Let's Try Anal (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 310 scenes with updates around 2 times a month (sometimes it seems like you only get one video per month, but 3 the next month so it might vary a bit)
- All scenes have download options from 320p to 1080p and almost all scenes also have images (around 50 to 80 photos at 2000 x 1300 or close to it). I was surprised that even old videos seem to have high resolutions (1080), but older images are only 1200x800.
- The site layout is very similar to the Babes network and I believe the Reality Kink network. The search could be a bit better, it timed out a few times while I was downloading stuff, and there are some other small issues but overall it's decent and works well.
- Most scenes are around 25-30 minutes and are mostly POV. Some scenes have some more wide angles but really the focus here is pretty close up anal action.
- Really great models. They have mostly better known girls recently (Lauren Phillips, Hime Marie) but a lot of new models in the older scenes. |
| Cons: |
- A lot of ads. You get a landing page promoting Reality Kings and the Babes network, ads at the bottom of each page and even when navigating around you get hit with banners going "Want more?! Unlock our 26 premiums sites"
- All downloads are not named, so get ready to have a few dozen "scene_1080p.mp4" and "gallery.zip".
- Downloads were fast, but I've had the site time out on me a few times, luckily once you log back into a page you can just resume the download and it seems to work fine.
- Since most videos are POV don't expect a lot of wide shots, not really a negative for me just something to keep in mind. Also while older scenes seem to mostly have anal some of the newer videos have a lot of oral and PIV sex before getting to the anal.
- Older scenes played with the idea of "this is a real couple and he's convincing her to have anal for the first time" more recent scenes seem to follow more standard porn plots so that could be a downside. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Mofo network is pretty impressive with around 3700 scenes already up and at least one new video added to one of their sites per day. They have some great looking actresses and Let's Try Anal has some of the only anal scenes some of these models have shot.
Unfortunately the navigation could be better. When searching for the anal tag in the whole network you only get back 13 scenes... which, considering LTA has over 300 videos just goes to show their search system is seriously broken. Add the almost constant ads the site has everywhere and compared to other networks like Team Skeet or Evil Angel I was left a bit disappointed. Even searching for one particular model turned out to be a bit of a pain since there is no way to see all girls that shot a scene for LTA (when you go to the models page you get all models in the whole network and even searching by name can return wrong results).
Something else that might be a turn off is that almost all videos on LTA are entirely POV. Some of the more recent scenes have some tripod shots but for the most part the site tries to sell the idea that this is a couple and you're seeing things from the perspective of the guy convincing his girlfriend to try anal for whatever reason. This plot point was more prevalent in older scenes where there's a lot more prep with toy and finger insertions. Also in a lot of the older shots the girls seem to be in some amount of pain and keep asking the male model to go slower.
Finally, these scenes also seem to have a more amateur level to them: the lights are not always perfect, the camera shakes a bit during the action, the girls comment on why is the guy filming them, that sort of stuff. More recent scenes seem to have better lights and camera work as well as more standard porn plots and doing anal doesn't seem to be the same big deal it was in the older scenes. The most recent update (Whitney Wright) doesn't even have the model talk, she just starts stripping and goes into anal sex pretty casually.
Now this is clearly subjective and I'm not a fan of "painal", so the way some of the girls acted really didn't work for me, but overall I think the handheld nature of the older videos was more interesting and unique than the more recent scenes. Older videos remind me a bit of Woodman casting scenes or something from Exploited College Girls, while the more recent scenes are more generic. I'll also make a special note about the Joseline Kelly scene where the guy is supposedly playing games on a turned off TV with no console in sight... I know I should care about details in porn, but come on, the TV is off!
In conclusion, the network has some pros but some serious cons. The site itself has some great models, but the scenes might not be your cup of tea if you are really turned off by POV shots... it's a bit of a mixed bag. If some of the models look really appealing to you and you never joined I'd say it's worth it, but if you're only interested in the most recent scenes you can probably get similar stuff on other networks. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
