| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
1176
|
Fuck My Melons
(0)
|
|
03-09-10 05:43am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1177
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
2: BTW: Cannot find a way to make contact to webmaster on this one - except if you ARE a webmaster...
|
03-08-10 09:17am
|
Reply
1178
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Weird! - and of course, like I see at Users - you're in New Jersey - last I heard, that it's the US, LOL - still strange - and these regional pricing problems seems to hit more and more PUs..
|
03-08-10 09:11am
|
Reply
1179
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
The sites looks FINE - so why this hold back about reviews? a bit strange when you've already have put out the site for members to join - well, just this to ad - replied the latest comment for the site.
And BTW: it still LOOKS good..
|
03-08-10 08:36am
|
Reply
1180
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
Cybertoad got a point - voted NO - as I'm in a long time, fine marriage with no porn-problems.
But once had a girlfriend who by accident discovered my nude-magazines (back in the 80th) - and got somewhere between mad and sad - 'Don't you have enough in me?'
Guess that could still be the problem for younger PUs.
|
03-08-10 08:30am
|
Reply
1181
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
This is a weird one - and rare.
A billing where there's no help from Epoch - on the contrary.
Normal billing: CCBill - and yes, again: Not $24.95 via TBP - BUT: Euro 24.95 (over 36 bucks) (for europeans and others outside US - AND this is a french site).
And you can try to sign up via Epoch AT the site - but, man, here it's even worse: Euro 29.95...
Never seen that before....
Please, webmasters at Explicite Art: Let's have a good/some explanation.
|
03-08-10 08:20am
|
Reply
1182
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
That's news to me, mbaya - that those regional prices ALSO goes for Canada....is it so?
|
03-08-10 08:11am
|
Reply
1183
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
Ahem....Is the site open for formel reviews?
https://www.thebestporn.com/review/artlingerie/
(see review status)
Or do we still have to wait till April - and if so: Why?
You let in paying users!
|
03-08-10 08:09am
|
Reply
1184
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
For sure, turboshaft and this user dreams, too - and BTW: not very mysterious: Some models do a better orgasm-fake than others...depending on the producers, too!
Guess this is because a lot of us are 'good ol' pornusers' that can see through the fake (but still keep on dreaming), LOL...
But as the pull was put: Do they reach orgasm?
Not likely in most cases.
|
03-07-10 05:42am
|
Reply
1185
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Have not been at this site for over a year - at least. (used to love the content at Pier 999 - and have not seen any newer inputs for some time).
But this review by tangub is very helpful - and in spite of the lack of updates in 2010 - I still hope the site will be back (great videos)..
BTW: Welcome to a new user here - keep up those fine reviews...
|
03-07-10 05:32am
|
Reply
1186
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
wildstar's Comment
First: CCBill certainly has some of these currency-problems with when joining from Europe.
But NOT here: (at least via TBP)
Take a look again at join-page: Go to 'Use EU Direct Pay' - here you get a right price: 20.31 Euros - which adds up to the Dollar-price....
And once more about this EU currency problems:
If CCBill is too expensive, search for the site at Epoch Shop (Adult) - 9 out of ten (alomst) you'll get a fair price, that's similar to the price in dollars...
|
03-07-10 05:24am
|
Reply
1187
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Another one!!!!!!
A bummer for Drooler and other members - and again: How can sites like this go online?
Do not give a damn if it's $ 7.50 or $29.95 - it's the same Deal or NO deal...
Apart from the idea of a general 'Special Notice' at TBP - this experience from a fellow PU, who's certainly not a rookie here, should turn into a PU-warning about this site.
And again general: 'Kick ass' here and let's be united at PU - like Danny Joe Brown from Molly Hatchet said: 'Nobody walks on me'!
|
03-06-10 08:38am
|
Reply
1188
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Could not resist:
'Didn't know women have orgasms' - at pornscenes!
Too much fake - but ok, maybe here and there a real one...
|
03-06-10 05:35am
|
Reply
1189
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Aloha....went to preview as soon as, I saw this - but that preview does not seem very good. And where is/are all the old/archived material AND models?
Anyway, bro - thanks for heads-up on this - certainly gotta spend some time browsing previews at all sites in this deal - and the 19.95 could be ok... (that 'In The Mask' I remember as fun)
|
03-06-10 05:23am
|
Reply
1190
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
2:
BTW: got a mail-thing going with a Peter (guess one of the webmasters)from 21 Sextury - and I promised him to send links to some of those 2008-videos - but really: should that be a task for a paying user?
Still, I'm on it....
|
03-05-10 07:42am
|
Reply
1191
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yes - it looks more and more like it's worth staying on - Cuties Galore, Lez Cuties - and not to forget that Anal Teen Angels - not a big anal-fan, but those previews you get at first hand at 21 Sextury looks just great....
|
03-05-10 07:09am
|
Reply
1192
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Look forward to your review - and what I've seen: trailer, ect - it looks really like a great site...
|
03-05-10 07:06am
|
Reply
1193
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I'm just a persistent m.....f....
But all is not well at Club Sandy or Pixandvideo - they still got problems with a whole lot of 2008-videos..
Now your're there, Drooler - try to take a look at these videos, just as examples - only in bad quality - 'medium quality':
Club Sandy:
Nicol Needman 2008-05-11
Peaches 2008-06-15
Angelica Heart 2008-07-01
Jana Maho 2008-07-08
Nicola 2008-07-27
Got them all from the 'former' Club Sandy in MUCH better 'high quality'
And others from 2008 I want to re-download - but not in THAT so called 'medium quality'... there's no 'high quality'
|
03-05-10 07:02am
|
Reply
1194
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Hi mbaya
Please see your thread....
Cheers!
Denner
|
03-05-10 06:09am
|
Comment
1195
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
|
03-04-10 07:56am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
1196
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
This is an interesting review - because of something else, too:
We've had 'complains' about doing reviews of single sites in networks.
A complain I do not agree with - and certainly not in this case:
Grandpas Fuck Teens is one of the sites at the 21st. Sextury netwotk that only is available after more than a month of membership.
So: for a PU: What do I get here, if I stay on (and if not joining direct). Thanks to mbaya for this one..
This site is something special, btw - and fine to compare it with oldje - or Beautyandthesenior..
Been to all those sites - and Grandpas Fuck Teens has - in my opion taken that deal with 'an old geaser' and a young model a bit futher - and a bit more sexy.
Have - among others - saved a scene with Shalina - that's just great in the genre of old/young...
|
03-04-10 07:38am
|
Comment
1197
|
Sweet Denisa
(0)
|
|
03-03-10 08:37am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1198
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Exactly - stop the filming and get hold of the scene before shooting again....
|
03-03-10 06:42am
|
Reply
1199
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
nadiencendia got a very good point here - I know it's subjective, but this user have that FEELING, too.
Generally this new network has caused problems for the former corporation of Pixandvideo, Club Sandy ect.
21st Sextury STILL has a lot to offer and I'd still name it as a favorite - but as I'm coming along in my membership, THINGS are not like they used to be - still the navigation/search ect. bothers me.
AND when you got problems like that, SOME of the fun at these former great sites is less.
AND those problems with NOT updated video-quality from earlier sites.
Mailed the webmasters, but the answer was a bit like blowing in the wind: We upgrade the early videos first....but how can later videos (2008) now come in a lot worse quality that before the change?
Still waiting for an answer from webmasters about that...
|
03-02-10 06:58am
|
Reply
1200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
This question is returning here at PU - and for a good reason - my view: WHY is this deal needed at a fine video?
If the producer/'director' is good there's no need - and it's a boring part of a video. Just watch those sites like Bangbros and Reality Kings.
A lot PUs have said it before: Skip all that yap....and most of that yap comes out plain silly.
|
03-02-10 06:42am
|
