You say there's no tour, but I just went to the home preview page to check this out, and there are several downloadable clips of what is available. I reckon that's far better than many so called 'tours' that I've looked at that have turned out to be a con! At least here you get a genuine taste of what's on offer.
Actually, I do agree that they should let would-be punters browse the whole site - there's a lot there to show off IMO, so they should do it. :)
Davit
Interesting. I re-joined Sapphic Erotica a few months ago (just for the second time) to get some updates, and was a bit disappointed with much of the newer material.
You also say you'd like to see more American girls. But for me, this site's strength is that it focuses on European girls who have a completely different style (less noisy or fake). Just my personal taste though (I just love quality European lesbian porn)!
Thanks man, appreciate that.
As you'll see from what I wrote on my profile, I believe we should have a lot more of these negative reviews where appropriate, as they are just as important as the positive ones. We've all been ripped off, or bitterly disappointed before by substandard content that doesn't live up to the tour, so by writing about our bad experiences we can save others from doing the same!
There are too many review sites out there (not TBP) that consistently give high scores regardless. We need to give some balance to that!
Well, that's an interesting question, as when I came to look at my Sapphic harem folder yesterday (before I decided to delet it), I was reminded that I hadn't downloaded a single picture set. Now, since I love picture sets, I can only conclude that this is either because:
a - there weren't any, or
b - they weren't zipped and I couldn't be bothered or
c - they were just crap
I think a or b are the more likely scenarios.
What I can remember is that those very alluring magazine cover-type images, are links to movies. Just goes to show though, you can't judge a book by its cover.
I found that a bit harsh mate, about warning us never to go live. I've had many great experiences live, with girls that get straight down to it.
You're right - there are girls that will try and rip you off and go really slowly. But there are plenty that don't (I have plenty saved to my favourites) and they're the ones that get my money.
Not that I bother much, as like you say, there's a great pre-recorded video package.
regards
Davit
It's worth noting that the Viv Thomas streaming videos can be saved to your hard drive too - just allow one to stream from start to end, then click into your temporary internet files folder, and the movie file should be there at the bottom. Simply drag it from there into a folder of your choice!
At least that worked when I used it a few months ago - hope nothing's changed. They're quite low picture quality, but hey - we're talking Viv Thomas here, so the content is often amazing.
Regards
Davit
Most welcome indeed. Maybe you'll join and give your own review. You may find other aspects worthy of comment that I didn't, or just offer an alternative viewpoint (which is what user reviews are all about).
Regards.
Firstly, yeah, *generally speaking* the updates come in pairs of updates for couples (each the reverse role of the other in terms of recipient) or if it's a threeway then there tends to be 3 updates, where each girl has her turn at being the recipient of the other two. They tend to be not very long - although there are some that go up as long as 11 minutes, but these are in the minority. The shortest one I have is 2mins 11 secs, again in the minority. I'll amend my average to maybe 8 minutes (but that's a best guess - don't expect me to go through my entire collection and work out the exact average, please, I don't want to get pedantic).
Bitrate seems to be mainly 521kbps/320x240. There are also a handful (on my hard drive at least) that are twice this (1060kbps/640x480). This surprised me when I checked this just now, so I played a couple to get a fresh idea of how they look, compared to the many other vids I have. And, very importantly, they *look* much lower res than the stats would suggest. One possible reason is that they've come from a lo-res source - or possibly that the conversion software is substandard. This, of course, is pure conjecture, I can only speak objectively about how they physically look when played. And they do look quite low res and grainy - although, as I said in my review - still watchable.
Your final question about orgasms - in all honesty, I'm not convinced that most of the orgasms portrayed here are genuine. As with most sites, there's little or no evidence of real white 'girl goo' to be seen (the only definitive proof of female orgasm really). But at the same time, the girls don't 'overact' and do seem to be really having a great time together, and most of the climaxes - whether real or not - are the result of anal stimulation principally, and sometimes, but not always, aided by vaginal stimulation simultaneously. The emphasis is definitely on tongue to ass. And the camera is good at getting that shot - after all, it's the whole point of the site.
Hope this helps, but if you have any more questions, or if I have been unclear, please ask away!
Regards
Davit
Firstly, I welcome you, BadDaddie to the site. But if you look at the scoring system for PU, 99% does not make any sense after reading your review.
It's not a question of any of us disagreeing with you - I've never visited Twistys, so what do I know.
It's a question of you disagreeing with yourself in the same review. You can't give such a near-perfect score on the one hand, and then give such negative remarks in the written review, and then expect people not to question that. You're just contradicting yourself.
For that reason, I had to give a 'No' vote on the trust issue, for the first time since joining PU. Not because I think you're not a trustworthy person (you're probably a decent guy), but because I wouldn't trust any review by someone who clearly doesn't understand the scoring system.
Apart from all that, it's one of the most badly written reviews I've read so far on this site (all four sentences). Sorry to be blunt, but you need to raise your game, IMO.
Well, you're not the only one my friend. I had to deal with some seriously childish arguments from the webmaster of 1 by Day after I gave some constructive criticism that he couldn't handle (even accused me of being a plant from another porn site, because of course no one could possibly genuinely dislike his site) - but happily I got LOTS of support from fellow PUs (even those that disagreed with my points) and he showed himself up for the petty little man he was.
I agree - we can make a difference!
Regards
Davit
Just been reading through your unpleasant argument with asmith12 - let me add my support to your side! You gave your own opinion, based on verifiable facts, and so don't deserve to be 'mistrusted' based on that!
I found asmith's arguments ludicrous - comparing unlimited downloading to 'filling up a plate with food, then having to leave it to be thrown away'. Jeez, talk about tenuous. Downloads aren't perishables! They are there to be saved and accessed at ones leisure!
I agree with all these comments. As I said in my own review, it's unlikely you'd want to join this site more than once, as you just know the updates would be kind of more of the same.
It would be better if all the girls were changed regularly - if it was a different house with different housemates for each show. If that were the case, I might return. But as it is, it's not worth it.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
