| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Sincerely, I wouldn't enter my credit card info if I had to do the http-https trick. It was just to offer a certain degree of security in case you really wanted to join the site.
AFAIK, communications become secure once you use the https; the warning is because the URL you are accessing (scorehd.com) doesn't match the one in the certificate (score-cash.com). But communication is encrypted and an eavesdropper would only be able to intercept the communication if he were the owner of the score-cash.com certificate.
In this case, the trick works because the server happens to have an SSL certificate installed (even though domains don't match and you get a warning) but, obviously, not all servers will have one.
|
04-11-10 10:27am
|
Reply
252
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
When I joined Christy Marks (also by Score) some time ago I also went through a similar page. I don't remember if the credit card page was sent through HTTPS but it was also a page hosted at score servers. I was eventually billed by an unheard of billing company but haven't had any issues afterwards.
You may try altering the http part to https. The server has a certificate but it is for score-cash.com domain (the page you receive is at scorehd.com); you will have to set up a certificate exception but you'll be able to join through a secure page.
Needless to say, an HTTPS certificate costs money (not much, just about a 100$ yearly) but for a company that conducts its business online is a must.
|
04-11-10 07:55am
|
Reply
253
|
Sex A Mexican
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I remember a similar discussion on Curry Creampie. In fact, several of the scenes, like the Sativa Rose and Keri Sable one, come from a DVD titled "Mexicum" which can be found at DVD sites.
What's even weirder than the performer name change is that you can see Porn.com watermarks on some of the tease thumbnails but this site doesn't seem to be owned by Porn.com.
|
11-15-08 07:46am
|
Reply
254
|
Sexy Soccer Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I'm not a member so everything I wrote was from thoroughly checking the free tour. The irony is that the samples make me think that, more than a panty site, it caters to bottomless (panties off, shirt kept on rolled up throughout the set) and knee-high socks (plus soccer shoes).
|
03-04-12 11:21am
|
Reply
255
|
Sexy Zdenka
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
The free tour page you've seen lists everything that is available inside. To their credit, it's also worth mentioning they clearly separate the three types of videos: behind the scenes, candids and sexy videos. This is something not all sites do.
I grabbed a couple of the behind the scenes videos and they are a bit peculiar: there's a lot of editing showing shoot preparation and the model while posing for the camera but also some stills from the shoot. A bit unusual but quite well done. Keep in mind that I do like behind the scenes material.
Even though, as I said, I feel photos are the strongest point of the site.
|
06-08-09 01:28pm
|
Reply
256
|
Sexy Zdenka
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
It's still updating 3 photo sets per week on average although it looks like one of them is usually just magazine scans. Latest sets are being released at 2000x1333.
The galleries section of the free tour shows everything you'll find inside.
|
06-07-09 01:20pm
|
Reply
257
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
I didn't get a membership directly for Shay Laren but to another site from this company, which is no longer listed here at PU. That site only listed 5-6 bonus sites at its home page but my password worked at all but one of the 15+ sites that company had listed here at PU at that time: all the solo model sites did work; also Glamour Models Gone Bad and Amateurs Gone Bad. If I don't recall badly, only one of the sites did not work and it was not a solo model site; Digi Dolls or Bitchin Movies most likely.
I don't know if it's sloppiness on their side or an unadvertised feature but I doubt they have a membership maze set up. They for sure didn't have it a couple years ago and they were already listing just a few bonus sites at the members' home pages.
|
05-09-10 08:13am
|
Reply
258
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
Good review. Regarding the connection maze, I think you get access to all sites from this company with your membership. I was a member of a site from this company a couple years ago and my password worked at all sites.
|
05-08-10 03:35pm
|
Reply
259
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
plan b's Reply
Thanks for the info. I was rather disappointed with so many screen captures in that network but it's good to know that it was temporary.
I agree the site is a must for Shay Laren fans. I only grabbed the zip files but there are some very good pictures in them. I wish she didn't have that tattoo in her back, though.
|
06-12-08 02:31pm
|
Reply
260
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
plan b's Review
Excellent and accurate review. Keep up the good work.
I was member to another site in the network about a month ago and several of the most recent photo updates at that site were merely individual frames from HD videos (blurry, horizontal, 1280x720). I found that very sleazy. Is it happening at Shay Laren on the most recent sets too?
I could access Shay Laren and downloaded most of the zip files and I've only found one (Peach Lingerie) where they did this but I was wondering if they have also done it in the last couple of sets.
|
05-31-08 11:04am
|
Reply
261
|
Sierra's Secret
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I haven't seen her couple recent scenes for other companies and just browsed through the content here. As far as I could see, pictures here were often about goofy sexiness and videos were in such bad image quality that I really can't tell.
|
07-10-11 08:19am
|
Reply
262
|
Sister Reunion
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Reply
Thanks for the info. This site, though, so far seems more like a mainstream US porn site; I believe most of the models are known to those familiar with US porn: Britney and Whitney Stevens, Ashli Orion, Havana Ginger, the Love twins, Rhylee and Rhyse Richards, ...
I must say, though, that the sister/twin thing isn't really something I'm into; I just came across this site trying to figure out the relationship between Havana and Savana Ginger (they are sisters). Since this site seems to be US based, I was wondering how many sister groups who are already somewhat known and already active were left in US porn so they could make it to this site. Thanks again for your input.
|
01-01-09 07:18am
|
Reply
263
|
Sleep Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I was sincerely upset with the theme of the site and that's why I ranked it so low. I also happen to like the "belly-down-flat" position but it doesn't appeal to me at all if the models allegedly stay unconscious throughout the scene. I strongly feel they should add some intro or epilogue to justify it. Otherwise, it's just too creepy.
|
11-22-08 04:34am
|
Reply
264
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
Both PinkPanther and pat362 are right. Streamate.com's "private" is referred at other cam sites as "group" since any number of user may join and chat with the model. It's easy to tell when a model is in exclusive because you don't get the option to join her current "private".
Things get complicated when you throw in the flat rate "gold shows" in the mix. If you have the time and courage, you may try reading my "Taxonomy of a Host's Online Status" comment further down at the Streamate.com comments section here on PU.
As to what models prefer, I've seen all kinds of situations at Streamate.com: models who don't even know that the exclusive option exists and also models who set the exact same price for private and exclusive to encourage 1 on 1. When I asked a model who set the private 1 cent cheaper than the exclusive, she said she did so because she couldn't cope with the multiple requests at the same time that come from a non-exclusive chat and preferred giving attention to just one member.
|
05-02-12 11:57am
|
Reply
265
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Maybe Streamate.com tried to charge something on your card and your bank didn't allow it? If I remember correctly, they were sending me an email whenever a charge was made on my card. Check your spam folder in case there's an email with further info there.
|
01-07-12 02:39am
|
Reply
266
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
FaerieChick's Reply
Thanks indeed for the long reply and the model's perspective on the show type and her options. My comment was written about the time they launched it but, despite my initial disapproval, ended up joining a couple Gold Shows ever since.
I used to like having 1 on 1 with pornstars and Streamate is probably the site with the most pornstars. For the time being, at least. It's frustrating to only have the option to get Gold Shows from them now. I've ended up removing most of my favorites and canceling the SMS alerts. Haven't spent on Streamate in a long while.
|
09-22-11 03:19pm
|
Reply
267
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mika5213's Reply
I used the term clone site in the sense those sites are mere re-brandings of Streamate.com. If you check It's Live, iCamz Live, Cam Crush or Live Freaks pages here you'll notice there's a big "site clone notice" at the top. Those are just 4 of the 50+.
There are probably better ways to track referrals than to use a different domain. As a user, I was confused at first with models talking on the net about cammodels and Streamate.com indistinctly.
|
06-20-11 12:12pm
|
Reply
268
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Thanks for the tip. It's not as slow as actually entering the room and you get the benefit of not being banned by a trigger-happy model but I find it has a extremely slow response time compared to other cam sites' similar functionality.
It's also worth stressing that this feature only seems to be available at Streamate.com and not at its various clones. Since most models actively promote their cammodels subdomain, this feature is likely lost by many users.
|
03-24-11 12:43pm
|
Reply
269
|
Sugar Paradise
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I suppose you're aware that TBP has numerical data from 09/2008 and info on video resolutions (74 photo shoots and 40 videos).
I'm not a member but all the Last-Modified headers for image updates on the home page are from the same date on 11/2008. It doesn't necessarily mean there haven't been more updates since then: it could simply happen that they haven't changed the tour for a while.
I found some samples following the webmasters link on the home page and going to the news section.
|
05-15-09 01:46pm
|
Reply
270
|
Summer Banks
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
The easiest way to know when a file on a web server was last modified is with a javascript bookmarklet. Search for "javascript lastModified bookmarklet" and you'll find it easily.
It often gets fooled because some servers send the current date but, in cases like this, it's quite handy: I cannot be a 100% sure the site hasn't updated in 6 months without joining it but, since the picture of the last update on the home page was uploaded in June 2008, I draw my own conclusions.
|
01-22-09 10:58am
|
Reply
271
|
Summer Banks
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Needless to say the date in a huge font at the home page is not the date of the last update but today's one.
Looking at the web server headers, the update at the top goes back at least to June 2008. The site most likely hasn't updated in the last 6 months.
|
01-21-09 02:31pm
|
Reply
272
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
That's weird. The company being Czech, one would expect it would work properly in the Czech Republic. For the record, following the Tainster link here at PU works OK for me.
|
05-29-10 01:42pm
|
Reply
273
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
Yes, that's what I meant when I said it's confusing. My guess was they copy-pasted the info from the basic package and left by mistake the pay-per-minute, pay-as-you-go and pay-per-view part (aren't those three the exact same thing?). The full package contents lists "all eromaxx videos (stream/download)" and there's no reference to credits in the full package so that's why I assumed it's a regular membership. I could be wrong, though.
I spent some time at the Eromaxx blog but there's no real information. Neither is there any info in the FAQ. The news section has a snippet that points in the direction that Tainster is Orgy Max 2.0: "We've taken the old network and given it not only a full facelift, but we've also added so many features and pimped out the technology in such a way to make Tainster the new leader in online adult entertainment"
Who knows :)
|
05-29-10 01:41pm
|
Reply
274
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
Reply of
critic's Reply
Never heard of Fellucia Blow before but the previews there are limited and they don't seem to be updating. The concept seems similar to the Art of Blowjob but Camille Crimson's site seems much more interesting.
|
10-09-11 01:45am
|
Reply
275
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
Reply of
critic's Comment
Can you point a specific update? Looking at the free section to me it seems just like there have been some changes in shooting style, hair and makeup but it's always the same model.
|
10-08-11 07:50am
|
