I recently saw one page on the internet that showed 16 bonus sites if you join through Give Me Teens. But those sites did not include Rocco Siffredi or Peter North, two of the top sites in the network.
However, at the Give Me Teens site, there is a page that states membership to Give Me Teens does give access to to the entire bonus network.
The 5 sites I listed above are the main sites, but there are also some other sites that have value.
So I am thinking that the one internet page I saw recently, that only listed 16 bonus sites, was only showing a partial list of the sites you get access to.
It's been about 5 years since I was a member of this site. Back then, they had some really cute models. Nice softcore photography. Their preview pages give a very limited idea of the site contents. They advertise the site updates twice a week. But the preview pages don't show the posted dates of any recent updates.
What is new to me is that you are supposed to get a large number of bonus sites with your membership. The bonus sites are solo model sites and multi-model sites. I believe many of these bonus sites are archive sites, that have not updated in 1 or more years. But maybe it would be worth a 1-month membership to see what these sites have. Or not.
One cute model is Ema, who has her own site named Ema's Place. The site preview states she is 18, but she is also featured at Metart, under the name of Avril A, which says her current age is 25. I think Metart tries to be more accurate about a model's age than most web sites.
Anyway, Metart has 20 photosets of Avril A, the last one posted 2010-11-19.
The preview pages for Ema's Place state weekly updates, ultra fresh content. But my guess is that the last update to the Ema's Place site was probably a few years ago. I don't think Ema (or Avril A, or whatever name you use to call her) is still active as a model.
And that's probably true of many of the bonus sites you get with a Glam Deluxe membership. Bonus sites that no longer update.
I wish that the preview pages for these porn sites would more accurately reflect the current state of these sites, instead of promising you fresh, weekly updates that you won't be getting.
Any recent members of glam deluxe care to comment on site?
Apparently there are 2 bonus sites included with membership to glam deluxe:
helens planet
emas place
It's been almost 3 years since I was a member of glam deluxe. The photography sets were high quality then, many of the models were gorgeous. But the update rate was slow. And there were no zips for the photosets.
There were only a small number of videos.
Any recent members of that site care to comment on their experience with this site?
The bonus sites are solo model sites. Cute girls. Are those sites still updating?
OK. TBP states last update for emas place was 04-24-10 (as of 05-17-11)'
Also, TBP states content count has not changed for helens planet since 2008, even though the dates for the content supposedly show recent updates. So site probably has not updated in years.
Advertises "over 40,000 high quality sexy photos."
The site preview is extremely limited: I see some thumbnails, but nothing larger to see what the actual photos look like. So even though there are some cute models here, I'd look elsewhere.
Using the PU link to Goddess Nudes, and then hitting the join page link, you see the prices:
$29.99/month recurring
$39.99 for 1 month (non-recurring)
$99.99/year recurring
This is a big jump for the monthly price, which used to be $9.99 (recurring).
Check you inbox for promo offering of $5 for the first month of Hard X.
I've never been a member, but lately, it seems I've been getting a lot of promo offers from sites to join for $5 for the first month.
Don't know if this is a sign of desperation, or if the hard economic times are still continuing for the porn sites.
But the main preview page appears to be slightly misleading.
The main preview page shows 126 nice-sized thumbnails. And there is a popup over each thumbnail which says, "HD, Play Movie", "100% Full 1080p Resolution".
So you would normally think that there would be 126 videos, instead of 11+ videos.
Maybe the site is looking ahead, to what they will have in the future, instead of what they have currently.
But you would never know that the site only has 11+ videos, from the preview pages.
Are there any bonus sites that come with a membership? TBP doesn't list any bonus sites.
And if there is not a nice selection of bonus sites, then a site that is apparently this small might not be worth even a 1-month membership.
Hegre (and a lot of other sites) running discounts for holidays.
A lot of fine (and not so fine) porn sites are running special discounts for the holidays. I guess the Easter spirit has made them reach out in brotherly love to porn addicts.
Hegre, MetArt, the list goes on. A lot of fine sites offering low membership prices right now.
USE THE PU LINK TO GET TO THE HEGRE SITE, AND YOU WILL SEE THE FOLLOWING PRICES:
(THE FIRST PRICE IS THE 'REGULAR PRICE', THE SECOND PRICE IS THE SPECIAL PRICE.)
More than most softcore teen glamor sites, Hegre seems to make people respond in different ways, from loving the site to finding the site a bore. The PU score for the site is 77, while the TBP score is 92. That is quite a range.
VideosZ has a PU score of 75 and a TBP score of 92. VideosZ is a hardcore video site, instead of a softcore glamor photo site.
But I think it's interesting how some sites seem to polarize the members at PU.
Three of the most important factors in site value are:
-content quality
-content quantity
-price
Like hondaman, I think price is a major factor.
Hegre-Art is a good site, as far as content. But it's way overpriced based on the prices from a few months ago.
Prices for Hegre-Art have dropped recently.
PU currently lists a monthly cost of $19.95, recurring at $29.95/mo.
PU currently lists an annual fee of $150.00 (non-recurring)
The Hegre-Art site currently lists a sign-up fee of:
$19.95/month, recurring.
$99.95/year, non-recurring.
You almost need a dynamic link to these sites to get the updated prices.
This seems to be a very small site. With very limited information from the site preview area. PU discount price is $17.97/month. But the site preview only shows maybe 15 models in the "all girls" section. 15 models at this site, that's started in September 2009, according to TBP?
TBP states 18+ episodes (videos) for the site (facts updated 01-05-11).
So apparently this is an archive site, with little to no updates. I mean, 18+ episodes for a site that launched in September 2009? A very tiny site.
There are supposed to be 7 bonus sites, so possibly it's worth a 1-month membership.
Have any PU members been a member of this site, and would comment on whether it's worth joining this site (with the bonus sites)?
If site only has about 30+ videos (20 minute runtime), it seems kind of expensive at $29.95/month.
Anyone at PU been a member, care to comment? With only 30+ videos, the number of models is probably very limited.
Is there any bonus content, such as access to a network of other sites, that is included in the membership? TBP does not seem to show any bonus sites included. Although TBP states there are bonus galleries.
What are the number of video updates at Hustler for 2009?
I would like to hear from someone at Hustler that can indicate in a clear and specific way
what the number of latest updates have been made in 2009 and what is the normal update sequence.
Also, some of the latest movies are only steaming. I would like to know why some are only streaming and some are not.
Thank you,
Bruce
...........................................................
(Note to PU staff: Please credit this comment to bruce987. He made a reply to an earlier comment of mine, lk2fireone, but should have submitted it as a new comment, instead of submitting it as a reply to an older comment.)
The current PU score for Hustler is 72.9, the TBP score is 82.6. That is a big difference, One reason might be that the TBP score was given Nov 4, 2006. The PU scores are from more recent reviews. Actually, if TBP was following PU rules for scoring, Husler would have no TBP score, because the reviews would have expired, and the scores based on those reviews would have expired as well.
A second reason for the difference in scores is that PU members mainly have an aversion to DRM.
Hustler videos were until recently DRM protected. That would have lowered the score massively for many PU members, or they would have avoided the site altogether.
bruce987 writes in a comment dated 04-26-09 that Hustler has removed DRM 3 months or more earlier.
But TrashMan writes in a review dated 01-24-09 that "Downloads have DRM".
james4096 in comment dated 04-22-09 writes, "It does seem like they have removed DRM on their wmv videos....but the video quality still stinks in most videos."
Webmaster reply 02-28-09, "we removed all DRM protection a couple weeks ago".
PU lists price as $9.95/month recurring.
TBP lists price as $19.95/month recurring.
You click on the PU link to the site, and when you go to the join page, the price shown is $19.95/month recurring.
This is a small site, with only 40 models so far. The site is listed as amateur girls. I've seen a few of the same models at Metart, Femjoy, and other sites, so not all the models are complete amateurs.
Were any PU people members at this site, and have an opinion on whether it's worth joining?
Apparently the site featured female masturbation when it started, as stated in a PU review by anyonebutme posted 12-01-10.
But since then the site has also featured male-female hardcore action, done in a tasteful way. By tasteful, I mean the sex is gentle, with the man trying to please the woman.
The videos are sharp, with good lighting and colors.
Site had 42 videos in August, 2008.
Site has 42 videos in January, 2011, two years and 4 months later.
So no updates at all.
A shame, because the videos are very high quality in definition, and mainly well-shot. Pretty models, but most of the videos are kind of boring (or very boring).
Anyway, I guess they ran out of money to keep shooting new videos. Or they are using the money they do have for other things.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
