Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : Tom SawyerR (0)

Feedback:   All (5)  |   Reviews (1)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (2) Other:   Replies Received (5)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Site Comments All site comments from this user. Shown : 1-2 of 2   Type Site Feedback / Review Date Comment 1 St. Mackenzie's (0) I wouldn't recommend I'd give this site a 60ish rating It's a great concept, which is why I checked it out Turns out it really is like a group of girls that got together bought a house and decorated a couple of rooms and one stairwell to look (loosely) like a schoolhouse. The picture sets are 90% softcore (5-10% of the pics show tit/ass and less than 1% you see pussy (legs together) Half the models are hot and half are mediocre at best with 1/3 of them "bigfords"/slightly chubz (one is huuuuuge lol) It added (not in a good way) to the "authentic amateurness" that the photography seems like the girls bought a cheap cannon 6megapixel camera or something and took the pictures themselves 50% of the photos are blurry and the most frustrating part is for the latter 5-10% of the photo sets when the tits start showing up, the camera focus suddenly becomes its worst. Checked out a couple of the videos...Garbage It's a true amateur site. I am/many of us are a little spoiled these days with pro sites like MET/DDG/etc. and their high resolutions but the picture quality and content of this site just killed me. I tried really hard to give a fair shake (in fact went through 75% of all photo sets but only kept less than 5% for my permanent collection. then I just got to frustrated/bored and deleted the rest) 04-06-10  02:45pm Replies (1) Comment 2 In The Crack (0) Rated 88+ Awesome site! The girls are pretty high level hot. The asses are round and round. The camera (picture) work provides a super hot perspective that is slightly different than other sites. Usually I filter out pics that don't involve something showing (pussy/tit) however; I've kept tons of the pantie shots for the slide-show collection. The pixels aren't quite as high as something like MET but still pretty high resolution. They also throw in just enough kink (speculum, toys, urine). The movies are 1080 and look great. There's a little more kink in the videos and for me that's a good thing. I don't usually do softcore when it comes to the videos. download manager worked for me. Lots of bang for my buck. I was surprised at how diverse the pic sets are. They have plenty of the usual photo-set posing but here you get the "inthecrack" shots super close, clear, shots of butts, pussies, ass holes (none gaping but ass spreading) Scene locations are exotic and varied (some indoor some outdoor) Also the clothing seems really sexy and they use high contrast colors BRIGHT PINK!!! 11-20-09  01:44pm Replies (2) Shown : 1-2 of 2   Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.05 seconds.