| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1226
|
Just Nips
(0)
|
Reply of
Mitch74's Review
Hi Mitch,
Welcome to PU.
It is nice that you have picked up on a site not previously reviewed here as your opening gambit.
I would urge you to read around the reviews & comments here. Not only will it give you lots of related information, it will also show you what details to feature in your reviews to improve them.
To return to the subject of the review.
What percentage of material here goes from fully clothed to fully nude, please?
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-04-12 09:12am
|
Reply
1227
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
A very strange situation.
Perhaps CCBill forgot a tick a box when they set it up?
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-09-10 09:48am
|
Reply
1228
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
Whilst I can appreciate you rating it this highly if you are enamoured of her looks, no zips is a big negative for photo collectors; and those low res video figures are going to be a problem for vid. folks.
Lack of nudity may be another issue! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-08-11 11:35pm
|
Reply
1229
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Well, I hope I see that in my inbox soon.
I haven't been there in quite a while.
Mainly based on the cost ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-23-13 09:12am
|
Reply
1230
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Well, I cetainly hope so too; although a resurgence of photosites is very unlikely in the current climate.
Cap'n. :0/
|
06-04-12 12:04pm
|
Reply
1231
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
I think you raise valid points on the networking issue.
TBH so few sites are available in my niche these days I doubt there would be enough for a network anyway.
Cap'n. :0/
|
06-04-12 09:54am
|
Reply
1232
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
A well thought out review. It is nice to get a perspective from a video guy. For me, it rates probably around the 85 mark as I am a photo phreak. :0)
I do agree about your network point though.
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-04-12 01:25am
|
Reply
1233
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
Yeah, I would second that brief but accurate statement.
Just an impression I have perhaps, but I think you get more shaven & more silicon at KHA.
I know you didn't ask, but the sam goes for Karups Older Women.
Too much silicon & shaving for my taste.
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-12-10 04:20pm
|
Reply
1234
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
It is really.
No, seperate companies so far as I know, I was referring to the ATK reference in the Bottom Line.
Sorry, it was a little confusing. :00
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-05-10 08:18am
|
Reply
1235
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
ezride's Review
As you have spotted videos are not really strong here.
As with most ATK sites they are more photo orientated.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-05-10 06:20am
|
Reply
1236
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I am with you 100% on this.
Landscape format can be so much more intimate. It draws you into the photo. Portrait, I find distancing & more formal.
I don't dislike the portait format, but do prefer landscape.
My prefernce would be 2/3 Landscape.
|
09-06-09 03:38am
|
Reply
1237
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Like I said.
I know that feeling well.
I don't know if it is better or worse.
With CCBill I get the Goldfish Scenario.
'Oh is there a problem.'
Here we go again! :0/
In your case it is difficult to know if the problem is the Webmanager or the billing company.
Either way there should hsve been some response by now though.
Hang in there.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-28-11 11:14am
|
Reply
1238
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes it is frustrating.
Mind you, so is 6 weeks & counting for CCBill to get their GEOIP database sorted. STILL waiting!
All a matter of scale, I suppose.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 10:30am
|
Reply
1239
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
RS?
Not heard of them before.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 12:21am
|
Reply
1240
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I thought those were the billing companies they used?
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-27-11 01:32pm
|
Reply
1241
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I am pleased you are enjoying the site, my friend.
It is generally of good quality & consistent.
It is always on the list for a rejoin for me.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-11 05:21pm
|
Reply
1242
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
A very fair assessment.
I am with you on the 'enhanced' breasts issue.
Quite often they appear to be best viewed clothed, which to be fair I suppose they would be 'designed' to look good that way.
On a few occasions there I have been mightily impressed with the clothed shots, only to be a little taken aback when they are revealed :00
Another thing that used to be an issue for me there was the preponderance of the shaved look. :0/
I agree with your score though.
A good solid MILF photo site really, just with a little too much 'enhancement.'
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-20-11 01:50pm
|
Reply
1243
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I'll put my reply to that under AO30,it will be more relevant there.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-09-11 05:23am
|
Reply
1244
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
A fair and comprehensive opinion there.
It is one that I have been meaning to revisit, but the memory of an excess of silicon & the widespread shaven look has meant I have left it a little longer than perhaps I should have.
Good to know they are still updating consistently.
Thanks for the review.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-08-11 05:56pm
|
Reply
1245
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Thanks for the reply, Rick.
I'll not hold my breath then! ;0)
|
09-28-09 02:50am
|
Reply
1246
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Review
A solid review there, Monty.
This is one of my favourite sites.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-04-11 03:36am
|
Reply
1247
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
Well, as far as I can tell, Karup's do sponsor a lot of content.
What happens when they are done with it is more of an open question.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-12-11 04:12pm
|
Reply
1248
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Hi Pat,
Given that it was a site not geared to your preferences, I think you have been very fair in your review.
Yes, the Karup's sites are primarily photoset orientated.
From a personal point of view the thing that tends to downgrade my view of them is that they seem to insist in a lot of fake arousal & 'touchy, feely' at the expense of clear body shots.
Other than that I really like them.
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-18-11 11:23am
|
Reply
1249
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Review
Nice review.
They certainly aren't the only ones guilty of slack photoediting though. ATK is much the same with their sites.
They have to get their heads around quality as well as quantity.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-26-10 11:12am
|
Reply
1250
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
hardog's Reply
Some AV / Security software can be paranoid & flag up false positives.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-10-10 09:10am
|
