| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Thanks Elephant, I really appreciate your time to write that. I can't say I have a lot of respect for that webmaster who wrote that horrible message. So what if one person posts some negative things about his site? Big deal. A sensible webmaster would look at that and think 'what can I do to improve that' or maybe he might think 'but most people love it so I'm not going to worry'. But to post insults and accusations like he did is not very professional at all.
You'll never find 100% balance in a single review, as each review is from a single point of view. The balance comes from having LOTS of people's reviews, I reckon.
Kind regards
Davit
|
01-03-08 01:55am
|
Reply
102
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Hi JD - hope you will see my further comments and maybe reconsider your suspicions of me. I am new to this, and have been a bit green. The only time I posted a specific link was when I considered it relevant to the subject. Yes, the 21 Sextury sites are my favourite at the moment (closely followed by Sapphic Erotica) but of course this is entirely subjective, and I will try to be a bit more objective in future and try and see more potential in sites for other users who may not share my opinions, even if I do not think the site is all that great.
Kind regards
Davit
|
01-02-08 01:29pm
|
Reply
103
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Sorry, I realised my mistake a bit later and take it back unreservedly. The 'webmaster' was obviously from DDF, not THIS site's webmaster! I'm new to this, so please forgive me. Thanks for your understanding.
|
01-02-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
104
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks Drooler - I really do appreciate you taking the time to leave that comment.
|
01-02-08 01:22pm
|
Reply
105
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Thanks Toadsmith for introducing some balance. I have literally only joined this review site in the last few days, and naturally the first sites I reviewed were mainly ones I love (and I happen to love the 21 Sextury lesbian niche sites - as well as Sapphic Erotica). I joined 1 By Day very recently and have been a bit disappointed - but tastes vary!
To be fair to Bella, I did actually post a link to a specific movie within Club Sandy (because it was relevant to the discussion - the movie featured a similar theme to a DDF movie being discussed). But if that is forbidden then I apologise.
But I was kind of disappointed to realise that this whole review site must be biased if the webmaster is affiliated with DDF.
People, I will probably start putting up a few more 'negative' reviews in the coming days. But this is only because I've been stung a few times by awful porn sites that don't deliver what they promise, and I think the web NEEDS more negative reviews to protect future users.
I will always try to be as objective as I can - and where it is based just on my subjective personal taste, I will say so. Regards. Davit.
|
01-02-08 11:30am
|
Reply
106
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I do take your point, Drooler. It's just that, I find the very top quality HD ones aren't really worth it, considering the large file sizes (just my opinion). My system also struggles a little with playing huge HD files (response is a little slow when fast forwarding or whatever) so I'm sure others must have that issue too.
But I do agree that the 21 Sextury ones could probably do with improvement in terms of resolution. I still prefer their's though, just for the overall production values.
As for the earlier comments from the people who are suspicious of me - I'm sorry for putting up a link in a reply I posted to someone - I did not know this was forbidden (I sent a link to a Club Sandy set which was related to the discussion of a DDF set).
But I am not affiliated with any porn site. My opinion is my own, and my only bias is just toward good European lesbian porn (that is what I really like).
I stand by my criticism of DDF productions. I do find the lighting is frequently poor. I do find the camera to wobble a lot and often not find the best angles (not just on the earlier movies). If you compare styles of camera work between DDF and 21 Sextury movies (or Sapphic Erotica), the difference is quite clear to me - but I stress, this is only one opinion, and of course people will disagree. :)
|
01-02-08 11:11am
|
Reply
107
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Bela's Reply
Bela
You have passed judgement on me with no basis whatsoever, just your prejudices, which are obviously effected by your bias (given that you work for DDF).
Excuse me, but I thought this was an INDEPENDENT review site? Is this site affiliated with DDF?
I am NOT affiliated with any site, whether 21 Sextury or Saphic Erotica (another fave of mine) or anything else.
Happy New Year to you to, Ms Sarcasm.
|
01-02-08 10:25am
|
Reply
108
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Completely agree that the Cindy-Lulu movie is one of the better ones on 1-By Day, but I do reckon it would've been even better in the hands of a decent cameraman. If you love the Cindy-Lulu movie though, for all that sensual eating of ice-cream off each other's pussies, you'll REALLY love this. It's not HD, but the production values (lighting, camerawork, editing) is far superior, IMO. Try this link (although you need membership to actually view it). If you've not seen it before, trust me, for all that cold ice-cream, it is incredibly hot!
http://clubsandy.com/preview/publication/2346
|
01-02-08 01:37am
|
Reply
109
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
hondaclf's Review
Hi Hondaclf
Just had to pick you up one of your comments: 'this site has something for everyone'. But nowhere in your review did you mention that this site is very softcore, from other reviews I've read (not visited yet myself). I've read it concentrates much more on gentleness, and girls prancing about in the nude, rather than real hard cunnilingus and analingus and girl on girl fucking.
Can you confirm if this is the case - or has it moved into harder territory lately?
Regards
Davit
|
01-20-08 12:47pm
|
Reply
110
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
wishdj's Review
Good review - but I think it is very important to mention that 'Alex' talks throughout many of the movies, and therefore may be an annoyance to some.
|
03-08-08 09:19am
|
Reply
111
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Review
I'm not sure that your review - with all its valid cons - really equates to an 87 score, but I respect your opinion, and enjoyed reading your review. :)
|
02-29-08 07:21pm
|
Reply
112
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
daveboy's Reply
So, if a guy has the right kind of voice, you 'love' it?
I'm assuming you're not gay, so I'll just resign myself to total confusion, and leave it at that.
|
02-17-08 03:30pm
|
Reply
113
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
daveboy's Reply
I know what you mean about design, Dave - but when I said 'design' I was thinking more in terms of navigation and layout, rather than cosmetics.
But you're right, design comes a far second place to actual content.
As for that camp guy's voice making you 'feel like you could be there holding the lights', I'm sure that's not what most of us fantasise about when we watch porn (not that I'm criticising you). If it were a female director, then for me that would be a whole different thing. But none of my fantasies involve the sound of a camp guy - any guy for that matter - in my ear. That's my biggest issue with the site. To be fair, judging from other comments, I reckon I'm in a minority with this opinion.
|
02-17-08 07:40am
|
Reply
114
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
daveboy's Review
Gotta say, I find a score of 90 way too high for a site with such poor content, bad site design, and a bloke with a camp voice that talks all over the movies. Just my opinion though, glad you enjoyed it. :)
|
02-16-08 06:19am
|
Reply
115
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
The context I was writing in, was one of someone who appreciates good porn (as I see it of course - we can only speak for ourselves). I like to review music also. The fact that I don't consider porn or music to have the same importance as world politics (and clearly they don't!) does not mean I therefore paid little care to my review.
I happily corrected the mistake that you quite rightly pointed out. But everyone makes mistakes. Don't use my honesty in admitting that one error as a stick to beat me with, regarding my reviews in general!
As for that voice - I didn't say it was yours. Are you saying that you are the guy whose voice is on there? Why is it relevant whether I would consider it to be alto or bass or whatever? The only issue I had was that it *sounds* gay. I know the guy (you?) is NOT gay. I didn't use the term 'gay' as an insult either (I have no interest in homophobia, and find homophobics to be pathetic) - and I know you didn't accuse me of that, but I think it's important to clarify the point. But I still don't like to hear male voices - or worse still, gay-sounding male voices - in my porn videos.
I think it was valid to mention this in my review - I know from reading many other porn reviews in the past, that a dislike of male voices in all-girl porn films is not unique to me, so is a point of interest to potential subscribers.
Kind regards.
|
01-19-08 12:22pm
|
Reply
116
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Reply
Hi Posterdude
I appreciate your opinion, but I can only speak from my own. We're all different, and will all have varying opinions. That's what makes user review sites like this so good.
There's no need for personal insults if you disagree - just say why you disagree (which is fair enough), and leave it at that!
Regards
Davit
|
01-19-08 12:08pm
|
Reply
117
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
You're entitled to your view, Robare, I'm entitled to mine. I'm not sure how you got onto 'faking urination'. I didn't think that existed! Relax - you sound very angry, and there's really no need - it was just one opinion! (And I'll let you into a secret - we're only discussing porn here, not world politics - you don't need to get so worked up about it!)
|
01-17-08 10:28am
|
Reply
118
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Forgot to mention, PP - I know they are clearly labelled as to whether they are photo shoots or whatever - that wasn't the point of my comment.
And the talking thing - he definitely talks in most non-photo shoot vids. I know it's generally not much - but just the occasional sound of his voice is still surely not a pleasant experience for the vast majority of viewers. Does anyone actually think it's a good thing? I suspect that most people who sign up to an all-girl site are people who really *really* would not want to hear a male voice in their porn vids at all, never mind occasionally. I reckon that's fair to say.
|
01-13-08 12:45pm
|
Reply
119
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
Hi Robare - your point about me not mentioning American girls is valid - I'm about to amend my review. I didn't mean to mislead - it was an oversight, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. And while I find most American sites to feature annoyingly badly acting girls who can't shut up (!) I did actually find the Americans in this site to be generally much more natural.
If you think this was a negative review - you should hear my opinion on many sites that Porn Users don't feature. There are some dreadful ripoffs out there that I would struggle to give much more than zero, they're that bad, i.e. not delivering any of what is promised in the tour screens - just excuses to get an email address to send junk to!
So on balance, I reckon I gave Alsscan an above-average score.
One final point - you said you only saw one scene where the fluid 'might have been pee' - well, I can tell the difference, there's no 'might' about it! I know which hole pee comes out of, and what pee looks like, as opposed to girl cum. No offence intended.
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
|
01-13-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
120
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Hi Pink Pantha, thanks for your reply mate. But I didn't think I was being inaccurate - if you notice I never suggested Alex actually was gay - I personally couldn't care less about someone's sexuality (I have gay friends like most people these days). I only said he *sounded* gay, which I think is fair to say - because he really does! Any male voice is not nice to hear on a site aimed at lesbian-loving hetro guys - but a gay-sounding one is even worse! Just my take on it.
|
01-13-08 12:18pm
|
Reply
121
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Review
Agree totally about the director talking to much, and the annoying voice. In fact, he sounds like a gay friend of mine (not what I need to hear in a lesbian porn movie).
And I agree the video content doesn't make it worth joining really. Many of the videos are not even proper porn movies - they are either filmed photo shoots are movies of the girls acting goofy on the beach or in the street, with that annoying guy shouting things to them.
Wish I'd taken more notice of your review before I joined.
Regards
Davit
|
01-12-08 06:51am
|
Reply
122
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Reply
You said 'best is an objective term'. For something like porn, that relies on personal tastes, I would suggest it is entirely subjective.
|
01-11-08 05:40pm
|
Reply
123
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Review
This looks good - I'm considering joining. Can't understand why you joined a lesbian site though, if you want to see naked men? You said you want to see more boy-girl stuff. If you want to see naked men, surely there are other sites...?
Regards
Davit
|
01-11-08 05:37pm
|
Reply
124
|
Anal Toy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
Well, my search has brought me to In The Crack, which seems to offer all that Anal Toy Girls offers - but without the male hands, and with less toys too! See my comment for that site.
|
02-29-08 07:30pm
|
Reply
125
|
Anal Toy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Absolutely agree.
|
02-28-08 05:17pm
|
