Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I suppose you are right but this site has some downright hags :) I am quite open to all women and I even don't mind some more of the 'ugly' women going at it or you could even say plain janes. This site has a lot of beautiful older women and plain janes. However, I lump these two categories in terms of attractiveness together because I think they both have great qualities that most can agree on. I am not trying to sound superficial but I understand that concept of others finding certain qualities better than others. As I think I said in a post on the forum, I think the overall consensus of men know what an attractive woman is and can agree on what a total hag is. Were talking about porn here and I'm not gonna get in to personality cause that's a whole diff concept. For example, a plain jane can be totally hot to me cause she is totally down to earth and a playboy bunny can be totally disgusting to me because she's a downright bitch. However, in porn, I wanna see the playboy bunny and not the plainer jane if I have a choice. And by looking at anilos, I see this concept being put in to the place. That site looks great as far as the content is and I think they are on a great pace to give this place a run for their money. So I guess what I'm trying to say is if the standards were lifted just a little, I'd prolly give this a low score in the 90's, maybe it's opinion based but it's just how I feel. However, I prolly would deduct points if they went out and got these 20 something 'milfs' I see on all these other 'mature' sites. Maybe, if they would just not worry about updating so much, they can find better quality models. And by the way, I don't mind a 'lesser' attractive model being thrown in to the mix every once in awhile, just not daily :)
|
04-01-09 04:57pm
|
Reply
152
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I'm gonna do a new review pretty soon for this site but the videos seem to be the same as the older ones. Same WMV and MPEG formats at the. They look okay I suppose but def not up to par with what I've seen on plenty of other sites.
|
03-23-09 07:48pm
|
Reply
153
|
All Teen Rev Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Reply
Yeah I would say the whole network, this is solely based on using the information from TBP stats. Since the stats at TBP state that there are more videos than what I downloaded upon joining, I am assuming that they are revolving old content as new. However, this is all assumption. But, I can tell you that upon joining that the content was much lower than what each of TBP says there should be. And yes, the quality for all the sites is pretty bad. There are a few sites within the network (I think 3 or 4) that offered 640 X 480 videos with an average bitrate but this is not the majority. I stated in the original comment how many each site within the network averaged within photo sets and videos.
As far as the network goes, it just lists all the sites on the same page then links you to each site logged in already. Hope this helps clarify things.
|
09-29-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
154
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
plan b's Reply
Thanks for the reply and yes I was still looking for an answer. I hate that DivX files rarely play on the PS3 and even some WMV's. The worst thing is when I join a site that says WMV and I assume they will work for PS3 and they don't.
|
01-01-10 04:43pm
|
Reply
155
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Very interesting details and elaborate response. Thanks for the quick reply and butt load of details. You have definintly helped towards a decision to join or not.
|
06-24-09 12:08pm
|
Reply
156
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Hey exotics4me.
Once again I have a question. I am a bit confused as to what the content is in general. After reading other reviews and yours plus looking at the preview, I have a few questions. I understand this shows models that are not as 'petite' as shown in the original ALS scan site, but as far as the actual content goes; is this a girls with toys/fingers site? Can this be compared to a site such as In Focus Girls or maybe Xisty in terms of what is found? Any information would be greatly appreciated.
|
06-22-09 11:06pm
|
Reply
157
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Just like PinkPanther's reply, I am sorry for the late response, I had a busy weekend. You are right about the voting, I wish I had more space in review to go in to more detail about this but your reply sums up the cons of this precisly. Sweet, the members feel like they are interacting by voting for their favorite scenes to be updating in that order but sometimes a model strikes a viewer a certain way, why not let them enjoy that model even if it is a 'not for the masses' model and did'nt get the votes? Limiting this can be quite troublesome. However, I do think you are right in saying this was more with the older content. I think with the new stuff they have all the content shot (usually up to 3+ scenes) already and the voting is just the order it will be updated rather than if they will get updated or not at all like the older times? I'm not entirely sure how it is totally done exactly.
Also, to add to the updates, how are they figuring out which sets and videos to reformat if anyone knows? Do they vote for this too?
I wish other sites just gave off the vibe that the creators produce at ALS. I think due to this, this is why the sets and videos are so well (yes, I do think they use the best equipment and compression as well). Hopefully, in my laundry list of sites to join I can find this but ALS definitly sold me enough to join ALS Angels for sure :)
|
08-03-09 04:39pm
|
Reply
158
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Sorry for the late response but thanks and to this date, this is my favorite so far as well!
|
08-03-09 04:30pm
|
Reply
159
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Thanks a bunch that info was exactly what I was looking for in terms on a better idea of content and more clarification about the differences between the two sites. Appreciate the facts and I'm looking forward to joining the site eventually :)
|
07-08-09 09:41am
|
Reply
160
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
I know it's been awhile since you have reviewed or maybe been a member here but I have a question: I noticed you were the only one who really talked about what the content actually is that is provided. Therefore, I noticed you said speculums. So, since this is extreme spreading, do the models do any 'extreme' spreading with just their fingers or is it primarily insertions and the speculums? I hope this makes sense, or if you even remember. I assume you would because you like the site so much :)
Anyways, I have been interested in ALS Scan for awhile now and I was told that this displays primarily more 'petite' models while ALS Angels is more of the 'thicker and busty' models? Any info from any of these questions would be great and I'd appreciate it a lot!
|
07-07-09 07:01pm
|
Reply
161
|
Amateur Facials
(0)
|
Reply of
Denny's Review
Site plug city :) Pro's and Con's aren't bad but that bottom line is ridiculous. But, you seem very excited with this site so I might check it out one day.
-GCode
|
03-11-09 09:30pm
|
Reply
162
|
Andrea Nobili Productions
(0)
|
Reply of
BenThruston's Review
Thanks for a review of a site I have been interested in since I stumbled across it. Some pretty good information but I would not mind even more detail as to what the site has to offer. Like, do both the TS and male models cum in most videos? What kind of settings are involved? How many different models are offered? While you mentioned a lot of scenes the male is the bottom, but is this always the case? Are all the scenes involved showcase the male as the bottom? If not, is there any rotation of the TS as the bottom?
While I ask these questions, I still respect and enjoy the review you have offered. Thanks for your time and I hope to see more!
|
12-17-10 08:13pm
|
Reply
163
|
Andrea Nobili Productions
(0)
|
Reply of
BenThruston's Reply
Thanks for the detailed info! You really helped me. Appreciate it!
|
11-28-10 11:51pm
|
Reply
164
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Weird you mention interviews because that was one of the favorite things I liked about the site. The fact that most were interviewed by a woman which made a better atmosphere in my opinion and the teasing the models would do. As far as the 'more is better' thing, I dunno if I'm right. I'm just throwing it out there :) I think it makes sense but I think it might be a combo of that and the fact that almost every site does it as well. It's probably a huge factor that most sites do it that the directors/producers feel the need to do it to so they are not the odd ones out. I have to agree that I'm sure that the masses must enjoy dildos or that there are just not enough of the majority complaining about it that they must think that this is what the masses want.
|
05-13-10 08:33pm
|
Reply
165
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Ah yes, the dildo routine. I liked this site because of the stray away from mostly all that. I remember even seeing some machine use. I have to say you are probably right when it comes to dildos. I think that just most producers/directors probably just think a models use of only fingers does not give enough 'umpff' to the content. Therefore, the result is bringing in toys. However, I've always thought that the simple use of fingers shows much more erotism amongst models because they are using their own technique in such a simple way to get themselves off. But, back to what I said, I think a lot of makers of porn tend to see more as better and toys are the solution in the eyes of them :( Stinks but it is what it is I guess.
|
05-12-10 08:22pm
|
Reply
166
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
That's a stinker :( Were the videos for purchase webcam videos made especially for members who sent her money? I've seen a few models on their sites do that. Too bad you won't find much of those outfits here as you already know :( So I'm guessing this is the only site that features her, let alone in videos? Good thing you checked back to this site so you get snatch these up!
|
12-15-09 06:42pm
|
Reply
167
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Yeah she's a good model with a nice natural body and a great personality within the videos. Definitely worth it to check her out.
|
12-15-09 05:44pm
|
Reply
168
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
4 or 5 softcore sets to 1 hardcore for each model usually with an occasional model doing 2 hardcore scenes. Photo sets are good but have quite a bit of photoshopping.
Hmm I just wrote a review a few days ago and I'm hoping I covered some of this. Messmer has wrote a well founded and informative review as well, you should check them out for more information if you need it. Or you can ask me more here if you need it, my membership just cancelled yesterday and I have evey single thing you can download up to yesterdays date.
|
12-15-09 05:43pm
|
Reply
169
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
haha yeah it definitely is subjective and that's why I asked your opinion as a fellow PU who enjoys older women. I fully agree on what you believe is a mature model for sure. Being a bit younger than you, I suppose I think a 'mature' model would be about 10 years older than me so that's about 37+. However, maybe mature sites think the same way and think that their target audience may be in the 18-21 range and a 10+ year old model would range around 28-35 or so. I never really thought about that until now and I think that may be why models on most 'mature' sites are getting late 20's and early 30's models and marketing them as 'mature'.
So many of these models on these mature sites could keep their original titties and natural features but be more demanding that the models keep in shape and this would result in really hot models. This is my opinion, but I hate the fact that a lot of 'mature' models tend to be early 30 somethings with huge fake tits and that means they are quality mature models. I like a natural sag as well (I think you like them a bit more and I respect that for sure) but I want my photos to feature them in the flesh as I would see them if I MET them in the flesh, ya know? For example, At Anilos, I love Chennin Blanc because of her natural look and her freckles but these are only present in the videos. If you look at her images, they are not there. A huge disapointment in my opinion :(
Now that you bring it up, I would not mind seeing a touch of gray in the hair of these models if they have it. It just adds to the natural look in older women that I love. Thanks for the insight and the reply!
|
12-13-09 08:14pm
|
Reply
170
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the vote of confidence in the review, buddy ol' pal :) This is definitely a site in the forefront for quality mature content and I basically joined based on your review and feedback. And....I was not disapointed! I'm glad you took my 'imperfections' remark the right way, I had a feeling I was going to get some negative feedback on that opinion but I'm happy to hear that I am not the only one who felt that way. These so called 'imperfections' that people tend to observe creates a downfall in some sites, IMHO. One of the largest qualities in mature women is the natural freckles many have (huge turn on for me) and I saw a lot of these attributes 'washed out' with image altering which pissed me off in the photos. You can see them in the videos which is great but they are air brushed in the photos (BOOOOOOOO!!!!). This is probably one of the largest quirks of this site that I found, that and the fact that model selection are a bit young to be featured on a mature site :( Don't get me wrong, they are quite attractive but I wanna see natural older women!
I think this is the most dissatisfying thing I find in sites that are considered to be in the 'mature' niche. While the argument is there for what is a true 'mature' model, I think this site is not entirely spot on in this aspect. However, the site is great and I do feel we think the same way on this issue. What do you think are some descriptions of what makes a true 'mature' model? I'd love to hear your feedback. Thanks again for the reply and take care.
|
12-13-09 06:27pm
|
Reply
171
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
I'm glad you found Messmer and I's review useful in making a decision to join a site that I'm sure you will enjoy as a fellow PU who enjoys mature content. Can't wait to see your thoughts on the site as well!
|
12-13-09 06:18pm
|
Reply
172
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Wow that it her and I totally looked at that index. I must have totally overlooked the picture because it seriously did not look like her at all until I put both pages next to each other. Thanks a lot for this, I would have never looked at that page again until you checked this out. Now the hunt is on... :)
|
06-25-09 05:54pm
|
Reply
173
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hey,
man I didn't even notice you could go to the model index without a subscription. Thanks. And yes, these models look great so far. No doubt though, this site is on it's way to become something great! Thanks for the quick reply man.
|
03-23-09 07:34pm
|
Reply
174
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Great review. I have a question as far as being comparable to the other mature sites out there. I joined all over 30 earlier this month and I like the site so far... (review later) but I have noticed between the attractive ones, a lot are unattractive. Is it the same thing here? How wide spread are the truly attractive models in comparison to the unattractive. I know attractiveness varies between most people but I think you may get my drift in my example?
-GCode
|
03-23-09 11:12am
|
Reply
175
|
Asia Movie Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Yeah the mosaics don't bother me much. I mean I would not complain if they took them away lol :) But, I have a skewed outlook anyways because I find Japanese women to be the most attractive females in the world, so I think my threshold for dealing with mosaics is higher. This site was worth it at $29.95 because of their library and offer of WMV videos. WMV are almost non-existant in JAV sites which usually offer AVI files. Most of these AVI files are not supported through the PS3 media player, while most if not all WMV's are. That was one of my major perks of wanting to join this site. But, I wont pay $40 for the site, that's for sure.
|
05-17-10 11:37am
|