Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 270 scenes with updates every 2-4 days (updates are not dated, but you can see when they were uploaded on the forums)
- Videos are available for download in a few resolutions (up to 4k on the more recent ones) No photos unfortunately.
- Most videos are pretty long, I'd say the average is around 1 hour with several longer than that. Often the scenes start with Woodman and the girl having sex and progress to a threesome with other male performers.
- I believe pretty much every scene has anal sex and rough action with deep-throating and slapping. The difference compared to some other Russian themed anal sites is that in most scenes the girls seem to really get into it and go along very enthusiastically. There are a lot of moments that feel genuine and unscripted
- The scenes have the Woodman look to them (filmed in a hotel room, most often with a handheld camera, lots of close up shots and no story really)
- Excellent models that look amazing with pretty minimal makeup
Cons:
- Site is dated, the search function works for searching for specific models, but no tags on the videos, no model page, no special features and a relatively hefty price. And videos auto play with a really loud intro.
- I've had issues with certain payment processors (I believe they switched away from some processors a few months back and in the process I ended up losing access.
- Downloads were slow for me sometimes, otherwise they were perfect, no idea what made the difference, maybe clearing cookies helps?
- Don't expect any cute outfits on the girls, different locations any interviews or plot. The site is focused on "girl sleeping" in a hotel room Woodman or another male model walks in and the sex starts. It can get a bit repetitive, but the energetic action plus the combinations of both MMF, MFF threesomes and group sex keep it interesting.
- Woodman is in most scenes and might not be everyone's cup of tea especially if you have issues with dirty talk in a French accent.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member of both Woodmancasting X and this site for quite a while now, part of the reason being that the longer you stay a member the more of a discount you get. It's a weird system, but I believe I pay 29,90 euro at this point. Yes, the site bills in euros and there is no really easy way to get a price locked in with USD, so some months you end up paying more. Never thought I'd care about monetary policy when buying porn, but here we are.
That is not the only oddity about the Woodman sites compared to a big network. The entire site seems to be run with a pretty skeleton crew and I've had numerous odd issues that seem to go away eventually (videos not streaming or jumping ahead, the billing issue I mentioned above, passwords reset function not working for a day, that kind of stuff). The support system is also not the greatest and probably the best way to get an answer is to use the forums.
Speaking of, the forums are a big part of the whole experience since Woodman will often tease future updates, engage with the fans and post BTS details. I've followed the woodman forums probably much longer than I've been subscribed to his site since there are a lot of interesting insights into the porn world as well as candid photos and even one or two models who post their thoughts.
Between the forums and the interviews on the casting site you often end up feeling like you know the models here better than girls on other sites. This works very well for the kind of porn Woodman shoots: there are no plots, the girls don't give the somewhat fake porn interviews common on other sites and in several scenes, despite the rough action, you get the sense they are having genuine fun (The way Tina Hot jokes around during her scene is awesome, Megan Rain seems to have a genuine orgasm or two as does Alexi Star, and I'm sure I'm missing a few other great moments).
As I mention above the porn is on the rough side with a lot of face slapping, a lot of name calling (honestly this is one of the few sites where I watch the scenes with the sound off bc the noise and the constant calling the girls rude names gets to me) a lot of DP and closeup of anal gapes, but somehow it also feels more intimate and personal than most porn on other networks. Almost every scene also has several sex scenes, especially the newer scenes. There are several updates here that go close or even over the 2 hour mark.
Oh and of course the models are top notch, several great American models, but mostly European girls that look gorgeous.
Something else to note is that most scenes use condoms, and several of the older scenes are mostly POV with some limited camera angles. Also some scenes feature water sports if that's a big turn off or turn on.
So in conclusion: a dated site with odd technical issues, rough sex that may or may not be everyone's cup of tea, but some amazing models in hardcore action that feels pretty natural and enthusiastic along with a glimpse at what may be the model's true personality. I personally think it's well worth the money, but if you're a fan of one of the big, more glamorous networks this may not be the site for you.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Team Skeet network so you get a lot of similar content across the entire network. Several of the models you see here are also available on Exxxtra Small or one of their other sites.
- Some really attractive young adult models (Elsa Jean, Alexa Nova, Joseline Kelly). The entire network has some great models so no big surprise here.
- All the pros of the Team Skeet network: fast download speeds, archived photos, well shot action, frequent updates (to the network, not this site) and so on. The website is clearly run by a a professional company and they have pretty much all the bells and whistles you'd expect.
Cons:
- Sadly no more updates since 2016. This is a dead niche site.
- The same downsides of the Team Skeet network. Lots of ads, some minor issues with navigation and their search system could be better.
Bottom Line:
This is going to be a short review since there isn't that much to say about the site, after all they only have 30 scenes. However while other sites in the Team Skeet network have a lot more content I really enjoyed almost every scene they have here and I'm secretly hoping that more attention might convince them to bring back this style of videos.
Almost every scene is POV and some of the earlier ones only have blow jobs, no PIV sex. The action itself is good, but relatively average. The models are hot, but again there are other sites in the Team Skeet network that have the same models and a lot more content. What makes this site stand out is the nice variation in set up and the girl's outfits. Vera Drake is giving a massage in a very cute hippie romper she just slides to the side so she can ride the male model, Harley Jade looks great in a business outfit, there's some school girls outfits and stockings that get ripped. Unlike a lot of the sites focused on particular outfits there is a nice variation and they go out of their way to shoot scenes in different locations with outfits that for the most part look very normal.
I wish they had kept this site around and explored even more types of clothing. I guess a lot of the content that could have gone here now ends up on Exxxtra small since that site has plenty of interesting outfits (or Innocent High if it's school girl themed), but it would have been really cool to have a Team Skeet clothed sex focused site.
The score is necessarily low due to the small number of videos, but for me it was a really nice surprise in the network and I wanted to call it out as such.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Thousands of videos most of them in pretty high resolution (but of course older scenes are only around 640x360) Updates are also relatively frequent, but it might not be your specific niche (while I was a member they updated mostly incest themed scenes)
- Photos are available in archived zip files but they are only screen caps and sometimes you get 30 images, sometimes there's 200 with several virtually identical shots. Overall I wouldn't join this network looking for quality images.
- Some great scenes in a variety of niches. The Ella Nova and Samantha Rone double anal scenes are a must buy in my book, but they have some really well done parodies as well and the Anya Olsen Eliza Janes lesbian scene is incredible. Besides the awesome models all recent scenes I've checked out are very well shot with a lot of variation in angles and action. They also mostly use soft lighting that gives scenes a nice mood.
- The network goes on pretty deep discount pretty often.
Cons:
- As other people pointed out the search function is not the best and finding the scenes you're interested in can be a bit of a pain.
- Since they still seem to be focused on DVD's sometimes you get several updates in one niche one after another, then no similar content for a few weeks. Also for some DVD's you only have the option to download the whole movie instead of individual scenes (this is mostly an issue with their XXX parodies)
- The type of content is a bit all over the place, they have some really intense double anal scenes for example, but also some more standard, almost romantic scenes. There are some DVD's that feature one actress in multiple BDSM scenes (The Submission Of Emma Marx) and other DVD's that are focused on the daddy niche. The variation is nice, but also makes it a bit hard to recommend the network to anyone who is interested in one particular sub genre.
- I've had some issues with downloads timing out, nothing too bad but a bit frustrating.
Bottom Line:
New Sensations reminded me of Videobox or Bang, one of the networks that have a lot of DVD's from several directors. While I believe most, if not all of their content is shot for them exclusively it's clear they're ripped from DVD's so you get a wide ranges of themes, types of action and even quality. For example the ASS FULL OF DIESEL DVD is focused on close up anal action with very little set up, while the James Deen scenes are almost identical in style to the videos he puts up on his own site and Analized. The older Mike Adriano scenes feature his style of POV with lots of lube while some other scenes feel like they were shot for Teen Fidelity and so on.
This makes it a great network to join if you're interested in a lot of different types of porn, but aren't looking for a specific niche. However, it can be a bit disappointing if you really like one particular theme and realize there's only one DVD's worth of content for it. Also since they're probably trying to appeal to as wide an audience as possible a lot of the scenes seem to follow the trends in porn with plenty of focus on step siblings and hotwifing. A few older scenes (I suspect right around when 50 Shades of Grey came out) are focused on BDSM or tied up models.
Since there is so much content and it's all pretty varied it's hard to make any general statements. For the most part all content is really well shot, the models are good looking and the action is varied, but it does depend from DVD to DVD. Some videos focus more on the setup, while some jump right into the sex, some are more POV focused, while others have soft light and wide shots.
I don't regret joining and I grabbed around 200 scenes that I'm very happy with, but I also don't know if I'll be joining again until they update a lot more content that I'm interested in. It certainly didn't feel like a site that I had to stay subscribed to for a long amount of time. The lack of photos and some navigation quirks also didn't help it's case, but on the other hand I think the scenes with Ella Nova are some of the best she's shot.
If you've never joined the network before, like the models they have or really like porn parodies I'd say the score is easily 6 points higher, but for me personally it was a bit of an average network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 310 scenes with updates around 2 times a month (sometimes it seems like you only get one video per month, but 3 the next month so it might vary a bit)
- All scenes have download options from 320p to 1080p and almost all scenes also have images (around 50 to 80 photos at 2000 x 1300 or close to it). I was surprised that even old videos seem to have high resolutions (1080), but older images are only 1200x800.
- The site layout is very similar to the Babes network and I believe the Reality Kink network. The search could be a bit better, it timed out a few times while I was downloading stuff, and there are some other small issues but overall it's decent and works well.
- Most scenes are around 25-30 minutes and are mostly POV. Some scenes have some more wide angles but really the focus here is pretty close up anal action.
- Really great models. They have mostly better known girls recently (Lauren Phillips, Hime Marie) but a lot of new models in the older scenes.
Cons:
- A lot of ads. You get a landing page promoting Reality Kings and the Babes network, ads at the bottom of each page and even when navigating around you get hit with banners going "Want more?! Unlock our 26 premiums sites"
- All downloads are not named, so get ready to have a few dozen "scene_1080p.mp4" and "gallery.zip".
- Downloads were fast, but I've had the site time out on me a few times, luckily once you log back into a page you can just resume the download and it seems to work fine.
- Since most videos are POV don't expect a lot of wide shots, not really a negative for me just something to keep in mind. Also while older scenes seem to mostly have anal some of the newer videos have a lot of oral and PIV sex before getting to the anal.
- Older scenes played with the idea of "this is a real couple and he's convincing her to have anal for the first time" more recent scenes seem to follow more standard porn plots so that could be a downside.
Bottom Line:
The Mofo network is pretty impressive with around 3700 scenes already up and at least one new video added to one of their sites per day. They have some great looking actresses and Let's Try Anal has some of the only anal scenes some of these models have shot.
Unfortunately the navigation could be better. When searching for the anal tag in the whole network you only get back 13 scenes... which, considering LTA has over 300 videos just goes to show their search system is seriously broken. Add the almost constant ads the site has everywhere and compared to other networks like Team Skeet or Evil Angel I was left a bit disappointed. Even searching for one particular model turned out to be a bit of a pain since there is no way to see all girls that shot a scene for LTA (when you go to the models page you get all models in the whole network and even searching by name can return wrong results).
Something else that might be a turn off is that almost all videos on LTA are entirely POV. Some of the more recent scenes have some tripod shots but for the most part the site tries to sell the idea that this is a couple and you're seeing things from the perspective of the guy convincing his girlfriend to try anal for whatever reason. This plot point was more prevalent in older scenes where there's a lot more prep with toy and finger insertions. Also in a lot of the older shots the girls seem to be in some amount of pain and keep asking the male model to go slower.
Finally, these scenes also seem to have a more amateur level to them: the lights are not always perfect, the camera shakes a bit during the action, the girls comment on why is the guy filming them, that sort of stuff. More recent scenes seem to have better lights and camera work as well as more standard porn plots and doing anal doesn't seem to be the same big deal it was in the older scenes. The most recent update (Whitney Wright) doesn't even have the model talk, she just starts stripping and goes into anal sex pretty casually.
Now this is clearly subjective and I'm not a fan of "painal", so the way some of the girls acted really didn't work for me, but overall I think the handheld nature of the older videos was more interesting and unique than the more recent scenes. Older videos remind me a bit of Woodman casting scenes or something from Exploited College Girls, while the more recent scenes are more generic. I'll also make a special note about the Joseline Kelly scene where the guy is supposedly playing games on a turned off TV with no console in sight... I know I should care about details in porn, but come on, the TV is off!
In conclusion, the network has some pros but some serious cons. The site itself has some great models, but the scenes might not be your cup of tea if you are really turned off by POV shots... it's a bit of a mixed bag. If some of the models look really appealing to you and you never joined I'd say it's worth it, but if you're only interested in the most recent scenes you can probably get similar stuff on other networks.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Access to a large network with thousands of scenes and a lot of them are focused on young looking US based models (I think the only exception really is Lust HD which seems to be focused on European girls). If you like one site you'll probably like most of the ones offered here.
-Innocent High itself has 458 movies and updates about once per month. Updates are available in several resolutions from 360p to 1080p (Although several older scenes only have 576p as the maximum).
- Each scene has zipped photos and screen caps. Zipped archives are named after the model (thank God for no gallery(10).zip)
- Like every site in the Team Skeet network, navigation is pretty straightforward, downloads work well and overall the technical quality is good.
- Top notch models. Most of the girls are really good looking and act well. A lot of known names, but there's a handful of somewhat new faces. Luckily the tour page gives a good idea of the content you will get.
Cons:
- I wish there were less ads. There's a landing page when you first log in and several promotions that look quite a bit like regular scenes. Not a deal breaker as nothing auto plays or takes over the screen, but a bit annoying.
- Scenes seem to be anywhere from 25 to around 45 minutes with more or less set up. It's a bit hard to know what exactly you'll get, one or two of the older scenes just have the girl masturbating while there's a voice over, some of the recent scenes have a 5 minute set up. It's a bit of a mixed bag and since they're working with a relative limited niche the plots are not as interesting as some other TeamSkeet sites.
- A bit repetitive for example only 5 anal scenes, 5 threesome scenes, no lesbian scenes, almost all scenes end with a facial, the girls almost always wear the same school girl outfits (although they do have a handful of cheerleader outfits).
- The tagging system for the network is a bit of a pain to use.
Bottom Line:
I commented on my Teens Love Anal review about the pros of the TeamSkeet network. They have good download speeds, a lot of scenes (going back to the early 2000's if I'm not mistaken), great models (mostly pretty well known actresses that you can see on other sites, but hey they are well known for a reason) and they have discounts and sales pretty often.
The whole network has a focus on young adult performers and most of their sites focus on a niche within that. You can probably guess what Exxxtra Small or Teen Pies focuses on. Innocent High follows the same pretty obvious naming convention and focuses on school girls having sex, mostly with their older male teachers.
Most scenes are around the 30 minute mark and are shot in rooms that look convincingly like a classroom. There's a lot of sex on chairs and desks, but occasionally you get a bed or a couch if the girl is supposedly skipping class. Almost all scenes are BG and while the action is pretty varied with a decent number of positions I do wish there was some more variation. For example there is just one female teacher as far as I can tell, no MMF, very few threesomes at all and while the other Team Skeet sites seem to have at least some ethnic diversity almost all girls here are Caucasian US models.
Even the plots seem pretty formulaic. While Teens Love Anal seems to have all kinds of story reasons explaining why the girls have to have anal sex Innocent High is rather narrowly focused on a teacher catching the girls doing something they shouldn't and then either blackmailing them or the girls seducing the teacher to get out of being expelled. I can't complain too much since the network has other sites dedicated to specific niches, but I wish they had played around a bit more with the idea of schoolgirls exploring sex. Maybe a high school party that turns into an orgy or a teacher showing several girls how to use toys on each other.
It’s really a shame since the outfits the girls wear are pretty cute most of the time and the models could pass for 18 year old's in high school, I just wish the site went the extra mile to have them in more unique situations that match their theme.
Outside of this rather subjective complaint the site is pretty good. I did have some issues with the pages not loading properly and I really wish they had a better tag and naming system (a scene called Skip Class And Fuck My Ass has no anal sex for example) but overall the network is pretty good. The only reason I’m giving it a 79 is the amount of ads and the somewhat limited variety, if you don’t care about the schoolgirl niche this could easily be a higher score.
Thank you, I honestly joined the site mostly because your review and comments. I generally find that if you score a site high there's something on there I'll end up saving in my collection :)
Good points all around.
As far as keeping the reviews coming.. it's not so much winning the jackpot as having a lot of downtime in November and December after a crazy busy year. Also with all the discounts it feels like a good time to refresh my collection.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Not the easiest site to total all the scenes but I'd say around 180-190 scenes with updates coming weekly. There's also a section letting subscribers know what the next scenes will be. That said be aware that this includes a decent amount of BTS videos. There's about 165 models with some shooting 2 scenes
- Great models. Most of the well known young looking models in the last few years have a scene here (Piper Perri, Charlotte Sartre, Anya Olsen, Megan Rain etc.)
- Huge props for not trying to upsell you, also the banner ads are minimal. The site is focused on the content it offers, not trying to trick users into buying another subscription.
- Pretty unique content with a focus on playing out a domination scene. Several of the girls really seem to go into sub space and it's pretty hot how far they are willing to go. The behind the scenes videos are also some of the best I've seen. Highly recommend checking them out.
- Some nice photos that are available as zip archive.
Cons:
- The site is certainly not for everyone. Take a good look at the preview pages (which are pretty great at giving a good idea about what kind of models and what kind of action is here). The models are all in the teen category with one or two exceptions, the makeup is pretty over the top, the outfits are an odd mix of belts and loops and the action is pretty rough domination stuff, with the fan base asking for even more puking, rimming and pee. Some of it works for me, some is a bit too much, but to each their own.
- You get 20 video downloads per month (no limit on photos) for the first 3 months. BUT the price for the site is $20 per month. I'd say just buy the 3 month subscription if you really want to download everything.
- A decent portion of the videos are also on Evil Angel, so if you're really on the fence that network is probably more bang for your buck.
- Technically speaking the site is a bit outdated. I appreciate the clean design, but better navigation would be nice.
Bottom Line:
I first stumbled upon Bryan Gozzling through Evil Angel. They must have some kind of sharing contract because around 140 of his videos are also hosted on their network. Usually getting updated after they've been up on his site for a few weeks.
That said, several of the shared scenes have been edited in some way. The scene with Megan Rain for example is around 55 minutes on Evil Angel but an incredible 2 hours on the Hotshot site. Evil Angel cut out several anal angles and a portion where he gives Megan an enema with some blue liquid (which makes no sense since the video is titled "Enema Leads To Manhandling Sodomy", but whatever not going to get into critiquing porn titles). Lola Fae's scene is about 30 minutes shorter, both Pepper Hart scenes are about 20 minutes shorter (because they cut out any reference to pee) and so on. It's not always the case but I'd say maybe half the videos have a few minutes shaved here and there.
The other videos that are exclusive to this site are the behind the scenes, and these are some awesome videos that go through choosing the girl's outfit, posing for photos as well as a pre-scene and post-scene interview. It's great content that really highlights the girls and shows how Bryan prepares a scene (they are almost all 1 hour of content).
Considering how intense some of the content gets it's also really nice to see the post scene interview where the girls are happy to go over what they enjoyed and confirm everything was consensual. In my opinion every site with rough sex should have these kind of post scene check-in videos to remind everyone this is a fantasy.
And it is a pretty specific fantasy: each video plays on the idea that a young girl wants to be dominated and have rough sex so they go on the Hot Shot Hook Up site to find a guy they can call "daddy". From there almost all scenes go through Bryan presenting the girl, fingering her (often to squirting), a really sloppy blowjob and pretty rough sex in several positions. There's rimming, a lot of anal scenes, some pee scenes, some puking, a lot of "yes daddy" and "thank you sir".
A lot of it works because the female models really seem to get into it and go with the flow, but as I said it's not for everyone and this is for sure not the typical stuff you'd find on every other porn network. To be perfectly honest the whole daddy talk and male rimming was not my cup of tea and I do wish there were more older models and maybe more BDSM focus (just say "sir" or "master" instead of "daddy" and I'd be much happier), but like every site that is one person's vision it's never going to be 100% what everyone wants so I'll take what I can get.
Also keep in mind this whole operation is run by a small crew, the location is always the same, the male actor is always Bryan, it's pretty much all boy-girl scenes.
The small scale of the operation also shows in the site itself. At one point the download photos button got shifted under the images and I couldn't click it anymore. They have a 20 video download limit so people don't hammer their servers then disappear after a month, the photos (while great) are taken during the sex so sometimes they are not the best angle. Small gripes that overall don't really detract much from the score if the content and models seem interesting to you.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The main site you get with this subscription is Babes.com, but they offer network access to Elegant Anal, Stepmom Lessons, Black is Better and Office Obsession. Babes.com has around 977 scenes with updates every 2 days, but the network updates even more often.
- Scenes are pretty varied with a lot of different locations, premises and types of action. To give you an idea they have around 224 Lesbian movies, around 100 threesome scenes, 181 Outdoor scenes, about a dozen massage scenes and 149 work fantasy scenes which include all kinds of jobs.
- Some great models and while the focus is clearly on white young models shot in glamour scenes there is some variety. For context 640 scenes have a Caucasian model.
- Most scenes are around 30-40 minutes and there's a decent amount of variation in set up: some scenes have no dialog, some scenes have voice over to set things up, some have the actors talking and setting up the scene, it's a nice mix overall
Cons:
- As I mentioned in my Elegant Anal review this whole network has an ad problem, tons of ads pretty much everywhere you look. They are pushing content from other sites, they have channels which seem to be attempts to re-sell other networks. The regular membership only includes streaming and a big banner that ask you to unlock downloads. It's a pain overall and it feels like navigation is more cumbersome than it should be (the menu for example has 3 navigation buttons but 4 buttons that lead to some kind of promotion or upsell).
- No easy way to filter all models from just one site. The tag system is alright, but could also be improved. Like let's say I want to see all interracial scenes on babes.com, but not those on Black is Better (which will obviously all be interracial) but the tag for black models doesn't show up when filtering by site, only when searching the entire network. Not a deal breaker but some odd quirks.
Bottom Line:
I don't usually join networks that are focused around boy-girl or lesbian content, so it will be a bit hard for me to compare this to sites like Vixen or X-Art, but I'm fairly certain babes.com is going for the same glamorous look so I'll give it my best. Also for full disclosure I had a streaming only subscription so I’m not sure how fast downloads are.
Let's start with the positive: All videos I watched here were very well shot, good light, good editing with a nice mix of closeups and wide shots. They have some loosely themed series like "The Sessions" which is supposed to be a therapist interviewing a male or female model they end up having sex with, or "Bad Girl Justice" which is a series of about 5 videos themed around school girls having sex with a teacher and taking revenge on him for cheating. These mini series (some of them only 2 or 3 videos) give the site a chance to vary up the plots, the clothing and the location of the sex.
Aside from this they also have some scenes focused on oiling up the female model, kind of similar to Fucked Hard 18 and scenes that are very reminiscent of Vixen with a voice over from the female model. More recently they added a few scenes that I believe are meant to look like they are shot at night in a dance club maybe a bit similar to stuff you'd see on Blacked Raw.
Overall this variety makes the network pretty interesting as you're not always sure what you'll get when you open a scene. There is also some pretty good variety in the outfits the models are wearing and where the sex takes place.
Finally, they have some great models, both European and American. Several scenes from Elena Koshka a great scene with both Elsa Jean, Piper Perri, scenes with Gina Gerson and Luna Rival and so on. For the most part pretty well known models that can put on an interesting scene.
Unfortunately, the negatives drag things down:
Payment is really not clear. They say unlimited access, but that means no downloads unless you pay an extra monthly fee. There are ads everywhere and it constantly feels like they are trying to upsell you.
Navigation is good, but for a large network I would expect some better tagging and more filtering options. It’s also incredibly frustrating that you can’t tell what videos you’ll get from the pre-purchase preview pages. They have plenty of interesting content, I don’t get why they make it hard to preview.
Overall, the technical and sales aspect kind of lower the score here. I happened to join the Team Skeet network at around the same time I joined this site and I find myself going to their site a lot more than I’m going to babes.com although the action here is probably more interesting. I just don’t want to bother with all the ads and rather poor filtering options. That said, if some of the models I mentioned above sound interesting and you want more variety than what Vixen offers this might be a good network to join.
That really sucks, sorry you had this happen to you.
That said I read your message and went directly to Segpay to cancel my membership and that worked well for me, didn't get changed again and the site properly shows up as canceled now.
Really easy to click on a video from another site and get billed tho, so you have to be really careful when clicking around.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of a network with a handful of similar sites, most notable Backroom Casting Couch, Net Video Girls and Black Ambush.
- I believe they now have around 750 videos with about one update per week. Keep in mind that number includes 2 videos (POV and tripod) for some older scenes as well as some returning models. They also have a nice upcoming section showing the next 3 models.
- Almost entirely amateur models, the whole point of the site is that these are new girls to the porn industry and while a few of the models showed up on other sites for the most part this is the only place you can see them.
- In my opinion they have mostly really attractive girls but they have a very distinct "girl next door" look. Don’t expect super-glamorous videos of well known models here. Most scenes have an intro interview as well as an exit interview after the scene is over so you get a good sense for the girl’s personality.
- They finally have photos of the sex in archived zipped filed.
Cons:
- Like pretty much all the sites in this network, the web design is dated. It’s pretty much the same design since 2012 or so when I first joined this site. It works alright, and the tags are very useful but things could be improved.
- These are amateur girls and it shows, some scenes are really hot some scenes can be a bit awkward with the girl seeming to zone out a bit. I think overall there’s a lot of quality content here, but don’t expect every scene to be at the same level.
- They try to vary up the action, but ultimately they don’t have the budget of a huge network with a lot of financial backing so expect some less than professional lights and editing and the same male model. I personally don’t think it’s an issue and if anything it ads to the videos, but to each their own.
- I do wish they had better photos, but again, the limits of a small network.
Bottom Line:
I’ve been an on and off member of this site for years. I first joined before they were partnered with Backroom Casting Couch and back in those days I’d have a hard time justifying the membership, but between the other sites in the network and the substantial backlog this has become one of my go to places for scenes of amateur girls.
Speaking of amateur I believe I said something similar in my Backroom Casting Couch review, but don’t expect this site to have the level of production something like Tushy has. The videos are decently edited and there are a lot of side-by side views (one focused on the girl’s face and one focused on the action) but this is not the professional, perfectly lit set of a typical porn. Almost all scenes are filmed in a hotel room (sometimes with oral sex in a car on the way to the hotel, the light is sometimes too artificial and the make-up on the models could be more professionally done, but again, this is a small operation and in some way that is all part of the appeal (at least for me, but I love seeing girls in their own outfits and own makeup).
Also the models are mostly very cute and attractive, but often not in a perfectly polished porn-star way. There is some amount of awkwardness, some scenes that are meant to be anal end up just as anal toy or anal fail videos, there are some awkward interview answers and so on... you get the idea. This is a lot closer to the girl’s real personality than most porn sites get for the better or worse.
Most scenes are boy-girl but they have diversified the videos a bit with around 50 or so threesome scenes and around 150 anal scenes. Most scenes include around 10-20 minutes of interview, a scene of the girl dressing or showering (some of the older scenes even show the girls getting ready to do an enema) and an exit interview. Most videos are around the hour mark, which for me is a bonus, but could easily become too much if you don’t care about the model.
So all of that said, it ultimately comes down to what kind of porn do you prefer. I’ll keep my subscriptions to the big networks, but when I’m tired of seeing the same familiar models (believe it or not sometimes I don't want to see Mick Blue paired with Zoey Monroe again) I like to jump to this network and see some unknown girl laugh at how big the sex toys are or share some embarrassing story about when they first tried anal. It's a nice change of pace and while not every update here is for me, every time I subscribe I grab at least 20-30 scenes that make it into my permanent collection.
I’d also like to note that some of the threesome scenes they got in 2018 are outstanding, well worth the money (Paige and Elena have a lot of chemistry as do Naomi and Bonnie). I hope they continue to do more of these in the future.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Decent price for the amount of content you get (something like 3000 videos across the entire network), and around 76 videos on this site ( the tag system says you get a total of 171 anal scenes across the whole network with a handful at Exxxtra Small and a few more at Lust HD).
- All scenes come in multiple resolutions and have zipped photo archives.
- Access to most of the Team Skeet network (some sites are not included, for example Family Strokes or Daughter Swap, but you get about 28 other sites)
- Website is decently easy to use on both desktop and mobile. Easy to search for certain categories in the entire network (unfortunately no easy way to just see all models that shot a scene for one site.) Fast load times, no issues with download speeds. Good technical site.
- Good looking models with a good mix of new faces and familiar models (Jillian Janson, Moka Mora, Holly Hendrix are some of the common names you'll see here).
Cons:
- Just 1 update per month. You get more content inside the Team Skeet network, but more frequent updates would be nice especially since the site is relatively small.
- Full page ad to unlock the rest of their network as soon as you log in. Not that many ads once you’re inside, but the updates show several videos that are locked and there are periodic prompts to “unlock” other sections of the site. It's a bit annoying they make these ads look like they are just another scene until you look closer.
- Several scenes have a plot that at times can interrupt the action. For me this is a plus, but it may depend on your taste. Just be ready to spend about 5-10 minutes out of the standard 30-35 minutes for each scene, on a story.
- Photos were a bit disappointing (if you care about still images) Several scenes don't have that many shots of the action and while they do offer screen caps in a zip archive as well I wish there were more dedicated photos.
Bottom Line:
I had never joined the Team Skeet network since it seemed to be yet another big budget network that didn’t stand out with content that unique, however I am pleased to discover that is not the case. Or rather, I should say, they have the good parts of a big network (lots of videos, fast downloads and decent webdesign) but enough unique flair that that their videos stand out. They have a lot of models you have seen on other sites (Zoey Monroe, Dakota Skye, Angel Smalls) but what’s different here is the effort they go to make most of the scenes have a plot.
For example, the scene with Alina West titled Mom Knows Best starts off with pretty standard BJ and masturbation action until about 10 minutes in when the “mom” walks in and scolds the two actors. Cut to about 4 minutes of the mom explaining that “you can’t take my daughter’s virginity, you’ll have to have anal sex instead” and then things jump right into anal while the “mom” coaches Alina. Now, I’m not a huge fan of the whole incest theme, but the way the scene is structured is certainly different from most sites that seem to only be focused on gonzo scenes with no plot whatsoever. Everyone involved acts over the top in a lighthearted way, the anal action is well shot and in the end the whole movie stands out as a pretty hot scene.
Some other examples are a scene with Arya Fae where she spends several minutes playing with a fidget spinner anal plug, before her step dad finds her and the scene proceeds as expected… except she has a spinner but plug inserted for most of the action. Or Yhivi pretending to be a virgin who accidentally has anal sex the first time, as both her and her boyfriend comment several times during the movie.
Hopefully, you get the idea… most scenes have kinda goofy scenarios that will either work for you and make the whole movie more interesting or will put you off because they’re too outlandish. Keeping in theme with the kinda goofy scenarios none of the scenes are really rough. The sex, while well shot and plenty energetic is almost always on the playful side rather than the intense, slapping and spitting side.
They also have a lot of scenes about step brothers and moms so if that’s a big turnoff maybe this isn’t the best site for you, especially since the setup is usually brought up at least a few times during a scene.
Overall, if their approach to setting up the scene works for you, this is a pretty great site. My biggest con is that they only have 76 scenes and are updating relatively infrequently, however the content in the rest of the network makes up for at least some of this.
If you can find it on one of their many deals, this is a good buy for sure, especially if you enjoy a bit of plot with your anal videos.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 185 scenes and about 125 models with updates every 5 days.
- The Mad Cheddar sites are pretty well known for shooting high quality glamour hardcore scenes. With all these sites (Vixen, Tushy, Blacked, Blacked Raw and more recently Tushy Raw) you get top notch performers in well lit, well shot and edited scenes that remind me of Playboy but with the Hustler hardcore, if that makes sense. Great content both as far as models and technical quality of the videos and photos.
- Fast downloads, no issues canceling subscriptions, frequent discounts, responsive site on mobile and good search function. From the technical perspective everything works well.
- Great photos that include some great magazine quality solo shots of the models.
- In my opinion more variation in models and scene type than Blacked or Tushy. While most models still have a very specific look there's more variation as far as hair, ethnicity and type of scene including some nice threesomes and orgy scenes.
Cons:
- The ads are getting out of control. In the last few months when you first log into the page you get a big slash page advertising all the other sites they own. You click continue and get an auto playing video ad, then more ads on the main page itself. Luckily no ads when you actually select a scene, but it's kinda ridiculous, especially since I already pay for a few of their other sites.
- No real network access. Even if you buy the other sites there's no easy way to see all scenes a model shot for all their sites. A network hub would be nice, network pricing would be even nicer.
- While the site works, I wish there was an easier way to filter out certain models and I wish the categories were more obvious. You end up having to rely on the search bar a lot.
- While more varied than their other sites the scenes can get a bit same-y. I wish they used the set-up stories they have a bit more or maybe had the girls keep on their outfits a bit longer.
Bottom Line:
If you like porn there's a good chance you already know what Vixen is all about, the high level of quality, gorgeous models and frequent discounts make it hard to miss the Mad Cheddar sites. They shoot truly great porn that has a very unique glamour feel to it. All the models are incredible, the videos are well shot and they never go into a very hardcore area (no spitting, gagging or really rough sex here) while still keeping the sex pretty intense and active. This site gets top marks from me and while I will point a few of it's flaws below, they are really minor nitpicks.
Most videos are around 40 minutes with about 3-5 minutes of setup. The stories are pretty basic stuff that's easy to ignore, but they are usually presented via a voice over from the girl while showing her in lingerie or undressing. I love this approach to their videos as it removes some of the inherent cheesiness of porn plots and gives you a chance to see the female model in a few different outfits. Unfortunately I don't think they really play around with this enough and almost all the videos have the girls completely nude very quickly, more than once getting naked in a cut-away. It's really a shame since they have the models dress up in some gorgeous lingerie that doesn't get highlighted that much.
Luckily, if any part of the video is not that interesting they have pretty handy markers on the streaming player letting you know when the action switches to another position. It's a great little feature that makes streaming the videos so much better.
If you do decide to download the videos they come in several sizes up to 4k and I've had no problems with download managers. The photos are also awesome and come in zipped archives that are easy to download. Unfortunately there are no behind the scenes videos of the shoots or interviews with the models. I think it would have been cool to see the shooting of the photos since they are clearly staged separate from the sex scene.
One section of the site that adds a bit more content (but is also a bit disappointing) is the Vixen Angels awards. This site is the only one that has a special section for "Angels", which is essentially the equivalent of a Playmate. There are a few photos of the "crowning" (essentially the girl receiving a bunch of Vixen branded stuff) and a photo shoot along with a under 1 minute BTS video of the photo shoot. That said you can't download any of this content and it's maybe 10 photos total. I was really hoping for a brief interview with the model, maybe a longer BTS video and an actual photo shoot that maybe highlighted something unique about the model. As it stands I looked at it once went "meh" and will probably never look at it again.
I gave Tushy a 95 as it's an almost perfect site to me. Vixen's content is not nearly as anal focused (only about 10 scenes) so it doesn't speak to my interests, but it's an absolutely great site all around even if it could polish a few rough edges a bit more. All in all I'd highly recommend it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Despite what the official best porn review says the site only lists 80 scenes today with the latest being uploaded on December 11, 2017.
- The scenes have categories and you can search based on those pretty easily, although I wish there were a few more descriptive ones.
- Incredibly hot models and a nice mix of European and American girls (tags are not always right but the site lists about 30 European models. The American tag only lists 11 models but there are a lot more American girls here).
- Really hot outfits, lots of stockings and high heels and for the most part the outfits stay at least partially on.
- Lots of positions (especially since most sex takes place on tables and couches, it's impressive how creative they get)
- Great light and editing, lots of nice close-ups mixed with good wide angles. The editing is also for the most part really good with nice music over the intro and smooth cuts whenever needed.
Cons:
- No updates since 2017 and the site doesn't show in all of their main search functions, pretty safe to say it's dead and no new updates are coming.
- Most scenes are boy-girl. They do have a few threesomes and at least one lesbian scene, but don't expect a lot of variance in that area.
- While the theme is supposed to be office sex, there are a handful of nurses/ doctor scenes and some other scenes that don't fit the theme ( a maid, a Christmas scene, that kind of stuff), not a big deal breaker, but just don't expect all 80 scenes to be set in an office.
- As I noted in my Elegant Anal review some scenes from this network can be a bit short. Almost all scenes here are at or over 30 minutes, but with some having a relatively long set up of 7-8 minutes that can be a bit of a downside. Also no interviews or behind the scenes or any extra content.
- Some models have a thick accent which makes some of the set-up a bit awkward to listen to if that bothers you.
Bottom Line:
I originally joined the babes network for elegant anal and while a lot of the stuff I said in that review applies here as well this site blew me away.
Let's start with the good: all scenes are very well filmed with good cuts, nice mix of wide shots and closeups. The models are really gorgeous and while they still are mostly Caucasian and teen looking there is more variation here than over at elegant anal.
The website design is modern and responsive, I've had no issues with it on my phone or pc, even with some spotty hotel internet. I wish they had less ads, but overall can't complain.
I couldn't really check download speeds since I only had a streaming subscription, but the photo galleries have a nice slideshow function and videos played in high resolution (1080p is the max, no 4k here) with minimum buffering. Overall very happy with the technical side of things. (Categories could be a bit better, but the site is small enough that I could find the videos I liked pretty easily)
Unlike elegant anal where I wish there was more attention paid to the setup for the scenes most videos here have a longer intro and the girls keep on their cute outfits. Zazie Skymm leaning backward over a desk and giving a blowjob while still wearing her heels and a half opened yellow shirt is an incredible sight. The way Jade Nile is playful and smirks at the male model when he's trying to ignore her because he's in a conference call is simply adorable. There are so many incredible models here (Dillion Harper, Ella Hughes, Angel Smalls) and there are so many tight skirts, heels and stockings the site really stands out.
The biggest negative if of course that it's a dead site. No longer getting updates is a pretty big downside and I haven't been so sad to see a site go in a while. That said the 80 scenes on here are great and while a few of them could be a little less blurry (the Angel Smalls and Janice Griffith scenes in particular seemed very fuzzy for some reason) or would benefit from a few more wide shots, overall the content is top notch.
In conclusion if you like the office setting fantasy or just like to see girls partially clothed in stuff they might wear around an office, and are interested in the models I mentioned above, this site alone makes the babes network worth it. Throw in the other sites they have (elegant anal, babes, step mom lessons) and this is worth checking out at least once.
I am only giving it a 75 instead of a higher score because there isn't more of the great content they can produce.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 95 videos with regular updates two or three times a month.
- Streaming in multiple formats, always very fast for me, even when not on the best internet.
- Well filmed scenes with a good mix of wide shots and closeup's on the girl's faces (especially when they first move into anal sex or if they really get into it)
- Good light and a nice mix of positions, action and location. Some scenes only have anal sex, some decently long shots of pussy eating and rimming, some scenes are filmed on the floor, some have couches or beds... you get the idea it's a pretty varied mix.
- Modern web page design, you can filter scenes by quite a few categories, the videos thumbnails auto play a preview when you hover over them, responsive mobile design. Everything you'd want in a modern site. The only big downside is that the model page is decent but shows models on the whole network, you can't see all the models that are on just on Elegant Anal
- Good looking models.
- Great photos.
Cons:
- Most of the models are pretty well known European actresses (Linda Sweet, Gina Gerson, Ivana Sugar) Not necessarily a con, but they have a certain look.
- While there is a nice variety in the video premise and location I believe all scenes are boy-girl. Don't expect gang bangs or threesomes, I didn't even see any toys being used.
- Some scenes are pretty short. The average is around 30-35 minutes, but for example the scene with Foxy Di and Martina Gold are each 19 minutes and there's a handful of other scenes that are around 25 minutes. No bonus behind the scenes footage or interviews or anything like that either.
- Quite a lot of ads, the first page when you log in is an ad you have to close, there are pretty big animated banners at the bottom of each page. Since I only had a streaming subscription I periodically would get a banner asking me to unlock downloads.
Bottom Line:
Let me start off by saying that I got access to this site through a streaming only subscription to babes.com, so I'm not sure how the download options work. It seems like it would be fine as they advertise unlimited downloads, but I can't comment on that. Speaking of streaming, if you're not sure and want to check the site out that's a pretty good option since it gives you access to pretty much everything with the only downside being a pretty big banner that pops up every time I logged in reminding me I should upgrade to download.
That said, the content here is pretty good. The models are really gorgeous and the filming style works pretty well overall. There are a lot of tracking shots, soft light and a nice balance of closeups and wide shots. I am also really impressed with the variation in locations, I don't believe any of the scenes are filmed in the same room. If you ever wanted to see anal sex scenes in a restaurant, barbershop, sauna or in a pool this site has you covered.
As far as action there's a decent amount of positions (partially due to the locations), every scene has at least several minutes of anal in a few positions and most also have some oral and vaginal sex. Unfortunately not a lot of ATM (26 scenes are tagged as such) and if they use toys it's very brief (3 scenes are tagged as using toys). There are also a decent amount of scenes that end with an anal creampie or the male model cumming on the girl's ass, which is a nice change compared to the standard facial. Unfortunately it's a bit hard to find these scenes since the tags are not always that accurate.
Another downside for me was that the set up is quickly brushed aside. Most scenes jump to the sex within 2 minutes, and the girls are completely naked within at most 4 minutes, which feels like a wasted opportunity. There are a lot of cute outfits that could be kept on or more slowly stripped off to add to the whole glamour side of the site, especially since a lot of the videos are only 30 minutes.
There is one particular scene with Linda Sweet where she is dressed as a business woman/ FBI agent and she slowly undresses while getting seduced by a con-man, keeping her stocking and garter belt on, it was a very well done scene that used the setup well. I wish there were more scenes in that style, it would have made the site stand out more when compared to Tushy, Hardx, Holed or 21naturals.
At the end of the day, that's probably the biggest downside, while well done there isn't anything that really stands out here. You can get more scenes at any of the sites I mentioned above, the models are pretty well known so you can see them do anal in other places and while there are some good scenes here I don't know if I can recommend it unless you're a big fan of anal glam porn and have seen the stuff other sites have.
Man, the last few months have been bad for this network, from the occasional banner ad they have gone to full page take overs where you have to click "take me to tushy.com" before they let you actually access the site after you log in.
Today the even started auto playing and ad for their new site TushyRaw and the main page after you log in has some big banners for ever other site in the network. I like their content, but it's starting to get really annoying.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site claims to have 1236 Movies and 283 models and as far as I can tell that's pretty accurate, you can go back all the way to videos from 2004 (and surprising enough, a lot, if not all of the older videos have remastered versions which are very good 1280x720 quality)
- Regular updates (I'd say maybe every 3-5 days there's a new video going up)
- Not all videos have photos, but those that do have a very useful zipped archive and even a larger resolution zipped archive.
- Definitely amateur models, don't think I recognize any of them, but overall the selection is pretty good with a range of body types and looks.
- The content is mostly girls masturbating, but there is a lot of variation in location, toys used and length of the scene. There are a lot of videos from festivals showing nude women dancing or wet t-shirt contests, decent amount of girl girl action (hard to navigate the categories, but maybe about 100 scenes), about 40 or so scenes of blowjobs.
Cons:
- The site looks dated, the search is not great and the categories are not always that descriptive or easy to navigate.
- The model page is pretty bare bones, it's useful to see all scenes from one model in one place, but they often don't even have a photo of the model, just her name and how many scenes she is in.
- Camera work is pretty bad at times with a lot of jerky movements and a lot of scenes have a very distinct "college" feel. There are several scenes of weed smoking, the camera man making bad jokes about the sex toys and several of the girls don't really seem that interested in the action.
- Slow download speeds on the largest videos (as far as I can tell these are pretty much uncompressed high bit-rate videos that are not that different from the HD mp4's and the site does warn you it will be slow so there's that)
Bottom Line:
I'm a fan of amateur content and several, if not all of the models here are clearly not professional porn actresses. There is a very distinct "unscripted" vibe and from the way several scenes go together I get the sense that the site owner finds girls who are willing to film and they hang out for a day or so shooting a bunch of different videos. This site in particular has the solo or lesbian scenes while some of the more hardcore stuff goes to After Hours Exposed.
Because of this the scenes on here end up really varied: there are some interviews with the girls, some shower scenes, some videos where the girls are already naked and it feels like they just finished another scene. It's a bit of a mixed bag that doesn't follow any strict steps, for better or worse.
The same thing extends to the models and videos as well. As with any site that uses mostly amateur girls some are more comfortable and fun, while a few seem a bit stiff and awkward. Some scenes, especially when there's natural light in the room end up looking really good, while in some scenes the light and angles are not really that great. Overall a mixed bag, I'd say a mostly positive mixed bag, but don't go in expecting the standardized production quality of a large budget porn network.
Something else that didn't really work for me, but I'm sure is a selling point of the site is the focus on a "party vibe". For example, there are a lot of photos and videos from festivals and "spring break". Some of the girls in these are really cute, but I didn't feel like it was really worth paying subscription to see a few seconds of some topless girls at a fest. Luckily, there are plenty of other videos with more explicit content so it's easy to ignore this content.
All of that said, I got access through a membership at Backroom Casting Couch and as part of that network this is certainly a good deal. Between ExCoGi (Exploited College Girls), the Casting Couch HD content and this site I can't think of a better network for amateur models. It's not big budget porn so it doesn't have that level of polish and there are some rough edges, but there are certainly several really hot videos here and there is so much content it's easy to skip the stuff that doesn't work for you.
P.S. for what it's worth I haven't had any of the issues with downloads or videos not playing that RagingBuddhist mentioned in his review, but your mileage may vary.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 500 videos in total with updates coming in about once a week. That said a lot of the older scenes are pretty poor quality, so I'd say you get around 200-300 good quality HD videos. Around 350-370 of the scenes have some anal if you care about that.
- Almost entirely amateur models, some of the girls in teh first videos have gone on to shoot other stuff but lots of girls I have not seen on any other site.
- For the most part really attractive girls with a very distinct "girl next door" look. The models clearly do their own hair/ makeup and choose their outfits because it ranges from really sexy well put together outfits to girls that look like they rolled out of bed and threw together whatever they had around. Overall it's kind of a nice change from the polished look of some sites.
- Network access to a handful of similar sites, most notable ExCoGi and Black Ambush.
- Decent preview, that gives a decent idea of what you get when you sign up.
Cons:
- The premise is really not that interesting. The whole spiel is that the girls come in for an interview and they get "tricked" or lured into having hardcore sex with the promise of "high paying porn jobs". The models don't seem to buy it (most just go "ok, whatever"), the guy running the interview isn't particularly convincing, you, as the audience roll your eyes and skip forward in the interview. I don't get why they keep it up instead of just doing regular casting videos. I feel like at this point it's just annoying.
- No photos of any kind
- Site is pretty bare bones. I have been an on and off member since 2010 and the site looks the same now as it did back then. Actually I think they added some more ads for other sites. You only have an option to download videos in 2 sizes, the category section is pretty simple and while everything works there's not a lot of extra features.
Bottom Line:
If you are considering this site and are really concerned about the price I would strongly recommend you read pat362's expired review, while there are more videos now, a lot of his negative comments still hold true. The site still has the silly premise of "tricking" girls, the interviews can be hit or miss depending on the girl, the videos are still shot in the office with the black couch and so on. (Although for the last few years they started using another male model "Vince" who seems to be doing a much better job switching positions and fucking the girls energetically).
IF you are looking for really professionally shot videos of dolled up models this is not the best site for you. The girls here are clearly amateurs and sometimes the interviews are painfully awkward (on the flip side you get some really cool girls that are very open and uninhibited) The camera work is really good for a small site, but it's clearly not the elaborate production of a large network, and on the technical side the site is alright, but won't win any design awards.
All that out of the way, this is still one of my favorite sites. The models are absolutely awesome, even the awkward ones :) they don't put on fake porn moans, they are wearing their regular clothes, sometimes they get into the sex, sometimes they are clearly not that interested. As far as unscripted sex it's some of the best stuff I've found. Sometimes a girl really gets into the anal action and sometimes they end the scene pretty quickly after that since she clearly said she's not interested, almost every scene has a different vibe and while pretty silly the interviews before and after the action are sometimes awesome at showcasing the girl's personality.
Now, before my final paragraph I have a final disclaimer. As some other people mentioned the action is a bit formulaic and I honestly wish they had a bed so they could get more creative, but generally each scene follows the following format: 8-10 minute interview and intro, the girl strips and masturbates (depends on the girl how long) Vince usually helps her insert an anal toy or eats them out. Then she gives a blowjob for a few minutes and they have sex on the table in doggy or with the girl on her back, then there's a pause while they get ready for anal and the video shows a side-by-side view of the insertion and the girl's face. They move to the couch and either go at it in anal or have a cream-pie. The last 2-3 minutes are the girl dressing and/or an exit interview. All in all each scene is about 30-50 minutes. For me this is not a downside, but it depends on what you're looking for. It's definitely not focused on long blowjobs, rough sex or intense anal. If you're looking for one of those niches there are better sites out there.
So overall, while the site is clearly not for everyone there are some awesome scenes here with some very natural models and unscripted moments. What sold me on it were all the anal scenes, but what kept me subscribed were the great models and genuine reactions.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 190-200 scenes with regular updates (about 1 video per week)
- As the name implies all scenes include anal sex. They are well filmed with lots of closeups, ATM, deepthroating and generally a focus on relatively rough sex (expect some breath play and slapping, but it doesn't really get into BDSM territory). I assume most scenes are directed by James Deen (at least 90 videos feature him) since they all mostly have a similar approach: an few minutes of intro with just the girl moving around (no interview), no real set up (there are some very bare bones stories, but they are easy to ignore) and it quickly transitions into a pretty hardcore scene.
- Lots of interesting positions and generally really good looking models that seem to get into the scene. I don't believe they have any girls that are really exclusive or brand new to the industry, but the models they have all give excellent performances.
- Overall fast download speeds.
Cons:
- Pretty difficult to navigate the site, categories are not easy to navigate, no easy way to filter male models from the model view, no easy way to see which scenes have photos or just screencaps. Videos auto-play and the ads are a bit intrusive (sometimes placed right under the video). Overall this is a super bare bones site. The search category works well enough, but it's not enough.
- Most scenes are boy-girl, not a lot of variation as far as threesomes or lesbian scenes. Not necessarily a con, but they have a formula and stick to it.
- Doesn't seem like there is a good way to grab a zipped archive of the photos (I swear I saw a .zip link on some pages, but it doesn't seem like it's always present. Either way, not a great site if you're looking for photos)
- While fast, sometimes when downloading a scene I couldn't stream something else.
Bottom Line:
I'm a bit conflicted on this site. On one hand many of the scenes are incredibly hot, with the models seeming to really get into it. The sex is rough, but never gets into an uncomfortable territory (there is no puking, not a lot of double anal or "push her limits" kind of sex). The models are mostly well known performers you can see other places as well, but the scenes here are all well shot and often a bit more rough than what the models normally shoot.
That's all the positive stuff, the negative is the site itself. For the most part it works, but the design is very bare bones and I've had it timeout on me several times. There are no zipped archives of the photos or screencaps (and often the photos don't contain all the action shown in the videos). When browsing the site, the screen-caps of the scenes are not that descriptive, don't show a preview when you hover over them and if you click into one the video starts playing right away (on my phone often at a much lower resolution than what my wifi can handle) Overall, a lot of small issues that just made me not want to bother logging in and browsing around. Oh and when downloading the videos they have a generic name, instead of the model or the scene name.
Technical issues aside the content here is pretty good, as long as you're interested mostly in boy-girl anal. For the most part they don't have interviews, the girls are already mostly naked and there are no BTS videos. It's all pretty standard porn, without a focus of glamour shots like Tushy or a lot of rimming and ass eating like TrueAnal.
That said performers do switch positions a lot and there are a lot of great shots of anal against a wall as well as some great ass to pussy shots that look really good.
It ultimately comes down to how interested you are in seeing their selection of models in pretty energetic, but relatively standard anal scenes. I've found at least 40 scenes that are absolutely top notch and will make it into my library, but your mileage may vary.
Thank you for the review. This is another site on my wishlist. I'm just curious (Bc the preview search doesn't really work well) roughly how many scenes are anal?
wow, this is a super in depth review. Thank you for all the details.
I've been looking at joining this site (and Wow Girls) for a while, I am just curious, can you search by any kind of tags or categories and how many anal scenes do you think they currently have (I know it's not the main focus, but I'm a sucker for more ass content)
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 16 videos, but the site give you access to the entire NubilesPorn network which has over 1000 scenes.
- Website design is clear and easy to use, the downloads come in multiple sizes and let you know ahead of time how large the file will be (from 1920x1080 ~3-4gb to 480x270 ~under 100mb).
- Very attractive models, this site in particular has several videos with Anya Olsen, Tiffany Watson, Haley Reed and Gina Valentina, often without make up, looking gorgeous in a more natural state.
- Several videos have multiple sex scenes and there is a lot of variety in both action and where the sex takes place (There's car sex, a blowjob on an inflatable raft and lots of outdoors sex.)
Cons:
- The site seems to be on hold for now. It's still listed as active, but no new updates since Mar 4, 2018.
- Most videos are only around 25 minutes with a few minutes of intro, so while there is a lot of sex overall it does feel a bit like a small amount of content.
- Photos are not always available and when they are there doesn't seem to be a zipped archive option. They do have screens of the videos that are pretty good quality, but again no zipped archive.
- While they have "seasons" which follow a theme each video is pretty unique, there's no repeating style in each scene (which I find great and refreshing, but if you're looking for more structured porn this is not really it)
- As with most Nubiles stuff don't expect the sex to be too rough or lean towards the hardcore side of things, there's also not a lot of toys and no anal scenes, but the varied location makes up for this.
Bottom Line:
I love behind the scenes videos, interviews with the girls and just generally natural feeling sex. In my opinion it's always awesome when you can get a sense for a girl's personality and can tell she is into the whole scene. As such this site really intrigued me and I joined the Nubiles network for it and the Nubiles-Castings site (although the whole network is pretty awesome, with a lot of great scenes of very attractive models).
The site has "Seasons" which you can almost think of as a DVD - About 4-7 scenes themed around a core idea:
Rally Race - they have a branded car they use to do some interviews with random people and shoot car sex scenes (Anya Olsen is the main actress here and she is great as a host, full of energy and very fun even if the interview is a bit awkward) then they drive several models to a cabin in the woods and shoot there.
Snow Bunnies - Several models on a sky trip.
Lake Powell - Several models on a boat in Lake Powell.
What makes the whole site awesome, beyond the hot models, is that they show the girls arriving at the airport, driving to the cabin (flashing people as they're on the road), playing around and just generally being goofy. There's a lot of behind the scenes content cut into the intros to the videos showing everyone having a good time. It's absolutely awesome and makes the scenes feel like you would imagine a spring break college trip could be. The girls have good chemistry and it genuinely feels like some sex scenes are not planned, it's just a bunch of models and guys with cameras setting out to film porn, seeing what happens and filming it.
Sadly most of this "theme setting" content is only used in the intros to the videos, in well edited montages. For example, the Snow Bunnies episode 1 has some great shots of the girls in the car to the winter cabin, getting out and showing their bottoms, and even a car blowjob before the scene cuts to a really good shower sex scene. The content is great, but they don't keep any of the banter in the car, or show the reaction of the other girls while one of them is giving a blowjob right next to them. I know that it must be really hard to cut together all that content in an interesting way, but to me the appeal of the site is the vibe of "yeah we're porn stars, but we're also just a bunch of girls on vacation having fun". It would have been really cool to keep the videos a bit longer (most of them are around 25-30 minutes) and show the girls chat, flirt with each other, maybe a brief interview or even the planning of what kind of content they want to shoot. Something to showcase the girl's personalities more. They even toyed with the idea of having some models record stuff on their phone, but it's very brief and easy to miss. I would have loved the girls maybe giving a bit of an interview on who they plan on sleeping with (nothing to crazy, but more than just a "Later That Night" card and then a cut to sex.
Overall the way they use the BTS content feels like a missed opportunity. At times it's almost like "here's the fun montage up front in a 2 minute intro" now let's cut to the sex.
All of that said, this is still some of the most unique content I've seen in a while, as I said before the models are awesome and they have good chemistry while the action is varied and fun. I just wish there were more seasons, and the videos were longer but if you're a fan of unscripted sex scenes this is a must buy. Probably as close you can get to amateur sex, while still filmed very well and edit into a great final product.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Around 1500 scenes, even more photo sets (I'll revisit this point in the cons) and regular updates. (about 250 anal scenes if that's why you joined)
- Really unique style with a "dark" bend to it. A lot of Gothic make up and clothing.
- The preview of the site is what you get. I really appreciate the honest approach to showing exactly what kind of and how much content you will get when you join.
- Good navigation, decent download speeds overall technically good site (but be aware it uses the same design as evil angel, hardx and a handful of other sites)
- Good diversity of models within the "alt-chick" "punk" aesthetic.
- Models seem to genuinely have fun and the shots are for the most part fun and lighthearted.
Cons:
- Some scenes have too much make-up and even some Halloween make-up that make it hard to focus on the models.
- A lot of scenes have two photo sets one with just glamour shots of the female and another set with the action. I kind of wish the two would be combined, or at least named something similar so I could pair them up later. As other reviews mention, the photos are all labeled as a number so you have to go back and update the folder with the name of the models (really small issue if you don't care about photos)
- If the punk theme of the site doesn't appeal to you there's not much variation. Tattoos on female models are also the norm, so if that's not your thing this won't work.
Bottom Line:
I love this site, the models are incredibly hot, the action is varied and fun and there is plenty of hardcore to enjoy.
I believe the site was started by Joanna Angel and she is the main performer in a lot of scenes. However, she is also directing and adding her own flavor to many other movies, making the site really feel like her vision. And it is a great vision. I really enjoy female porn directors as I feel their scenes end up feeling somehow more intimate with the female models acting more like themselves, really hamming it up in a goofy script then getting really involved in the action.
Speaking of hammy, almost every scene has some funny element to it (a naked model doing yoga in front of two distracted guys, a student helping a teacher "hack" the school network, adult Wednesday Adams and so on). This intro goes for about a minute or two and just adds some comedy, before the action get's started. Some DVD's it's more pronounced than others (unsurprisingly "THE WALKING DEAD A HARDCORE PARODY" has more of a plot than "Stockings". Then again the walking dead parody also has zombie sex, which I can now safely say is not my thing.)
Overall I'd say most scenes go more towards the hardcore side of things, with some double anal action, plenty of deepthroating and rough sex. However it never crosses the line into BDSM and the models seem to be having a great time.
All of the praise above comes, of course, with the caveat that you have to like Tattooed girls with an emo looks and way too much dark makeup. The site caters to a specific audience and if you don't enjoy Hot Topic this site might not be for you. On the other hand this site offered me the opportunity to see some models I thought I knew very well in a different light(Holly Hendrix & Chloe Cherry in dark makeup in the same scene is a must buy in my book)
If that last paragraph didn't scare you off, I'd say this site is well worth it, especially if you catch it on sale
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
