- I believe all videos are available in different formats, including mobile video, MP4 and WMV. But only the more recent ones are available in high resolutions (older ones are a most 480p and most new ones are 720p, with some 1080p )
- Almost all scenes have photos, but some have only a handful while others have over 100 images. No zip archives as far as I could tell.
Cons:
- Older content is interesting, but a bit disappointing. I almost wish they'd give you the option to filter it out.
- Model navigation is hard with many models listed incorrectly or under different names. Some links to models don't work and they display the male models along with the female ones. There is a sort function but it doesn't work very well.
- Navigation overall was a bit clunky, with a lot of focus on directors of the DVD or the DVD itself. You can easily find all scenes directed by Mike Adriano, but the related scenes aren't really relevant half the time.
- Some content or very similar is already available on other sites (anal acrobats is a great example, but a lot of girls appear with the exact same male actor on 21sextury for example)
- It's a bit hard to preview scenes, as all you get are some tags which are not always accurate and one preview image. Although they tell you the length and size of the scene.
- Scene quality and content is a bit all over the place.
Bottom Line:
This is another mega site and it feels like one. You get more content than you could surf in years and with very frequent updates you won't get bored soon. There are a lot of girls, some amateurs but a lot of them well known pornstars. The action is more hardcore then the average big network site (I'd say more hardcore then Porn Pros, Reality Kings and even Hustler, to name a few, but right on par with 21 sextury or Teencoreclub)
There are a lot of niches, including some great deep-throat POV scenes, some very nice lesbian scenes and a lot of anal.
However,like most big networks that have been around for a while searching through the older content is a lot like venturing deep into the jungle armed only with a flimsy weed whacker.
The older links, tags and even the content of the video is a bit confusing. You could easily watch a video halfway through before realizing it's a transvestite blow-job scene. The tags say blowjob and anal play but there are no actors listed and the image is too grainy to tell what is going on. Yes, a lot of the older stuff is shot with bad light, poor camerawork and a general feel that reminds one of 80's VHS porn.
Even worse, some of these older DVD's are mixed in with more recent updates, making it hard to mark a point in time past which you should not venture.
That being said the vast majority of scenes are much better quality and the new updated tend to be HD, and very well labeled. Overall I'd say you get maybe 4000 good scenes out of the 6500 available and their number grows every day, with many, many exclusive scenes (although you can get some of them with the bonus evilangel membership on videobox the site still has a decent number of exclusive DVD's)
While this kind of quantity is a great thing, navigating it can still be a bit tricky. The site follows a DVD system more then a streaming scenes or nice websites model. You can easily identify what DVD each scenes belongs to, who directed it and browse other scenes from the DVD, but it's a bit hard to find related anal scenes or all scenes by a particular model that are also DP scenes.
In fact the best way to find content is to select a DVD title (like Buttman adventures or Slurpy Throatsluts to give you a taste of the content available here :) and then navigate the scenes available on that DVD. That is the only way I found to get an animated preview for each scene as well as some quick categories of what the scene will contain.
It seems a bit backwards in the era of streaming internet scenes, but the authors of the site clearly would prefer to just release everything as DVD's.
This also means that each DVD is different in tone. Some feature only American girls and there are pretty standard interviews and English commentary during sex. Some DVD's feature Russian girls who barely talk or are completely quiet. Some scenes are pretty rough with make-up running down the girls faces, while some are softcore or solo masturbation. You have the Anal acrobats fetish DVD's (ever wanted to see milk shot up a girls ass?) and leather face masks, but on the other hand there are some blow job only DVD's that are pretty mainstream and tame.
There are also several DVD's focused on women with strap-ons or shemales fucking guys, around 500 scenes or so, not much but it's a bit strange that they don't really have a separate page for that. Then again, they don't have a separate page for the vintage videos although there are dozens of them.
It's a bit of mish-mash and sometimes it's hard to know what you're looking at. A more in-depth description of the scenes or the ability to preview them from the scene navigation page instead of having to go to the DVD page would have been nice. An easier way to navigate the female models would also have been helpful. Overall I'd have to say that this site could learn a thing or two from 21Sextury when it comes to organizing the website.
I mentioned 21sextury a few times, because the content here reminds me a lot of their stuff. There are anal lesbians, a lot of DP, several of the male and female actors appear in both, I sear even one or two of the outfits appear on both sites (mind you a different scene, but the same studio, same girl same male model) This is of course true of only some of the Russian videos, but it's still a bit strange.
The one area where evilangel is really different is that a lot of the girls look a bit more mature and they like to dress the girls in interesting outfits (Lexi Belle in a bunny costume anyone?)
Overall I'd have to say that the hardcore content, the cute girls and the exclusive scenes make this a must for anyone who likes anal or deep-throating. If you're really on the fence check out what they offer on the Videobox membership deal (I believe it's only 15 bucks on top of the videobox membership, so it's significantly cheaper).
I am just curious ( and maybe you won't be able to help, maybe you will) Do you think it's a better deal to join Evil Angel directly or just join through Videobox? It sounds like they don't have all their content here so maybe it would be easier to just get the DVD's available on Viddeobox...
Anyhow, thanks for the info, will have to get a membership here in some way or another soon.
Indeed thanks for the review. I have been a member of the evil updates over at videobox for a while and was really curious if the site was any different. I didn't join it in the past becuase I assumed it was the same, now that I know that isn't really true I might have to stop by :)
I tried to sign up for this site recently and for some reason it didn't let me do it. The payment page kept going inactive. I tried several browsers and two different connections (work and home) Maybe it's just a fluke, but I thought I should point this out. Looks like a nice site, though.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of a network with a handful of similar sites, most notable Backroom Casting Couch, Net Video Girls and Black Ambush.
- I believe they now have around 750 videos with about one update per week. Keep in mind that number includes 2 videos (POV and tripod) for some older scenes as well as some returning models. They also have a nice upcoming section showing the next 3 models.
- Almost entirely amateur models, the whole point of the site is that these are new girls to the porn industry and while a few of the models showed up on other sites for the most part this is the only place you can see them.
- In my opinion they have mostly really attractive girls but they have a very distinct "girl next door" look. Don’t expect super-glamorous videos of well known models here. Most scenes have an intro interview as well as an exit interview after the scene is over so you get a good sense for the girl’s personality.
- They finally have photos of the sex in archived zipped filed.
Cons:
- Like pretty much all the sites in this network, the web design is dated. It’s pretty much the same design since 2012 or so when I first joined this site. It works alright, and the tags are very useful but things could be improved.
- These are amateur girls and it shows, some scenes are really hot some scenes can be a bit awkward with the girl seeming to zone out a bit. I think overall there’s a lot of quality content here, but don’t expect every scene to be at the same level.
- They try to vary up the action, but ultimately they don’t have the budget of a huge network with a lot of financial backing so expect some less than professional lights and editing and the same male model. I personally don’t think it’s an issue and if anything it ads to the videos, but to each their own.
- I do wish they had better photos, but again, the limits of a small network.
Bottom Line:
I’ve been an on and off member of this site for years. I first joined before they were partnered with Backroom Casting Couch and back in those days I’d have a hard time justifying the membership, but between the other sites in the network and the substantial backlog this has become one of my go to places for scenes of amateur girls.
Speaking of amateur I believe I said something similar in my Backroom Casting Couch review, but don’t expect this site to have the level of production something like Tushy has. The videos are decently edited and there are a lot of side-by side views (one focused on the girl’s face and one focused on the action) but this is not the professional, perfectly lit set of a typical porn. Almost all scenes are filmed in a hotel room (sometimes with oral sex in a car on the way to the hotel, the light is sometimes too artificial and the make-up on the models could be more professionally done, but again, this is a small operation and in some way that is all part of the appeal (at least for me, but I love seeing girls in their own outfits and own makeup).
Also the models are mostly very cute and attractive, but often not in a perfectly polished porn-star way. There is some amount of awkwardness, some scenes that are meant to be anal end up just as anal toy or anal fail videos, there are some awkward interview answers and so on... you get the idea. This is a lot closer to the girl’s real personality than most porn sites get for the better or worse.
Most scenes are boy-girl but they have diversified the videos a bit with around 50 or so threesome scenes and around 150 anal scenes. Most scenes include around 10-20 minutes of interview, a scene of the girl dressing or showering (some of the older scenes even show the girls getting ready to do an enema) and an exit interview. Most videos are around the hour mark, which for me is a bonus, but could easily become too much if you don’t care about the model.
So all of that said, it ultimately comes down to what kind of porn do you prefer. I’ll keep my subscriptions to the big networks, but when I’m tired of seeing the same familiar models (believe it or not sometimes I don't want to see Mick Blue paired with Zoey Monroe again) I like to jump to this network and see some unknown girl laugh at how big the sex toys are or share some embarrassing story about when they first tried anal. It's a nice change of pace and while not every update here is for me, every time I subscribe I grab at least 20-30 scenes that make it into my permanent collection.
I’d also like to note that some of the threesome scenes they got in 2018 are outstanding, well worth the money (Paige and Elena have a lot of chemistry as do Naomi and Bonnie). I hope they continue to do more of these in the future.
Bacroomcastingcouch is now available as a bonus if you join exploited college girls.
Not sure if you get ECC as a bonus for joining BCC but either way this is great news. These two sites go together like peanut butter and jelly, and it's awesome to see this package deal.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Kinda hard to tell how many models they have but by my calculation it should be close to 200.
- Almost all of the girls were new to me and they looked like actual amateurs (or at least not the seasoned porn stars we get on many other sites)
- The whole angle of the site is similar to backroomcastingcouch, but a bit more focused on getting the girl made-up, getting her in sexy outfits and convincing her to do DP or Anal. (Several of the girls have more than one scene. A hardcore initiation video and a anal or DP shot)
- Videos are available in several formats (most recent ones seem to be around 640x340 WMV, while older are 480x360 MPG) Videos run very long, several at 1 hour or so with interviews as well as some behind the scene stuff (make-up, different outfits etc.).
- Images available for almost all scenes as zip (1200x1600)
- A lot of very very cute models who are nervous and seem extremely genuine.
- Weekly updates
Cons:
- More navigation options are necessary. Right now you can navigate the scenes by update date or by model, no way to find all DP scenes, or all Anal, or all POV. No search function, very basic design.
- The site didn't let me download more than 2 scenes at once, it didn't even let me navigate the site while the downloads were going on.
- The bonus sites are some strange streaming only sites that required me to install a strange plug-in.
- A lot of the older videos have really bad lighting/ camerawork. I remember one particular scene where the girl's skin looks yellow and for several shots you get a giant lense-flare.
- Older scenes offer a POV and a third person camera view, while newer stuff only seems to have one camera angle, although there are multiple cameras around.
- The descriptions of the scenes are very detailed, but rather useless as they don't have a quick category break-down.
- There is a lot of talking in the videos which might put some people off.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site after enjoying Backroomcastingcouch on and off for about a year and have to say that this site is very similar, even sharing some of the models. In case you're not familiar with this type of site, they focus on "real" girls doing a porn scene for their first time. The scenes are filmed by one or two guys with handheld cameras or fixed tripods, start with an interview, and go into pretty rough sex (they have several anal scenes, the girls give rim-jobs to the guy, there is some deepthroat and pretty good facials).
As far as I could tell with one or two exceptions all the models are new-comers to the scene and exclusive. (they have Lexi belle and Nicole ray, but mostly you get some very cute looking amateurs).
As any amateur site some girls are really into the sex and are freaky, while some just giggle or talk non stop, while looking extremely nervous. You get several scenes with awkward "stop, I can't do that" or strange moans. Also, while the girls are very cute for the most part, they are not perfect models. You get to see a bit of a fat roll, or some stretch marks on their breasts. If you're a fan of "real" women as opposed to the standard porn-star look this can be great, otherwise it can be a bit of a let down. Just don't expect the airbrushed look of hustler or playboy.
Several scenes have the girls change into more sexy outfits from their regular clothes, or take breaks in between different sex acts, so there is a bit of lack of continuity (I remember one scene where the girl blows a guy in the back seat of a car, then dresses up in a cute school-girl outfit and has regular sex with him... it was rather strange to see them go from a BJ to striping, back to a BJ, but on the other hand it keeps the content varied and interesting.)
Also during most scenes the guy talks to the girl almost the entire shoot, asking her if she ever went so deep on someone's cock or if she ever had her vagina spread open by such a huge dildo or other standard porn conversation along those lines. Depending on the girl and how into it she is this can make the scene a lot better (I remember one girl that to her surprise really enjoys having a dildo in her ass and is extremely cute as she tries to describe the sensation)
Then again, if you prefer your porn silent this will be yet another let down.
For me the small mistakes as well as the awkwardness of most girls made the site feel fresh and interesting, but I can easily see how some might find it frustrating. It really depends on what you want from your porn.
If you enjoy amateur porn and like behind the stage stuff you should really like this site, but if you want a more mainstream porn experience there are many other networks that offer better value. If you are unsure if you want to be a member of this site or not I recommend checking out Backroomcastingcouch since I feel that site is more mainstream, but very similar.
Two of the biggest differences from Backroomcastingcouch is that this site focuses more on toys and for many scenes you can get a separate POV or third person shoot of the action.
Also I'd say that this site has more younger looking models while casting couch has a lot of varied models. Either way both are good if you want more realistic porn.
Now that I discussed the content a bit, I'd like to mention some of the negative stuff. The download limit of only two videos at once was really disappointing, and the fact that older scenes are really poor quality is really a shame. I'd say that basically maybe a bit over half the scenes are worth downloading since everything older is shot in poor video quality and has strange color issues.
The bonuses for the site are a joke (they mention 23 sites, but they are streaming only, non exclusive stuff that is really not worth your time) If they would add Backroomcastingcouch as a bonus site this would be an epic network, as it stands though it is a bit pricey for a singe site.
Navigation has to improve. Right now this is one of the most basic sites I've seen out there. No search features, no real way to tell when the older scenes were updated, the model index is very basic, and there is a different page layout for the older stuff. Not very good thumbnail previews and no streaming.
Finally, the images are also a joke, most of them rather poor quality and several not even showing the sex scenes. This is a video centric site and it really feels like one.
There are other minor issues, for example the main male model always blurs his face which can cover up some of the action if he's giving head or using a toy on the girl, he always holds a camera for the POV scene and that can get in the way sometimes.
Overall the site is good, very good if you like this type of amateur content. For someone like me this was a great find and along with Backroom castingcouch one of my favorite places for amateur porn. If they get a face lift this is a 90 instead of an 89.
I really like the feel of this site, but does anyone know if it comes along with a subscription to back room castings? I would love to get those two for the price of one, yet no one is really clear about what your subscription includes.
Thanks for the review. I've been looking at this site for about a week (looking for exploited college girls and ended up here :)
Anyhow, my question was: is there any anal? And does the girl talk during sex at all? That is a huge turn on for me and almost no sites have it.
Very nice videos. Not as much exploitation as I would have liked/expected mostly only oral and vaginal sex. Also some girls were old timers in the porn world (Alie Sin) but overall a good buy for anyone who is a fan of teen porn. A bunch of great scenes with very cute models. I love the gonzo style...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 171 scenes about half of them in relatively small mpeg resolutions (300x something) and about half in several high definition formats (640x480, 720x480,1280x720 1920x1080) Also the download speeds are ridiculous two 1280 movies at over 1 gb each were down in about half an hour.
- each scene has photos at 1440px × 960px. Zipped archives are available.
- a lot of amateur looking girls (some cuter than others) and some real hotties like Amai Liu, Faye Runaway and Gina Lyn
- easy browsing, although a better search function would have been nice.
- really, really hardcore stuff. Deepthroating, a lot of anal and in the newer videos...a lot and I mean a lot of abuse.
Cons:
- some of the girls are hotter than others and since they are theoretically amateurs you have everything from a goth chick with a pentagram tattooed on her back to a deaf girl and some chicks that should really not be in porn...I guess the site wins in the variety section.
- many of the more recent scenes are way to abusive. I mean I'm okay with anal sex, choking, even the spitting in the girls face (I have no clue who get's off to that but whatever...) Yet seeing some girls cry and beg the cameraman to do something else besides anal, or seeing a girl scream for them to turn off the camera...half the videos made me feel sorry for the girl (especially the new ones) You can really see that these girls signed up for more than they can handle and if that turns you on fine, for me it was a turn-off.
- the racial slurs were too much for me to handle. In Amai Liu's scene they keep making "sucky sucky" and "love me long time" jokes over and over again. NOT FUNNY!
Bottom Line:
I am really trying to be objective in my review. This site offended me, (every girl is insulted and not even cleverly. The camera man just calls them whores and hillbillies and makes fun of their heritage in a pointlessly mean way.) but I guess some people will like it so I'll try to be objective.
This is one of the most abusive sites out there (even compared to Anal Acrobats and Buttman and Teach my Ass). In the earlier scenes the girls are cum covered but they look like they had some fun. In the more recent videos in the best case scenario the girl looks like she's thinking "Money, just hold out and get the money." In the worst case the girl runs away or she starts crying and bargaining with the cameraman. I guess if very rough sex is your fantasy this site is awesome. For me, especially after seeing nublies where the girls are treated like gorgeous special beings, this site was very depressing. Especially brutal was the scene where the girl has anal sex and collapses, but the guy pulls her back up onto his cock. Depressing...
On the positive side, the quality of the videos, the download speeds and the network content is good. For 20 bucks through PU this is a very good deal. But be warned if you don't want to see extreme porn don't go here.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
