| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1426
|
Gag Factor
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Comment
I sure hope someone answers and confirms that they have been upgrading the video. I was a member a couple of years ago and a lot of the quality was crap. I'd take a new membership pretty quick if someone could answer your question in the affirmative.
|
04-30-13 06:04pm
|
Reply
1427
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I must be living under a rock since I didn't know there was a third "21" site. I'd never heard of 21 Naturals before. If it is as good as the other two I'll definitely have to give it a try.
|
04-30-13 06:00pm
|
Reply
1428
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Jent's Comment
TheSquirrel is right: the pricing structure is just like a normal site now though you can build up credits when you're a member. They used to have a unique and frustrating membership, but that's gone. I joined both 21Sextury and 21Sextreme for the first time a couple of months ago and they are among the best sites I've joined. Highly recommended!
|
04-30-13 05:59pm
|
Reply
1429
|
Nude In SF
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
According to your comment it was almost exactly four years ago, and I think you are 100% accurate in your assessment: nothing has changed since then. (Except that it is technically twice the price now because they shortened the membership from two weeks to one, but that really isn't a big deal because there is very little here and a determined member with a normal internet connection could download everything they wanted in a couple of hours.)
I really, really, really wish that there were more sites with good public nudity in American (or Canadian or Western European cities) but I realize that the current legal climate probably prevents this. Not to sound like a shill, but if you do like public nudity, the best I've seen is Teasers VOD.
|
04-30-13 05:54pm
|
Reply
1430
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
Great review, and based in large part on it I'm adding this to my list of favourites and will probably join soon. Like you, this isn't exactly my usual kind of site, but for a different reason. I prefer harder porn than this, but after taking a membership to X-Art a while ago I realized that I really did like this softer stuff too. And I'm glad to hear that I'll recognize a lot of the models!
I hope the download manager issue was temporary. I like a lot of Manwin sites and I sure hope they don't start blocking managers on other sites.
|
04-30-13 05:49pm
|
Reply
1431
|
Val Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I'm more of a video collector and these sites tended to favour photos. I've kept some of the videos and they were probably substandard resolution even five years ago. One of these days I'll take the plunge and join a couple of solo sites again.
|
04-29-13 05:37pm
|
Reply
1432
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Comment
I've been interested in this site for a while but the preview does seem to show a lot of 'enhanced' models as you point out. I'd certainly appreciate a full review when you can get to it.
|
04-29-13 05:35pm
|
Reply
1433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Barefoot is my preference, but I don't mind footwear either - as long as it makes sense.
|
04-29-13 05:33pm
|
Reply
1434
|
Val Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I've always wondered about that too, and can only conclude that it has to be the model's choice. But it seems to me that once a model gets into this business she might as well go all the way.
My biggest beef with these solo 'teen' models is that they are almost always poorly done. I'll admit it has been a while since I joined one, but the picture and video quality tends to be poor.
But like you I'm still drawn to these sites. This one (and the network) are on my list of sites to join at some time.
|
04-25-13 05:32am
|
Reply
1435
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Excellent review as always. I'm really glad to hear that the webmaster has created a good bundle of sites with the network. I'll definitely be renewing my membership soon.
|
04-25-13 05:29am
|
Reply
1436
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, I guess this is another area where I'm a bit out of the mainstream. I'm not a big fan of vaginal fisting, but I doo keep an eye out for anal fisting. Male on female anal fisting is pretty rare though. Probably for a good reason...
|
04-13-13 05:36am
|
Reply
1437
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I'm not really sure what the question is, but if it is something that is bad for me, then the answer is yes.
|
04-01-13 05:45pm
|
Reply
1438
|
Dominated Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks for the comments Jay.
|
03-10-13 02:46pm
|
Reply
1439
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I don't consider that I 'live here,' but I do pop by a couple of times per day...
|
03-10-13 05:53am
|
Reply
1440
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I remember getting the email from the guy and having to read it multiple times to make sure I wasn't confused. The worst thing is that I really liked the site (aside from the streaming-only) and gave it a high score based on content but I said in the review that potential members needed to be aware that it is streaming only. As I recall now, his beef wasn't that I told people it was streaming but that I said he was unclear whether it was streaming. He pointed to his Terms of Service which were VERY vague as proof that he made it clear to people that the site was streaming only. I don't think the TOS was clear at all, and even so, how many people read the TOS before joining a site?
But I am still convinced that regardless of what he said his issue was, that he was really mad that I probably killed 90% of his potential business from PU members by pointing out that there were no downloads. (The site was new and hadn't been reviewed by the TBP folks yet.)
|
03-09-13 04:26pm
|
Reply
1441
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
What an excellent review! Seriously. Detailed and thorough with every word contributing to the overall point.
This is a site I've thought about joining and I still might even though it has a lot wrong with it. I think just having a reputable biller is enough to cure a lot of problems because I know my risk is just the cost of the membership.
|
03-09-13 05:06am
|
Reply
1442
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Good point on a possible source of material for them.
I discovered something that I thought was odd about the site. I'm going through there and replacing some of my favourite scenes that I had downloaded as lower-res wmvs with the best resolution H.264 on offer and I noticed that Burning Angel studio gave VB almost everything in HD whereas other studios have nothing in HD. I assumed that VB licenced the material and decided how to upload it, but it may be that they're licence is a lot more restrictive.
|
03-09-13 04:56am
|
Reply
1443
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
It sounds like you and I are on the same path - now that we've taken the plunge into HD there is no going back.
I agree that if your tastes are for mature women this isn't the site for you as a frequent rejoin or as a long-term member: the updates you're interested in just aren't that frequent and they are rarely in HD. You're right though that my tastes make this a better deal. But the reality of porn is that my tastes are just better served by the market anyway. I do have a few niches that aren't well served so I can empathize with you in your search for good quality porn with mature models even if I don't share that specific interest.
|
03-09-13 04:52am
|
Reply
1444
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Nor me. But even if I were interested in the female model the business model is enough to keep me away.
|
03-09-13 04:47am
|
Reply
1445
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It matters a lot to me - when it occurs. What I mean is that a webmaster doesn't need to respond to me personally, but when a webmaster replies here (or webmaster attitudes are reported here) that does impact on my decision to join a site. If a webmaster seems helpful, friendly and genuinely interested in providing a good site for members that is definitely going to make a positive impression. On the other hand, when a jackass threatens to sue me for revealing that his site is streaming-only, that likely means I'll never give him another dime.
|
03-09-13 04:46am
|
Reply
1446
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Interesting review, pat. I'm definitely not in her target market, not being interested in MILFs. But even if I was, the need to download in segments would keep me away. I really don't understand how a webmaster could get a site so wrong.
|
03-07-13 01:33pm
|
Reply
1447
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I agree - VB is trapped in a cycle that they probably don't want to break out of, namely the need for five updates per day. With a $12 per month membership that limits them. But I'm assuming that at any given time VB must have thousands of members so it must still be lucrative for them - and I don't begrudge them for that. They provide a decent product for a low price.
But... I'm sure I'm not alone is saying that I'd stand by them if they went to one or two good quality updates per day. I think they could get away with that due to the huge size they've already built up.
I do think you've probably hit on a big part of the problem in that major studios might be reluctant to licence titles to them as that might divert traffic away from the studio's own site.
|
03-07-13 01:27pm
|
Reply
1448
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Unless the site goes belly-up in a month or two... But I'm guessing that guys like us would do enough research to minimize that risk.
|
03-07-13 01:22pm
|
Reply
1449
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the comments - and for correcting my error. They do upload 5 videos per day. I agree that if you have a specific niche you like you're better off going to sites that cater to that niche rather than relying on VB. The lack of anything above 640x480 on 80% of the uploads is a real drawback.
|
03-07-13 01:21pm
|
Reply
1450
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Interesting membership option. I'm not sure I'd consider it given the volatility of the business though. But who knows? If Evil Angel or Kink made such an offer I might take the plunge.
|
03-05-13 02:47pm
|
