As I had joked about with others on here. I'm not for sure I like paying for the enjoyment of sex. I'm mainly saying, what I saw on the site isn't any different than the sex I have in life. I still think they will succeed with the site in the long run. On the boy/girl ones, my main complaint was on videos. I prefer the female only photosets.
As Pink Panther mentioned, Evil Angel has an original movie/series that would cover more what you're looking for. I enjoyed it and it may have even hurt my view of Kamikaze Love.
Not only distinguishing it as season 1, but on the last one in the list it still says updates weekly.
The good thing, it at least looks like they are now releasing more b/g sets. I think you know by my review that I am glad KL is over and won't be seeing a sequel. If I was to say, I would guess they got ahead of themselves with the excitement of the new site and tried to do too much. If it was just about anyone besides Met-Art, I would have scored the site lower since I wouldn't expect most sites to be able to refocus, but it does look like Met is doing so now.
Maybe the review did some good. Right after my membership ran out and I posted this review, six of their next eight scenes were boy/girl. With the other two being girl/girl. So maybe there is still hope for them delivering on a more hardcore site. On the other hand, one of those new ones has the female model covered in "stone" like a classic art statue. Those overly artsy sets alone push me away. I haven't even liked most bodypaint sets in the past. And the scenes give you a feeling you're supposed to watch from beginning to end, but I didn't find much story in them to keep me that interested.
If Porn Pros sticks to this niche on a couple of their sites, I would recommend it since they are coming from the typical hardcore, even sometimes extreme hardcore genre, but there's no telling with them since they just kind of sprung the softer hardcore on members with no warning. I'm guessing they will stop shooting it without warning too or start a separate site that requires a separate membership to access.
I've heard the most good about X-Art, but as I've told the others, their models hold them back for me since I still don't care for the tiny, slim models as my only option.
I guess I will have to eventually try X-Art out. I wish they would get a few more ethnic or exotic models. And watered down was my feeling exactly with Sex Art. There were a few scenes that showed potential. One is a threesome with Malena Morgan, she masturbates while watching a guy/girl have sex then gets involved right near the end. There was maybe a little feeling of domination from that scene since the girl with the guy was trying to keep his attention on her, but he kept looking at Malena. Another that has Riley Reid in it is very good.
I still think most men would be shocked if they knew open women. The 4 women all work in the psychology field and discuss nearly everything openly. I sometimes think they're bigger pervs than the men I know.
It's kind of funny. I always wanted this genre and thought Viv Thomas Videos was the closest to pulling it off on a regular basis, but two months of Sex Art, has made me reconsider if I would really want this type of porn on a regular basis. I still haven't tried X-Art, but a lot of that is based more on me not seeing enough models that interest me on their site since it does look like they have a style I would like. The other problem with the niche is probably one that porn always has. Once one site does a niche well, you get dozens more trying to mimic it and you either get tired of it or the sites go overboard with the niche.
I have always found those 18-22 aged models cute, pretty, but it's just so rare to find any of them who make me believe they could get guys to have sex with them with anything beyond just their looks. Which is also why I thought Viv Thomas pulled this niche off well. Most of his models are mid to late 20s Euro models, but even with his site, I haven't been on it in a few years.
That's alright on the humor part. I must not have caught the GB on it, meant MB. I do prefer the smaller videos and rarely download the HD versions just to save space. While I have quite a bit of space, it's starting to become a hassle trying to keep up with the different hard drives and what is on each one. I used to have a huge collection compared to most, but most of the newer PUs here are blowing me away in hard drive space, servers, I'm still under 10 TB total.
Skin is my favorite newer model, but I haven't downloaded anything of her on Evil Angel yet, but will now. I didn't even realize Sandy was on there, putting her in a scene with Skin sounds too good to be true!
I was about to post a comment about my newfound interest in Evil Angel, a site, I had only added on my Videobox account before and never thought I would join outright by itself. I like the Voracious one. I'm pretty sure my problem with Kamikaze Love was that I had never seen Kayla Love, or at least I don't remember seeing her before and was hoping for a lot more of her in the scenes.
And to my surprise, I seem to be leaning more away from the softcore. My last 3 joins have been 2 Kink sites and Evil Angel. I would like to think my taste is becoming more sophisticated, but I'm guessing 9 out of 10 people would disagree!
Would it make a huge difference in crispness if I have a high end PC? I just bought the one I'm using a few months ago and it has very high specs. Seems to make everything look really good. And I agree, I thought the filesizes looked really strange for 1920x1080 videos at 4000 bitrate. I haven't been back to the site after downloading all the photo sets, which are very good, but will stop back in and download the videos towards the end of my membership to at least give them a fair second chance before reviewing it.
Hey slutty, I probably could have went into that deeper than I did and will in my review. One of the big selling points of Sex Art is that it is much more erotic than your average hardcore porn scene. Considering the scenes I downloaded are 1920x1080 quality, that would automatically make the file sizes bigger, but the scenes, to me, are extremely short to be sold as "erotic". Very little story, very little talking and the sex lasts 8-12 minutes. My complaint isn't so much with the file size as it is with the scenes being very short and not being very erotic, the filesize was used more to show just how short the scenes are. If it were a 640x480 resolution clip, I wouldn't think much about the smaller file size, but at true HD, it shows how short the scenes are by showing the smaller file size.
And what you ask at the end is the interesting part. The videos are very crisp, I mentioned maybe they are optimizing bitrates or using some kind of trick to get the best quality at a small filesize. The files are listing Codec: H264-MPEG4 AVC. Bitrate is 4215 kb/s. As an example of what I was saying, the video I got that info from is a solo video. The model is fully dressed and walking in her apartment/house, she is fully nude by 1:42. The entire scene is 8:38. I hate to beat a dead horse, but it seems like erotic videos would have more than 1:42 of fully dressed to fully nude, with teasing, stripping, etc...
This is very interesting. I last downloaded a scene on there on 4/23/2021. After reading your question, I signed in and there are no downloads on videos. Photos can still be downloaded. The one thing that changed between 4/23/2021 and today is I canceled my account with them on 4/24/2021. Have you canceled your account? I'm wondering if they're removing downloading rights once the member cancels. I still have a week or so left on my account. I will send their support an email and see if I get a response. If I don't and if they don't return the downloads, I will be lowering my score on this site by 15 to 20 points just for them stopping downloads. Thanks for the heads up on this.
I have talked about it a little. I have vision damage in one eye. I think the videos look good and even download the 720p versions. My vision damage is most noticed in colors and lights, which possibly makes me not notice the lesser pixels. I don't know what all their preview shows but the last scene I watched was Angie Posion Amor and it looks very good to me. To put the vision damage in perspective, I have a Samsung 4K Qled television but can't tell that much difference between 4K and 1080p on it. I can tell the difference between 1080p and 4K on video games.
They're surprisingly not that big of files. Just looking at 3 of the newest scenes, the 1080p files (24-28 minutes each) are between 775 and 900MB. Their bitrate is 4200. Something I forgot to mention in the review since I do understand some Spanish is the scenes are subtitled are English.
I understand what you are saying, but your review lists a con as, "Lousy video quality". It isn't specific to the "other sites" as a matter of fact, in your bottom line you are specific to say, "I concentrated on those two sites". All sites that have been around for a long period of time have some bad quality clips. You mention ATK, where most of their videos are in parts and can't even be downloaded in full clips and are not any better in resolution on the videos. ATK also does not have full zip downloads and doesn't have half the resolution of the picture sets found on babelicious or sexy babes.
And most of all, I cannot understand why when you join a site that you would take off for "bonus" sites. That isn't the least bit logical. There is the old saying that you don't have to go to those sites. I would even question most of the logic in the review. Like saying it is hard to get the content on your hard drive, only to then say the zips are good and something other sites don't offer. I'm not trying to be negative towards you, quite the opposite in fact. I am saying though, that your review borders on looking like a review posted by someone trying to lower the overall score of this site. Especially since you mentioned that you read the other positive reviews. I've said it on here before, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but there still is a point where we have to consider that society today is known to have some members that dislike the "popular" whether it is sites, people, etc.. And that is what this review sounds like.
Just wanted to add here that while some of the content is available on other sites, it isn't available in the quality that it is on Babelicious and to a lesser extent Sexy Babes. If Babelicious has a set that I already have, I replace the set I have with the Babelicious set since it is usually close to double the resolution. Also not for sure what the reviewer considers "lousy" video quality. Looking at my hard drive and the Babelicious network videos, I see what looks to be a standard of 640 high end on those with what looks to be a minimum of 2000 bitrate.
If you consider that lousy, you haven't been to many sites, it is well above the average.
It's interesting because I lived in Los Angeles County up until 2013. One of my biggest concerns about moving was finding a cable company similar to Time Warner. I moved over 2,500 miles, right along the NE Tennessee/Virginia/North Carolina border in the mountainous area. I moved out here because I got a divorce and because my sister-in-law told me she was putting my nephews up for adoption. My brother, their dad, passed away when the boys were toddlers. So, I moved out here to try and get away from the fast life in LA and to adopt my nephews. I knew they watched a lot of television (teenagers), used the internet a lot and streamed movies. When I got out here I had 3 choices: Charter, Comcast and some company called Century Link. I went with Charter. They only had 30Mbps internet but their cable was a lot better than the other two. It went up to 50 Mbps right before they bought Time Warner and created Spectrum. Their customer service is similar. My newest bundle has telephone included. Which is more useful than I thought it would be. Works well for keeping my nephews off cellphones while at home and is at least teaching them to talk to people with their mouth. I talked to Spectrum just after sending this. They said the 100 Mbps is the slowest in my region but that 2/3 of the city still only gets 60 Mbps. The customer service will argue with me for 30 minutes on the phone but the people in the office are very nice. This is a progressive southern metro that's the same size as the Atlanta metro. Most everyone out here is very nice in person. I do have fiber optic internet at work but haven't really been able to test it since they wouldn't be too happy if I started downloading porn lol.
The only things I really miss about LA, are the weather (it's -5 to 95 with 100% humidity here), the pretty women everywhere (more laid-back, conservative business women here) and Tommy Burgers and In-N-Out Burgers (they actually have a restaurant here called Pal's Burgers that is based on Tommy Burgers but they're not quite as good, still not bad.)
Thank you,
I usually look over the cookie cutter parts. I know back 10 years ago, when the Euro scene was taking over, they had zero plot and were still my favorite sites. Fitness Rooms interested me because, first, the site is based around pretty women exercising in workout clothes. I like to see the models clothed before nude. The only problem was they remove the taking clothes off part. The models will be clothed and exercising then an edit pops in and they're suddenly naked.
I remember being a member on Dane Jones years ago and unless my memory isn't working good, I could have sworn it was a solo site back then. I think I've become almost as picky as messmer. I don't really like anal, don't really like the sex that pushes a softer, romantic side but it really shouldn't be a surprise since for the first few years on PU, I almost exclusively joined solo masturbation/tease sites.
And on the other reply it was a mistake on my part. I also have Spectrum at 100Mbps and the downloads on here were varying between 2MBps and 15MBps. The 15MBps is unmatched, that's the highest I ever get. I'm usually in the 11-12 MBps range. Of course, when I'm used to 11-12 MBps, dropping me to 2 MBps is a big change.
Does Spectrum upgrade your speed? I haven't ever paid more than whatever the basic internet speed is that they sell. This one I currently have is listed as 50Mbps on my contract but they sent a postcard a few months ago that said I had been upgraded to 100Mbps with no raise in price. I wondered if it is because I download so much and stream television.
That's interesting, I put strapon.xxx in my search bar and it opened Sexy Hub. I checked all of the sites they have listed as add-on or upgrade options but there's no strapon.xxx. I also did a standard search for "Strap on" and there are 21 scenes that came up, of course, if the word "strap on" isn't in the scenes title, it won't show those. Of the 21, 6 are on girlfriends.xxx and 15 are on Lesbea. I found the bonus channels and there is a lesbian one there but I selected "MILF" as my bonus so it won't let me see the lesbian one unless I pay for the upgrade.
Of the 21 scenes, all are two women, lesbian scenes. None with men but interestingly enough, the search for "strap on" brought up 9 models and 3 are guys but the scenes these guys have don't have strap-ons in them. I did find a few tube sites that had content from strapon.xxx but none of those scenes look familiar. They have other networks too, besides the obvious ones like Brazzers and Mofos. They also have Fake Hub network which is very similar to Sexy Hub. Oh and I clicked on the locked bonus icon, it offers access to "thousands" of bonus scenes for $1. It can be confusing in the member section. I'll keep an eye out for that content and let you know if I find any.
When you click on the join now or instant access, it will show only a $29.99 option, but if you look down the page you should see something that says, "Segpay our secondary billing" click it instead, it will open a new window that has the trial option available. For some reason, the trial isn't available from CC Bill on their site, but SegpayEU it is. Another thing to watch for, it is a 3 day trial, I'm not for sure how fast SegPay cancels their accounts when you cancel, but I know that Paycom has been known to take up to 5 days, which would give them enough time to charge you for the whole month.
Also, this site is available through maniacspass or smoochmyass.com, if you go through smoochmyass.com you get 60 some other sites as well, even on the trial, unless they have changed it. My wife was really into the skilful hands site, we joined it probably a year ago, but I had forgot about these until you posted this comment.
It is either the same content or we've looked at so much porn that it's all starting to look the same! I'm starting to think we need new poses, maybe the cameramen/women could take all of the pictures upside down or throw in some dwarves running around in the background?
Thanks for the reply, I was expecting much more from Simon Scans than what I got. I don't think I signed in for the last two weeks of my membership, I was that bored with the site.
Blame Drooler, he made me do it! Seriously Alex, wouldn't you rather us joke around AND point out the mistakes, instead of cussing you and your site out over mistakes? I've noticed that many sites have taken the comments left here and put them to good use in improving their site, plus we all get a chance to laugh a little. And if you fire everyone, who will be checking your work?
I checked out the review you posted on the previous version of this site, thanks for the tip of it switching to this new name. I had cheated on TBP a little and read Rabbit's Review of it, it looks like they didn't carry all of the content over from the original version that you reviewed. Rabbit has the numbers as 19 pic sets, 11 videos, review date was May 2008, but Rabbit has the site listed as updating twice per week. That makes me skeptical since I'm wondering if they are just releasing the content they removed from the original version of the site as new content. Oh and the genre at Rabbit's is listed as "Fetish". So I guess it is going to be mostly these strange settings and sets that the previews show.
I think that one listed update that has her in the Blue Nike bikini is the one thing pulling me back ha ha. What a stomach and curves in that one! I just noticed that it says "65 updates and counting" I didn't understand the whole reason though for only 30 photos per update that Rabbit lists, that is a terribly small set of pictures. Thanks for the info on the original version.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
