| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Interlacing is used for older TVs (CRT tubes). To achieve 30 frames per second with smooth, natural movement, they interlaced the video into 60 fields per second. The frame would draw every other line top to bottom and then every other line in the opposite direction. On progressive screens like your LCD computer monitor, interlacing becomes visible as a slight shearing effect (for lack of a better description). It's most visible in fast motion or side panning. Bottom line: it's obsolete and ruins visual quality on modern equipment.
|
07-16-08 02:40pm
|
Reply
2
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
I'm not sure if you're still looking for an answer but i just got around to testing this today. The story is still the same. The WMV and MP4 files will play but they're not smooth. The AVI files will not play at all. Since most of the videos are still AVI files (and even some of the newer posts are AVI), don't expect to stream them to your PS3.
P.S. I'm running firmware 3.15 on my PS3.
|
01-01-10 04:32pm
|
Reply
3
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the info! I've been really interested in this site for a while now. I was actually an ALS member when they launched Angels so I have no doubt that the quality is there. But I can't justify the time to babysit downloads so I like being able to queue up a few at a time.
|
02-12-09 04:05pm
|
Reply
4
|
Danielle FTV
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
There aren't any split files. All the videos are one whole "scene" but the scenes vary in length and you only get the option of WMV, which isn't a big deal for me but could be for others. She's tattooed in most of the videos I've watched so far. But she's getting the tattoo removed. There's even a video about the tattoo removal.
|
04-04-09 08:54am
|
Reply
5
|
Danielle FTV
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Just posted a full review. I'd been planning to get around to it earlier but I'm moving out of state in a couple weeks and I've been a bit preoccupied. :)
|
03-31-09 07:56pm
|
Reply
6
|
Danielle FTV
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Wow, I had no idea they set up a site just for her. I'm signing up now. Should have thoughts to post (or maybe a full review) in a few days.
|
03-12-09 04:22pm
|
Reply
7
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Okay, I've been thinking of joining this site for some time now. But this revelation has moved the priority up. What an incredibly brilliant idea!
|
03-18-09 08:16pm
|
Reply
8
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
I had access to this site as part of a network package through Shay Laren's site. By itself, I wouldn't have paid for it. The content quality is really hit or miss. It really felt like everything there was relicensed from another source (though I can't verify this as fact). Some image sets are decently high res, some not so much. Most of the videos I bothered to DL and watch were low resolution and low bitrate, but there are some that are nice and high quality. On the plus side, they add new stuff often.
|
03-13-09 04:38pm
|
Reply
9
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
What I did was keep multiple browser windows open. One with the model index by name, one with whatever search results I ended up with and then one for the actual model's page. Clunky, but it worked.
I'm also right there with you as far as all the European models. I just signed up for In The Crack, which has a fairly decent mix of American & European. But the content might be too extreme for most folks.
|
07-15-08 12:15am
|
Reply
10
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Yeah, well I hit the limit so what does that say about me? :-)
My suggestion is to use the search. They're really good about tagging videos & photo shoots so you should be able to fill up with what you really want.
|
07-08-08 05:51pm
|
Reply
11
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
That's interesting, I hadn't bothered to dig into their site for that statement. What I can tell you is that I did hit a DL limit despite what that says. I don't remember the exact wording of the message but the error page I saw said that I'd downloaded 30 gigabytes over the last 24 hours and that I wouldn't be able to access the site until another 24 hours had passed from the time I hit the limit. Note that it didn't tell me exactly what time I hit it, I just had to go w/ a best estimate and try back a few times until it let me log in again. Regardless, it's a very generous limit and I doubt that too many subscribers run into it.
|
07-08-08 04:54pm
|
Reply
12
|
Lesbea
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeremias27's Reply
I think Lesbea's behavior is very customer hostile so I actually wouldn't recommend subscribing at all. I ended up subscribing to Sapphix instead. Comparatively, I think Lesbea's content is far superior in quality. Both sites use a lot of the same talent, but I prefer Lesbea's cinematography and think it's better in angles, lighting, editing, closeups, and eroticism. But Sapphix has 4x more content, so they make things up in quantity. Sapphix gives you downloading ability with their regular membership and I never hit any kind of limit. Sapphix is consistently fast as well, with most downloads ranging around 350-500 megabits/sec (I have a gigabit connection).
|
07-15-20 12:49pm
|
Reply
13
|
Lesbea
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeremias27's Reply
Based on the chat conversation I had with support, yes. You'd have to pay an additional $15 per month on top of whatever you had subscribed to in order to get downloads. I was going to do an annual subscription also, then I decided to look here in case there was something I missed. So when I went back to my chat with support and asked, they confirmed the $15/mo addition. No where in the signup process does that get shown as an option. If I hadn't checked PU first, the only way I would have discovered it was to complete the subscription payment, then log in and see that there was no option to download media.
|
07-14-20 09:07pm
|
Reply
14
|
Nude 2 Rude
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
Spot on review. I was a member late last summer but never got around to writing up a full review. The only thing I'd add is with respect to the video camera work. Amateurish only begins to describe it. In the videos where the camera guy interacts with the model, he gets so caught up in flirting with the model he completely forgets that he's supposed to be filming it. In one of the speculum scenes, he spends a lot of time shooting closeups of her shoulder cause he's to busy ogling the model on his own. And there's so much camera shake that some of the videos make me motion sick.
|
04-10-09 12:59pm
|
Reply
15
|
Sexy Jamie
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Thanks for the heads up! I'm about to cancel my subscription too.
|
07-08-08 05:10pm
|
Reply
16
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
The last few sets posted are definitely not screen captures. But I'd say they're not all that consistent either. The last two are fair resolution (1600px - 1700px), but one came from Matt's Models. The one before these two was kind of low for today's technology (1024px). I honestly think I could take better pictures with my own amateurish photography skills. IMHO, still worth it for a Shay Laren fan if you're the type to sign up, drain and then cancel.
|
06-12-08 02:03pm
|
