| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1151
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
joeyhart1's Review
I had a 1 month membership and I had a helluva time navigating and maintaining recognition of my membership status. If I were just downloading the newest updates, no problem, but if I started looking around at sites in the network, it would ask me for my membership info again and then not recognize it. - and their e-mail "Customer Service" was crap - just a repeated canned response. Soured me on this site totally, though there's a lot of good content here.
|
09-08-08 11:14pm
|
Reply
1152
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
shooterbo's Reply
Hmmmm - nope, don't see it - oh, well.
|
08-21-08 06:49am
|
Reply
1153
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
shooterbo's Comment
Where are you seeing this? I don't see this deal at all.
|
08-20-08 09:51pm
|
Reply
1154
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Julian4's Review
I tried it for a month - it's got some good stuff, for my tastes, We Live Together, Pure 18 are probably the best parts of the network.
I found major problems having the site recognize my username & password in IE - I'd log-in OK but if I were surfing the various sites within the network, very quickly I would hit a spot where it would need me to login again and NOT recognize my username and password.
I found their e-mail Customer Service to be pure shit. They sent me a single canned response over and over. I was able to maintain consistent access using Firefox, but I really don't care for Firefox much. I won't be sticking around more than 1 month.
A site that has great stuff but where access is a pain in the ass is a site that is a pain in the ass, in my book.
|
08-14-08 09:03pm
|
Reply
1155
|
Rocco Siffredi
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Have you clicked on the site? If so, I'm wondering why you're asking the question, because when I click on the site, the "Latest Updates" are very clearly displayed.
|
11-11-11 10:44pm
|
Reply
1156
|
Rocco Siffredi
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Not too surprisingly, the Staglione-directed Fashionistas trilogy is available on Staglione's site, Buttman.com.
Rocco was the male lead, but that was Staglione's project, from the beginning and on through the subsequent Las Vegas stage show. All rights are in the hands of Staglione, as they should be.
The Fashionistas material (at least some of it) is also on the EvilAngel.com site, which also has Rocco's Evil Angel material - lots of it.
|
12-26-10 11:14am
|
Reply
1157
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
Jent's Comment
At least you get to listen to his interviews with the models and hear him give his sage advice about what a bad idea it would be for them to do hardcore and "fuck n****rs." I wouldn't rejoin this site again on a bet.
|
02-24-13 05:23pm
|
Reply
1158
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
brixze's Comment
Yeah, but on the plus side, you get to hear Ron Harris's annoying talk, talk, talk on the vids, including his racist bs when he tells models like Jana Jordan "Don't ever let them talk to you into getting fucked by a n......, no matter how much they're gonna pay you."
Needless to say, I agree with your comment - all the sites that you mentioned are superior to this one.
|
12-13-11 10:18pm
|
Reply
1159
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
No, they were sexy aerobics vids - but to tell you the truth, having downloaded them when I was a member of this site a long time ago, I would rather watch Met Art vids than Ron Harris' "sexy" aerobics vids - and Met Art vids are the Gold Standard of boring vids.
Unless you really want to see old soft-core stuff - and not the best soft-core stuff that you could find either - I don't recommend joining this site for the crusty old "sexy" aerobics vids.
|
07-14-10 06:40pm
|
Reply
1160
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Review
This site does some great stuff, but has some real negatives for me:
1) The excess photo-shopping/painting of images - frequently takes all the erotic charge out of the pics
2) Ron himself ruins many vids. He's not a guy that tends to get women to want to get sexy. He has sexy models and if he just turned on the camera and pretended he didn't exist and focused on the camera work, the site would be hotter than it is. Nobody - including the models, it seems - wants to hear him talking.
|
12-05-07 05:36pm
|
Reply
1161
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
This is another one of those sites, like Pier999, where the painting in the pics is so extreme as to completely do away with the eroticism for me. I found the vids to be the aspect of the site that I liked the most because vids don't offer the same opportunity for messing with a woman's appearance and cause he gets in nice and close. But Ron H doesn't have nearly the skill that Alex of ALS Scan/ALS Angels does at bringing out a models' personality - watch vids of the same girls shot by both guys and 9 out of 10 times, the model is much more vibrant and sexy and FUN when she is being shot for the ALS sites.
I'm tempted to re-subsribe to this site for just a month for the vids, but then I think "Naaaaaaaa" and don't regret it.
|
06-28-07 09:01pm
|
Reply
1162
|
Sandra Shine Live
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Cruising Girls is now open - oh, and for Sandra fans - you might want to be aware that she posts - fairly often - at Freeones' message board - just search for her name and you'll easily find the thread where she posts.
I just downloaded an amazing vid of her at ALS Angels - Sandra close-up in full-screen squeezing her awesome boobs in my face is one beautiful sight, let me tell you!
|
07-16-07 08:31pm
|
Reply
1163
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I just did my review of the site - check it out. I'll be interested to see yours.
|
01-22-09 06:14pm
|
Reply
1164
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I added a comment to the review that you're commenting about. Something about the review flat-out stank, in my opinion, so I double checked since my membership to this site is about to eclipse.
This bit about "bonus stes have been added" - where? Click on the "Bonus" page on this site and it is completely blank.
I asked the reviewer to ezplain the comment, but I don't expect him to. I think it was a BS advertisement and not a review, which is too bad, since this is a good site and deserves to be given kudos for it's actual merits and not to be overly hyped by BS advertisements posing as reviews.
|
01-20-09 05:50pm
|
Reply
1165
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
KWH1071's Review
One thing I've got to point out that adds to the questionable nature of this review is the comment about "bonus sites and other features have been added."
I'm currently a member. My membership is about to elapse. There is a "Bonus" page, but when I click on it, it is blank - there is no "bonus" content. Please explain what you mean by your comment.
Otherwise I've got to conclude that this is a BS advertisement instead of an honest review.
There is a lot good about this site and it doesn't need to be overly hyped.
|
01-20-09 05:46pm
|
Reply
1166
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Yes - as a member of her previous site, I received an e-mail when she started this site. A lot of the material being presented in the new site is licensed material that she did for other sites, such as Ron Harris' sites and Suze.net and FTV Girls. The only site that does really unique material that I have not seen re-presented on this site is her ALS Angels material - ALS are pretty into having their material on their sites being 100% exclusive.
She is also doing some unique material for this site, but not a large amount. The material she is doing more is more hard-core than what she used to do, but also frequently not that interesting.
If you like Sandy, I would say that it's worth a short-term join to see what all is here. I'm not going to claim that you're going to want to stay for many months, though.
|
06-04-08 10:59pm
|
Reply
1167
|
Sandy's Fantasies
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Given 21st Sextury's comments about their DOS attacks coming from their main competitor, I wonder if there is a little porn war going on between 21st Sextury and DDF. What was the reason for this site except for DDF to prove that a bunch of the 21st Sextury material was produced by DDF?
That's OK if DDF was going to keep this site as a real updated site. Now - not having updated the site for almost 7 months, it just makes DDF look lame. They ought to shut it down or give it as a bonus to people that join the premium DDF sites.
|
05-03-08 09:39am
|
Reply
1168
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
On 10/31/12, they posted a vid that was clearly labelled "licensed from Viv Thomas". That was the post of the day, so I wouldn't regard it as bonus, but it is clearly labelled as to whose material it was originally. This site has never mainly done original material, in my experience.
|
11-01-12 08:18pm
|
Reply
1169
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
enigma's Review
I agree with you about the lack of surprise with this site. Even though it has numerous models, like Caprice, that I just LOVE, I have never found this site exciting in the least. It's like watching paint dry to me. Other people that like the style of this site probably find it admirable for its consistency.
|
07-06-11 06:55pm
|
Reply
1170
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
wawwynutmeg83's Review
I'm on a current month-long join for the first time in a long time. My previous impressions were that the site just is devoid of "zing", but I decided to try it again since it had a fair amount of Caprice aka Little Caprice aka Lolashut.
My impression now - it's boring. It's a site with great-looking women pretty much wasted, somehow, because their material is just not exciting.
It reminds me of my first join to Nubiles.net. I had the same feeling - no spark of excitement, nothing to make me go "Wow".
Nubiles put effort into changing that situation and their site got shoots where the models were a lot more engaged. This site - not.
I recommend 21st Sextury's lez material - much more exciting than the material here - and I'm always a big fan of ALS Scan's girl/girl action.
And actually Twisty's recently posted a mind-blowingly hot girl/girl scene of Tanner Mayes and Sandy of Club Sandy.
All that stuff makes this site's material look like drying wallpaper in comparison - too bad, because they do have hot women performing for them. But, then, so did Nubiles in the days when their stuff was boring.
|
03-02-11 07:03pm
|
Reply
1171
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
It's a matter of taste. I have been a member on 2 occasions - both times because the girls are cute and the site is held in such high esteem by so many - but I find their material really boring. I consider the girl/girl material at ALS Scans to be the best on the net and I find the material at Lez Cuties to be much hotter than anything at this site. Lez Cuties is only updated once a week, I should add.
|
08-07-09 07:23am
|
Reply
1172
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
moby dick's Review
Stay away from 21st Sextury sites with this English Only perspective - I quite agree with you that Sapphic Erotica is boring - there is lots more exciting les action to be found on the internet - the points you make as to WHY you find it boring are different than anything I would have come up with, though - lol
Funny review.
|
07-18-09 03:49pm
|
Reply
1173
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
juicylucy's Review
Just to lend a dose of cold water here. I think this site is definitely a taste-tester with some, like juicylucy, obviously loving it. I've been a member a couple of times and find it just terribly boring - I don't think the pics have anything exciting about them, I don't find the models all that attractive, in the main or very engaged in what they are doing and I find the interaction between the models incredibly mechanical and flat-out boring. I let my membership lapse after 1 month with no regrets whatsoever.
Enjoy your membership, though, jl - it's always good to find a site that you enjoy thoroughly.
|
07-02-08 07:48pm
|
Reply
1174
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Getreal's Review
I don't know how exclusive their content really is. Paul Markham does a lot of their content, I believe, and he has his own site.
There's a churn-it-out quality, I find, to a lot of their content, and I found myself quickly bored, but that's a matter of taste.
|
08-17-07 09:36pm
|
Reply
1175
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Porn fans wanting to be PC - seems like an oxymoron
I'll stick with the webmaster/mistress - it's kind of fun
|
02-01-11 06:29pm
|
