| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
godsgirls's Reply
My main point had been that neither of the reviewers mentioned there were any tattooed models on your site and I think even you would agree it is a major feature that should be mentioned in a review. However, I'm glad you replied and let us know what the site is about. I'll definitely check your site out in more detail!
|
02-03-07 08:39pm
|
Reply
277
|
Hall Of Fame Stars
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
That's pretty cool about the automatic linking! Thanks for the comment dude! ;)
|
10-30-07 03:30pm
|
Reply
278
|
Housewife Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hey exotics Dude!
That one is pretty pathetic, but then again that's what shows like Mystery Science Theater 3000 are for! I wonder if anyone has even done a porn version of that show. And if anyone doesn't know what I'm talking about, check it out...it's cool.
The most believable one I've ever seen is MILF Hunter. Yes, you know the bits are scripted, but at least they take the time to set it up by going to a location, flirting with the girl, and then going back to the room to do the deed. And they actually use a different house now and then!
Please, someone save us from our lame reality site nightmare! Well, it's not that bad...they do still get it on, right? ;)
Thanks for the reply,
SD
|
06-05-07 03:52pm
|
Reply
279
|
Housewife Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Hey nygiants Dude!
I can certainly see your point and I'm not saying that the site should be closed or anything, but I just think that sites used to do a better job of maintaining the fantasy. It's still there, just less so in my opinion. I agree if the sex is good, then who cares? I'll be interested in a review.
Thanks for your comments!
-SD
|
06-05-07 03:36pm
|
Reply
280
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks e4m! :)
|
05-25-07 07:16am
|
Reply
281
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
Reply of
RoseAnn's Reply
Hey RoseAnn!
Thanks for the reply and I appreciate everything TBP and PU does, but do realize that things change over time. I was just excited that someone had done a review and would have updated info! So, if you took that as a criticism, it really wasn't meant to be.
Thanks,
SD
|
05-25-07 07:10am
|
Reply
282
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review! Question: How much content is there for Veronika Vanoza and Olivia de Treville? I knew there are pictures, but there are videos too? The TBP review says there aren't any, although it sounds like you found some.
|
05-24-07 07:22am
|
Reply
283
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
mudman's Reply
Thanks for the info Mudman! I have always thought it would be cool, but softcore can get a bit dull after awhile and I was concerned about the limits of what you can see. No doubt there must be some awesome clips though and the site just needs some more time to fill up the archives like you said. If they did combine the sites and provided a small discount, I'd be there in flash. Actually, I'll probably join them at some point anyway, but if you told them that they probably wouldn't think of offering that discount thing I mentioned. ;)
|
03-12-07 03:28pm
|
Reply
284
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
mudman's Review
I just left a reply on another of your reviews asking for more info which I could exactly replicate here. With a score of 84, I'd really like to hear more!
|
03-09-07 09:03am
|
Reply
285
|
India Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Hereford's Reply
Now I can see why you gave it that rating and I just wanted to make sure you weren't giving the site a 50 if you honestly thought someone might think the pictures made the site worth it. However, with the additional negatives you mentioned along with the original review, even the greatest lover of this niche would likely leave the site unsatisifed. If anyone disagrees, bring it on! :)
Thanks for replying and for the review!
|
02-10-07 11:29pm
|
Reply
286
|
India Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Hereford's Review
It definitely looks like a crappy site, but if there is even one positive (you mentioned a number of pictures) does it really deserve the worse possible score? Another way to put it is this: Can you imagine no site being worse than this one? If not, then I guess a 50 is about right. :)
|
02-10-07 09:24pm
|
Reply
287
|
Inside Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Great review! Was this site part of the basic membership before they added the second tier sites? If it was, I guess I'm not as observant as I thought! But this does look cool since the stars act a bit more normally.
Keep up the great reviews dude! ;)
-SD
|
06-26-07 07:20pm
|
Reply
288
|
Izzy's Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
Hey King,
I was mostly just joking and giving you a hard time, but I do appreciate your response and your reviews. :)
-SD
|
04-05-07 11:23am
|
Reply
289
|
Izzy's Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
Hey King,
If you are only looking for so-called "young" girls, you are definitely missing out. Older women (which many classify as anyone over 22 for reasons I can't explain) are the spice of life! ;)
-SD
|
04-04-07 06:28pm
|
Reply
290
|
Jack Lawrence XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
FemCop's Reply
I absolutely see where you are coming from! And, like I said, if you really love the site in question then it's hard for me to argue with a high score. I just wanted to offer an idea about why people may be suspicious, that's all. :) If you do join another site, make sure you come back and give us your review! And thanks for replying!
|
02-23-07 09:12am
|
Reply
291
|
Jack Lawrence XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
FemCop's Reply
I think what would make users suspicious of your review is because you only have submitted one review and you give the site a near perfect score. As Khan said your opinion is just as valid as anyone else's, but until you write up some other sites it may seem like you are biased towards the site. If you like it that much then I feel great for you because you've found something that suits your needs. That's awesome! However, if you really want other people to find your reviews helpful I'd suggest rating some other sites, particularly any you have not liked to provide some balance.
|
02-22-07 08:28pm
|
Reply
292
|
Jack Lawrence XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Reno911's Review
Ok, so you are admitting it has some negatives and you still gave it a perfect score? What pains me about reviews like this is that I would rarely score even my favorite sites ever above 95 since a site can ALWAYS improve. Unfortunately, the result is that my fav sites get lower scores while reviews like this send their reviewed site straight to the top. Yes, I could go ahead and give sites a perfect score just because they are my favorite, but does that help anyone else decide whether or not to join?
Thoughts?
|
02-20-07 02:04pm
|
Reply
293
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jeffaz's Reply
I agree with you about sites that only offer cam stills, but to be fair to Jen's site my review is nearly a year old. I know she had some recent pictures up at Freeones which were definitely not cam stills. I'd do a search for her at Ask Jolene or other site that archives sample sets to see what the quality of her pics are now.
|
01-28-08 08:37pm
|
Reply
294
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
|
Reply of
MikeAndJen's Reply
Hey Mike,
I appreciate the nice words on the review and it definitely sounds like I came in during a major changeover! And I certainly know what you mean about addressing lighting and other things while the art is underway! I'll drop you a line since I'd love to see how things turned out to get the full effect you both intended.
It's great to see Webmasters interacting with users on here!
-SD
|
04-04-07 05:05pm
|
Reply
295
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
|
Reply of
heynow's Comment
I reviewed this site right in the middle of the change from MyWifeJen to JenMadison. I think she abandoned the MyWifeJen too quickly after getting everyone used to it not being JenUncut anymore. I'm sure it's left some members scratching their heads and even more confused after the second change! In her defense, I think the cam show thing that has her still listed as JenUncut is because she either hasn't thought to change it (sometimes what the cam show operator sees isn't what we see, so they don't notice) or she can't change it without opening another account. Bottom Line: It's eyebrow raising as a prospective member and curious to current members, but once you get inside the site it isn't really a big deal.
|
02-19-07 12:35pm
|
Reply
296
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
|
Reply of
marquis58401's Reply
Glad you found the review useful Marquis and I hope you enjoy the site! Regardless, make sure you come back with your review, especially if your experience differs from mine. Have fun! :)
|
01-29-07 08:17pm
|
Reply
297
|
Joanna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
KevinG's Reply
Thanks for the info! Much obliged!
|
12-19-07 06:53pm
|
Reply
298
|
Joy of Spex
(0)
|
Reply of
Daeron's Reply
I can't tell you how excited I am to hear that! I'll be waiting at the door to sign up, of that you can be sure! :)
|
08-21-07 06:41pm
|
Reply
299
|
K Package Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Markus's Review
If you can't think of a "Con" per se, can you think of any ways the site could be improved? I think that's what folks are looking for in reviews.
|
04-17-07 05:44pm
|
Reply
300
|
Kitty Karsen
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Review
Great review fellow dude! And since I see that you joined recently, welcome to the site! I think you'll like it and I look forward to your next reviews. :)
|
04-15-07 06:30pm
|
