Some of the reviews on here mention that the sex scenes are passionless or robotic. I looked at the site's preview and some of the girls look like they might be actual lesbians, do you get this feeling at all from within the website? Do the girls seem reluctant to touch each other or are they more open to having sex? Also about what percent of videos are more robotic...if anyone knows...
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 26 scenes with Russian model Sasha Rose doing all the basic and not so basic stuff (solo masturbation scenes, fisting, regular hardcore sex as well as anal and double anal penetration, lesbian action as well as lesbian fisting)
- Videos are all good quality with multiple size options and formats to chose from HD- 1920x1080
SD- 640x480 and WMV or MP4.
- Images are available as zipped and are decent quality at around 1200x800. There are around 170 images per set and overall they look decent/ aren't just thumbnails.
- The site had great download speeds, no log-out periods, no issues navigating and overall it probably has the nicest interface of the whole network.
- The Bonus feature is a joke, but you do get access to several network sites that still update pretty often.
- There is a members forum where you can report issues and in theory could communicate with Sasha. (t would be awesome if it worked)
Cons:
- The last update on the site was 10.10.2010 and I don't think we'll see much stuff here in the near future.
- The forum, while a potentially nice bonus is devoid of life and Sahsa only posted on it 6 times total.
- The whole strength of a solo site is the girl offering new and unique content. While the scenes here are exclusive they are not incredibly unique (except for one or two). A membership with many other networks will get you similar stuff from Sasha. Some of the outfits here are nice (a hot pair of heels here and a nice corset there) but simply not enough different content to warrant joining this particular site.
- The network sites are nice but several of them are old and don't update anymore (Dildo sex machine last updated in 2009, Brutal anal sex doesn't have dates but is old. Extream Kream updated this year but irregularly, anal dildo lesbians last updated in 2008)
- They have adds in the member's area
Bottom Line:
I love Sasha Rose. I loved her since I first found her sets on Teencorenetwork. She does anal, fisting and even double anal and makes it look effortless and fun. She has a great body and gorgeous lips, overall she is one of my favorites so joining a site dedicated to her sounded like a great idea.
While I usually don't care very much for sites dedicated to just one particular porn star I've had some good experiences in the past. Membership to a solo site usually means some live chats, maybe a forum or journal of sorts and even if the model herself is not posting someone pretending to be her does, which is the most you can ask for really :).
I remember solo sites where the girl would upload random photos of herself every day, answer questions regularly and auction off bits of her clothing or just give it away, you could make special requests for a certain type of outfit or scene and she would deliver. I even remember one site where the community convinced the girl to finally try anal. Overall what I'm saying is that if you're not going to promise hundreds of different hot girls but just one you have to make sure that one girl caters to her fans.
This site at a first look appears to do just that. Sure, most of the videos are pretty average sex scenes, but you also get some unique and exotic content: a milk enema video, a peeing scene that is very tastefully done. We get some interesting outfits (black leather jacket and white stockings anyone?) In the beginning Sasha was posting in the forums and they were taking requests for what the next scene was going to be. Everything seemed to be going great.
Then it all stopped. No updates, no one answers the forums anymore, it's like a ghost town in there. The first thing in the member's area is a banner proclaiming they will update weekly. There are dozens of users asking when those updates are supposed to happen and dead silence since 2010. It's like a slap in the face.
The site looks great, it navigates very easily and has a ton of nice features (each scene is dated, rating buttons for each scene, easy to preview the action and even easier to download stuff) Sasha looks awesome and she does very hardcore stuff, but nonetheless the webmasters dropped the ball in the worst way possible. It almost feels like Sahsa decided to leave the network and they had a huge fight or something.
Now don't get me wrong the content that is here is not bad, in fact it looks great, but except for a few videos, you can get the same type of scenes on a dozen other sites that will also have a lot more scenes.
I would have loved to see some backstage stuff, some interviews (I know she doesn't speak English, but subtitles or a translator) something to make more of a connection with Sasha. They only have the same type of porn I can get at 21sextury and teencoreclub and on top of it all they aren't even updating anymore.
The network itself is not bad, they have a few sites that are still updating regularly and a bunch that have older videos/ clips. But I wouldn't join just for Sasha's site. If some of their lesbian/ dildo content on the other sites looks incredible and you're already in the network Sasha is a nice bonus, but otherwise it's simply not worth it.
Check out brutal dildos, huge strap-on lesbians, moms teaching teens or brutal fisting before deciding on this network (those are all sites that still update regularly and have significant amount of content). Those sites bundled into the package also drive the score up from a 60 for this site to a 69 overall package value.
Good advice here. I hate it when videos don't have a descriptive name and one has to go and re-name them later. I didn't even realize this could be caused by java script...I'll have to play around for a while and check this issue out. Thanks for the helpful info.
I got here through innocent virgins so maybe the two sites are somewhat different but nonetheless I thought this would be a better place to leave my comment.
As far as I can tell you can only stream the content on here and much of it is actually just a link to a third party website. There are around 100-200 scenes that vary in quality from 70 grainy porn to somewhat acceptable scenes taken from DVD's.
The content isn't organized and the whole site feels like a mess.
The image galleries are decent but you can find the same stuff in other places, in much better quality.
Sorry, I wasn't very clear about my meaning. You should add the information you offered in message #4 "Her pics are .jpgs and her videos are .wmvs. (and so on)" Into the actual review. That way people can read the review and don't have to check the replies for information about the site. Also it will make your review look better.
A nice start to a review. There is potential but you should add more. I am new here too and I am always striving to improve, read the forum, read other reviews and you can become better as well. There can be much more said about a site than you have...
I hope you stay around and I really hope you will improve.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-41 models in about 90-100 videos. A bit hard to tell since each video clip is taken from a DVD and each DVD has a different amount of video clips. There are around 15 DVD's each one having a few videos, casting info and a few photos as well as the story behind the DVD. But don't get too excited, most of the stories are nonexistent and the photos are 600px × 800px and in very small quantities.
- However you do get access to some bonuses. After a month of membership you get access to Collegeinvasion.com. Then there is S.H. TV which streams a few different videos (if you can get it to work, if you have a slow connection don't even bother). You also have some amateur photos and videos around 36 or so. Not very attractive amateurs if I may add.
- Kinda fun videos. They are all college themed and rather amusing or at least try to. Some models are hot, not as many as I've seen at other studios, though.
Cons:
- Couldn't find any download options for videos.
- Browsing was funky, the whole, select a DVD then we'll show you the scenes you can see was rather disappointing. At least you could browse based on models.
- The amount of content is not really that large, although at first the site seemed overwhelming. Most of the bonus features don't work or are disappointing (I'm thinking of the unattractive amateurs or the lounge which contains some bonus videos that were rather short and boring)
-The whole site seemed based on selling the DVD's and keeping you a member while offering as little content as possible. Left a bitter taste in my mouth...
Bottom Line:
Maybe I'm getting older or maybe I have too high expectations but when I join a site I choose not to purchase a porn DVD. I want some exclusive content, updates and some model info or other bonuses that a DVD couldn't deliver. However when a site makes me feel like I'm just previewing DVD's in order to choose which one to buy, well it just doesn't stand well with me.
The Anal Acrobats network (for example) also puts out DVD's and a lot of their content is available in that format but they don't remind you at every second. Their browser doesn't take you to a DVD cover with the options to see video clips from the actual DVD.
On the positive the videos are fun and the premise for the actual porn is interesting (blazed and confused= a girl smokes pot and then gets fucked, college courses in anal and strap-on road trip or something like that, are some examples of how this site tries to connect with the college world...which is cool and all, but it just kinda makes you want to buy the DVD's and avoid a monthly fee)
To add to the whole feeling of "Why bother paying for this site" I believe at least some of the DVD's are available at Videobox. I know at least Glazed and Confused is.
So the final conclusion is don't bother with the website, try and get the DVD's the content is good but not worth a monthly membership.
I have been following this site for a while and it seems that like a few others in the Teencoreclub network they don't like updates. Every few months this network will add a new site then let it die.
Right now if you want similar content I'd recommend looking at doubleteamedteens which still updates.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 78 videos in HD (1200 x 720), standard WMV (380 x 200) and quicktime format.
- good download speeds
- around 37-40 photo galleries (around 683px × 1029px) with around 150-200 photos per set. No zipped archives, but some very hot photos that did not have a videos matching them.
- very nice and decently sized network of HD porn in a bunch of niches.
- this site surprised me as I hadn't even visited it a few months back when I got my first HD porn pass, but this is one of the best sites in the network in my opinion. The milfs here are truly moms I would love to fuck as they are hotter than many of the teenage models in the rest of the network and most of them didn't seem to be familiar models. Some very hot scenes.
Cons:
- most scenes are cut in two or three pieces, each one less than 20 minutes
- the same problems as the rest of the network, lack of a good search function, videos are all named the same when downloaded, some scenes are too generic (there is a soccer ball around hence the soccer mom milf porn...)
- this was the only site in the network where streaming was funky and slow at times...
Bottom Line:
This site has what all the HD network lacks...personality and a certain air about the models that makes them hot. Maybe becuase they are supposed to be more in charge, maybe the girls just resonate with me, but I downloaded almost every video on the site. As opposed to other sites in this network I feel like Soccer Milfs is really, really arousing and a very, very good porn site. I think it all comes down to the models acting different than girls in everyday porn. They are usually dressed up or look like well off women that actually want sex with some random dudes. The girls seemed to initiate some of the scenes or at least be more willing than the regular girl that is often portrayed as just an accessory.
I felt like there were real women having sex in front of the camera not just models who were thinking about the check at the end of it all.
The content still feels like a major company's product and it's nowhere near the kind of personal connection that models have with the user on smaller networks, but here I actually felt turned on by most videos, like back in the days that Playboy was actually cutting edge and didn't show Marge on the cover just to get a few more sales...know what I mean?
This is main stream porn at it's best not it's lowest.
The only complaint is that there aren't enough videos and the whole cutting scenes in pieces means you actually get only 30-40 scenes once you're don merging everything together....give us more!!!
All and all, I recommend this site wholeheartedly. Check it out guys, especially if you like HD porn. This one alone is worth the membership fee, combined with the big network behind it, it's a steal.
I've been too busy to add any serious reviews recently, but I just wanted to say that this site has got my attention. It's one of the best BJ sites I've been to. The action is well done and all the models have a certain "average" girl look. I liked this much more than Facial Abuse which was a bit to intense for me.
If you like messy BJ's with a lot of realistic cum, check this one out
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Network access to many sites with similar content (only one site in the network has more mature women, the rest are almost all built around young adult)
- Around 225 scenes available on this site with about 2 updates per month.
- Video quality ranges a lot, some old scenes are as low as 320x240, but the more recent stuff is 1024x768 and some are as high as 1920x1080. The average is 832x468 25 frames per sec
- Zip archives for images as well as slideshow option on the site. Images are 1024x768 and around 150- 200 images per set.
- Model pages are very nice and help you find other scenes the girl did on the network
- Very fast downloads, maxing my internet connection regularly. No Time-outs, no DRM or other issues.
- The models are hot, a lot of familiar faces from other Russian sites, but also quite a lot of new girls, some of which might be exclusive.
- Most scenes are group sex, two guys and one girl although there are a handful of two girls and one guy
Cons:
- The web design is a bit dated, no search function no quick category filter, no easy way to separate all girl-girl-boy scenes from boy-boy-girl.
- Sometimes clicking on the show all girls link will actually lead you to the models on another site (Ifinallyfuckedher) meaning that really the best way to navigate this site is by looking at the scene thumbs, which are not very descriptive.
- They have animated ads in the members area, pretty prominently.
- Some strange cuts in the scenes (it's all part of the "virgin" gimmick- cut away from penetration, cut back in and magically there's "blood" on his penis. Not really a big deal, but a bit distracting)
- Some older content is really unwatchable (several scenes with very bad resolution/ lighting)
Bottom Line:
A lot of Russian porn goes for of MAXIMUM HARDCORE action with innocent girls. Just think about sites like First Anal Quest, Gapeland, Defiled 18. It's almost like you have to have anal gapes to be a Russian porn site. Spoiled Virgins and in fact the entire network here doesn't really follow that rule. Sure, there is an anal only site, but for the most part the girls here do group sex without DP's and/or doubleanal shenanigans.
In fact the spin of this site (as the title suggests) is the idea that these girls have never had vaginal sex and the first penetration is a big deal for them. To sell the idea the site has a fake doctor check the girls out and proclaim them virgin and even goes as far as using fake blood in several of the shots.
While all of this is not really that interesting and in my opinion only takes away about 6 minutes out of the rather short 20-25 minute scenes what was interesting for me was the way the girls act when the guys first penetrates them. In all scenes they act eager, yet shy. Hesitant, sometimes even in some pain, but ready to guide the male model inside them. It's all acting and some do it better than others, but overall the girls really seem into the sex in a way that a horny virgin girl might be.
Those few moments of the initial penetration make the scenes here truly worth it for me. I quickly skip through the phony doctor (who sometimes strips naked to have sex with the girl...talk about dedication to their patients ) and the set-up which is in Russian with no subtitles. But once you get to the actual sex scenes there are some great, great shots.
Once the doctor is gone almost all scenes continue with a few moments when the girl is penetrated and another girl or a guy watches the whole action. It probably sounds lame, but trust me the whole act can be surprisingly arousing.
Once the initial awkwardness is taken care of the sex goes to some pretty hot threesomes without going into hardcore anal mode. It's pretty much just BJ's and vaginal sex here, but with some pretty good angles and positions.
While the lack of DP's could be a disappointment for some it also means that the site managed to get some very hot looking girls that are probably not willing to show up on other sites. Combine that with the somewhat different acting and you get a pretty decent site with an unique spin.
Another plus is that the locations are varied and while a lot of the scenes are filmed around a couch at least it's a different couch. Also the male models are varied and there are several who look right around the same age like the girls and don't come off as complete perverts who creepily moan into the camera.
The angles and light are decent, with a good mix of wide-shots and some close-ups. One disappointment is that a lot of cum-shots are on the girls chests, not cream-pies and very little swallowing.
Overall I'd recommend this network and this site to anyone who loves young Eastern European models and wants some different scenarios past the usual gonzo porn. There are many models who were unknown to me and several that are familiar faces, but I'd say the vast majority are petite and very hot. It's a combination you can't go wrong with.
Don't expect actual virgins and while the network does have some Deepthroat and anal centric sites most of the content is a tad more softcore than the vast majority of Eastern European porn out there.
This is one of the new sites that Porn pros really seems to be pushing. They have weekly updates and while they only have around 25 scenes so far the content is pretty awesome.
Each scene seems to be around 30 minutes long and we get to see some gorgeous looking girls tied up and played with until they cum in a squirting explosion.
The male model uses all sorts of toys on the girls as well as fingering and fucking them. (Surprising not a lot of head from the guys in here) It's also interesting that some scenes end with the girl cumming while some end with her getting a facial from the dude. It almost feels like they had a lot of content from another one of their disgraced sites and decided to create a new site, then more recently started making content exclusively focused on squirting.
Anyhow, the scenes are fun and each one starts and ends with a very cute interview. Good, high quality stuff that fits right in with the rest of the porn pros content.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Over 100 scenes most of them with image sets and videos (Movies come usually as WMV at 640x 480, but some have MPEG formats at smaller resolutions. Also some scenes are available as clips or 320x 240 resolution. Images were around 768px × 1,024px)
- A great variation in models (some Russian teens, some more mature models, a lot more Asian girls than similar networks so that was a nice surprise)
- The tour gives a good impression of the action inside the site, some lesbian (2-3 scenes) a little anal (more of the recent stuff has it, I'd say maybe 20 scenes overall) and mostly hardcore boy girl with focus on outfits/ stockings, including some footjobs and guys cumming on the girls feet. Overall a lot of variation (which is good and bad at the same time)
- Some hot models that really seem into it
- Full network access with a few more sites that are very similar.
- Download speeds were very good and I didn't have any trouble navigating the site. (No dead links, no sudden sign-outs)
Cons:
- The site updates randomly, the latest scene on 03/04/11 the one before on 12/12/10 (3 or 4 videos in December last year, with not much before then)
- The site is really not focused on images (some sets only have the girl stripping and none of them have a zipped folder download option)
- More and better quality video options would be nice (the camera work is not always the best (awkward angles and poor lighting really hurt many of the videos))
- The whole site feels like it has 3 very different types of content(I'll elaborate in the bottom line, but overall there is a kind of strange break between various scenes.)
- Navigation, while it works is not the best. No search options, no way to tell what happens in the scene, no model index. The site is basically a page that shows all the sets movies and pictures mixed together on one page. It's simple to the point where it's frustrating, especially when a photo set shows up but you have to hunt for the movie.
- Some sets are mislabeled
Bottom Line:
This has gotta be one of the strangest sites I have joined in a while. The members page is a black screen with thumbnails of the movies and the photos all together on one page, mixed with each other to the point where it's hard to understand what exactly you're getting (a few of the older sets are also mislabeled or several of the girls have the same name)
Basically I wanted to get the scene with Brigitte white from the preview tour. I click on the movie of the model called Brigitte only to realize that it's another model, of course the thumbnail was so unclear and they had no preview images so I only realized I had the wrong video after finishing the download. I go back only to realize there is no Brigitte movie... I think. Not sure since there is no way to search for a particular model or type of scene. Even worse, they have no zip archive... but they do have a slideshow option so there's that. But wait, a bunch of the photos are actually not hardcore action, just the girl getting undressed. Maybe I could stream the scene instead, alas no streaming available on this site. At least the downloads went incredibly fast, got a 400 mb scene in just a minute or so.
To make things even more confusing there seem to be 3 types of scenes on the site. The very first 20 or so scenes feature English speaking girls, dialogue (mostly stuff along the lines of: "Those are hot stockings, you make me hard, I am cumming now.") and a lot of focus on the stockings, cumming on the stockings and rubbing the penis on the stockings (These scenes are all named "ss_model name" and are very similar to what the preview tour promises, just see the trailers to get an idea of what these scenes look like).
The next bunch of videos named "was_model name" seem to be pretty generic hardcore Russian porn. No talking, no music, guy walks in and within 30 seconds the girl is blowing him. The models are also not as cute in my opinion, they look more generic Russian porn-like, and there is not nearly enough focus on stockings.
Finally the last kind of videos which only have the model name are little story scenes (girl dressed up as bride, girl dressed up as secretary, etc.) and have horrible, horrible music. I swear I have never heard such poor choices for porn music.
Scattered among those rather generic and boring types of scenes there are some real gems. I found one scene where the girl tries on several pairs of stockings in front of a guy before having sex, I also found a really good video with a bunch of behind the scenes type of directions and an adorable model in crotchless panties.
Sadly there is no easy way to tell which scene will be interesting/ different and which one will be a 15 minute close up of a girl's back in doggy style. Some scenes have the girl look straight at the camera as she puts on stockings or plays with herself, some are nothing but poor close-ups of genitalia. Overall a rather strange mash-up of scenes that feel like they belong on different sites.
Aside from the strange discrepancies in the content the site was overall average. Navigation was sub-par but the large network makes up for it ( check out like legs and secretary hoes since both have a bunch of stocking material). Download speeds were very fast, but the lack of more download options/ better quality videos brings the score back down. The models were okay, with no exceptionally ugly or beautiful girls standing out. Overall a nice mix of English and Russian girls (they are missing out on some really cute girls though, no Aspen, no Payton or Flick, no Amai Liu or Sasha Grey).
Another unhappy point is the technical quality of the videos. Sadly, I think none of the videos looked as good as the preview page made them appear. The lighting is not always optimal and sometimes the camera guy focuses on the wrong things (please no close up of a dude's face while he's jacking off.) also I think the three preview videos are a bit misleading since most of the content, especially more recent stuff is not really representative of those trailers (In my opinion)
That being said there are some nice gems hidden here and if you do join I recommend Whitney and Anne as their scenes were some of the more interesting ones. Also make sure to check out the rest of the network.
Good review, thank you for sharing. However would you mind adding some more technical details? How many videos, what sizes/ resolutions how fast were the downloads. I know a lot of people care about the technical side of these reviews :)
Thank you very much. This is the perfect clarification. The site is not what I was looking for after all. Sounds cool, but not really my cup of coffee.
I am a bit confused about the site. I looked around for a while and I looked at the video section which seemed to be all user submitted stuff. If this a social site or a softcore porn site with a strong community around it? Are all the shots made by similar people or do people just update their own photo sets?
Also as a fan of videos is there any purpose in joining? I read pinkpanter's review and I'm just curious if things changed since then.
Finally how easy is the navigation of the site? My partner might be interested in the content but she is pretty computer illiterate. The tag thing sounds cool but are there any other similar options?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A lot of content. The membership offers you access to 25 websites (sweet auditions, bukkakepiss, french fisting, max hardcore, angel videos etc. Most of the sites are hardcore and most of the content is of pretty hot girls) Each website has around 10-20 models minimum each one with anywhere from 1 to 5 videos and just as many photo shoots. Add some bonus galleries (both video and photos) and dvd content and you have quite a decent network.
-A lot of cute models/hot scenes and a lot of hardcore scenes (the camera man/interview person was a woman which made the whole scenes somehow much more hot...in fact the interviews I saw on this site are some of the best I have ever experienced...but then again I love interviews.)
- Videos come in various resolutions and types (wmv, quicktime, mpg) and some download very fast. However, the quality of many videos is sub-par. I guess that makes them smaller and easier to download but still....
- Streaming worked very well for me.
Cons:
- The biggest problem I had with this network was it's inconsistency. Some sites had poor quality videos (Athens Angels come to mind, with fuzzy videos at poor quality) While others have up to 640x480. The models are also rather random, there are some chubby girls and some mature women but you have to manually look for them; most of the models are teens or teen-looking. Finally some sites had easy navigation while others made you dig for the content.
- Speaking of navigation it could also be improved. It was a bit buggy at times with pages loading the same models twice, and some sites not letting me use the open in new tab option which made my navigation very hard...
- Finally, the download speed for me was very bad and many of the videos crashed before they were done. However since my connection is very poor right now so I am not going to take points away for it. Just be warned that a spotty connection can result in every video reaching 0 bytes after it's about 25% done.
Bottom Line:
The network has a lot of issues. Most videos are available only in pieces. The fact that there is no real way to search for chubby or mature models (or any kind of models in fact) in the whole network also makes the navigation unpleasant. Sure we have a search model by name but unless you know the girl's stage name this is not really useful. The previews for videos are very poor quality (they reminded me of 70's porn shots). There is no zipped archive for photos and so on...You get the idea, the network could be better.
I personally also had issues downloading videos but I blame that on my poor internet connection.
However, on the plus side I had never seen so many pee, anal and group sex scenes of hot women and teenagers. The female cameraman was also a nice change, but there are also videos of sex without any back story if you prefer that. Overall a nice variety of hardcore porn (including a bunch of Max Hardcore videos which are pretty good if you like female abuse and ridiculous anal)
All and all the network has good content, which can be very interesting if you are into water sports, anal, or bukakke (however it's spelled) but the navigation and user features could be improved. Worth checking out and if you like the Max Hardcore style of videos or the Pierre Woodman. For me it worked for others the issues might be too much to deal with.
Damn..She was hot. It's always a shame when models leave the business but then again with the average time they last being less than a year, can't really expect more than a few good movies....
I perfectly agree. The site and the whole network is just a mess. there are some videos and some photo sets that could make a good website but the way it's divided and run it's simply a mess and not worth signing up for.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
