Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
Jaimes's Reply
And years later it is still pretty much the same. A VERY slow leak of the older Erromax and most of the rest, garbage. Adding new sites that are useless unless you are into bondage and gross outs. The REALLY good older stuff, yet unreleased. The newer stuff, getting less exciting by the minute. I said it years ago: porn has been broken, for good.
|
07-01-16 05:05am
|
Reply
2
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
60 IS probably too generous. But for the 10 or so videos where all the girls DID get naked, in the end, (after much editing) it might be worth a month.(but not two)Still, compared to something like DARE DORM this is a much better site. DARE DORM is a vicious crime against porn humanity. Talk about purposely and remorselessly torturing viewers. 3 (maybe 4) if your lucky out of (many times) groups of girls, get naked on an average DARE DORM. I fast forwarded the last DVD in 20 minutes and saw NOTHING worth keeping. The camera work was EVEN worse than S.S.P. S.S.P. is closer to COLLEGE RULES where SOMETIMES all the girls get naked but often, not so much. Other torture sites to be wary of: MOFOS and BANG BROTHERS. And if you sense a bit of redundancy in porn these days it's because most sites are owned by three companies: MANWIN (now MINDGEEK), TAINSTER (used to be ERROMAX) and the entity calling themselves MOFOS...
|
11-10-13 07:05pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Simply when a porn star doesn't look good anymore. Seriously does ANYONE want to see Ron Jeremy naked anymore. Just sayin'
|
11-10-13 01:26pm
|
Reply
4
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
International M's Reply
International M: as a former member (several times throughout the years) and as someone that has seen EVERY DSO and Hardcore Party that has been released in the United States. I must note, that yes, you have 3000 scenes BUT, once you take away the gross out sites, you are left with maybe 3 decent ones. Out of those, several of the sets were incomplete or had technical problems. Not to mention the quality of creativity is sub-par, with the same casts over and over again. I've said it once, I've said it a hundred times-including complaining while I was on the site: TAINSTER has ruined, not only a decent idea (Erromax was flawed, but it was still leagues above Tainster) but porn in general, by creating copy cats. The sad thing, is that this COULD be the best site on the scene if it jettisoned the gross sites, (bundle the gross sites together for the German market and bundle the orgy sites together for the straight orgy porn lovin' individuals like me)stopped hiring extras and hired girls to at least get completely naked, AND brought back all the old Erromax stuff you have been hoarding, promising for years to release, but refusing to.You do that and I will finally respect you in the morning.
|
11-29-12 09:50am
|
Reply
5
|
Haze Her
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Elephant, that's what it MAY seem, but the fact is far from the fantasy. First off, these are not amateurs. (which is fine because many are very cute)All you have to do is Google HAZE HER: identify girls and you will see a plethora of message boards dedicated to tackling the fact that most of these girls appear elsewhere. Secondly, the strap-on scenes insure that whoever has the strap-on will not be getting totally naked. Also for the most part, don't count on orgies. This is mostly controlled 3-4 girls on average. Sometimes more. But rarely. And never full on orgies. Finally, the whole "humiliation" thing is not fun. It's ugly and ruins the fantasy. Especially when men acting like pigs are involved.
|
08-08-12 10:26pm
|
Reply
6
|
Haze Her
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
Yes, that is correct: no previews! It is just another way that this company insures you are mislead into thinking their site is more than the sum of it's parts. You are probably doing yourself a favor steering clear of this site. Good call.
|
08-08-12 10:14pm
|
Reply
7
|
Haze Her
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Yes, some cuties, but for me if they don't all get at least naked, it really kills the fantasy and becomes more frustrating than titillating.
|
08-08-12 10:11pm
|
Reply
8
|
Haze Her
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Elephant:I agree that there are definitely some hot moments, but mitigated by the frustration of not seeing the girls naked and the very ADD addled camerawork. And yes, this is the same insidious symptoms that haunt almost every single party site. I think in large part, because Drunk Sex Orgy was so successful, this became the norm. Sad truth is for most, it works, but for some of us it ends up being frustrating. While I would like to see all the girls have sex, I would be happy if at least they got entirely naked. None of this just topless BS, either. In one particular set: NEW PLEDGE DICK SUCKING. Only ONE of the girls even gets entirely naked! There is really no excuse for this other than the money the producers are paying out. It has been proven that 99% of the girls on these sites are all up-n-coming porn stars.
|
08-03-12 02:36am
|
Reply
9
|
Czech Mega Swingers
(0)
|
Reply of
oldguy's Review
Good review, in general. I am thinking of joining but more interested in pics. Does the site include pics? Or just videos. I can't believe that no where on the internet is this information available! The site SHOULD tell you what's it's going to include but, of course, it doesn't. Also: do the subtitles distract? Do they cover up any action? I hate that... Any additional news would be appreciated.
|
01-08-12 07:16pm
|
Reply
10
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Reply
petefountain:thank you for your response. Indeed, I did not mean to offend anyone. But I do think that C.F.N.M should stay in it's own backyard, so to speak. But more and more it is seeping into all kinds of porn; from Parodies (Not Married With Children) to websites.(the aforementioned COLLEGE RULES, DARE DORM and FUCK TEAM FIVE all have had their share of C.F.N.M seepage. Also V.I.P., V.I.P. CREW and REAL SLUT PARTIES)Sometimes you get lucky, but most of the time they show you a bunch of cute girls (and waste a lot of time doing so) that don't even get naked. As you alluded to, on average you might see 2-4 girls actually get naked or participate. (and in the case of Party Hardcore and Drunk Sex Orgy almost NEVER the real cute ones that the cameramen seem to tease us consistently with) In the scheme of things, say, when you compare it to real issues like Global Poverty and possible Nuclear War,it is a niggling thing, but gosh,it is damn annoying
|
12-27-11 04:16am
|
Reply
11
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
qted's Reply
qted: Exactly! And adding Gina to Party Hardcore is not particularly
a bonus-she never gets naked these days, and it is odd that when the males M.C. they always get naked, but when it is a girl, she never gets naked. Does no one realize that it would be far more exciting if the female M.C.s got naked (or even participated once in a while) while M.C.ing. Sadly I do not see this trend waning. Too many people like C.F.N.M. Myself, I just don't understand the appeal at all.
|
12-27-11 04:05am
|
Reply
12
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Mbaya, you are right. It is an unfair judgement call on my part. I should have been more specific and said, that, in my opinion, it is sick to me. But I still maintain that certain genres should be kept out of the mainstream. I still maintain that C.F.N.M is ruining porn. I watch porn to see girls get naked. If you don't, that's fine, but please don't have it leak into my genre. This is not the movies where you can mix and match genres and it's fun. This is porn. I see cute girls, I want to see them naked. Just like in a mystery; you see a gun in the first act, it better be used by the third. I can't tell you how much this frustrates me. It is simply inconceivable to my brain that folks would enjoy this torture but again, to each his own, just don't let it leak into MY mainstream.
|
07-31-11 03:39pm
|
|
