Last I checked Give Me Pink also had stopped releasing new updates, believe that was in February as well. Hard to say if it is a permanent move, I wouldn't expect it to be permanent though. I have noticed over the last few years that some of the very exclusive sites are doing their shooting in the spring months, so that could be it, but maybe they have decided to pull back for awhile. I would imagine that considering the quality of their content 1920 high end video, completely exclusive content, that with most of the world experiencing financial problems that they could just disappear for awhile.
One bit of good news, when I was last a member at Give Me Pink, they were allowing a member to switch the remainder of their membership to one of their other sites at any time.
For example, when I canceled my Give Me Pink membership, there was a few weeks left on the subscription. It gave me the option at anytime during those remaining weeks, to switch the remaining time left to any of their sites and as far as I know, you could then do it again and again to each of their sites until your month was up. I thought that was one of the best ideas I had seen.
I've never tried Muffia out, but it's worth noting on the Reality Kings billing, if you click "backup credit card processor" they now have the full month with TBP discount of $17.95 if you follow the Reality Kings link on here and the backup biller is the much more reliable and easier to deal with Epoch. For months and months the backup billing through Epoch would only have the trial option, but it's fixed now for the month join.
This was one of my favorite sites awhile back, but they keep changing access to bonus sites, then offer no bonus sites, then offer several, but they don't work. Still, the older content is really good for those who collect exclusive content of Euro models.
I do think some of it is from Evelyn's site. The content, while very small, is very good. I'm not a huge fan of Vendula, but can recognize her beauty and some of this content is familiar. The other site though, from what I have seen looks to be all new. I think my mind needs a break from porn for about 3 months, all of it is running together!
That is pretty nice of them, I was surprised when I seen it there. The bad thing is, now I'm trying to get this one great sentence in for sites to use ha ha!
I understand GlamShots, I'm a fan of Evelyn's site and will be patient with it. You all have some of the best picture sets on the internet as of right now, and I will take your quality over most sites quanity anyday. If you want my opinion, you all don't even have to update daily. If it is just consistent, maybe 3-4 times per week, I would be okay with that as would most fans that prefer quality over quanity. You guys are doing a good job on it. I was a member back when it was Evelyn's World, and can see improvement since then. Thanks for replying to my review and explaining. Good luck to your site!
My monthly rebill is getting close, and I'm seriously considering letting it go for one more month. If you've ever seen Eufrat and like her, they have her best content I've ever seen. I have a tight jeans fetish, Eufrat in tight jeans that the crotch splits out of is on this site. I just wish they'd hook Evelyn up to a Sybian or something to get some emotion out of her.
Thanks for this, I had looked at the site before. I too like this niche, and was seriously considering joining, but will hold off for awhile now. Thanks.
I can't remember the name of this one, but there was one that had Savannah, remember her, gorgeous blonde that committed suicide? I rented it, she was in it at the end talking about being a porn star ha ha. Not naked, fully clothed.
Hey Drooler, I hear you on the exclusive part. We can thank a couple of the bigger Euro sites for this new definition of exclusive. As long as it is on one of their sites, it is exclusive to their company, not to the site which I think is nearing false advertising since it would seem to me they should include each of their sites if they are going to be allowed to share content within a family of sites, but still call it exclusive, though we have to buy separate memberships to each site in their family. I guess sites have realized the old tricks of putting a gorgeous model on the front page only to have 20 pictures of her, no longer works so they are finding new ways to get some cheap money.
Yeah, the interview says it's her first ever time shooting porn. Some of the interviews seemed too planned out like they told them what to say, but the Gianna Dior scene does seem like a legitimate first ever time shooting porn. The first time anal ones also seemed legit.
That is interesting, sorry I hadn't gotten back sooner. I don't know why they would remove a few months of the archives, though I do know that Eve's site is having a slowdown right now. As of today, almost Sunday, there isn't a Saturday update or even a button to see July's calender.
I've been frustrated at times with Gen. Entertainment, but overall, I've had good experiences with their customer service. For example, on Eve's site a recent set where she is standing under an outdoor shower with a thin shirt on, the WMV version won't let you scan forward, but the MOV version will. I catch myself checking every clip now just in case the WMV version has this problem, probably 6-7 over the years have had the same problem.
I'm still not for sure about lowering the site. There are few sites on the internet that have the quality pictures/videos, even if only for 19 months, daily set equals roughly 550 pic or vid sets for $14.99. That is a lot of quanity and quality for half the price of most high quality sites. You will have to excuse my positivity, I'm from California, I like the glass half full!
But seriously, I can understand that some would take away, especially if they make a habit of recycling sets. I'm almost positive that each of the General Entertainment sites are ran by different webmasters and have different customer service reps. Let me know if they continue to recycle.
That is interesting, when I go to Mya's site the archive goes back to 12/05. I believe 12/05 would have been about right, Eve's was up about 5-6 months before Mya's.
I don't have Mya's pictures saved on my HD, I usually go for her friends section. I checked out though and I would say it is possible for them to use the same set twice. I have two Eve videos from Eve's site that are almost identical. One is about 3 minutes longer, also, if you aren't a member of Eve's site, check out the preview and go to July 16th 2005 on her updates calender. There is nothing there, a picture, but no downloading options. One thing that I have noticed about Mya's site is the 2 part videos, that they split into 2 updates. The number of the set will be exact, except it will have a 2 at the end instead of 1.
I'm not for sure if General Entertainment is working as hard on their sites, Eve's is going great, she even did a Member Request recently. I also had let my Lora Craft membership cancel, for the first time since the site started, I go back, but can't get the TBP discount to work anymore. I have found that Mya's customer service isn't quite as responsive as Eve's. Eve has a CSR named Olga who seems to answer within 24 hours. I had sent an email to Mya's customer service asking why they didn't have any Eve material, when I am certain they did at one time. Never received a reply back, so I let it cancel too.
It is my understanding that several sites are facing DDos Hacks, I know that PixandVideo sent a lengthy email to me last month explaining the hacks that got them and how it slowed their site down and messed up their updates. Send an email in, I've found they respond well to nice, short emails. Well you know what I'm talking about, I always put "Hello from America" one thing they are known for is giving an extra 2 weeks onto your subscription for no charge, if you have a valid complaint with them.
Well now Panther you can't put a gauge on a site that has been up for over 2 years based on just one month. I've been a member for a 3 month stretch last March/April/May on Eve's site, then joined it again in September 2006 and haven't cancelled since. It also depends on when you were a member, there was a time this past November/December that Eve had posted that she was going to a Sex Expo to accept an award along with Viv Thomas. Those few months did have some problems. Including the most common, updates posting, but you couldn't download them. Then there was a month, believe November 2006 where the updates were only coming once every 7-10 days, instead of daily and would come in 7-10 update bunch. I'm not for sure who does her updating, but I noticed that even Pics and Video missed an update yesterday. As long as customer service lets me know, "We will be back up in a day or so" I'm not too concerned.
In 2007, when Eve's site goes down, so does Mya's and Balkan Amateurs and on the most recent one also Lora Craft's was down, all four at the same time. I've been a member this year on Eve's, Mya's and Lora's (since they opened it) and the other two, Eve's the whole year and Mya's all but one month. Also what could make a difference on the interaction you are seeing with Eve on the site could have been the month you were a member. I don't think the comment section was put on Eve's site until this year. She replies to most and if not, she will a month or two after they have been posted. I have left 4 comments, she has responded to each one.
I like to talk about Eve and Mya's sites together since both are so similar. I don't know if I maybe worded one part wrong, when I mentioned personality. I didn't mean the site's personality, but was talking about the way I like how Eve smiles and laughs in some videos. The current problem that has come up on the sites has happened 2 times in the last 6 or 7 weeks. It lasts 1 day. The main page takes a good 30 seconds to open. If you do the tour, it opens right up, as does the payment page, but if you login, the screen goes blank.
This is fixed by the next day and really, I have all of the archives, so I am only downloading the one new update each day, so I don't even really notice when it happens. If you haven't been on it lately, you should try it out again. I still think the best value in porn is the combination of Eve and Mya's sites for $30. Have you seen the behind the scenes sets? Eve really does do most of the picture taking when it is a "friend". It is kind of funny to see the pictures since someone else is taking a picture of Eve taking a picture of another model.
Denner, hadn't noticed your reply until now. That is strange, the yellow thing wasn't flashing at the top of the screen. I have been a big fan of Mya's site. I still am NOT that big of a fan of Mya herself. I like women who smile more, laugh some, like Eve is. Mya does have a great body though. Now, if they moved Eve's friends to Mya's site and Mya's friends to Eve's site. Eve's site would have a 99 from me. Plus, I really like the General Entertainment sites, I like sites that let me use a download manager for one thing. Thanks for the reply!
Having just signed up for this network a few weeks ago, the pimp.xxx was a pre-checked cross sale, nearly every paysite has those and they are a pain in the ass but not a scam. It's a common practice you have to watch out for. Send them an email or call them if they didn't refund you, you should have access to the sites for a month.
I tend to score sites on the high side. On my 485 reviews, the average score is 86, putting Naughty America 10 points over what I consider an average/good site. The original scoring format (2007) on PU pushed for reviews that were at least 70 and up. My scoring range, for the most part, became 70-100 instead of 50-100.
On your comment about the offer they made you, it's something that a lot of members don't think about, the sites themselves don't know how long you joined for. The billing company knows that information. It's why you'll sometimes join a site then get an email from them 3 days later offering you a promo price on a new membership. The exception to this is when a site uses their own billing.
It surprised me when they went to that strange system of only allowing members to see recent scenes. It has been one of my favorite networks for a long time. The funny part for me is I originally joined it years ago for So Cal Coeds. It is still around but hasn't been updated since 2007. It's funny how 2007 made 37 scenes of exclusive Southern California college amateurs seem like such a big deal.
Thanks slutty, I didn't even know about the renew price. I have a cycle I use with types of sites and usually am joining the reality networks each year in June-August, so that may be why we're having the similar subscriptions. Which is also why I didn't know about the renew price. I rarely stay with a reality network for more than a month at a time because I know I will get bored with the same theme. On the models with the fake boobs, I'm with the anti-fake boobs beliefs as much as anyone is and while I do agree that the sites do choose which models they hire, there is still another side to that too. Not all natural models do hardcore. There are so many twists to sites hiring models that I do think they are still limited under the "damned if we do, damned if we don't" position.
I don't think we have come close to connecting on any of these posts. You say my logic is flawed. Let me show you flawed logic.
McDonalds advertises breakfast on television and on their outdoor menu. If they up and stopped serving it, but was still advertising it, that would be false advertising. NA advertises "regular updates". You said on the worst case scenario week that they could have 8 new updates and 5 remastered updates. That is regular updates.
Moving on, when I said NA isn't a premium site, that is based on price. They are a bargain site. My comparison between regular unleaded gas and premium unleaded gas was, yes, far-reaching, but not flawed. You are expecting a bargain priced site to deliver more than the premium sites do.
You can look at my reviews to see that NA is ranked tied for 15th out of 160ish reviews I've posted. So, I too like their site, but when they lowered the price, I wondered if that would mean less updates.
For example, the original price had been $25 a month, if they gave you 13 new updates a week, which would be 52 in a month, that would be 48 cents per update.
Now they are charging you $15 a month. And using your example numbers of 13 new updates one week, 8 the next, that would be 42 NEW updates a month or 35 cents per new update.
So, there is no rip-off. They are charging less per new update.
On the cd part, you didn't even start to understand that part. I was not comparing having to buy a cd that was remastered. I was showing that it is NOT unusual for remasters to be sold as NEW. The DSotM remaster is identical to the others before it, same songs, no bonus songs, no bonus DVD clips of the band, yet they legally sell it at the same price as brand new never before released cds.
See what I mean? My first problem was what you have now said was a copy and paste error, so you can understand why I questioned that part. My second problem is why you have a problem with a site doing what the majority of members wanted and still giving you new updates, averaging more than 1 per day, for a bargain price. Let me add, 100% exclusive updates that they have to shoot themselves.
And don't look at it as so much a problem as it was me saying what more do you expect from them? You can see the price per new update above with the new price factored in. There is no false advertising and no rip-off.
I guess you don't think I understand because I don't agree with you? I understand completely. See the site 1byday, they are releasing remasters, or as they call them, "reloaded" sets as new updates. You can even look at their tour and see some of those. So, I'm quite aware of the practice and have been on sites that do it.
The first thing I would say is NA's tour nor join page says 13 updates per day. As a matter of fact, it only promises, "Regular updates" no exact number. So, I don't see why you are saying false advertising.
The second thing, a remaster is technically new. I don't really agree with it, but just go look on a site that sells CDs. Pink Floyd's Darkside of the Moon has been re-released and remastered, I believe 5 official times, just on cd. Same songs, same length, same order of songs and each one costs $12. Nothing new except better sound, just like the NA remasters have better video resolution and bitrates.
Third, I don't understand why you consider NA a premium level site. I'll use 1byday again, $35 a month, NA is $15 a month. To make a far-reaching comparison, that is like buying a tank of regular unleaded gas and expecting super unleaded performance.
On a side note for reference, very few sites can guarantee what they are going to do in the future days, weeks, months. Give Me Pink was easily one of the best premium sites on the internet, 1920 BR DVD quality videos, three different types of picture zips to download for each set, then one day a few months ago, they just quit updating and disappeared completely.
Going by NA's tour pages as long as they are updating, that very vague, "Regular updates" can't really be challenged or counted on.
Last, in your review, I had left a comment to another member Monahan and am interested in why your review is reviewed as you being a constant member over the last 3 or more months on NA, but in your cons you question a DL Limit since you hadn't been a member in about 6 months. You're throwing some pretty hard words out there about NA, false advertising, saying their DL limit is annoying, even though they haven't had a DL limit since October 2007.
I understood what you meant. The thing is, it is becoming fairly normal for sites to remaster and re-release old sets as new updates. I know of at least 3 major sites that are doing it. It goes into the problem I've talked about with those sites. Some members, especially with larger monitors and high end computers are complaining about the old videos. So, the sites can either let that old content die off, even though I think we all know that the older content on most sites these days is much better than the newer content or they can re-release the remasters. Similar to buying cds, when I first bought cds, I bought most of the Pink Floyd cds. A few years later, they released new remastered versions of those discs and by now, they seem to be up to 3rd or 4th remastering.
The main point that I was making is that they lowered their price nearly in half with the TBP discount from $24.95 to $14.95, they are still releasing new content, so I don't see how one can complain about the few remasters they release. I could understand if they didn't continue to release new content or if they were just recycling the content. I can understand why someone would get bored with their content though.
It wasn't so much that I disagreed with the score as it was that I noticed a few things that are odd.
Naughty America made a big move in Fall 2007, they merged their tier 1 sites with tier 2 sites and removed the DL limit. My review of the site in October 2007 talks about no download limit, since it had been a big deal up until then and had stopped me from joining. So, at least by October 2007, the DL limit was removed.
Now, look at the top where it says "how long have you been a member" the review says, "More than 3 months". In the review, the reviewer says, "I THINK there is a daily download limit? There was about 6 months ago when I was last a member". So, which is it? Reviewer is a current member for the last 3 months or hasn't been a member in 6 months?
October 2007 would be 18 months ago and there was no DL limit then either. DL limit is right up there with DRM when it comes to making or breaking a site. I just found the inconsistencies to make the review a little questionable.
On the part about download limits, I also think there was a download limit at one time, but I was just on NA last week and there is no download limit now.
Also, I noticed that you liked the $24.95 price, look up at the TBP price you get if you join NA from the TBP link. You can now get a month for $14.95. TBP made that deal just a month or two ago.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
