Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
An old favourite site of mine is Sapphic Erotica, which does actually have lots of girl-next-door types that, again, turn out to be dirty sluts - in the nicest possible way. Whilst you will see some tattoos and a variety of looks, it probably has the most 'next-door' type girls of all the sites I have personally joined.
Lez Cuties, as you might expect, has some very gorgeous innocent-looking girls that turn out to be filthy anal whores (!) but you will still see a fair few tattoos around, once the clothes come off.
|
03-07-08 04:20pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Haha! Maybe that page was missing from Pinche's bible! ;)
|
03-06-08 01:42pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
Tired? Never ever liked them in the first place. Women (and men for that matter) with tattoos have no class.
I hate it when a gorgeously sexy girl strips off, turns round, and there's a great fucking green tattoo across the top of her arse. Sickening.
For me, the sexiest girls are the ones that look very sweet and respectable, dress respectably (on the outside!) like you could take them home to meet your mother... and then they strip off and they're the dirtiest, rudest filthbags in the sack! That contrast is awesome! But if they already *look* like filthbags, with piercings and tattoos, it's less of a big deal when they're naughty. It's kind of expected, and not such a big deal.
No tattoos please!
|
03-06-08 01:39pm
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Apoctom is absolutely right. Women are definitely as sexual as us (arguably more so) but it's a mistake to think therefore they must like porn as much as us, as he rightly hinted at. Women are much less turned on by obvious sexual imagery than we are. When my lass sees a sexual image she's more likely to laugh or groan in disapproval than be turned on. And its not some kind of female repression, I'm sure of that - she's completely liberated sexually. She's just a woman, and women tend to not be too interested in that. They like suggestive images, but not pornographic ones.
Of course there are exceptions though.
Another reason straight women may not like porn could be because our bits are pretty damn ugly to look at, lets be honest. Wrinkly unsymmetrical sac, and a knob that changes size with the weather (!). No wonder they like us better when we're a bit covered up.
Bottom line: our brains are wired differently. Big mistake to expect the average woman to like porn as much as we do.
|
03-04-08 03:31pm
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I answered 'I have no problem'. Although I personally would be uncomfortable in my current long term relationship to know my girlfriend watched it - as I'm sure my girlfriend would be if she ever found out about my own porn habits!
Guess that makes me a hypocrite.
But if it were a casual relationship, it would not only be 'no problem' - it would be awesome! Only - she would have to like girls, as I just hate boy-girl porn. I find it boring and even a turn off.
I would also feel pressured into living up to the performance of the guy in the movie - which is why I do understand why some women would feel threatened by porn in that regard too, in terms of having to live up to an impossible fantasy. I love my girlfriend just the way she is, and wouldn't want to risk making her feel uncomfortable about herself.
As things are, I'm happy to regard my porn viewing as a solo sport! It gives me something sexually I wouldn't get in any relationship, and is no reflection on my girlfriend's lovely qualities. Porn is just something I came to enjoy in my late teens and was never willing to let go of, such is the pleasure it gives me.
|
03-04-08 10:37am
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Disagree, Pat. If the director wants the girl to be nastier, he should call 'cut!' and ask the girl off camera to be nastier, then resume filming - or at least cut his chatter from the soundtrack, IMO.
|
03-04-08 10:27am
|
Reply
57
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Use a DM squire - FDM works great with In The Crack for movies, and DownThemAll is good for pics. Hopefully then, if a download fails, you can just pick it up again once the site is back up.
|
03-03-08 01:25pm
|
Reply
58
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Reply
Ohhhh sorry! I get it now - sorry, was being a bit remedial there! Yeah, given the number of dollars to the pound right now, always good to buy American if possible! :)
|
03-03-08 01:20pm
|
Reply
59
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I've had a couple of problems since joining the site a couple of days ago, where the site has suddenly gone off-line. And I've found myself randomly logged out on a couple of occasions, which led to all my downloads in my FDM failing and me having to load them all in again once I'd logged back in. Must be that OS issue.
The site has just gone down again. Now there's service for you - it not only dishes up hot babes - it goes down on you too.
|
03-02-08 02:39pm
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
Absolutely right - if it's another girl doing the talkover, I can see that actually being a positive thing potentially. But this is so rare.
I think the guys who are calling the shots just have massive egos and just want some part of them to feature on the film, even if it's only their voice.
|
03-02-08 09:59am
|
Reply
61
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Amen.
|
03-02-08 03:55am
|
Reply
62
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Haha! Good points well made... EXCEPT: (!)
The point about guys in porn being considered 'props' and therefore we guys are more 'objects' than the women are. That's not a good parallel, as the 'prop' thing is coming generally from other straight guys, not women.
Bet Paul McCartney would relate to the Robin Williams quote right now!
|
03-02-08 03:53am
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I notice one person put 'it really depends'.
Yeah - really depends on whether you like listening to men's voices while you wank, or not.
|
03-02-08 03:46am
|
Reply
64
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Great review, Drooler. The token system is now gone. I literally joined this site for the first time in the last 48 hours, and am just blown away by the awesome camera work, both motion and still. I've been downloading like its going out of fashion, I just can't get enough of this style of content (i.e. ass worship). The newer stuff is also superior to the older stuff.
Good point about the 'objectifying' of the women. But in a sense, I think this is less objectifying than, say, catwalk models who are just there to look good and hang clothes on, and are void of personality. I think feminists overstate the whole 'sex object' thing and place way too much relevance on it. Personally, I like my porn performers to have some character and personality, and all the best porn stars are not necessarily the best looking, but are the ones that have warmth and personality. That comes across a lot on this site.
The 'anal twitching' comment - absolutely agree. It's interesting for about 0.3 seconds, we don't need to see it filling our screens for 10 minutes straight!
You mentioned 200-350 pics per gallery. What you have overlooked (if I may say so) is that a great many of these shots are very repetitive. I'm not really into playing 'Spot The Difference' (7 shots of an open pussy in a row at ever so slightly different angles) so I tend to prune my pic sets right down to something more concise.
I'm still gonna give this site a very decent score, as it is just so unique, from what I have seen. I read you were disappointed in the site (although your 83 score suggests it wasn't all bad for you - and that's despite the tokens!).
I feel it's too soon now, but look out for my review in the coming days or weeks.
|
03-01-08 03:03pm
|
Reply
65
|
Sapphic Harem
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Thanks man, appreciate that.
As you'll see from what I wrote on my profile, I believe we should have a lot more of these negative reviews where appropriate, as they are just as important as the positive ones. We've all been ripped off, or bitterly disappointed before by substandard content that doesn't live up to the tour, so by writing about our bad experiences we can save others from doing the same!
There are too many review sites out there (not TBP) that consistently give high scores regardless. We need to give some balance to that!
|
03-01-08 01:59pm
|
Reply
66
|
Sapphic Harem
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Well, that's an interesting question, as when I came to look at my Sapphic harem folder yesterday (before I decided to delet it), I was reminded that I hadn't downloaded a single picture set. Now, since I love picture sets, I can only conclude that this is either because:
a - there weren't any, or
b - they weren't zipped and I couldn't be bothered or
c - they were just crap
I think a or b are the more likely scenarios.
What I can remember is that those very alluring magazine cover-type images, are links to movies. Just goes to show though, you can't judge a book by its cover.
|
03-01-08 05:37am
|
Reply
67
|
Anal Toy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
Well, my search has brought me to In The Crack, which seems to offer all that Anal Toy Girls offers - but without the male hands, and with less toys too! See my comment for that site.
|
02-29-08 07:30pm
|
Reply
68
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Review
I'm not sure that your review - with all its valid cons - really equates to an 87 score, but I respect your opinion, and enjoyed reading your review. :)
|
02-29-08 07:21pm
|
Reply
69
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
I should also state that, as said by some others, this site no longer uses the token system of purchasing movies. You now simply pay your monthly fee ($35 right now, which is a little dearer than average, but I think worth it) and you have access to over 135 sets at the time of writing.
But it doesn't stop there. Each set often consists of anywhere from 1 to half a dozen 'subsets' - in other words, you click on a set's link, and suddenly you're presented with anything up to 6 full movies of the same girl, and occasionally even more (each split into smaller parts).
So I have to say this site is actually excellent value.
All movies are available in at least 640x360 (my preferred option here - it's reasonably detailed, doesn't take up too much disk space, and doesn't tax my processor too hard) and many are available in HD (files are huge though). It's a shame that 960x540 isn't offered, as that is my favourite res as it's damn near HD, but files aren't so big and my processor doesn't stutter when playing them. But 640x360 is still quite good IMO, obviously a step up from 21 Sextury's 400x300 ones.
I love that there isn't a huge emphasis on dildos - they do feature here and there, but fingers are used more, to finger and pull open those ass holes and pussies for the camera in the sexiest way imaginable.
I'll be writing a proper review with a score once I've fully assessed all the site's content. At the moment I'm thinking late-80s - even early 90s, as the site offers a style I have not seen elsewhere and am thoroughly enjoying. But I only joined today, so who knows how this may change.
|
02-29-08 06:26pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yeah, those machines are soulless and turn me off almost as much as naked men.
|
02-29-08 05:08am
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Not gay, don't watch porn with naked men in it, turns me right off.
|
02-29-08 04:53am
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I do believe you Khan, sorry! No offence was intended to TBP, I was just musing about it. Bit of a cynic, me, that's all, but I do believe you.
Cheers
Davit
|
02-29-08 04:49am
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Can't answer this. I'm not criticising anyone at all, but how do we know its always the same 4 people? And how do we know that the women are really women?
How do we know it's not all done by one or two guys?
I'm just an old cynic!
|
02-28-08 05:36pm
|
Reply
74
|
Anal Toy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Absolutely agree.
|
02-28-08 05:17pm
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
My ideal method is watching wmv movies on my DivX player.
|
02-28-08 05:14pm
|
|
