Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Denner (0)  

Feedback:   All (2775)  |   Reviews (120)  |   Comments (399)  |   Replies (2256)

Other:   Replies Received (1709)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 101-125 of 2795 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
101
Visit Petites Parisiennes

Petites Parisiennes
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Exclusive, exclusive and exclusive - the best pros I got for this site.
+ Several vids and photosets of almost each model.
+A few very adorable models/girls/ladies.
+Models - a few - NOT seen elsewhere.
+Special style in both vids and photiosets.
+Some - or rather quite a lot of - reverse strip tease - if you're into that
+Fine vids download options in three formats/sizes:
640x360, 1280x720 and 1920x1080 (think the numbers are correct)
+Fine and fast feed back from webmaster
+Forum for discussions
+And, need I say it: Zip for photos..
+ Pix size: UP to 4000x2667
Cons: - I have been confused(have now canceled) about updates - the site only show ONE update at the time - when hitting "Updates"- bottom.
- Close to "most" of the models are either quite average or - some - even unattractive. (I thought France had more knockouts...)
- Still more well known models - not really a 'cons' - but a bit disappointing for a site like this.
- Problems joining from Europe and the ol' regional pricing item - BUT got help fast from jamy, the webmaster.
- Had several problems when browsing - not logical - confusing more likely...
- Somewhat low in amount of models (But: that kind of adds up with the fact that each model has 5,6 or 7 vids/sets)
- Almost 1/3 of models have NO vids - only pix.
- Only Softcore - but that's the name of the game here..
- Older videos (not that old: 2009) - some of them are BLURRED...or maybe old time Penthouse alike, but NOT good.
Bottom Line: The first hits I got, when joining this site, I was enjoining myself - and after reading some earlier reviews I really thought:
Here is a NEW, different and quite an exiting porn/softcore site with some great "birds"...

"Birds" - or models that is not seen elsewhere - and ok, along with well known models, too...
But I was hunting for the unknown ones, unknown at least at all those hundreds of sites we all here are accustomed to...

But now - after terminating one month of membership - I'm disapointed.
Only saved vids/sets of two or three models in my stash - those NOT seen elsewhere - both exclusive for model and for the sites vids/set...

Like mentioned in the Cons.: Too many of the exclusive models do not hit the fan - OK, this is very subjective - but again - a review has got to be subjective - others here at PU may like the models I don't and visa versa.

BUT: generally this site could be much better with a bit more demanding way of choosing models...at least the unknown ones...

Like I mentioned in Cons I had problem in the browsing/navigation - it's simple if you go for "MODELS" - but almost every thing else you run into problems... like for one: Updates - you only get ONE coming up.....again subjective: I think it's a bit of a mess.

About the reverse strip tease:
At this softcore site you get a lot of special clips/vids (movs) of girls posing, stripping and very little masturbation.

It seems like the most favored deals here is reverse strip:
It CAN be fun, sexy, ect. - but when it's a theme at a lot/ too many vids, it gets to be too much... watching one of the few special, gorgeous models doing more vids with that theme, you loose interest - well I did, anyway.

Photosets: I like many pics in a set - but this site seems to be a bit stingy....too few, bottom line. My favorite only has 50 - not enough in my opinion.

Quality - viewing: Generally the new/latest vids are pretty good in viewing quality - but not more that pretty good/ok. Compared to what we got elsewhere it's only average - and some 'old" ones (not that old - 2009) are way off todays standard.

Sorry, but I can't get higher than the 70 here for some nice exclusive girls, but they are too few - and I can't get nowhere close to that 91 we now see at "Top Rated" at PU....It's bottom line a subjective and an honest opinion from this old timer here at PU....

08-01-11  08:18am

Replies (3)
Review
102
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Before pros:
This is a premiere/opening night, la,la.. of more short reviews from this user:

+ Top of the pops in nice models - a lot of really great models, to be precise..
+ Fine/Great video quality
+ Somewhat a fine variation of models
+ Great photosets - maybe better than vids
+ Zip for sets - AND choice of fine resolutions
+ Exclusive material
Cons: - Main cons: Repetition!
- Like a couple of other soft core sites MC Nudes seems to have a lot of difficult in renewal of general attraction in both sets and vids.
- They go for 3D now - who cares - for a paysite at PC-level...
Bottom Line: MC Nudes was once kind of a favorite - for two reasons:
1) Great models
2) Fine quality vids, quality has seems to go further and further - fine.

But generally the content of both vids and sets lacks a lot in "development".... not much new in matter of more sexy videos - of more refined erotica..
MC Nudes has been the same for too many years - in my book and:
It never seems to get off that special way of doing the same style over and over again.
Did not mean to join, but some models I dig, I had to go for - AND: Those models have a lot better/more erotic/more sexy vids elsewhere.
Still it's a 70 - for the quality and models.
Go elsewhere (TBP) than this review for specifics about formats ect.....

07-05-11  08:57am

Replies (2)
Review
103
Visit Rascal Dog

Rascal Dog
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Here you get the 'old' Foxes-material - videos and photosets for one price in all.
+ Great - mostly - models in sexy outfits.
+ Decent photostyle - decent quality.
+ SOME of the newer videos are ok, BUT...(see below)
+ Wellknown super-models.
+ Relatively easy navigation.
+ Zip for photosets.
+ Nice layout.
Cons: - Too few videos - about 70 right now - and it does NOT seem to grow much!
- Quality of most videos are way too shitty for a site like this.
- Way too expensive.
- Currency rip-off for outside the US.
- Slow browsing.
- Strange navigation.
- No response from webmaster.
- Pre-crossed sales.
Bottom Line: First of all:
THANKS to fellow user james4096 for giving us the first info about this site. Foxes is an old US-glamoursite, but with nothing in helping PUs to a site. If you want some of the videos or photosets, you risk to pay a lot.
But james4096 found this site where you get the content for a monthly fee.
At least it gave this user a slip from buying single videos for $ 9.95 - it could go high along the way.
But Rascal Dog gives the whole deal of Foxes - OR rather most.
Went searching for videos with Laurena Lacey - 4 at RD - Great, I thought, but the quality os those videos are almost 'shit' - how can this be?
They do not care, if you ask this user.
It's pretty strange, because the Co. behind this Foxes also got two other websites with Candice Cardinele and Lucia Tovar. Here the quality is much, much better.
The prefered videos of the great irish Laurena Lacey are not only blurred, but damn far from crisp - NOT like those videos at the Candice Cardinele-site, WHY?
Tried to get an answer, but NADA - do these people not give a damn about their customers?.
Also tried to mail them about the lousy currency-deals - nada!
Most in the US know about Foxes-photosets - earlier all in small size - BUT the later sets here at Rascal Dog/Foxes are getting much better - still it's NOWHERE near what we can expect in 2009/2010 - way behind other major-sites.
The videos are offered in 2: WMV or MOV - most prefer WMV today, BUT the MOV-files are better in viewing-quality, strange...
Still: Foxes/Rascal Dog has that aura about it where you look for glamour-girls/models - AND you'll find it
BUT do not go for videos here.

Videos again: It very strange, that some of those other CO.- sites - here Candice Cardinele has a LOT better quality in videos - so:
IF - or - when you join, you have a pre-crossed sale for the Candice Cardinele-site for $ 2.95 for two days - TAKE IT!!! - if you like Candice.
I did - and do NOT regret - but remember to cancel fast..
Those videos of Candice at her own site are MUCH better in quality and many more in numbers.
So Bottom Line: Not sure I can recommend this site, BUT if you like Candice: Go for her site!

01-12-10  07:18am

Replies (2)
Review
104
Visit Euro Pornstars

Euro Pornstars
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 213 videos of some of the finer euro-models.
Both hc (bg and lez) - and solo.
Aproxx 550 photosets of - mostly the same models.
Both hc (bg and lez) and solo sets, too.
Videos in wmv and mpg.
Navigation ok - with model/photoset/video search
Fine/ok full trial price.
Download-speed ok, but only ok for download.
Zip for photosets in 3 sizes. (BUT see cons.)
Some US-models, but primarily euro-models
Cons: Download Manager NOT allowed - and no way to get around it.
NO DM for photo-zip either!
Horrible repeating login.
SLOW browsing (see below)
A little cheat in amount - some videos posted twice with different name of model - but it's exactly the same video.
Bonus-sites gives you even more hassle with repeating login.
A LOT materiel is NOT exclusive.
Bottom Line: Been looking at this site for some time - and read Wittyguys and Droolers fine reviews, so WHY NOT?
First of all the site has some fine stuff with wellknown euro-models.
But not all are exclusive - far from. Still I found some videos here that I want to keep - and Oh, yes - get the picture why Drooler was up at 79 - and I guess that's because of the photosets - AND they are worth a bit more than the videos.
The deal with three sizes:
1000, 2000 and 3000 px - is maybe the best about the site - and at 3000 px those sets are just great.
So maybe for the first time I'l keep more photosets than videos.
But as a video-freak, I'm disapointed:
Ok, the site got both wmv (socalled HIGH) and MPG (low res) - forget the MPG and the WMV is NOT crisp enough for 2009! Only:
640 x 480 - NOT good enough.
BUT TBP forgot one major item in the review:
The site does NOT allow Download Manager - not for videos, not for the Zips!
And since some of the video-files are up to at least 600 Mb (one 1000 Mb) - I have to downgrade the score.
Ok, the download-speed for conventional dl is just ok - I get almost 380 Mb/Sec. I still miss a lot better speed with DM.
And the browsing-speed is annoying. Sometimes you have to wait and wait for a page to show up.
Another downgrade with this site is the repeating logins - tried several browsers, but none could save the login/password - never had that before.
And if your're not active at the site for more than 10 minuttes or so (even during download) - you have to login again (and the password is generated and not by your own choise)
Bottom line: Some fine/ok stuff in here - but the handeling of browsing/download makes you tired of this site too fast...
So no more than a 70 from this user - and it's only for the content.
Won't be back.

05-10-09  08:09am

Replies (3)
Review
105
Visit Candice Cardinele

Candice Cardinele
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great looking model - solo site
Exclusive all the way
Ok looking, very new and rare videos of this doll
Ok photosets (small in size, though)
Zip for photos
Cons: Small selection even for a solo-site
A bit prizy - not $14.95 as stated at TBP, but 24.95 - at the moment "special price: 19.95
Video-quality COULD be a bit better
No interaction
No zip for "girl-friend"- photosets
Softcore only - no real masturbation - no lez
Bottom Line: I joined this rather small site with a slim amount af content because the girl, Candice Cardinele is a great looking girl.
Followed her for some years where she mainly appears on photosets from Foxes.com - those photosets that is well know for preview on the net - and I think, wellknown for their rather small size, though foxes-photosets have been made in huge amount.
Here at her new own site Candice (under Foxes.com) has complete new stuff:
But: Only 10 videos (again not bad, because the amount of videos with her is slim in general):
WMV and Mov. or stream for both.
Download for full videoclips or parted in three.
Average size: 80-110 Mb, 720x480.
Photosets: 21. (Plus 11 sets of socalled friends - no zip here, strange)
Size only: 850x566 - but still good viewing quality.
If you also think Candice is great there are two ways of preview: At her own site the preview video gives you a pretty good idea. No previews for full size-photos.
At Foxes.com there are two other fine preview videos of Candice - but I never quite figured out the membership-deal with Foxes.com - it looks like you "Buy" one video-download for $9.95 - but maybe other PUs know more about this Foxes.com.
But Bottom Line: Even if the amount is slim this latin-type doll is simply sexy and I spend my $19.95 with pleasure - 'cause I can return to this girl again and again.
Still: No more than a score of 75 - even from a fanatic.
The site needs a lot of improvement.

Had to downgrade.
Way to few updates
No Zip now!

06-07-08  05:20am

Replies (5)
Review
106
Visit Amour Angels

Amour Angels
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Photo-section is the best for this site
A lot of exclusive easteuropean teens and a lot known easteuropean teen in exclusive photo-sets.

Some fine videos in fine quality, some in average/poor qiality
Zip for photos
Cons: Way too few videos.
The site has promissed more videos and updates for archives videos, but that has not been fullfilled in my period of membership.
Bottom Line: This site was one I had some expectations for. Since the webmaster stated to both jd1961 and myself in a mail, that the amount of videos would increase.
But that has not happened.
In almost a month three, maybe four new videos has appeared - that's a laugh.
Look at the price - almost the same as 1ByDay - which has 2 dayly videos in very high quality.

But ok, for old timers like me on the porn-hunt 1ByDay and alike might get a little boring in the long run. So the alternative COULD be a site like Amour Angels.
But, folks at PU - AA is not an alternative. The pickin΄is much too slim. For a video-freak you do not want to restrict yourself with three or maybe four new videos in a month for $29.95.

The best thing about this site is the amount of exclusive photos - and thats what earns the score. But I no longer care much about photo-sets, so for other video-entusiast at PU: I cannot recommend this site.

11-26-07  07:32am

Replies (1)
Review
107
Visit Barbi's Slutty Adventures

Barbi's Slutty Adventures
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Fine looking blond on this individual model site and a great body.
All exclusive!
OK/average amount of content for a site like this
Different kinds of action with a swell looking girl who seems to like fucking as many as possible. (See preview)
Cons: Only average quality of video for a 640x480 - it's certainly not crisp. The olders onces (2006) are a little worse.
No zip for photos
Including strange scenes with guys with erection-problems, it seems.
Price: $29.95
Bottom Line: Barbi is a doll, a blond doll with great hair and body and a cute face.
This girl tends to fuck everywhere and with as many as possible (even an alleged politician she pikcs up) - and with her husband looking on and/or participating.
I've been searching for something new for some time and found this one by accident at Porninspector (ok, PU's OUMarcus has done a review, I did'nt see before - and Maggie did one for TBP in February, I also missed).
And ok, this site has some new stuff and a really hot girl.
But as I've been browsing, things are getting more and more strange: Her husband wants her to fuck different guys, but the first three or four videos I saw, these guys had problems getting a hard on with Barbi sucking and sucking and sucking...
She also goes for some black guys "longing for a big dick" (quote the site). But in one video she's trying to get a black guy arroused sucking a numb and very small dick for a long time (not exactly according to the old rumour, no offence and no racisme intended).
Thats not sexy, it's just funny and what I'd consider a misunderstandig for a site like this. (remember the site: Janet Exposed?).
To bad becuase some other videos are quite nice and she looks sexy, for sure.
Photos are just ok, but guys: no zip.
And a price at $29.95 - it's too much.
Let's try to get more and more sites to lower their prices by a common effort at PU.

09-09-07  08:14am

Replies (2)
Review
108
Visit Asian Pervert

Asian Pervert
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Real thai-gils - locals and not US-based as many asian-sites.
Good/very quality videos.
Both solo and hardcore - hardcore videos are quite good.
Average/good quality photos in very large numbers.
Cons: Average amount of videos
Videos in 4-6 parts only and inquite big files 60-100 mb each.
No zip

Not much to find in the bonus sections
High price for what you get

Navigation is certainly not the best

The updates seem rare - I've have not seen ONE the last 15 days.
Bottom Line: Content-wise the videos are a bit like Creampie Thais/Asian Suck Dolls.

The good thing about the video is absolutely, that the girls are local thais and they act accordingly.

Espicially the hardcore videos are rather good and a bit rare in their style. The girls are not pros, but wanne-be - and that give a somewhat different sexy flavour.

If you like Creampie Thais/Asian Suck Dolls this is an ok site to visit and download some rare videos.

But the missing possibility of full video download is a bummer - the files divided in six with approx. 100 mb each is certainly not good

08-15-07  11:18am

Replies (0)
Review
109
Visit Aziani

Aziani
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Average-good amount of content.

Some of the later videos in fine HD-quality

A lot of different sites with different content

Some very sexy, mature US-ladies
Cons: High price for two days trial

Most content is not exclusive

Older videos in poor quality
Bottom Line: Difficult site to judge.
The main site aziani.com is widely a broad collection from most of the other sites.
When you search via models the site in general seems very large. But a lot of the models with photo and video are from older and welknown other places.
A few of these model comes in exclusive photos and videos - and some of these are very good like Abbey Brooks, Lisa Daniels or the faboulos Sienna West.
Other models have their own site - and apart from Rachel Aziani herself - most of these site is very average in quality. They even have probably the worst Crissy Moran-site here - too bad.

08-06-07  10:49am

Replies (0)
Review
110
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Mostly great looking young girls. Good design. Easy browsing. Good quality photos and videos (but short videos)
Cons: Very overrated site. The videos are average 50mb and lasts 4-5 minuttes. Video are way too few - when you - like I - go for the solo videos.
Bottom Line: Yeah, bottom line:

This site is not that good - and not worth a 90 or more.
Some - 200 - dull edited videos that is supposed to look like art, but are absolutly boring and without appeal.
You can find most of these girls in lot better sites with more sexy videos.
Even with the $19.95, I fell like wasting my money.

03-18-07  10:23am

Replies (4)
Review
111
Visit DVD Store

DVD Store
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some new DVD that you don't se on any other sites
Cons: 1) Don't sign up for the more expensivce part where you gat the so called high difinition - there is a $15 in difference. The alleged DVD qauality is NOT there it is blurred. Many other sites have lot better quality af videos.
2) This site is SLOW
Bottom Line: A bit of something new. But still. There is a lot of better sites - for a better price.

03-03-07  07:48am

Replies (0)
Review
112
Visit Cara Brett

Cara Brett
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + A solo site with a very beautiful (that's of course subjective) British model.
+ Fine quality (tech) videos - download.
+ Average/ok quality streaming vids.
+ Ok/average quality pix sets
+ Some zip - see below
+ Known/reliable billing co's (CCbill and Epoch).
+ Blog
+ General feed-back from model
+ Easy navigation
+ DL manager can be used
Cons: - No "pussy-shoots" - naked, but not intimate
- No separate link to updates
- Only about half of the pix sets have zip
- So called private vids are tame
- No other models, no bonus-deals
- The price is too high
- Generally hard to find updates
- Only one download at the time
Bottom Line: There are some good things to say about this somewhat new site, but - alas - the site needs quite some work. In too many ways...
This is her own solo site, but certainly not made by herself - and boy, could she do with better guidance.

Cara Brett is a 24-25 years old British softcore model - full breasted blond - and - I think - very beautiful.
Found her first else where "out there" on a couple of very sexy clips with dirty talk (but no total nude).
So why not go for her own site - good question, but I'll say: wait.

I was very disappointed after I joined:
Her vids are mostly boring - in spite of her sexy beauty. In the (average 5-8 minutes) vids she appears in different sexy outfits - and thats nice. But you only get like half a minute of Cara in total nude - and mostly from behind - or an awkward way of avoiding seeing her clit in front..

She's got these primary deals:
Gallery
Self Shot Gallery
Videos
Behind The Scenes (vids)
Private Videos

Going for the Private Videos do not expect real dirty talk - it's more like soft, very soft tease talk.
There are at the moment 12 of these private vids.
There are 30 solo/strip vids.

All vids are to download - or stream.
1920x1080 - only in WMV (8500 kbps)

The pix sets - 32 - are in 1600x1065 and 1200x798 - strangely mixed in the same sets.
More peculiar is that, only about half have zip???

As a little extra - if anyone cares - there's Mobile Diary and Message Me.

Care Brett is a looker, but how I'd like to see someone more pro make a site for her.

And BTW-bottom line:

Her tits look somewhat real - they could be - not that typical silicone style.
But - alas - they are not. Studying some photos (oh, they'll be studied, lol) - there are small scars underneath....

03-05-12  06:35am

Replies (3)
Review
113
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Vast amount of videos (could not count, but according to the site: over 1200) BUT: see below.
+ Even more photos (ditto: as above - over a quater of a million)
+ SOME ok - not great - material with easteuro/euro models.
+ Ok download speed - got about 550-600 kb/sec. - and without download manager.
+ Zip for photos/photosets
+ Some COULD be exclusive (doubt it, though - does not seem likely they got their own production), and most is from YoungPorn.net
+ Ok video-flash (if you care for that)
Cons: - Too expensive. ($ 29.95)
- The quality ruins the amount.
- Video HD is mostly a joke.
- Horrible login/access.
- Updates - or so called updates consists mostly of OLD material from YoungPorn.net.
- Way too little variation in models.
- Most videos seems outdated in style AND quality.
- Horrible and SLOW photo-viewing.
- So called bonus sites will claim even more from your creditcard.
- Generally: Vasted $ 29.95 here....no where worth the price...
Bottom Line: This site is right now 'HOT' at TBP - and it could be - if it was not for the fact that this in many ways is just a hidden clone of YoungPorn.net - at least concerning most of the content - and this is what's it about?

The worse thing here is to join, if you've been a member of YoungPorn.net within the last year or even more.
In that case you'll get just very little new stuff. What this 18OnlyGirls call 'updates' are mostly OLD material from that sister-site:
I'll not go into models-detail, but some of the latest updates here are from 2007/2006 also seen at YoungPorn.net.

And BTW: You can find a LOT of much better and high quality easteuro-porn elsewhere.

The access/login is hopeless - so much security and so much waiting, I guess these guys are really paranoid about hackers, too paranoid for a paying user.

Videos: They got wmv and flv (from flash) - (did not find mp4). They claim: HD, High and medium. Not that I found any difference between HD and High) And the size goes from anywhere between 20 MB and 1,4 Gb).

Photosets: They got thumbs, of course - but it takes for ever to watch a single photo fullsize - they even ask you to wait for preparing...
Zip-download ok in speed, though.
Quality: The Drooler would run away screaming - does that say it?

Bottom Line: friends at TBP - how can this site get an 83?
It so close to a clone of YoungPorn.net and the quality of MOST videos and photosets seems like some remains from 2006 or earlier..

So to fellow-PUs out there: It's not recommended - and certainly NOT to that price!
If you search for this kind of material go to Teen Mega World instead and for a price of $ 19.95.
Or try this one: Student Sex Friends - not great quantity - but the quality certainly is...

01-11-10  06:53am

Replies (4)
Review
114
Visit Playboy's Fresh Faces

Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some very fine looking girls/women - all of US origin. (of course)
Good/average quality of videos. Older ones NOT.
Five different sites in the package.
Both teens (almost) and mature girls/women.
Soft-soft-soft ...all soft.
Zip for photos
Cons: Not a large amount of content.
Confusing statements of what different sites you get with the package.
Earlier videos NOT good quality.
No info about updates
Few photos in every set
Price-confusion
Bottom Line: I joined this site or sites to get some authentic Playboy-stuff.
Ok, some of the content is really like the true Playboy, but the really true Playboy-stuff, like Playboy Plus prommised here, you do not get.
Instead you get 5 small sites in all like Fresh Faces, Try out, Sexy Wives, Busty Babes, College Girls and All Natural.
Sounds like much, but it isn't. It takes you a couple of hours or less to browse through it all.
The videos are mostly very short - 3-4 minuttes and like I hate videos of photoshoots, I also hate all these interviews where girls tell you a lot of (stupid) thing about what they like and do not like - what do I care. I want to watch some sexy videos.
Well, ok. There are SOME really sexy videos here - but it's too few. And the olders ones have some of the best content, but worst quality.
I can only give a low recommendation here - if you like sexy, soft US-girls there's a lot of other sites that gives you better value.
If your into it for the photos, forget it. Small sets and not great quality.

Price: They state $19.87 - when I joined, I was charged 21,46 Euro - that's almost $30. I may complain later....but I'm getting fed up with this kind of problems...

Bottom line: A few - way too few sexy solo-videos - and they are too short.

Has the old Heff outlived himself? - well, according to this/these sites his company has not been able to keep up!

12-06-07  11:54am

Replies (0)
Review
115
Visit UK Vixens

UK Vixens
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A special site with some/a few really good videos of british girls and mature women.

Only softcore, but with masturbation and some of them with dirty talk - quite sexy.

Newer videos in ok quality/ photos average
Cons: Updates! - haven't seen any for the month I've been a member - lousy.

Average/small amount of content - more videos than photos with no zip
Bottom Line: This is a bit of a strange site.
The interesting part is, that you can find a few of the girls from the well known and very softcore "Only Tease" doing some more serious nude with masturbation - not bad.
Also a plus is the sound of some of the videos - girls doing some regular dirty talk to the camera.

If you're in London or around you can find some of the girls for escort with phone and e-mail. We've seen som of this style before at conysgirls.com - which is a much better site. And even better try Suburban Amateurs.

But bottom line: This site is NOT worth the $29.95

07-11-07  03:12pm

Replies (0)
Review
116
Visit Nubile Ones

Nubile Ones
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site has one thing going for it:
Exclusive stuff video-wise I have not seen anywhere else - yet. Some could resemble Teendreams - and then again not.
There are some rather swell looking teens on video like Masha and Oxy - wauw!
If Nubile Ones keep up with more videos like this, they'll overdo the other Nubiles.
Cons: Difficult navigation.
Too much low prority stuff
Quality of content is not too average in general.
Bottom Line: Some great exclusive content with fine quality in videos.
Fine looking girls in some of the videos - but too many videos in poor quality.

Follow-Up:
After being member again for about 3 weeks there has been 1 - ONE - video update.

For $ 29.95
It's close to rip-off
Too bad, cause some af the clips are just great and a few are exclusive

But I must downgrade heavely....

03-03-07  09:29am

Replies (0)
Review
117
Visit Just Teen Movie

Just Teen Movie
(0)

68.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Crisp videos - if you want to call anything HD, this may be it.
VMW, DIVX, Ipod and Quicktime.
Some cute/sexy easteuro teens (SOME)
Access to both Just Teen Movie and Just Teen Site
Cons: Lousy navigation - no idea about updates, unless you've got a very good memory.
Most video-files are way too large (some over 700 MB for 15 minuttes).
Too few videos
High price - even with the co-access.
Lousy video-updates
Repeting log-in
Bottom Line: As Just Teen Site is among the best in its field when it comes to easteuro-teens (photo-sets and a few videos), why not go for the newer offer from this company:
Just Teen Movie has not had much time (since april 2008), so as you'd suspect a not so large amount of clips.
And you'd be quite right. In april TBP stated 32 (full)videos.
Here in middle august the amount is 42 - call that an honest way of doing updates? I do not think so.
I really liked the idea of Just Teen Site doing a special movie/video-site, but what a bummer.
Do not dream of a great variation of models -like Just Teen Site - it's simply a matter of to few models.
Instead some - not so exiting models (in my humble opinion) are doing three or more videos each - and that does not come to much out of 42.
The videos are crisp, for sure. But using up to more than 700 Mb on a 15-18 minuttes clip is not very professionel in todays standard.
OK: You get DIVX, VMW, iPOD and Quicktime and full scene downloads.Good stream-preview of every clip.
AND: The navigation is worthless - if there is any at all. You're not able to look for either updates, nor models - just go for "more videos" as you taggle along - and you end up comming back to a different start of content (out of line!).
Rediculous price of $34.95.
A comfort here is that you NOW get access to Just Teen Site as well - but where JTS was formerly also a good/medium good video-site - it lacks now. This is not a review of JTS, but I still notice, that this site has not had any video-update since july 16th.
But bottum line:
The score 68 is as mentioned at TBP/PU:
Does more things wrong than right - low recommondation.

08-20-08  06:02am

Replies (12)
Review
118
Visit Hungarian Honeys

Hungarian Honeys
(0)

67.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: They got lots of photos - both europeans and US-models.
A large amount of videos , but well known from a LOT of other sites.
Pretty good zip-system for photos.
A full access trial for $9.95
Cons: Nothing exclusive
Far too average quality of both videos and photos.
A lot of really old material.
Lousy navigation
Bottom Line: I only took the $ 9.95 five days full access trial - thank you!
Even that money was wasted as a whole. I downloaded some/a few photo-zips of which most was a rather nice reprise from earlier years - photos I've have cleaned from my pc years ago - but nice to see again, though.

I also downloaded a few videos, but, man.... again videos you've seen before included all the famous/infamous once on the yellow/orange couch. I erased them again.

Admid, I'm getting fed up with all those sites that are just replicates when you get down to it.
Still looking for something new in the style of good european/US-models solo and hc - things of quality that you have not run into a million times before.
You won't get that here.

But my 67 goes for average quality and good quantity of porn for people/fellow new users that's not been searching as long as some of us "old timers"....

Should this review only be for the "old timers" or connaisseurs it'd be around 50 or less.....

09-08-07  08:42am

Replies (5)
Review
119
Visit Torbe Network

Torbe Network
(0)

67.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The preview of these sites looks pretty good.
Some rare stuff with a few good looking models and this strange looking dude.
There is a couple or more of really sexy videos with latinas.
More bonus sites with solo-girls or individuals hardcore.
Cons: Most of the softcore stuff is ripped off somewhere else.
And one of the better looking sites with czech girls did'nt work at all - still does not, and I am about to end my term.
And I'm not comming back.
Bottom Line: The positive is a very few good looking videos.

But after all: most of the content is either strange or boring.

Do not waste your money

04-06-07  10:04am

Replies (0)
Review
120
Visit Teenrotica

Teenrotica
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + An extremely generous amount of models.
+ Not sure – but it seems like entirely exclusive material (see below)
+ Generally hot looking models, most of European origin.
+ Mostly a site concentrating in sets – so vids fans – your're warned.
+ It's like thay say: ”tons of galleries”
+ Zip – in 2 sizes – for sets
+ Mostly fine viewing quality for pix
Cons: - Close to miserable quality in the major amount of vids content – unbelievable for an almost major site in 2011
- Outdated style, design and navigation
- Regional pricing
- Three formats for vids – but none of them gives you any viewing pleasure
- Even some newer vids are a joke in viewing quality
- Too much lez content for my taste
- Even without regional pricing $19.95 it's too expensive for what you get – in vids anyway
- No way of knowing about updates – no date on those
Bottom Line: Oh, yes: bottom line: My personal feeling here is clear – I wasted my money – and that including the fact, that this site deals in regional pricing. But that's only a total secondary issue.

Teenrotica is downright outdated – in style, in navigation, design – and it's almost a scandal (harsh words, I know) that a site that cost $ 19.95 – and for Europeans about $ 29 – has such miserable material in videos.

Despite the preview has a so called UPDATE – that is missing at the members area – Instead you can turn to VIDEOS or GALLERIES for the latest and the first inputs. (or Models without dates)
When browsing for videos you get the new ones first – and being a member years back, I thought: Okay, this site started up in 2006 and videos then were generally not good.
But the new ones in 2011 are in a quality I'd would be ashamed of, if I was behind the site.
The size is all in so called 3:4 – and the viewing quality is simply low down.
Most vids are around 100 Mb in AVI format – and much less in both WMV og MOV. Three formats – save it and get better quality instead.

It's a shame. Because Teenrotica has so many fine models – and I seriously believe it's exclusive.
We all got favorite models – and the material I found of these models (both in pix and vids) I have not seen elsewhere.

This is mostly a site with solo and lez material – both vids and sets. A few hc/bg inputs – and most of these are only bj.
And for a couple of those bj vids – it's lousy editing. No foreplay, no posing – but starts with close ups of bj.....it seems like unfinished bussiness.

Then to the little more positive deals here:
The pix/sets are generally in ok/fine viewing quality. You get a choice of 2 zip download sizes (high and low) – guess no one will go for the low. And you got a pretty good thumbnail preview for all sets.
And you can use the thumbnails to view directly in Small, Large og XL. Do not really see the point, but some may like it.

If I was a pix fan foremost, this site could get a little better score, in my view. But the design, style, navigation AND first of all: those low/very low quality vids – I cannot recommend Teenrotica.
The 65 from this user is entirely due to the sets/models (See PU rating: 60-69 - Does more things wrong than right)

09-09-11  08:05am

Replies (9)
Review
121
Visit Babes.tv

Babes.tv
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Archived material is just top
+ Archived videos and photosets of older dates is mostly prime material
+ New price - for former members via mail - but ask for it (IF you want a part of this site????)
+ Exclusive videos and photos of wellknown models - mostly easteuropeans
+ Zip for photosets
+ Download managers allowed
+ Easy navigating ind the archived area
Cons: In spite of some serious pros - this site has gone down the drain - lately.
- A LOT af missing links to videos/photosets ("missing link" sounds like a joke) - BUT: when browsing for download-options - you get to a "No Link Found" - that means: you browse and find a model, BUT a lot of her material is NOT to be found, though you get info about the videos/photosets.
- No response from webmaster - tried to give them info/updates abnout those missing links - but NADA - and nothing happens - videos and photosets still not avalible.....!
BAD for a major site like this.
Bottom Line: Did a review of Babes.tv earlier - when the site was fine. Gave it 88, I think...
It's NOT fine anymore.
OK, the 65 score goes for the good ol' stuff - BUT man, the good ol' stuff I already have downloaded.

The site is a part of Babelicious - but NOT included in the Babelicious bonus-deals. Still you can join Babes.tv - and get a cheap three days access to Babelicious - but what's the point? (the updates at Babelicious is a laugh, but that's another thing).
Babes.tv has some of the best solo-videos/photosets - exclusive - of great/sweet/good looking easteuro-models - BUT it's primarely in the archives.
The videos are NOT living up to standars of 2009 - why they do not improve the quality is a big question:
Still videos at foremost wmv and only: 640x480 - too lame for a major site in 2009
Bottom line: This site used to be great - with some damn fine exclusive videos of great models
Today it's just mediocre

09-01-09  10:53am

Replies (2)
Review
122
Visit Women Of Playboy

Women Of Playboy
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A variation of mostly fabulous US-models.
Average/ok amount of photosets and videos (short videos, though.
The deal here is 6 sites in a pack (NOT 7 as stated at TBP - Playboy Plus not included)
Easy/average navigation.
Zip for photos
2 diffenrent video-downlod sizes (small for preview) WMV for newer videos - mpg for older.
Cons: Updates too rare.
Not up-to-date in currency convertion-prices.
Newer videos contains too much close-ups and background talking (see below)
Finding certain models on others sites in the pack is difficult.
Way too short videos.
No infos about the updates.
Photo-sets are too slim (too few photos in each set).
Confusions with repeating videos in different files.
Bottom Line: Been a member at some other site in this package before.
What strikes me now is the radical change in the style of filming/editing the videos.
Some models have two (a few three) videos. One with interview (forget it), one which you could regard as presentation where the model tells you (again)who she is and where she comming from, what she likes ect. ect.ect.....boring.
And then one video where you get down to bussiness and watch the real deal with undressing, posing and so on...(with background muzak) - very few videos with the models own sound/moaning or whatever...
BUT the sites seems to have changed video-editor/cameraman.
The newer videos focus way too much on close-ups - and since the videos are quite short (max. five minuttes) there NOT much whole figure filming - too bad.
Former members will remember the earlier videos where it was much better in that field.
New videos in wmv - average size: 70-90 Mb - dimension:
1280x720.
Some: 848x480
Older videos typical mpg in smaller size: 30-40 Mb.
The photosets does not live up to the otherwise fine Playboy-standard - and the sets are with too few photos - typical less than 30 pictures.
I'm still a fan of those US-dolls that this Co. finds - like some other PU once asked European Glamour Girls: Where do you find them? - It's amazing the "quality" of models Playboy comes up with - ok, a lot more US-girls want to be a Playboy-model that a "porn-model", I guess.
But, boy - if some of those models were better exposed in longer and larger videos/movies - wauw.
But the content and quality in general at these P-sites (package) leaves a LOT.
So: 65 from this user based on:
"Does more things wrong than right. Low recommendation."

03-07-09  01:33pm

Replies (0)
Review
123
Visit 24 Main Street

24 Main Street
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Exclusive photosets and videos
Some fine looking girls/women - mostly US-asians
Cheap full trial
Ok quality for newer photos (1024x685) - but just ok!
Cons: No zip for photos
Small sized videos (2-5 minuttes)
Weird navigation
A little older videos poor quality
Lousy updates
Number of videos: approx: 100 - but some only 5-6 Mb. - and most NOT good quality
Bottom Line: I went for this site because it seemed to have some girls/women in the category of Playboy-style.
And some stuff with Divini Ray.
And the full trial at only $3.95.
Well for that small price you get full access, allright.
But the content is pretty slim and in general the quality is less than average:
Even if some of the videos are at 640x480 there's absolutely nothing crisp here - AND way too many videos are old at 320x240 in blurred standard - all wmv and only wmv.
TBP states 95 videos - could not count that many and a lot 3-6 Mb - short and bad quality.
Been here before one and a half year ago or more - and man, do they NOT deal in regular updates..
Most stuff seems to be from 2005 and 2006.
This is primarily a photosite - becuase the video section is simply too bad to make it a serious porn-site.
The navigation is strange, to say the least: Mainly you can search for photosets and videos (that's what most of us are into) - but you have to use some time to get around. Like searching for videos, you have to check out: A place called Drive In - I do not see much drive-in movie here - and for photosets: Curves... but ok, that's their kind of fun.
The worst part is lack of zip for the photos: I hate to download 50-80 photos in a set - manual.

Ok, this review is on a basis of only 3 days membership - but I won't stay...

And bottom line: I do not think this 24 Main Street live up to standards of good sites today - and certainly not sites that gets a score of about 80 at TBP

05-21-08  02:05pm

Replies (3)
Review
124
Visit British Hot Girls

British Hot Girls
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Ok amount of videos for a special site
Good amount of photos in ok quality
zip for photos

Price is just reasonable - not more than that
Cons: Video-quality is average/below average in spite of dimensions - way too blurred in fullscreen.
Older RM-video files are a disaster - and they are about 1/3 of all sets

Slow updates - very slow video-updates
Most girls are ordinary and most - again - not very sexy.
Not crazy about the navigation - see below.
Bottom Line: In my search for sexy british girls - especially on video - this came up.
But in general the site is not good - almost at the end of one month membership I found 4-5 videos to download for keeps - and I'll probably only keep one with the model Lucy Zara - she's hot and has 5 good photosets.
The navigation is quite ordinary, but not very logical - for one you have to go through numbers instead of alfabetic-order looking for certain names - or have to know correct spelling of a models name - most not well known.
The layout is not exiting.
Even if most videos comes in 640x480 or the latest in 720x576 the quality is below todays standard - and the video-shooting seems stereotype - the style is too much alike - the sound - even with some sexy talk are terrible and noisy.
Video-file size between 80 and 150 Mb (approx) - thats ok.
Photo-size 1680x1120 and the quality is allright - better than the videos at least.
It's hard to recommend this site - it need LOTS of work - wonder if they'll get that work done.
At least they should invest in better video-equipment.

02-12-08  01:00pm

Replies (0)
Review
125
Visit AV9898

AV9898
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Vast amount of videos
SOME great looking asian/japan-girls/teens filmed in Japan
Video-quality is ok/average: 800x450 in WMV only
Cons: Very bad navigation
No full video-files
Video quality differs
Lame acting concerning the girls male partners - strange - but maybe only for us int he west.
Most non exclusive - but you can never tell with these huge quantities of jap-videos.
Bottom Line: This is a site you might turn to in search for sexy asian girls with non-US relations - since it's still one of the tops at TBP corcerning asians.
This is jap-teens/girls who mostly do a great performance - but foremost if your're into some sort of fetish. Like girls "crying" for more or for mercy in a strange way.
And japaneese men with half lame dicks getting off like wham-bam-thank-you-mam. Weird!
But ok, you can find some rarely seen and great looking teens doing a good job in pleasing the viewer.
Once in a while it's fine to watch non-US asians, but I'd prefer thais anytime.
The navigation is lousy - it takes a long time to get used to the logic here - or rather the non existing logic.
The video-files are all split up - you download via thumdnails (3-5 for one whole scene) - but the thumbnail are not always the right ones - a mess. You want to download one scene - and you get another.
The files are too big - one scene typical over 500 Mb (self-joined files). But the quality is not ALWAYS what you'd expect from a file-size this big.
Bottom line these Japan-based sites with Japan-girls are in a very special catagory - porn that may please for a short while - but in the long term it gets boring.
I downloaded 4-5 good movies out of almost 600 - no big deal
Won't be back.

BTW: The time-difference between Euro and US-members at PU is somewhat special. I made this review late afternoon in Scandinavia and it's early morning in the US (eastcoast, I guess)
Goooooooood morning.

02-04-08  08:06am

Replies (4)

Shown : 101-125 of 2795 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.66 seconds.