Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
St. Mackenzie's
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Cryton:
(Tom SawyerR's Reply)
>I would have loved this site if it came even close to getting "school girl naughty"...isn't that the point of the genre?<
Absolutely, which is hopefully something that came across in my review. The potential is there, but the selection of models (many of whom will only go as far as implied nudity) and the site's determination to keep everything soft really holds it back.
The appearance of the models gave a positive bias to my score.
|
04-30-10 10:24am
|
Reply
2
|
St. Mackenzie's
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom SawyerR's Comment
from Cryton:
I've looked at every model and none of them could even be remotely described as "huge" (no idea what "bigfords" means). One, Matron Jenny, could be described as curvy, but all the others are seriously in shape.
I tend to agree with the remainder of your comments however.
|
04-30-10 12:44am
|
Reply
3
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom SawyerR's Comment
from williamj:
Great site. If their kink is your thing you must have loved it? I know I am and did.
|
02-07-10 06:05pm
|
Reply
4
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom SawyerR's Comment
from williamj:
I joined it three times. On the second month of my third tour and still have a bit more to download. Its a great site for fans that like what they are offering.
The HD videos are the best I've seen in quality. Downloads are pretty regular and on schedule.
|
11-20-09 03:45pm
|
Reply
5
|
Ass Hole Fetish
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom SawyerR's Review
from TheRizzo:
Seems to many sites these days try to start with such little content. At least you said this content is good. I will probably wait till its about triple the size before I take the plunge though.
|
11-12-09 11:46pm
|