Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : uscue (0)  

Feedback:   All (255)  |   Reviews (26)  |   Comments (46)  |   Replies (183)

Other:   Replies Received (138)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 176-183 of 183 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
176
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The only sites I joined without trying the trial first were Brazilian Facials and Cathys Cravings. Both sites were excellent and I think they would do even more business if they offered a two-day, full access trial, although Cathy's website is cheap enough to not need one. But Brazilian Facials is still pretty much unknown and could do better if they let people sample it first. Trials are the easiest way to determine if to join a site - I've decided against really bad sites after sampling the area and stayed on others (videobox, bangbros) for over four months thanks to a trial.

04-22-07  08:33am

Reply
177
N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

DRM protection or stream-only websites. I don't see the point in joining a stream-only site

04-22-07  08:29am

Reply
178
N/A Reply of PinkPanther's Poll

It seems that alot of things can be taken to make the trust meter better for the whole. I don't think it should be limited to members with a certain number of points (maybe at least 1 rating posted though), but I also favor an anonymous comment section that a user has to madatorily fill out for a "no" vote. This is so that the users learn what about their reviews caused someone to be skeptical, and also ensures that people who vote "no" contribute to the community by their input.

The main reason why there should be an anonymous comment section is to help keep the community active. If a user gets six no votes without knowing why, that could discourage them from participating in the site if they begin to think that what they say isn't worth anything. However, useful comments for "no" votes are a way to keep them interested in posting rather than feeling too personal.


04-07-07  11:58am

Reply
179
N/A Reply of Oasis's News

Sounds good! I was a member a while ago but unfortunatly haven't been a member for about a year now. Seems to be about time to catch up on my favorite Arizona woman again

04-01-07  09:19pm

Reply
180
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

DRM

04-01-07  09:15pm

Reply
181
Visit Banged Moms

Banged Moms
(0)
Reply of spacemanspiff's Review

How many network sites are included? Wondering to see how many sites are included at the $30 price. Also, what are the download options (minute clips, full clips, 3 parts?). I know most of their sites were filmed in Europe...is the language in English?

03-25-07  10:06am

Reply
182
Visit Solo Interviews

Solo Interviews
(0)
Reply of DivBZero's Review

I haven't checked solo interviews yet, but their network sites OyeLoca and InnocentHigh do indeed have high quality pics. Or rather, just to be safe, i'll say they are smaller in size (700x1050) but high quality regarding how they look. They don't look anything like vidcaps or amateur-ish. They look like any other sites High-Res pics but smaller in size. Video quality wasn't DVD quality like some great sites but wasn't worse than any other regular site and I never questioned it until reading the review.

I agree that this site is not as good as the other sites in the network, but does it really deserve a 51? Is that based just on the pics (it is mainly a video site)? I'd think, based on the things you pointed out that they did wrong, that the site would be in the 70's, described as: Average, some things done right, some things done wrong or 60's: does more wrong than right, low recommendation.

51 just seems low for a site costing 17.84 a month with 4 other sites included (over 100 vids all together), has a score of 78 by TBP and five 80's out of seven other sites reviews, no DRM or download limit (not anymore). Even a site with vidcaps only would be at least Average with all those added at that price, but this site DOES have actual higher quality pics, just not as high (pixels) as others which you wouldn't notice unless you used a program that showed pixels like photoshop or irfanview.


03-13-07  10:35pm

Reply
183
Visit BangBus

BangBus
(0)
Reply of roseman's Reply

haha yes for the most part BangBus is great - good quality of pics/videos, huge quantity and probably the best quality of material for a great price. Like i said in the review, the only negatives i really have are that they deleted early material. But if you weren't a member then, then you wouldn't even know, nor does it matter with all of hte material. I do wish that they would add BrandiBelle to the network though. If I have to pick a negative it's that the file sizes are so huge for full videos. But they've even added a feature to see all videos by a star which makes it even better than it used to be. Still 100 :)

03-02-07  11:56am


Shown : 176-183 of 183 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.32 seconds.