Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Reply
I can read, jerk-off. The name "Anal Heaven" can mean very broad things, moron, so good luck finding your brain. Her galleries and vids I saw were misleading, as noted by my review. Little content, slow updates, etc. Look at the membership of sites like Shemale Yum and Shemale Strokers, look at the quality of content, and go from there. Anyway, you sound like a complete jerk-off so enough of you.
|
03-10-09 08:55am
|
Reply
2
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
bluepixels's Reply
Hi Blue, I appreciate the reply. I'm sorry you feel I was harsh in my review, but I have to call things how I see them. For $90, I expected a lot more than what was offered, and that's being generous. I must say I can't agree that Kim or anybody involved with the site makes no bones about the content; the preview video is rather misleading, showing Kim in various poses, stages of play, and finishing with a cumshot. On the site, the videos seem to start in the middle of a longer shoot and offer little other than giant dildo or fisting action. That video is what attracted me to the site and it's not representative of the content, unfortunately.
I'm happy to hear that, whether you agree with me or not, you're attempting to upgrade the quality. Since I have your ear and still have a paid membership, I'd like to offer some suggestions. More videos of Kim cumming would be first. More of her playing with her cock would help too, as would some good hardcore action not tethered to toys or fisting exclusively. If these improvements were made, I would happily post a better review. Thanks for listening.
Joe
|
02-23-09 07:58am
|
|
