Have any PU members joined this site? Eva is cute girl, but site preview is very limited.
Site advertises "updates monthly". I'm glad the site appears to be truthful, but it's difficult to think a site is worth more than a 1-month membership with a monthly update schedule.
What is amount of site content, and quality of content?
The pictures? The videos?
If membership gives you access to this site only, it's hard to justify even a 1-month membership to this site, unless you're absolutely crazy about this model named Eva.
What are the number of video updates at Hustler for 2009?
I would like to hear from someone at Hustler that can indicate in a clear and specific way
what the number of latest updates have been made in 2009 and what is the normal update sequence.
Also, some of the latest movies are only steaming. I would like to know why some are only streaming and some are not.
Thank you,
Bruce
...........................................................
(Note to PU staff: Please credit this comment to bruce987. He made a reply to an earlier comment of mine, lk2fireone, but should have submitted it as a new comment, instead of submitting it as a reply to an older comment.)
Currycreampie, for hardcore models outside the teen European mix
This site is part of the netFameSolutions network, who offer Devilsfilm and Silverstone. Currycreampie uses Indian models from India.
(mbaya pointed out in a comment dated 08-26-08 that some of the "Indian" models are non-Indians dressed up to look like Indians)
Silverstone has a number of DVDs with Brazilian models.
The sites are part of a network, with a low monthly membership fee ($14.95 thru PU), offering good quality DVDs, basic navigation.
There are a number of other sites in the network, offering niche products: granny; big-sized models; hairy models; lesbian; milf; etc.
Not all sites are have as much content as Devilsfilm and Silverstone. But for $14.95/month, it's worth joining the network for a look around.
Just joined devils film today through a special low-priced offer. I was a member at pornaccess, so I received an emailed offer to join devils film for 30 days.
Signup was fast and easy.
Just remember to uncheck the "special trial offer subscription" to pornaccess or whatever other site they are offering, unless you want to join that other trial.
Access to devils film site was immediate. No waiting for membership to be processed.
Also, immediately received 2 emails:
1. confirmation of membership subscription, with membership pricing specified.
2. separate email for username and password, and email support address.
This was a nice, clean signup.
I am also impressed by how nice the site (devils film) is laid out, compared to pornaccess. Even though both sites are apparently run by the same company, devils film seems to be much cleaner, and much easier to use.
I just joined, so I really know little about the site so far, but am impressed by the first video I am looking at streaming: it was so easy to click and start the video, easy to navigate to the video, the video looks nice and clean.
This site, in my opinion, very tentative so far, is so much better than pornaccess.
Femjoy models need more makeup in their photosets and videos.
This is a matter of personal taste or personal opinion. But:
I've been a member of femjoy about a month now. The site has some great-looking models, that you will see at other teen glamour sites. And the photography is high quality by top erotic photographers. But my gripe is that the models basically need more makeup to bring out their attractiveness. I'm not big on models (or people in regular life) wearing excessive makeup. But with a video or photoshoot, unless you use a minimum of makeup, the model will normally appear less attractive. Met-art usually gets it close to right, and the models usually appear to be attractive to very attractive. Femjoy uses less makeup on their models. The same models, the same photographer, and the photoset will be better looking at met-art than at femjoy. That is partly because of the makeup difference; also met-art allows more variety of costumes.
femjoy is almost entirely nude, very little use of clothing/costume, and any clothing used at femjoy is very simple. Femjoy is going for a very simple, natural style of photography with their models, and it detracts from the presentation of the models. I realize appreciation of a model's beauty is a personal taste, but if you see the models of Victoria's secret, or world-class supermodels photographed without makeup, and in old, cheap un-colorful clothes, it takes away a huge amount of the glamour and allure of the models.
There are a huge number of lovely models at femjoy, but the photosets don't bring out the eroticism of the models. The site is trying to present lovely girls as "the girl next door", with a very natural, simple style, but the style reduces the attractiveness of the models in the photosets.
Even if you are using the "girl next door" theme, which was probably first made popular with Playboy back in the 1950s and 1960s, for nude photography, you still want the model and photos to be as attractive as possible, with an erotic appeal. You don't want to take a good-to-great-looking girl, and produce a bunch of photographs that just look blah and unappealing. Met-art, in general, takes good-looking girls and makes good-to-great-looking photos. Femjoy takes the same girls, and makes photos that are less good-looking. That's a shame.
I see from the comments and reviews that other PU members don't necessarily agree with my opinion on the need for more makeup at femjoy. But I think my opinion has merit, and frankly, I'm surprised some PU member hasn't already expressed a similar opinion.
I am a sucker for teen. Some of the models here seem to be yummy. The price I see at the sign-up page is $29.96/month. Not much cheaper than the $34.96/month shown at PU and TBP, but still, a more attractive price.
The PU review of this site is over 2 years old. The TBP reviews of the site are almost 4 years old. Would any PU members who have been recent members of this site care to comment on the value of this site? Is it still actively updating with new photo sets? New videos? What is the quality of the photos, quality of the videos? Is the site worth joining for a 1-month membership, or would the money be better spent on better sites? There appear to be a huge number of models at the site (700+), but it also appears that many models have a small number of photos (less than 100 photos).
Have any PU members joined Sugar Paradise and have any opinions on value of site? The preview/tour is only 1 page, it does not list number of photos, photosets, or videos, or give any numerical data on site contents. The preview page shows a bunch of teens, 1 is really cute, Diana, but need much better idea of content quality and quantity before joining this site. It's part of a small network of teen sites.
MPL Studios looks attractive, but expensive at $34.95/month. Is there a discount available anywhere?
I mean, really, the price is out of line with most other sites of a roughly similar offering. I'd like to get in to sample the wares, but not at that price.
I just signed up with Femjoy, based on Mr Fountain's comment that a membership is now offered at $29.95 for 60 days. I gave my name, credit card information, etc. to CCBill, and was given a username, password, and subscription number. However, I can't log on to the user area of Femjoy with my username and password. I transferred to CCBill to see if I can find what the problem is, and CCBill shows I have no subscription/membership at Femjoy. I will try to log on at Femjoy later. One problem, besides being not able to log on to Femjoy member area, is the warning at log on that after 3 attempts to log on to member area, "you will be ...". (It doesn't say what you will be, other than dotted 3 times, but I suspect I will be barred from being able to log on for a number of hours, or maybe barred for 1 day.
Not a good start to my membership. Even tho CCBill shows I do not have a membership, after I gave my credit card and other information, I was then given a subscription ID, so I think I do have a membership, even tho it's not working properly.
Edit 1: OK, checking back at CCBill, it now shows I do have a membership at Femjoy, which started today.
Switching back to Femjoy, try to log on, and still can't get into member area. Will try again later. Hope that I am not barred from site because of prior attempts to sign on.
Edit 2: A side note: I used to get confirmation emails whenever I joined a pay site. I did not get any confirmation email yet from CCBill for this membership (recently I also did not get any confirmation email from another paysite membership).
Tried to log on to Femjoy member area, still can't get in.
Is it too much to ask for that once you pay for a site membership, you should be able to log on easily?
Edit 3: I can now get into member area of Femjoy. I still have not gotten any confirmation email of my membership, but as long as I can get into site, that's the main thing. Some of the models are gorgeous.
I've never been a member. I looked at site tour back in November 2008, when it apparently first opened. At that time, site had 24 models. This is April 2009, 5 months later, and site still has 24 models. Since number of models apparently the same, site might have no updates.
Free tour gives little information. Does not list number of models, number of photo sets, number of pix, number of videos, or a bunch of other useful information.
Site contents appear to be small. Advertises daily updates and new models added regularly, which I strongly doubt. Daily updates and new models added regularly were probably intended, but that didn't happen.
Site might be worth joining for a 2-3 day trial if price is right and you could download entire site contents. But joining for 1 month or more would probably not be worth it.
The current PU score for Hustler is 72.9, the TBP score is 82.6. That is a big difference, One reason might be that the TBP score was given Nov 4, 2006. The PU scores are from more recent reviews. Actually, if TBP was following PU rules for scoring, Husler would have no TBP score, because the reviews would have expired, and the scores based on those reviews would have expired as well.
A second reason for the difference in scores is that PU members mainly have an aversion to DRM.
Hustler videos were until recently DRM protected. That would have lowered the score massively for many PU members, or they would have avoided the site altogether.
bruce987 writes in a comment dated 04-26-09 that Hustler has removed DRM 3 months or more earlier.
But TrashMan writes in a review dated 01-24-09 that "Downloads have DRM".
james4096 in comment dated 04-22-09 writes, "It does seem like they have removed DRM on their wmv videos....but the video quality still stinks in most videos."
Webmaster reply 02-28-09, "we removed all DRM protection a couple weeks ago".
Looking at the tour pages, last update was December 2006. With small number of models, limited number of photo sets and videos, it's very questionable why anyone would want to join this site. Since the site owners apparently have some other small sites that stopped updating years ago, they should combine the different sites into a single, larger site, or offer the different sites as part of a network, instead of trying to sell the sites on an individual basis or as a 2-for-1 combination.
Some of these models are so skinny they look like they belong in a hospital. Maybe they don't have an eating disorder, but it's not healthy to be that thin.
The site says Perfect 10 magazine is available at bookstores and newsstands throughout the U.S. But doing a Google search, I find a report that the Perfect 10 magazine stopped publishing a paper-based magazine years ago, switching to an Internet-based subscription model at its web site.
Is the Perfect 10 web site still updating with photosets of new models, or not?
The review by Xororos on 03-31-09 seems to imply the site is not updating with new material.
The review by james4096 on 03-16-09 says, "I believe the site is still being updated, but how often and when, I cannot say."
There are some great-looking models on this site, but based on the recent reviews, it's not worth joining:
-download limits
-no zip files
-no high res pictures
-very limited video content.
-can't download the video content, only watch it streaming
-poor site navigation
Special $59 offer for 1 year subscription to muse.org
Special $59 offer for 1 year subscription to muse.org
-Richard Murrian site (with some contributions by other photographers).
-He is softcore nude teen photographer, featured at Met-art.
-Very glamor-style, very softcore. Pictures are female solo models.
-Most models are teens, some in early 20s.
-Some really stunning-looking girls, some really great-looking pictures (but strictly softcore).
-photo series come in 3 resolutions: 2500 px, 1500 px, 1000 px
-plus a zip file for download of the photo series
-video formats: quicktime, divx, ipod
-payment by ccbill or verotel
It would be better to put a date with the TBP review status comment that "The webmaster of this site does not want their site reviewed at this time.". That way, the reader knows what date the comment refers to, instead of trying to guess.
Haven't been a member of met-art since Sep. 2008, but they keep trying to make the site better.
Now they advertise "Read the full model bio" (for newest photo set updates). The older model bios were extremely limited, basically name, country, physical characteristics (age, height, weight, plus a few others).
Another new feature is allowing members to make their own photo galleries from pics they select from met-art photo shoots.
Life is unfair. I read that David (the photographer of this site) is married to Tatyana, who is a model. If his wife is the Tatyana featured on david-nudes, then PU members should nuke this site, because no photographer deserves a wife as gorgeous as this one.
Tatyana is the best-looking model on this site. There are apparently very few models, because this is a new site (site started mid-2008), but the site advertises 4 updates per week.
A unique feature of the site is the commentary on the set-up of the photo-shoots, model prep, etc. This would mainly appeal to would-be photographers, I assume. "You can learn how each session was created, from the technical photography issues, such as lighting, camera setup, location work, to finding and working with the models!"
So someone like Toadsith might find this site appealing.
Site appears to be off-line. When you click on link at PU, you get a 404 error (page cannot be found). Also get a 404 error when you try to access site by entering site name as URL for browser.
I am not a Fritz Ryan member. But reading the past Fritz Ryan reviews and comments, and going through the model directory:
There are a lot of good-to-great looking girls on this site.
The photosets appear to be natural, not photo-shopped or airbrushed. There seem to be problems using the site: poor navigation, download speeds sometimes poor, other problems.
Why am I writing if the site is not worth joining?
Because there appear to be a lot of yummy-looking girls.
Are there any PU members who have been a recent member of Fritz Ryan that will comment on the quality of the photosets? Hopefully, members who are more into photos than videos.
I just signed up for justteensite based on Drooler's review, which is fairly positive, and I also belonged about 2+ years ago.
Am having a problem viewing and/or downloading the photoset of a model named Tanya. The photoset was supposed to be posted at the site on 2008-05-08.
Anyway, I am trying to contact support about the problem, as well as the fact I can't view or download any of the videos at justteenmovie, which is a sister site that you get a membership with when you join justteensite.
The general support email address is given as info(AT)justteensite.com, when you hit the hot link for "General Support" (the other support hot links are for cancelling the membership).
The email address of info(AT)justteensite.com does not work when you put that into an email. You get an error message, "We cannot find a match for this email address. Please use an email address
that looks like: user@eample.com "
So I tried sending the email to info@justteensite.com , and that works, apparently.
Hoping I will get a response to the email I sent, that will let me view and download the photosets and videos I want.
Both Drooler and snappy said in October they sent emails to "Friendly Support" and got no response.
I am hoping I will have better luck.
If I can not view and download the photosets/videos I want at Justteensite and the videos at Justteenmovie, I will get a refund from CCBill.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
