Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Joymii's Reply
Nice to hear from the company :)
As for the connectivity, I checked today and your "updates" page shows now properly (I mean at a very decent speed).
Think this article sums up very well the situation: http://arstechnica.com/information-techn...-break-online-video/
As for the quality, the fact that I couldn't have a proper peek at your recent updates wasn't helping I presume.
You seem to have very decent looking models recently :)
I don't really have favorites. Though I must say I used to love Michael Sandberg's vids.
You should bring him back (as it looks like he's not making anymore videos) and let him shoot a longer feature with the models he used to work with on a regular basis.
Let me "somehow" disagree with the "one vid per week".
Now that I can really look around, it's: 3 for July, 2 for June and 3 for May which isn't exactly 1 a week (you used to have 4/5 per month couple years ago).
Thanks for your answer! I'll probably join back when I have more free time to spend on watching lovely models :)
|
08-03-13 10:21am
|
Reply
2
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Yes, you're right (about your opinion) : it has merit even though I don't share it at all, and exactly for the reasons you're expressing ;)
I think the less make-up there is the better it is. I usually avoid Met-Art because of the generic quality it brings : they're on quantity side instead of the quality one.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that M-A is bad, but it really has nothing special.
That's what I like about Femjoy, that "Girl Next Door" feeling you're speaking about.
And more specifically, the artistic side they bring rather than the erotic one.
If I come back here, that's because they know how to picture nude girls without using artificial elements like make-up, toys...
And watching at the videos, I can clearly see that they enjoy being nude in front of the camera.
But indeed that's also a personal point of view, to each his/her hown :)
|
08-12-09 02:39am
|
Reply
3
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Well, it's 19,95$/mo (or 99,95$/yr) if you come from PU/TBP. And that's a pretty good deal if you like HA.
Now if you hit the "Join" button directly from HA, then the monthly price is... 39,95$ (and 150$ for a year). I wouldn't consider joining HA at this price.
|
12-08-08 04:27am
|
Reply
4
|
Querro
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I was the one who asked that site to be listed here.
It was on my subscribe list, mostly because of its Femjoy look'n feel and because I had some hopes for their vids.
I can't write a proper review right now, but it's an average site, at least for me. I'd rate it 65/70. Not that it's bad, but there's nothing outstanding here.
Too much Photoshop on some pics.
Not enough vids and they're not that good, too amateurish.
It's a one year old site, with a regular update (a vid or a pics' set) once every two days (usually). So don't expect a lot of content.
In the end, that's just another softcore site.
|
10-05-10 04:25pm
|
Reply
5
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
You're talking about Nikita getting nude in Prague ?
So far, that's the only set showing public nudity I've seen and that's clearly not the focus of this site.
But you can find many pictures taken outdoor.
|
06-15-10 05:30pm
|
Reply
6
|
Zemani
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Zemani is quite an average site in my opinion and I share the feeling of the reviewer.
The best thing about it is the models. A lot of them are really cute, have a natural feeling and most of them aren't pornly-shaved : it's nice to see a bit of pubic hair from time to time ;)
The biggest downside is the pictures' quality. They really need to improve in that department : a lot of weird sets & many blurry pictures (and no, not an artist blur).
Don't join for the videos either : you'll easily forget them after seeing them.
70/100
|
08-12-09 02:15am
|
|
