Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Gonzo84's Reply
Hey Gonzo
I was just browsing a few reviews and messages, and saw yours about only being able to download 2 files at a time - I've had that problem before with certain specific sites.
If you don't use it already, I really recommend to use FDM - Free Download Manager. Just google it and you should get a link to download it. That way, even on the slower or more restrictive download sites you can just put your FDM to work downloading through the night while you're asleep! I always use it nowadays, most sites allow it. Hope this is of help.
Regards
Davit
|
01-03-08 01:44pm
|
Reply
127
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
It's encouraging to see the music being dropped. I never understood why anyone would prefer to hear someone's taste in music rather than just the natural moans of the girls. It's just off-putting!
Kind regards
Davit
|
01-03-08 06:25am
|
Reply
128
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Great tip about turning off the web accelerator. I kind of figured it out the hard way (after numerous problems with various websites and then discovering by accident that the problems disappear when the accelerator is off!).
|
01-05-08 07:49am
|
Reply
129
|
Club Dorothy Black
(0)
|
Reply of
matyko's Reply
Thanks Matyko, your reply was much appreciated. I am certain that the site will improve greatly, judging by your positive response. I wish all webmasters/customer support were as positive as you have been.
I look forward to visiting the site again at a later date once the upgrades are in place. With this in mind, I shall delay my full review until then.
Once again, thanks for your friendly response. This means a lot to customers.
Regards
Davit
|
02-15-08 12:45pm
|
Reply
130
|
Club Dorothy Black
(0)
|
Reply of
matyko's Reply
Hello again Matyko
Cold I just make a suggestion? The galleries don't specify which thumbnails are for movies and which are for picture sets (you have to click on them to find out). It would be great if there were a little symbol or word under each thumbnail to say whether it is a movie or a picture set.
Kind regards
Davit
|
01-03-08 05:42am
|
Reply
131
|
Club Dorothy Black
(0)
|
Reply of
matyko's Reply
Fantastic, thanks Matyko. I hate any music in porn, I don't think it adds anything positive at all.
Many thanks for your reply. I will certainly be subscribing now I know the sound is natural!
Davit
|
01-03-08 05:29am
|
Reply
132
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
jake07621's Review
Appreciate the review, regarding functionality. I never had any probs at all, but that was several months ago. I happily rated the site 95 for the lesbian content alone - it's some of the best I've seen absolutely anywhere.
But this is irrelevant if we can't access the site without extreme difficulty.
What a shame some bastards out there are attacking the site - as the webmaster says, it's probably coming from competitors that see this fine site as a threat.
I'll be keeping an eye out for any updates from the webmaster regarding a resolution, as I've been away now for over 7 months, and feel I'm due a re-visit.
With all the problems in mind, I still feel 75 is rather low for such an otherwise top class site. But then again, I'm not a fan of boy-girl (not really into naked men, being hetro) so am happy with the majority of lesbian and solo girl sets here. ;)
|
04-10-08 07:06pm
|
Reply
133
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
Hi mate
You say 'Sandy doesn't do hardcore anymore'. I noticed many people regard any porn that doesn't include a guy to be somehow not hardcore.
Isn't this a little sexist? Surely if a girl indulges in cunnilingus, anilingus, tribbing, dildo fucking, etc etc, with another girl, this is hardcore too?
Maybe I have my definition wrong!
Still, great review man.
Regards
Davit
|
01-19-08 12:36pm
|
Reply
134
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
studslut's Review
I don't get this review. You made this site out to be pretty horrible with fat, ugly, hairy women, and infrequent updates (although given your description of the site, I would regard that as a small mercy!) and yet you awarded it a massive 90 score! It doesn't add up!
|
01-20-08 09:26am
|
Reply
135
|
Cum Shot Circus
(0)
|
Reply of
tecyde's Comment
Well done for warning us, Tecyde. Most of us here have been stung at least once by rip-off merchants, and it's our duty as members of the PU community to name and shame those bad sites.
|
04-12-08 09:48am
|
Reply
136
|
Dirty Dykes
(0)
|
Reply of
SurfingGuru's Review
Hi SG. Just a comment in response to your review of Dirty Dykes. You mentioned that your ID didn't give you access to the bonus sites, if I read you correctly. I think this is because you were on the 7-day trial.
Even trials that offer so-called 'full unlimited access' will rarely include other bonus sites from the network in that offer (although that is never made clear of course!).
I've discovered that to my cost in the past.
Cheers
Davit
|
01-05-08 02:44pm
|
Reply
137
|
Fist Flush
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
Nice little review. Having checked the tour, I agree, it does seem a little bit of 'same old same old', much as I like these veteran models, and hope to go on enjoying them as they mature further (assuming they don't all retire soon, which many probably will).
I'm not really a 'fisting fan' as such, but am definitely a fan of Euro babes, lesbian and solo, who unlike their American counterparts, seem to be genuinely enjoying having dirty sex, rather than just acting at it and speaking corny lines ('just like that', 'right there', 'look at that' etc etc etc). This site appears to offer more exclusive material of European porno babes, and if that happens to include fisting, that's fine by me too. I think I'll check it out.
|
10-12-08 06:59am
|
Reply
138
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Reply
PosterDude, I don't think TBP take back handers from any porn company to give good reviews. But the bottom line is: don't trust those reviews, or any other professional review site's reviews. Only pay attention to independent user reviews. At least that's my motto.
Professional reviews nearly always seem to be in the late 80s and upwards. They're just not truly reflective of the reality out there. Some sites barely merit more than 10/100. And these review sites often review many dozens of pay sites, so I'm suspicious that they have either the time or money to do this properly.
I reckon a good proportion of professional reviews out there are based solely on the free tours! So no wonder they're artificially high!
Not saying that's the case with TBP, but is just a general suspicion of mine.
Regards.
|
01-20-08 10:50am
|
Reply
139
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Very useful review man, thanks. The comments about the large file sizes and gynaecological close-ups really struck a chord, as I had exactly the same problem with In The Crack.com - it ceases to be sexy when it gets so close up and internal, and becomes more like a biology lesson. And the file sizes are massive.
I actually gave In The Crack a good review originally as it was so different, but it became boring very fast, and I'm guessing Give Me Pink will be the same, so I will avoid it and save my time and money.
|
09-06-08 05:26am
|
Reply
140
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Actually, good point Messmer. We have referred to it as an ass site because that is how it is promoted (i.e. the 'crack' refers to the ass crack, not the pussy).
But you're right - a great many videos and photo sets aren't centred around the ass at all. For people (like me) who really appreciate proper girly back door action, and with no men featured, I recommend Lez Cuties a lot higher than this site. :)
|
09-14-08 09:13am
|
Reply
141
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Very good point Drooler. The notes are very comprehensive. One thing that does get my goat though, is the number of times you see words to the effect 'this is probably one of the best anal scenes we've ever filmed' (for example). I must have seen that line a dozen times!
It also annoys me to read 'We must warn you that the lighting isn't very good/the orgasm looks fake/the girl has no passion' or whatever.
If it's that bad (and generally when the movie has a warning like this it *is* bad) then why bother putting the movie up there? Happily, these are still in a very small minority.
I also mentioned to the webmaster about the repetitive photos in the galleries. He responded by saying he takes lots of basically the same shot to make sure he has everything right about the shot when it comes to assessing quality, but then he can't bring himself to discard them so posts them all. I asked if maybe he could post both 'full sets' and 'condensed sets' but he said I'm the only one who ever complained about this and he wouldn't be doing that - which is fair enough I suppose. I'll just continue to 'prune' my own sets once downloaded.
|
03-08-08 08:09am
|
Reply
142
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Yeah - the 1280x720 movies are crystal clear on my 17" monitor, and the colours are so natural. I haven't felt the need to go higher than that (not that my processor could really handle it anyway).
To be honest though, I have downloaded the vast majority in the 640x360 version, after weighing 'picture quality' versus 'size of file on my hard disk' and 'speed of responsiveness of my media player'. I find these are still very good quality, and the close-ups are still very detailed. It just gets a little bit pixelly where there's fast movement, and the colours are a bit less vibrant. But the brain is very good at dismissing that, when the action is so hot.
|
03-07-08 04:31pm
|
Reply
143
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Use a DM squire - FDM works great with In The Crack for movies, and DownThemAll is good for pics. Hopefully then, if a download fails, you can just pick it up again once the site is back up.
|
03-03-08 01:25pm
|
Reply
144
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I've had a couple of problems since joining the site a couple of days ago, where the site has suddenly gone off-line. And I've found myself randomly logged out on a couple of occasions, which led to all my downloads in my FDM failing and me having to load them all in again once I'd logged back in. Must be that OS issue.
The site has just gone down again. Now there's service for you - it not only dishes up hot babes - it goes down on you too.
|
03-02-08 02:39pm
|
Reply
145
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Amen.
|
03-02-08 03:55am
|
Reply
146
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Haha! Good points well made... EXCEPT: (!)
The point about guys in porn being considered 'props' and therefore we guys are more 'objects' than the women are. That's not a good parallel, as the 'prop' thing is coming generally from other straight guys, not women.
Bet Paul McCartney would relate to the Robin Williams quote right now!
|
03-02-08 03:53am
|
Reply
147
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Great review, Drooler. The token system is now gone. I literally joined this site for the first time in the last 48 hours, and am just blown away by the awesome camera work, both motion and still. I've been downloading like its going out of fashion, I just can't get enough of this style of content (i.e. ass worship). The newer stuff is also superior to the older stuff.
Good point about the 'objectifying' of the women. But in a sense, I think this is less objectifying than, say, catwalk models who are just there to look good and hang clothes on, and are void of personality. I think feminists overstate the whole 'sex object' thing and place way too much relevance on it. Personally, I like my porn performers to have some character and personality, and all the best porn stars are not necessarily the best looking, but are the ones that have warmth and personality. That comes across a lot on this site.
The 'anal twitching' comment - absolutely agree. It's interesting for about 0.3 seconds, we don't need to see it filling our screens for 10 minutes straight!
You mentioned 200-350 pics per gallery. What you have overlooked (if I may say so) is that a great many of these shots are very repetitive. I'm not really into playing 'Spot The Difference' (7 shots of an open pussy in a row at ever so slightly different angles) so I tend to prune my pic sets right down to something more concise.
I'm still gonna give this site a very decent score, as it is just so unique, from what I have seen. I read you were disappointed in the site (although your 83 score suggests it wasn't all bad for you - and that's despite the tokens!).
I feel it's too soon now, but look out for my review in the coming days or weeks.
|
03-01-08 03:03pm
|
Reply
148
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
I should also state that, as said by some others, this site no longer uses the token system of purchasing movies. You now simply pay your monthly fee ($35 right now, which is a little dearer than average, but I think worth it) and you have access to over 135 sets at the time of writing.
But it doesn't stop there. Each set often consists of anywhere from 1 to half a dozen 'subsets' - in other words, you click on a set's link, and suddenly you're presented with anything up to 6 full movies of the same girl, and occasionally even more (each split into smaller parts).
So I have to say this site is actually excellent value.
All movies are available in at least 640x360 (my preferred option here - it's reasonably detailed, doesn't take up too much disk space, and doesn't tax my processor too hard) and many are available in HD (files are huge though). It's a shame that 960x540 isn't offered, as that is my favourite res as it's damn near HD, but files aren't so big and my processor doesn't stutter when playing them. But 640x360 is still quite good IMO, obviously a step up from 21 Sextury's 400x300 ones.
I love that there isn't a huge emphasis on dildos - they do feature here and there, but fingers are used more, to finger and pull open those ass holes and pussies for the camera in the sexiest way imaginable.
I'll be writing a proper review with a score once I've fully assessed all the site's content. At the moment I'm thinking late-80s - even early 90s, as the site offers a style I have not seen elsewhere and am thoroughly enjoying. But I only joined today, so who knows how this may change.
|
02-29-08 06:26pm
|
Reply
149
|
Lesbians From India
(0)
|
Reply of
bbiillyy's Reply
That explains it then. I read English well, but my Sanskrit is a little rusty. ;)
I was only suggesting you get an English-speaking friend to proof-read your reviews for you - or at least use a spell checker. Just means more of us would enjoy your reviews, as more of us would understand them better. No offence intended. If someone picked me up on my poor Japanese skills, I would have to concede they were right! That's why I get my girlfriend to check anything I write in Japanese before posting it.
|
04-14-08 04:35pm
|
Reply
150
|
Lesbians From India
(0)
|
Reply of
bbiillyy's Review
I'm sorry, but I can't understand about 75% of this review - is it just me?
Please have someone who speaks/writes good English to proof-read your reviews!
|
04-12-08 09:42am
|
|
