| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Reality Gang
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(nygiants03's Reply)
Ok, that one was listed but was deactivated some time back. It was showing an error (back then) but now wouldn't qualify as there is no "join" link. It's what TBP calls a portal.
However, you should find all the sites that were/are included under the company listing for:
Deepak Agarwal
https://www.pornusers.com/site_company.html?id=1763
hope that helps
|
06-14-07 11:41am
|
Reply
202
|
Reality Gang
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(nygiants03's Reply)
Ok, I've passed it on to the TBP editors. Barring any snags, they should have it added in a day or so.
Thanks!
|
06-14-07 08:14am
|
Reply
203
|
Reality Gang
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
from Khan:
I see a "Darling Denise" listed but no Beautiful Denise.
If you want to send me a URL for a pay site you say isn't listed, we'll be happy to take a look.
|
06-14-07 04:52am
|
Reply
204
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Rick:
(nygiants03's Reply)
No problem at all. Thanks for your nice comments, and excellent contribution!
|
06-11-07 08:05pm
|
Reply
205
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Rick:
(nygiants03's Reply)
Hey nygiants!
I saw your question about the raffle, but wasn't sure who it was directed toward.
Thought I'd let you know that we chose $$ rather than pay-site memberships for the convenience factor. It would be much more difficult for us to give memberships to sites that each specific winner desired. Plus the fact that money is just more enticing. :)
Thanks for the poll submission btw!
|
06-11-07 03:04pm
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Gazette Risque:
(nygiants03's Reply)
Good thinking, Sherlock! :D
Anyway, I think the winning money is sort of supposed to go to your memberships.
But yeah, sounds like a great idea. Although I think most people would like to keep their privacy on which websites they have a membership to.
But the option to win a membership chosen by PU would be nice. And maybe they could have it be sponsored too. So that it doesn't cost them any money at all.
I'm sometimes way over the 75 btw.
|
06-11-07 03:01pm
|
Reply
207
|
Gigantic Natural Breasts
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
from King:
Very good review! You deserve your points.
Anyway, these looks a bit too big to me ;)
|
06-11-07 02:38pm
|
Reply
208
|
Aria Giovanni
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from juanchopancho:
(nygiants03's Reply)
I hear that. I'm sure there are millions who wish they could see a little more Aria action. Probably never will.
She divorced that Rob Zombie guy. She's a big nerd with a brain so I'm not sure what she saw in that rocker freak.
|
06-11-07 07:43am
|
Reply
209
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
from juanchopancho:
I would be interested in the Aria and Eve Angel content but if you can't download any videos forget it. No way would I pay for a site where you can't download videos.
|
06-10-07 06:20pm
|
Reply
210
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(nygiants03's Reply)
OK, that makes sense that there's only about 5 models with the 3000px, as it seems they've done a redux of the site and things are looking up.
The front page is new, too. Will give it some time to grow.
Thanks!
|
06-10-07 05:55pm
|
Reply
211
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(nygiants03's Reply)
What that is all about is your not reading carefully. Go back and read what Kman112 said about the site. That's what I was commenting on.
Apparently you've joined a revitalized BubbleGirls, so I'm interested. But not long ago, it was floundering, as Kman112's review reflects. And the last time I was a member, it really stank with small pics, broken links, and other frustrations.
We aren't imagining these things that we've commented on, you know. We have experienced them firsthand.
|
06-10-07 05:41pm
|
Reply
212
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
from exotics4me:
I was a member on bubble girls for the better part of 6 months last year. The Aria scenes and more so for me, the Eve Angel scenes, kept me hanging around. I loved the Eve videos, I've seen probably 8 scenes of her with men, never has she looked more than mildly excited, until bubble girls. That one orgasm she has on it, she nearly lifts her whole body off the bed! The best part is how it embarrasses so many of these girls. Haven't been back lately, but had heard that the updates were stopping. I just can't verify that though. Not to mention, watching the guy use his hands, is a good way to learn a thing or two, it is almost an instructional video on how to make women horny!
|
06-10-07 05:39pm
|
Reply
213
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
from Drooler:
After seeing your review, thought I'd check it out. They don't offer any kind of tour, and all links lead to the signup page. Wish they'd give a chap an idea of what he's forking out for.
They mention ibill as their billing company. Although they used to be dependable, last I used them, my passwords were being shared around and I was getting blocked. (Can't say for sure it was from inside ibill, but I've always wondered.)
ClubSandy and a few other sites had so much trouble getting ibill to send them their revenues that the sites were even telling potential subscribers to not sign up with ibill.
Can you tell me how much of the content actually goes past the 3000px range for photos?
Thanks if you can.
|
06-10-07 05:32pm
|
Reply
214
|
Phil Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(nygiants03's Reply)
You don't get Nikki's site, which is the most expensive of all of Phil's sites, I believe, but you do get access to cam shows of all Phil-Flash models, including Nikki.
It should be noted that Nikki is now pregnant and is doing chats but no stripping on her cam shows until she has her baby and gets back into shape.
|
06-09-07 04:23pm
|
Reply
215
|
Butt Cam
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Gazette Risque:
(nygiants03's Reply)
Thank you :)
It is a pretty dull site, although the videos do keep you entertained for a minute or two. I had never seen a female body this way before to be honest.
And it's kinda weird, I never look at the TBP score or a website I do a review on until afterwards.
And we usually seem to give out the same scores, well sort of.
|
06-08-07 02:38pm
|
Reply
216
|
Boobs XL
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
from roseman:
Site seems pretty cool
|
06-07-07 11:59am
|
Reply
217
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Bo M:
(nygiants03's Reply)
Well... - Isn't it pretty obvious that the site is for bbw admirers ?
After all she is pretty generous with samples that give a hint about what's it all about.
|
06-07-07 01:37am
|
Reply
218
|
4 Real Swingers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from OUMarcus:
(nygiants03's Reply)
Hi NYGiants,
I have to say that there aren't very many female orgasms to be had on this site. It is definitely an amateur swinger site, but it is more the prototypical fare.
I hope that this helps.
Best regards,
OUMarcus
|
06-06-07 07:03pm
|
Reply
219
|
Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(nygiants03's Reply)
BTW, thanks for asking about Rachel Aziani. I've looked further into the site and updated the review. Except for her name, she's just not as high profile in it as Danni or Sandy are on theirs.
|
06-06-07 12:01pm
|
Reply
220
|
Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(nygiants03's Reply)
I've been a member of FTV Girls a few times, and they don't strike me as particularly similar. FTV Girls is harder to navigate by model, and they break shoots into different photosets (annoying, IMHO).
FTV runs from one extreme (teeny soft) to another (raunchy with the toys and the "pink") and they even have a color-coded "lewdness index" (not their term; forgot what it was). The sets at Aziani are much more complete "stories," so to speak; some end with toys involved, some don't.
Also, the photo quality and picture size of the truly exclusive pics at Aziani are superior -- except for the "supersize" pics that occasionally show up at FTV (no 3000px at Aziani).
And FTV is all exclusive material, whereas Aziani is about 30% exclusive as a ballpark figure. But Aziani has 1-3 updates per day, whereas FTV updates I think 1-2x per wk.
Rachel Aziani does show up on the Aziani site and so I think she is involved. So maybe it's more like danni.com or clubsandy: She strips, she toys, she dictates memos, etc.
|
06-06-07 11:42am
|
Reply
221
|
Housewife Adventures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from SnowDude:
(nygiants03's Reply)
Hey nygiants Dude!
I can certainly see your point and I'm not saying that the site should be closed or anything, but I just think that sites used to do a better job of maintaining the fantasy. It's still there, just less so in my opinion. I agree if the sex is good, then who cares? I'll be interested in a review.
Thanks for your comments!
-SD
|
06-05-07 03:36pm
|
Reply
222
|
Cams.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Gazette Risque:
(nygiants03's Reply)
Ah, I thought you might get sort of "spending money" when you get a Premium or VIP account or something.
Hmm... guess my search for a cam site which has just a membership fee and no hidden costs continues.
Well thanks for the info, it was really useful. :)
|
06-05-07 05:17am
|
Reply
223
|
Polish Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
from roseman:
That's true, I am a big fan of Kate Bona ;-)
|
06-05-07 01:14am
|
Reply
224
|
Taylor Bow
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
from Gazette Risque:
Well for a one time investment of $23.95 it's not a bad deal I think.
Of course if you don't really like Taylor Bow, or think she's just average, it is indeed not really worth it.
And indeed I forgot to mention the pictures, they are of poor quality.
But the videos make up for it in my opinion.
|
06-04-07 03:33pm
|
Reply
225
|
Housewife Adventures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Gazette Risque:
(nygiants03's Reply)
I beg to differ about the age of the models there, but hey, that's what this site is for right? :)
Anyway, I just think the website is not that believable.
Only if you consider the people that appear on Jerry Springer "normal".
This is giving me a great idea by the way, JerrySpringerHousewives.com
How about that? :P
(also I might be overreacting here a bit, I know)
|
06-04-07 12:15pm
|
