Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Respectfully disagree my friend. Take 'Priscilla' for example (also known by other names elsewhere). She's absolutely drop dead fucking gorgeous, and pretty well known (pops up on Sapphic Erotica, Only Cuties, and the odd other site here and there).
There are loads of really fit girls on Lez Cuties (yes, many otherwise unknown), and I love that this site has many chicks that are not to be found in many other places.
The girls you mentioned (Sophie Moone, Eufrat, etc) are top shelf, and I adore 'em. But all the sites would look the same if they all featured those same girls, fantastic as they are!
Anyway, bottom line - for me, having mainly different girls to the other sites makes this site *less* boring, not more so!
Thanks for the comment anyway, and thanks for the compliment on my review!
Kind regards
(And it's Davit, not David!;) )
|
02-28-08 01:38pm
|
Reply
152
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Yeah - fisting is hot, especially when combined with licking. More of that would be nice.
|
02-27-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
153
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Some good points about Les Cuties. But I would disagree about featuring older girls. Don't get me wrong - I LOVE older girls. They can be even sexier and hornier than the younger ones. But this is a niche site that is focusing sharply onto one area - and that's in the title. Lesbians, and 'cuties' (and that means teens, or thereabouts, basically).
Agree too that higher def movies would be nice - although in all honesty, I don't mind these average-quality ones so much, as long as they continue to have such good quality content as they do (how many times have you seen a technically excellent HD movie and been bored to death? I know I have).
Completely agree about 'more fingers, less dildos'. That seems to be a commonly reflected comment on PU and I support it.
Your wish for lez orgies and peeing? Who could argue with that!
As it stands, there is only this site and the inferior Tushy Lickers that offer lesbian anal as standard that I know of. If you know of any others - or even solo girl anal with no guys - I would be interested to hear.
Regards
Davit
|
02-27-08 04:04pm
|
Reply
154
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Interesting. In a way - looking at it from a business point of view - you can't blame sites for doing that. They've realised that there's a lot of business in the 'one month only' customers who never return. So it's probably cheaper to just recycle and rely on those one-monther customers coming along.
What large sites should do is offer a choice of deals. The more you pay, the further back into the archive you can access. Different passwords could give different levels of access. That way, if you want to join again after being away for, say, 8 weeks, you could buy an 8 week deal - just get the last 8 weeks of archive - and the next 30 days of updates. This would be better value for the customer because he only needs the last 2 months updates. But for the webmaster it would mean he might come back more often, so it's good business sense. Large sites could offer 4 week, 8 week, 16 week, 6 month, 12 months, whatever deals, up to the entire history of the archive at the top price.
Wonder if any site has considered this? I've been away from Club Sandy for about 3 months - I'd love to visit again, but I don't want to pay full price just to get the last 3 months of updates. I'll probably wait at least a year, and shop elsewhere in the meantime.
|
01-21-08 02:22pm
|
Reply
155
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
But I don't even want it, Drooler! It hasn't been updated since December, and I have really lost all interest in the site. If it were Club Sandy, or Sapphic Erotica, or a great lesbian site then that would be another matter - and I certainly wouldn't shout about it round here *wink*!
One advantage of the free membership is, I can keep checking back for updates, and keep Porn Users informed as to when it bothers to update.
Keep watching my Eve Angel review for updates!
|
01-20-08 04:08am
|
Reply
156
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I know, my friend. Actually, at this time (or at least last week when I left) Mya's was fully up to date. But Eve's and Lora's are appalling. At least Eve's seems to update *eventually* and backdate the uploads for the missing period.
Not sure if the Club Sandy vid is better quality or not - I didn't bother to re-download it. I doubt it though. Both sites seem to have identical movie quality (i.e. about average).
I'm about to write a review of Eve's site. You know, I actually left a couple of months ago after one month's membership, and got my email confirming I had left and would not be re-billed - and yet I still have full access! I only discovered this when I got an email from customer service saying someone had breached my login details, and sent me a new password!
I replied straight back to say I had cancelled my membership, so it should not be active - but got no reply. So I sent a second email. Still no reply, and the membership is still active! This would be a great thing, if it weren't for the fact that the site hardly updates anyway, and when it does it always seems to be yet another Eve solo set, which never seem as good as Eve's movies on other sites. So it just shows you how bad it is when ex-members don't even want it for free!
|
01-20-08 03:48am
|
Reply
157
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Re Mya Diamond.com. Yeah, I have just come across (no pun intended) a vid and pic set of Mya and Sandy, which I had already got from Club Sandy. So this is clearly not a 100% exclusive site.
So far it seems to be updating on time - unlike Eve Angel's or Lora Craft's sites, which nowadays seem to update when they feel like it, if at all.
|
01-20-08 02:51am
|
Reply
158
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Glad I saw this review and replies. I was considering joining Mya's site having been a member of Eve's and Sandy's. But I think I'd better pass on that!
Kind regards
Davit
|
01-03-08 01:59pm
|
Reply
159
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
visor's Reply
Agree with everything you said except more m/f, but that's personal taste for you! :)
|
03-12-08 05:16pm
|
Reply
160
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well, Drooler old boy, you know what they say: 'Great minds' and all that!
|
03-08-08 02:52pm
|
Reply
161
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Reply
Ohhhh sorry! I get it now - sorry, was being a bit remedial there! Yeah, given the number of dollars to the pound right now, always good to buy American if possible! :)
|
03-03-08 01:20pm
|
Reply
162
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I agree with your comment, Elephant. I joined OC a couple of weeks ago, and it really can't compare with Sapphic Erotica can it? The performances are much more run-of-the-mill, as you say. I lost count of the number of times a video features a girl faking multiple orgasms from another girl just sticking her forefinger up her pussy for 15 minutes. Just dull. Very little full on hot cunnilingus and analingus. Too much boring dildo action.
|
02-26-08 12:15pm
|
Reply
163
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Yeah - thanks for your suggestions, I appreciate your time, RB. :)
I have since left another comment, saying that I found a solution, and am now using DTA - although not in the way I was used to. Right-clicking doesn't get you the file by any method at all (DM or otherwise). But LEFT-clicking does. Still doesn't help with FDM, but DTA does happily offer a way.
Cheers.
Davit.
|
02-20-08 03:47pm
|
Reply
164
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Actually, I have just discovered to my delight that DTA does work. When you LEFT click, a Windows box comes up asking if you want to play the file or download to disk...and another option for downloading with DTA!
Don't know why FDM (my preferred DM) is not on the list, but who cares, I now have DM support!
Thanks for your comment.
Regards
Davit
|
02-20-08 01:42pm
|
Reply
165
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
Where sites allow it, DMs are fantastic. Instead of just right-clicking a link and downloading immediately, you right-click it and load the link into your DM. You can fill your DM up with loads of download links (hundreds if you like!) then you can set it to work downloading all the files for you as you sleep! You also specify where you want to download the file to (which location on your hard drive) and can re-name the files in advance too. FDM is brilliant, I love it, highly recommended, won awards. But so far, no DM has worked for me with Only Cuties.
|
02-20-08 01:34pm
|
Reply
166
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
But have you tried it with this site, Robare?
|
02-20-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
167
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Down Them All does not work. Tried it after Free Download Manager didn't work. Problem is, right-clicking a link doesn't take you to the file. It brings up a file called 'download_video.php'. You have to left click it and then only using the Windows pop-up will give you the file, not FDM or DTA.
Whenever I use a download manager, it just beings up the file called download_video.php (which downloads in about a nanosecond).
Same happens with Dorothy Black's site, but customer support responded to a comment I left on PU, saying they were going to bring in DM support soon.
Are you saying there is actually a DM that definitely works for this site that you have had success with?
Thanks in advance.
|
02-20-08 01:21pm
|
Reply
168
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
Just a small point: the British pound has nothing to do with the Euro!
|
02-18-08 03:43pm
|
Reply
169
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
Hello again One Man
Just to reply to your comment on using East Europeans etc.
I do appreciate your concern from a moral point of view - i.e. using Eastern Europeans for 'cheap labour'.
But I respectfully disagree. I disagree because sure, it's cheaper from our economy's point of view - but to them they are probably earning a very decent living. This is where market forces actually work in favour of the poorer countries, as they can be more competitive (i.e. work for lower wages than us in the West) and therefore secure work that would otherwise just remain in the UK or USA or wherever.
It's no different to companies outsourcing call centres abroad (I work in a UK call centre, but my employer also uses an Indian call centre for the less technical customer support). And why does my employer use an Indian call centre? Because they're dirt cheap - but they still get the going rate for over there - which affords them a very nice lifestyle. The wages are less - but so is the cost of living within that economy. And that is their 'ace card' in the world market place!
OK, I'm ranting! Just basically saying you shouldn't feel bad about it IMO. Regards. Davit.
|
01-05-08 11:47am
|
Reply
170
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Agreed about Club Sandy. But Pix And Video, whilst having excellently produced movies and tons of content just like CS, does have lower resolution than any other 21 Sextury site I've visited (e.g. Dirty 101, Lezbo Honeys, etc.). I'm not sure where the duplicate movies appear first - Pix & Vids or other 21 Sextury sites - but all the ones I saw were lower res on P&V.
Still, these are still in a small minority, so I don't see it as a major issue - just a disappointment as there should be no need for this at all.
|
01-21-08 02:09pm
|
Reply
171
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Hi Elephant, just seen your comment, been away for a while (using a girl on girl torrent site!)
Yeah, I completely agree. There's something cold and soulless about using dildos. It's so much hotter to see flesh on flesh. S.E. went through a crap period where the girls just weren't up to standard, but now there are loads of fantastic threesomes and foursomes starring Eufrat (for example) with lots of anilingus, and some tribbing too. The occasional turkey still gets through, but there's definitely enough A-One stuff to justify getting your annual update. :)
|
07-12-08 02:26am
|
Reply
172
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
tintintin's Review
Well, I joined again, and can say hand on heart, this review is really not reflective of the site as it is now.
It's not right about there not being much anilingus available. There's shit loads of the stuff! Check out just about anything starring Eufrat (known as Juliet at SE) and you're in asshole heaven!
I do agree about the 3-some comment to a degree.
4-somes are even worse - too often it's just 2 separate couples on a sofa or bed, who then swap partners at half time, rather than 3 girls all giving the 4th one a real lesbian service.
But all in all, I think after a bad period where the movies were becoming dull and routine, the site is now back on track. I just joined after being away for 6 months, and was delighted with the return to high quality lesbian lovemaking to be watched.
Really deserves at least 90, not the poor score given here. (IMO).
|
05-03-08 05:28pm
|
Reply
173
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
tintintin's Review
Have to echo some earlier replies. I certainly have no wish for the girls to 'act a little bit', I hate 'acting' in porn. If I wanna see crap acting, I'll watch American porn ("Just like that, right there", ad nauseum), or an episode of 'Neighbours'.
As I said in my own review, I do think the more recent stuff is sorely lacking, compared to the earlier stuff (or at least that was the case last time I was a member, about 6 months ago). But there is still a shed load of material on this site that features genuine female-loving girls. These girls give performances that simply cannot be faked or 'acted'.
Unfortunately, there is a quantity of crap on this site now that you have to rake through to get to the good stuff. Make sure you don't 'mis' it.
|
04-18-08 11:42am
|
Reply
174
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
Have to agree about SE getting worse in recent months. Whilst the technical quality (resolution, picture quality) is better than the vast majority of sites out there (even better than many so-called HD sites), the content has become dull. I think the webmaster has taken his eye off the ball for a while.
Still, it's worth a month's fee to get all the archive, which is still mostly brilliant stuff, very reminiscent of what we see from Viv Thomas.
|
01-19-08 05:44pm
|
Reply
175
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
Agree with much of your review of SE, Goldfish. This was my first pay site too. I would add though, that whilst many of the older movies are lower res, they are often some of the best quality action.
Probably my favourite movie from the whole site is the threeway between Johanna, Kellie and Nina (who I've discovered goes by the name of Lucy Lee elsewhere). This is quite low res by today's standards, but have you ever seen 3 babes so into each other's bodies as those three!
Conversely, I find some of the newer movies to be very decent res and widescreen, but the action is often dull by comparison.
Nevertheless, it's still one of my fave sites for hot yet sensual lesbo action. Hard to beat.
Regards. Davit.
|
01-19-08 05:38pm
|
|
