| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Amazing amout of content
A lot of videos and a vast amount of photos.
Zip for photos, but very different sizes - some newer 1380x2000 px - some older a lot lower.
Bonus-sites for Crissy Moran, Lonnie Waters and Natalia Cruze. And another bonus site: Amateur Models Gone Bad.
Zip for photos. |
| Cons: |
Non-exclusive content.
Though Glamour Models Gone Bad has a hugh amount of content, the videos are mostly low/bad quality. Some of the latest ones are good though.
Average price ($24.95) - but still too expensive for what you get. |
| Bottom Line: |
77 is in the higher level of average.
That's what this site/these sites are: Average!
And maybe 77 is too high. But ok, the best thing about this deal is, that you ALSO get access to the bonus-sites of Crissy Moran and Lonnie Waters.
The two big sites: Glamour.. and Amateur... are for certain average.
Most photos I've seen somewhere else - the same goes for the videos. A few good ones from newer dates - and a lot (and I mean A LOT) of lousy quality videos from ealier dates.
There are plenty of stuff to search for, but at Glamour... and Amateur it's foremost photos that would go in the higher league.
I'm a big fan of Crissy Moran and I adore Lonnie Waters. But these sites tends only to photo-fans.
The Crissy site- even if it's apparently official - are only great for photos. The videos are a laughter compared to what you can find other places - mostly bad, bad quality - the same goes for Lonnies site (six videos - and no good quality) - much better videos at Twisty, M and B - and many others.
But ok, the best hit for Crissy-fans are the swell amount of good photos here.
I'd almost put it like this: Forget about all the other non exclusive stuff at these 5 sites in one deal.
And the price: They lower it under the infamous $29.95, but even $24.95 is too expensive for what you get. I've been a member twice before, but this is probably the last time.... |
|
09-05-07 09:43am
Replies (1)
|
Review
77
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Janet is a rare type. Swell build - a fantiastic/fine body for a milf, I think you call it in the US. A mature woman with a rare sexual charisma.
Both videos and photo-sets.
Straight sex, a lot of interracial, fetish and some solo.
Ok amount for a solo-site. |
| Cons: |
Older stuff (videos) in BAD quality. Alas some of the best scenes are older and therefore the quality in videos are NOT good.
No zip for photos.
Troublesome navigation.
No overview for scenes or photos.
Plain layout - this site could really do with some work. |
| Bottom Line: |
I normally don't go for these kind of solo-sites with "older" or rather mature women. But I've been here before and this girl/woman Janet is extremely sexy, I think!
She's cute, with a lot of smiling and a very fine and FREE attitude towards sex. And man, she's got a GREAT body for her age (I guess she about 45 at this state)
Her first interest is interracial - she's into young black studs and brag about it. Some of her fuck-scenes are of it's own kind.
She has a lot of interaction - which means videos and photosets with members of her site - who she gives a blowjob or fucks.
The newer video files is in both mov. and WMV (640x480) - and they are ok in quality.
Some older ones are just in mov. and here the quality waries too much.
Most/ almost all video-files are split up - not only in parts - but also in dates, so you have to wait for the final ones - not good.
The navigation is a mess and the overview of content is worse.
But I forgive Janet - or rather her webmaster (or whoever) because this lady is one of a kind.
Well, for other PU who might be tempted take a look at her free photos - if you like what you see, go for it.
BTW: The price at TBP of $17.95 is NOT the right price. It's $ 24.95 - but this user still have no regrets of spending that amount - but only becuase Janet herself is worth it - the site itself lacks a lot.
So this is some kind of a recomendation, but also a warning, if you can't have a sloppy made site.
But I'll repeat this US-girl is something else. |
|
03-30-08 09:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
78
|
Fun With Amber
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Not one site - but five.
Call it bonus sites - I call it five sites in one package.
Fine looking teens - four of them in the category "girls next door" - when you were a teenager yourself.
Amber is my favorite - petite blond with great "teen-tits".
Alli's got the best looking naturals. |
| Cons: |
Average to poor video-quality.
No zip for photos.
And again: No info on updates - but does not look good
Price: $29.95 |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, this is not just "Fun with Amber" - there are five sites in all - with five different teens doing some tease, some masturbation, some strip, some lez and one (Lana) some hardcore.
I would not have paid $29.95 for this package if it was'nt for Amber.
I've seen her in different sites - almost all just photos - and she is a doll, this cute, little blond with a great body.
She wears panties with a canadian flag, but not sure if she's canadian or eateuropean.
Her performance is softcore, fine photos, but only average/bad quality of videos (I love them, anyway).
The Busty Alli site is better with video-quality. And this Alli has maybe the most perfect naturals I've seen in a long time.
Little Danni is a cute brunette with some sexy ways in here videos and photos. Also just average quality, alas.
Lana's got the largest content of videos and photos - and she is also a looker - fine build blond. And she is the only one in this package who does g/b-hardcore. But the videos are also and mostly bad/average quality.
But, yeah, bottom line from the PU rating-points: some good, some poor.
Some things to enjoy, but I probably won't be back, unless they get MUCH better video-quality. |
|
09-16-07 09:06am
Replies (0)
|
Review
79
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great in the line of softcore. Som really good videos og photos of more rarely seen british girls.
A lot of different uniform-style.
Easy navigation and download.
Bonus-sites with some good/average content |
| Cons: |
Older videos are not good quality
A lower price would make this deal better. |
| Bottom Line: |
Different british girls for a change - though you seen some of them before in Only Tease for exampel.
Some of them are probably not amateurs.
Price a bit too high.
Follow-Up:
DOWNGRADE
This was one of my earlier reviews. Not good and certainlhy not very informative:
Just joined again April 2008 and I have to downgrade.
The models are ok - some swell-looking uk-amateurs - some just boring.
But the main reason for DOWNGRADE is the fact, that the site has NOT upgraded the video-quality in general.
The few new clips are still not in an ok tech-quality - nothing crisp here.
Second the updates for videos are way too few!!!
But still: Some british sexy amateurs in the crowd. |
|
04-22-07 10:58am
Replies (0)
|
Review
80
|
Only Tease
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive content.
Large amount of great and average looking british models.
Fine updates - daily. Either photosets or videos - MOSTLY photosets.
Good mix in styles of different outfits - well, this is a SOFTCORE FETISH-KIND of site.
Zip for photosets.
Photos in ok quality/size.
Ok navigation and layout.
Fair/average price-level. |
| Cons: |
NOT 2009 kind of videos.
Generally low/average video-quality.
Too few videos compared to photosets.
Very softcore - but ok, you can see that from the previews - that's the style of this site.
Marketing-promiss of HD-videos do NOT stick.
Some scenes are a bit stereotype - with re-use of same outfits too many times.
Some models do not even go topless.
Too many videos are photo-shoot-style.
Anoying password repeat when you download. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site sure does a lot for marketing the product.
Wish they'd do the same for the videos and especially the quality os those videos.
At the latest PR-mail I got in March, they claimed:
"Now HD-videos".
Empty words!
Because the new videos are no more viewing-HD or even in bigger file-size or bottomline NOWHERE near HD. BTW the size of those newer files are the same as it's been for the last couple of years.
For a major 2009-site their videos sucks - I normally do not use words like that in a review - but with this site: it's the case.
It's a pity with the whole video-deal at Only Tease, because the concept is/could be very good.
Those videos:
Average file-size: 50-60 Mb.
640x480 (that ought to say it).
Only avi.
But ok, apart from the frustrations about videos in 2009 at this site, the photosets are way better.
Three sizes of zip-download: Standard, Extra and Ultra. From aproxx. 10 Mb over 35 Mb and up to 100 Mb (2048x1056).
And even the standard photo-sizes are ok.
NB: When writing this review and scanning the site again, I now see ONE new video placed today (17th of april 2009) where the size suddenly is more like it: 285 MB - and NOW: wmv. Cheers! - ONE out of 1500.
The video is with one Ashley Massey and the viewing-quality is decent - not more. (and this one is quite boring).
But, ok - if Only Tease - finally - does videos this quality, I'd sneak my score up to 80 - next time. If I ever be back after 3-4 terms - doubt it, though. |
|
04-17-09 09:27am
Replies (3)
|
Review
81
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A good variation of big titted models
Euro and US-models
Good downloads speed (at all hours)
Fine navigation with a lot of scene-details, thumbs, preview and small downloads
Most scenes with strip/foreplay first, before fucking.
Looks exclusive to me.
Bonus-sites |
| Cons: |
No full-scene downloads - maximum is three scenes.
Updates seem slow
Price too high
Some girls/models from preview is NOT at the member-site.
No photos, just vidcaps
Video quality just average/older stuff worse |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're into big, natural tits, this is somewhat a good/ok site to join.
A fine mix of US and Euro-models - all doing hardcore.
At first I was a bit dissapointed with the site and stated "no review". But after a while the sites growes better - even if a lot of the video-scenes seems a bit stereo-type - there is a lot of repeating ways in editing and fuckscenes.
This is a tit-site, but I miss tit-fucking - too little of that.
(BTW: Just joined Fuck My Melons - that site has IT - will be back with a review).
This is only a video-site - the socalled "high quality pictures" are a laugh - they are just a little better than vidscaps (800x533)
But even if it's a video-site the quality here is not up-to-date. Average size for videos are:
640x480 - and NOT crisp.
The lack of new - 2008 - crisp full screen videos are the worst here. That's the reason this user do not feel for saving too many of the scenes - only some with special interest.
Formats are only WMV - exept if you want to download one minute clips - they are in MPG. But who today want to have 25 small 1-minute-clips from one sequence. (Again: They are quite good for previews).
There are some ok bonus sites: Public Invasion and Big Ass Adventure (plus a lezz site). But all have the same lacks and quality as Busty Adventure.
And bottum line:
If they could do better with the video-quality, the site/sites could deserve a better score...
Still it's recomended for big tit-lovers. |
|
09-23-08 06:49am
Replies (4)
|
Review
82
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
European/easteuropean single-girl masturbation site.
Pretty hot girls - most well know from a lot of other sites.
Special way of doing their filming - but very good technical quality.
Ok amount
Ok photos in fine quality
Zip for photos |
| Cons: |
Fisheye focus-videos/photos where some girls get their face looking strange - weird. Serious photographers learned to avoid that in the last millenium
Too big HQ video-files - some over 600 Mb - a serious problem.
Too much in close-ups - even if this is a site callled "Pink" - and if it's not a site for gynaecologists. I'm not turned on by entrails. |
| Bottom Line: |
These guys at this site which also is part of DEV8-company has some things going for them. And maybe it's more for doctors nurses and such.
For me - most of the sites are simply too much close ups with the inside of virginas and assholes (not the folks behind the sites).
It's a pity. Because the site - along with some of the others in this company - has some fine aspects.
First of all there are new clips of welknown eateuropean girls - some with their comeback here - Lenka/Lena for example - pretty and sexy as ever.
And the loooooong clips start up swell with strip and/or sexy moves - but after a while we get into this thing with shot of vaginas on the inside or "milky" buttholes - well, some might find that exiting - I don't.
My 75 here in rating goes only to some of the girls and to some of the sexy start of video-clips.
I've been here before, when the site was small. It has grown a lot with over 100, or maybe 150 (have not counted them, got tired) - videos. But the style has grown worse:
The latest video is with Candy. She seems strange looking and acting weird here - not like her latest at 1ByDay which is sexy and cute.
Well: Bottom line - this site is better for a university for medical students.
And again: Still give it the 75 for some cute/sexy first-part videos. |
|
10-13-07 12:10pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
83
|
Real Sex Pass
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is for fans of british girls - and, folks here are some GOOD ones.
18 different sites with some straight stuff and some (most, alas) weird.
New videos are just fine quality - older ones average/poor.
Photos just ok/average - but with zip.
Exclusive stuff.
Large content. |
| Cons: |
Outrageous price: $49.95 for the package.
For europeans they even charge extra for some kind of tax - I paid $58.95.
Some of the site are a little too weird for me - I'm not too much into bukkake and girls drowning in cum.
Earlier videos just average quality - some a little worse. |
| Bottom Line: |
What drove me to this site/package was the collection of some of the best/sexiest british girls.
And these sites comes up with some of the best exclusive films I've seen so far in that field - and with a broad variation of some of fine looking brit-girls in the porn-biz.
They have several videos - some fine quality - of Michelle Thorne - a blond knockout - videos of her I've never seen before and extremely sexy. There's an esquisit video of blond Veronica/Victoria (HC) in the Real Couples-department - here this scene is supposed to be with her new boyfriend - just great. (Take a look at the preview/preview video). The preview-quality is much lower than you get inside.
Still - this is for fans of british models - socalled amateurs and pros.
Most of the sites are crap.
But the 5-6 sites you can find some really good videos of Brit-girls - and in different ways of doing videos than when the same girls are on international/US-sites.
Anyboby for bukkake - there are some of the best videos in this field.
A lot of amateur stuff in general, but again - the newer vidceo-quality is ok.
But bottom line: This is for users with an interest in a somewhat diffent scene than US-porn and even some eateuropean porn, too.
But they got a pretty good preview - some of the sites with video-clips. Don't get turned off by the quality - most is a lot better inside - some still NOT good - and one or two sites are worthless.
Follow-Up:
I have to downgrade.
The price is absurd - and the updates are way too few.
Only reason it's still 75 is some exclusive videos of Michelle Thorne and Veronica |
|
09-26-07 09:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
84
|
Naughty Girl Sandy
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
New and better quality of videos
Very sexy girl
Good quality photos |
| Cons: |
Rare updates - seems not to be regular
Average/small amount of content
Price high for what you get
Videos in zip-files
No zip for photos |
| Bottom Line: |
I was here a year or so ago - and the site was in poor quality - apart from the fact that this Sandy is something else - very sexy and a good tease.
I do not quite agree with Pinkpanther, that the site has become so much better lately. But compared to what it was before - ok, it's an upgrade.
Stil it's not good that a site which wants to grow in quantity and quality has so many lacks.
No zip for photos and photos that comes up in browser-style is outdated.
And wmv-videos that only comes in zip-files for download is a little strange.
But one thing for sure: The quality of the videos are much better that before - and not only the new ones - they made the olds ones in better size.
I'm certainly not impressed with the amount of content for a price of $25 - especially compared to what it was a year or so ago. TBP states 73 videos - but some of them are split up in "chapters".
The video-editing and the cameraman could really use som professinal help. Among others there're scenes where you see the sun-shadow of the guy operating the camera - a bit frustrating.
And there's way too much close-up video-footage - so much that you miss seeing the entire body of this swell looking girl most of the time.
I'd like to see some pro videos of this very cute, sexy and teasing Sandy.
Pinkpanther states, that she's to be found other places - can anybody tell if some of these places has good videos of her - and where....?
Thanks. |
|
06-03-07 12:42pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
85
|
Try Teens
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site with russian/east-european models the hardcore way - the latest videos are in ok quality and there is a couple or more of very cute/sexy girls.
Mostly exclusive, I think - anyway I have not seen these LATER videos anywhere else.
Fine quality photos as well
Bonus sites with a few good videos.
Easy navigating |
| Cons: |
Half or more of the videos are older and in poor quality.
No Zip for photos (it's strange that webmasters don't go for zip i 2007)
High price! (29.95) |
| Bottom Line: |
Here I'm really on level with Spencer at TBP concerning points.
Try Teens is not BAD, but it certainly is not swell.
It looks like Try Teens has found some exclusive stuff and some of it is pretty good. But most I've seen before and most of the videos are - as stated - in poor quality.
I went for the site when I saw the girl Timber (and that's not Clint Eastwood doing the canadian woods) at the preview - wauv - and that video is great.
But maybe she not worth the 29.95 - 'cause she was all that really turned things on at this site...after all. |
|
05-07-07 06:48am
Replies (0)
|
Review
86
|
Score Videos
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A lot of content in the big tit area.
Some of the latest videos are great - both hardcore and solo. |
| Cons: |
Too few videos in good quality.
Most videos in really poor quality
Photos in low resolution. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's possible to find some good tit-stuff here
and there is a fair/good trial price.
But I think I can get through with this site in the 3-days trial periode and then move on.
Download ok. |
|
04-22-07 09:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
87
|
Asian Flower Girl
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This site has a few really sexy looking asians in photo and video (stream only)
The content isn't large, but quality before quantity.
I signed up joint with Moonangel where nothing much has happened the last year or so. |
| Cons: |
The bad thing is, that the videos are only stream. I've tried with all sort of download-programs, but no way - I cannot get some the best videos on my harddisk. (Anybody know a way around????)
Like the DRM thing - there is mostly a way - like renaming the file and so on...
No zip |
| Bottom Line: |
Some great looking asian girls in good quality streaming video.
But I still hate the "only stream"-thing
NB: Edited review:
No respons from webmaster and their "send us feed back" is "Not found"!!!!!
The last 24 hours the stream has not worked
So I downgrade
NB: 2. Edited review: Just got a message: They had problems with their stream!! And I just spend 2-3 hours trying to find failures in my browser. That sucks. |
|
04-05-07 01:36pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
88
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Entirely exclusive content
British girls - some known, some not.
Amateur-basis in general
Dirty talk - in most videos
a LOT of rarely seen girls here - again all british - some UK-based easteuropeans.
Zip for photosets
Newer videos in ok quality.
Natural looking girls.
Amount of videos/photosets
Updates come regularly |
| Cons: |
The price is way too high - $34.95.
I miss some/more really sexy girls - and with more focus on the dirty talk in general.
Some videos are bad quality - older ones, as usual.
Miss the general idea with dirty talk all around.
Bad dl-speed, unless you use DL-manager - then you get fine speed.
Wish for better video-editing/producing - the same scenes with different girls are repeating.
More video-download options would be better
No feedback from webmaster...
ONLY solo girl/masturbation - no hc/bg - some lez, though. |
| Bottom Line: |
Still on my hunt for british girls/british sites - and went BACK to this one.
The reasons are:
Those speciel british girls doing their own thing, like dirty talk (BTW: in a much different way than US-girls, amigos - are they better actors in general, just a question)
BUT: What I'd like to see from this site is more beautiful girls - ok, it's an "amateur site" like stated in the name. But certainly not all are amateurs - so let's get some more knockouts at the site.
They've done it a few times: Like Sasha - wauw - and she CAN talk dirty.
This is one of the few british site that can EVEN be compared to the better US-ditto. But, by gully - those british porn-producers still has a lot to learn.Professionalism is one.
The video are only in wmw - 720x540.
Photos (with zip):1025x680.
If you like british models, british style, this is ok - and do not forget the dirty talk.
You'll meet a lot of the models that also at Panty Amateurs, but here they are a bit more porn!
This is my third term here, but I do not think I'll be back for some time - the price is much too high for what your get.
The major bonus-site is Suburban Sluts - BUT it's mostly crap with bad quality in both videos and photosets.
So the recommondation is AVERAGE.
BTW: No feedback from webmaster: The site was "down" for a day or two with problems and no download. Wrote the webmaster, but no reply! - that does not look good for other member-problems.
NB: Last opdates: The webmaster just answered and with a fine explanation.... |
|
04-16-09 07:43am
Replies (4)
|
Review
89
|
Solo Teen Girls
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of a network with some great eastern-european girl, girl/girl and hardcore-videos. (plus specialities in more lousy quality-sites)
Some of the videos are exclusive. (I'd say 2/3)
Fine video-quality: 1280x720 (wmv - only)
Most girls seen before, but some quite rare.
New layout - not the one you see at TBP! |
| Cons: |
Very confusing setup how to join: TBP states some sites (bonus-sites, which is rather importend here) but when your're joining other sites are part of the deal instead.
Online-connection on and off - sometimes no connection (bad)
Photos: Forget it! (1280x856) - but lousy/average quality. (but they got zip, after all)
Could not gain access to bonus sites - waited four days before feedback from webmaster |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has a new and somewhat better layout now - the one at TBP is from the past. When you try the site, skip what's after: http://www.soloteengirls.net at TBP.
The motherload here at soloteengirls consists of approx. 150 solo-girl videos of fine quality.
There are a lot of ways/sizes to download the videos - a big plus for this site:
High quality: (1280x720) Average size: 350-600 Mb.
Medium: Size: 150-300 MB.
Low size: 80-160 Mb.
But there is also a fine divided small clip-download (6 Mb) or stream. Here you get the idea about the video-content before downloding the whole stuff. (A great plus)
The navigation is just OK. When looking for the whole deal, you go for the "Archive". Here you can browse through - now 17 pages whit aproox 10 girls each - where you get info/thumbnails about the girl. There is enough to last ALMOST a month - when you also brows the bonus sites.
Two of those are just ok: Gag-n-Gape and Old-n-Young. The content in the rest of the 23 bonues sites are mostly crap. (quality likewise)
But: Bottom Line: If you're into easteupean girls (solo) this certainly has some potentials.
Is you're more into HC: maybe try: Teen Sex Movs from the same co. (though some of the filming/editing here are a bit "amateurish"). |
|
07-16-08 09:20am
Replies (0)
|
Review
90
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Rare stuff with easteuropean/russian teens
Most seems exclusive to this PU - only most
Again - most - in good video-quality (720x576)- all full scene download
3 different qualities - all wmv
Variety of hc, solo and a few girl/girl
Descent Live Cam (only works with Explorer)
Zip for photos |
| Cons: |
Strange navigation - best way to navigation is via models name/thumb
Medium size content in both pix and video.
Price too high.
No info about updates
Large "tags" on most photos
A lot difference in quality for both videos and photos |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has SOME potential if you're into russian teens - I could also says eateuropeans - but they all seems russian or from some states around.
There's a selection of teens not seen many other places - and some I haven't seen anywhere else before.
Look at preview: Ariel for one, Albina too - or Tina.
There's 73 videos - all in full scene download and most in really fine quality - size between 200Mb-800Mb in "high Quality" - crisp!
Download speed ok - got my 650-700 kb/sec.
A mix of mostly hc, some solo and a few socalled lez.
Maybe 7-10 videos (older) in poor quality.
Photos is not worth to join for (Sorry, Drooler) - the sessions are ok, but quality varries too much.
Some: 1200x900
a few: 3453x2304
Approx: 110 photosets
And most with big "name-tags" i the lower corner..
Was taken in by the preview - but when it comes down to it - I guess only 5-8 of the videos are really great - with some good looking teens - the rest is average or plain worthless - but it's also a matter of taste in girls.
I've seen better russian-teen sites and a lot worse - the site is not a scam - in PU-definition, but it's not great either.
And with a price of $29.95 the bottom line is: Only Average
And just if you really fall for one or two of the teens not seen anywhere else, then...
But do use the preview a lot... |
|
04-30-08 02:17pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
91
|
Digital Desire
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good amount of videos and photosets for the price.
Some HD-videos in very fine quality.
Zip for photos
Ok price |
| Cons: |
Not much new - even some of the updates seems old.
Not all exclusive - quite a few video-sets/photo sets seen elsewhere
Confusing navigation - hard looking for the real updates.
To much content with video-interviews |
| Bottom Line: |
Had a comment resently where I spoke against the quality and non-exclusive updates.
In the "Current Member" and how long - I've cheated. I have not been a steady member for 12 month, but be a member on and off for 12 months and quite a bit more.
Still I get the feeling, that this site has quite a low standard all in all.
The updates and content in general are NOT up-to-date in what you should expect from a site like this - They still live on retro.
The small video-files are sometimes quite sexy, but mostly boring. Nothing new here concerning better filming, better and more sexy scenes and above all: Find some entirely new models - like a lot of the better sites are able to.
Maybe this site was somewhat of a pioneer at one time, but, man - that was a long time ago.
Too bad, 'cause some of the videos are still great - there is just too far between them.
Good that DD has quit DRM, but that's not enough to return a 6th, 7th or 8th time to this site.
And DD, your socalled HD (hardcore extreme) are a laugh - old, non-exclusive and worse - and you can call it "extreme" from here to Kingdom Come - it's still boring and older stuff. |
|
12-09-07 09:07am
Replies (3)
|
Review
92
|
Sweet Models
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A lot of video-content in quality from low to average to ok.
A mix of solo, girl/girl and a little hardcore.
Some small amount of content that are not seen at other DDF-sites. |
| Cons: |
A lot of videos are old stuff and in pretty bad quality
Site is slow - very slow - at times.
It's not worth more than the 19.95 pr month - maybe not even that. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a DDF-site where 1ByDay is probably the best know and has an awerage top-score for DDF at TBP and PU.
Sweet Models has much less content and most in lesser quality. For me this site looks like it has a lot of leftovers from early 1ByDay.
If you visit 1ByDay from time to time the 19.95 for Sweet Models is wasted.
Spend another ten bucks and choose 1ByDay instead.
New point: After a couple of days at this inferior DDF-site, I thought maybe their server had a bad day in the start. But the problems are still at large: Extremely slow and at long moments no reply. You can download one small video-file and nada else. And the speed is average 165 kb/sec. even with a fine download accelerator that normaly gives me 650-700 kb/sec.
I should downgrade this site, but now you get the picture....
I |
|
05-06-07 07:11am
Replies (2)
|
Review
93
|
Virgin Films
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of semi-exclusive/exclusive videos - some i pretty good quality - most in low/average quality.
Good bonus sites as well. A few of these bonues sites have video to download in same general quality as Virgin Films.
Zip in the photo-sections on bonus sites - and some good HQ videos in the same bonus sites |
| Cons: |
Too many videos are split up (a few also total video for download) - to day it's a bummer if you can't get whole videos too - for that price: 29.95.
And too many videos are in too bad/low quality for 2007. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site - and the bonus sites - are a bit tricky.
If you'er into russian/eastern european girls for a change you will find some really pearls. There is one Diana solo - great looking and sexy (9 on my scale).
But it's a not good that her and must other solo/hardcore videos are low in quality.
But ok, if you can live with a little blured videos for a full/or semi-full screen it's worth a visit. |
|
05-02-07 09:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
94
|
Asian Suck Dolls
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Real thai-models
+Models seem genuine "pros of the street/bars"
+Fast video-download
+Access to the major bonus/sister-site Creampie Thais
+A variation of beauty for models, but some are really among the best lookers for thai-prostitutes |
| Cons: |
Videos are ONLY in 480 x 320.
No photosets - though it states: Photo Sets - but these photos are merely vidcaps - horrible.
Several and anoying logins
Price too high
Worthless other bonus-sites
The scenes are way too much alike
Same male "artist" - not that I care - but it's getting too much - even more "anoying" than at Dreamstash... |
| Bottom Line: |
The best thing about this site - and - Creampie Thais (it's those two sites at this deal and nothing more is worth anything) - is mainly:
The real Thai-models - typical prostitutes from Bangkok Bars or whatever - maybe from other Thai locations.
So everything should be honky dory - but what ruins a lot here is that, the producers and male-actor (the same person) is completely out of date.
Videos for a site like this cannot sell it for $29.95 with videos (and this is videos only - photos are just vidcaps, as mentioned) with wmv-files of only:
480x320 - in the year of 2009.
So fullscreen - forget it!
It's strange that the guy/co behind this site/these sites goes for this low video-quality. It's the same who makes Thainee where there are much finer videos in 720x480 - ok, not the best but much better than at these two sites.
So have to downgrade since my first review - long time ago when we were not used to finer videos.
Get your act together here Ghost Pro Inc. Just cancelled rebill...
But it's a shame - THIS could be a great Thai-site - the models certainly are - but hey: Quality!!! |
|
05-24-09 06:14am
Replies (0)
|
Review
95
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some swell looking girls you (probably) will not see anywhere else.
Ok amount of sets and videos.
Videos are the top here and good quality- generally.
Mostly canadian girls and most very sexy
If you like softcore solo-girls, you'll find something here that no other site have (it seems)
Easy navigating. |
| Cons: |
No zip for photos (Man, it's 2008 - get your act together)
Some models are very "shy" or whatever. But some models do not even show their tits.
This could be considered as an american/canadian version of Only Tease - but it's even more soft.
Could not get the "Live" part to work, maybe it's my own fault?
Expensive! |
| Bottom Line: |
Browsed this site several times - then forgot all about it, until I saw silvers review.
When browsing the site again some real fine looking teens/girls came up.
The preview is ok, but get you to a point where you think the content is better than it really is.
I first went for the videos - as usual.
The best resolution is 720x480 - not top. But most videos are ok in quality - and then again the earlier videos still seem a bit blurred - even for 720x480.
They should do better in video resolution to make some kind of hit in the softcore-area.
Too bad some of the better looking models are doing videos extremely soft. No nipples, some keep their bra on and MOST do not remove their panties.
But - as mentioned - this is somewhat an answer to the british Only Tease - and if that's ok with you, this site is a fine alternative.
Still, you have to be a sucker for soft, because it's still $ 29.95 - and that's way too expensive for what you get, if you're looking for porn - even softcore.
And this is foremost for video-freaks. The photo-sets are fewer and there's no zip!
The navigation is allright with a lot of choices in browsing.
Do not know about the interaction, did not try, did not care.
Still - the live thing they promised did'nt wotk at all for this user.
Some good soft videos - but will NOT be back. |
|
03-18-08 10:10am
Replies (1)
|
Review
96
|
Little Mutt
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good amount of content.
A lot of videos hc and solo.
Fairly good update - but not good enough.
Zip for photos
Ok TBP-bargain price. |
| Cons: |
Mostly ordenary and not very sexy looking teens. (Some/a few great ones though)
Average video-quality
Photos 1200x800 but not the best quality.
Too much pseudo-lez |
| Bottom Line: |
Too much laughter and fun - nothing wrong with that.
But when I go for/pay for a pornsite - soft, hard, amateur or whatever I look for something erotic - to turn me on.
I sure adore american teens too - along with the european/easteuropean and there are some faboulos US-teens, but far too few in that catagory in this particular site.
This site tends foremost to the regular/ordenary girl - in some ways like Abby Winters. But I must say - they do not turn me on. Most of them, anyway.
Ok, there are a few very cute and sexy looking teens here - but they are outnumbered by girls who simply are not sexy.
This site tends to the amateur-thing, and thats ok. But I did'nt get that impression when I signed up.
There are too many boring scenes. And too much half-acted lez scenes for my taste. And too many scenes where a girl sits naked/halfnaked and talk to the camera about this and that. Yawn!
The quality of most of the videos are just average.
Well, ok: There are some very good g/b hardcore scenes - and even if I'm also a big solo fan, these hc's are the best at this site.
I see that Little Mutt has some devoted fans here at PU - and with this low points I have no intention of putting down these fans - It's just not my kind of site. So i figure this is as honest a review as possible from my point of view. |
|
09-03-07 08:11am
Replies (2)
|
Review
97
|
Sexy Employee
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some Exclusive content - some not (about 50/50)
Crisp/good quality videos at most times. (No bad old quality)
Some very sexy and some average hc-videos of easteurpean girl - some well known -some I have not seen before
Zip for photos (1600x1200 px)
Mostly hardcore |
| Cons: |
Videos divided in 3, 6 or even 8 parts
No full download
Updates too slow: 3-5 days between - sometimes even longer for videos.
Old fashioned design.
A bit frustrating navigation. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is clearly a russian site of some sort - based at the Islands of Seychelles where the russian mob seems to have a lot going.
But there's nothing island-exotic over this site.
The hc-scenes are typically filmed in some appartment in dark Russia - and the scenes are some girl looking for job and gets to strip and fuck some half-fat russian guy or his thinner stand in.
But most scenes are quite good, thanks to the performance of the girls: They give the (fat) dude what he wants.
Some of the scenes grow with good strip and foreplay by the girls.
There are some sexy-looking easteuropean girls, for sure - even some I have not seen at other easteuropean-orientated sites.
But around 50 procent are girls OR scenes seen elsewhere. The well known beige/yellow sofa with solo-girls.
For the first time I've seen two very good hardcore videos of the girl called Monique (at European Glamour Girls and more site where she sometimes has a different name)) - the brunette with the BIG natural tits. She's not wild in her performance, but just to watch her fuck/ride in what seem to be her hc-debut is great for this site - she even seems a little shy about har acting. Some other very sexy blonds are in good hc-videos.
I'd give this site higher points if it was'nt for the slow update and it little too much of non-exclusive stuff. And the hassle of joining 8 wmv-parts.
And the price is certainly NOT a bargain
Follow-Up:
Have to downgrade - the updates are much too rare.
NB: New improvement: The parted video-files are no longer 8, but 4.
Webmaster asked me to point out, that video-files are Divx-format - remember that, folks! |
|
08-25-07 07:10am
Replies (20)
|
Review
98
|
Only Cuties
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good and regular updates - video and photo
Mostly european girls both in video and photos
Zip for photos
More download options, WMV, QT and MPG with a choice of high or average in WMV |
| Cons: |
Here is a site which goes for european solo-girls, but most of the videos are a bit dull and monotonous.
Why don't these guys try to make something more out the vidceo-sessions, I do not understand. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is from the same folks that make In Focus Girls and Sapphic Erotica. And it is easy to see if you've been both places.
I do not see the big difference between this site and In Focus Girls - maybe a little different girls, but the same way of doing the videos.
The pros are the the choice of downloads in varius types and solutions. But a lot of the scenes are still a bit dull - like In Focus Girls.
But still you can find some good solo-girl stuff here, som a few good hardcore-sessions. This is foremost solo-stuff.
Easy navigating and a choice of photo-zip small, medium and large.
And at last - it's after all worth a visit: The price is good. 19.95 a month.
Follow-Up:
Joined again here in march 2008 - don't know why.
This time it was even more a disapointment - I'm into videos, but these clips are both dull and way too large in file-size for HD. And the scenes are filled with loooooooong close-ups - no finesse and way to short whole-body scenes.
I downgrade. |
|
07-29-07 09:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
99
|
Moon Angel
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Well, I joined Moonangel again for the 3. time. This time with Asianflowergirl.com in an offer.
Moonangel got a lot of exclusive photos and some ditto videos - and then again a lot of non-exclusive asian hardcore videos - but the hardcore sections we've seen before. |
| Cons: |
Too few exclusive softcore videos and not very good in quality - especially the older ones.
The updates in exclusive videos are ekstremely rare.
No zip for photos
And again: Like in Asianflowergirl.com the stream-only videos have not worked for the last 24 hours. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site COULD be good, but the updates in exclusive video section is way too few. There is a lot of great photos soft/exclusive, but honestly: Where is the zip-situation.
I'll NOT be back here for a long time
PS: (04-07-2007): Now it looks like I'm not supposed to be back, my username/password suddenly do not work after a few days membership - and yesterday the joint site Asianflowergirl could not play their stream - it's going great for those people.... |
|
04-06-07 06:26am
Replies (1)
|
Review
100
|
Pretty 4ever
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good quality photos
Exclusive videos og photos
Zip in 3 sizes 1200, 2000 and 3456 px
Some very cute/sexy teens, but most seen on other sites
Fair price |
| Cons: |
Since this is quite a new site the amount of content is somewhat average/low: 63 galleries - 24 videos
Unstable quality for videos - some good, some ok and some really blurred
Slow download
I little too much focus on outdoor-photo and video (after my taste) |
| Bottom Line: |
Pretty4ever is a new and somewhat fresh site - but again maybe they try to do like similar sites:
Met Art, Teen Star Magazine and of course their sister-site Watch4Beauty.
Yes, this is a russian based thing and some of the videos sure reflects it: A russian guy talks to the girl in the video and tells her what to do in either russian and some weird english - quite a bit of a turnoff.
Other videos only have background music
Even if it's a sistersite of W4B this one is not as pro - looks like W4B-wannabe in several ways.
The photos are good in quality, but someone should teach the cameraguy how to use photoshop and what they use - I don't like photos where they cut off the girls hand or feet and even top of the head.
There sure are some cute girls on both photo and video - but the pickin' is slim. Out of the 24 videos less than half are in good quality.
I've downloaded 6 good videos and a couple of galleries, thats all I found worse putting on my HD.
I'll probably cancel rebill |
|
08-17-07 08:34am
Replies (2)
|
