| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Code Fetish
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bebelover:
(otoh's Reply)
Wish they would get it together
|
05-12-15 03:42pm
|
Reply
102
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tangub:
(otoh's Reply)
Thanks otoh, I'm afraid you won't see much editing here, that is their selling point that it's raw, uncut and unedited amateur content. Picture sets are usually anything from 100 to 200 pictures in size.
|
01-27-13 02:48pm
|
Reply
103
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes, I have seen that, but as I know some softcore sites claim nudity when it isn't present, I thought it bore asking specific questions. ;0)
I am hoping for am - gnd rather than glam TBH.
Cap'n :0)
|
08-31-11 02:46pm
|
Reply
104
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from CosplayDeviants:
(otoh's Reply)
We have a full in browser gallery system, as well as an automatic slideshow that shows the images in full screen.
|
10-02-11 06:40am
|
Reply
105
|
Dare Ring
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from AlexMercer:
(otoh's Reply)
Thanks man, and hopefully you find my input useful. Off century taste is putting it mildly. I have seen typical 7+ rating girl getting railed and finished on so many times that I have lost the taste for it. It sends everyday there is another site offering above average girls getting pounded, I appreciate the more niche selections much more now. It seems much more exiting to see a girl having fun and being sexy, than a disinterested actress getting railed for a check.
|
10-03-11 04:55pm
|
Reply
106
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tangub:
(otoh's Reply)
Thanks otoh, for 8.95 Euros it was a No Brainer really. If you haven't done it before try starting the sign up procedure on their site by entering your email address then they might send you some promo emails...worked for me.
|
12-20-12 10:55am
|
Reply
107
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes, I was rather hoping there was something more substantial, in the way of outfits, hidden beyond the preview area.
It sounds like, as I thought, there isn't. :0/
Thanks for the additional info though.
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-18-11 08:54am
|
Reply
108
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from Capn:
An interesting review.
Combining this with tangub's recent efforts, I get the impression that the main downfall of this site is more related to website / housekeeping rather than the quality of the material itself?
Would I be correct in that assumption?
Whilst I am here, looking at the preview area the outfits all look to be glamour wear.
Is this representative, or are there casual & formal outfits too?
Many thanks,
Cap'n. :0/
|
08-17-11 11:13pm
|
Reply
109
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from Denner:
Fine review of this old site....
Some really nice models here - but I agree with otoh:
"Possibly too slick"!
Well said.
|
08-11-11 02:47am
|
Reply
110
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from tangub:
An excellent well written review as always otoh capturing the mood of the site perfectly.
|
08-11-11 01:28am
|
Reply
111
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from tangub:
Thanks for the tip off otoh, i just signed up here today as that price is too good to miss out on although at first i was only getting the TBP/PU price of $18 when i linked to it from here, had to clear my cache and enter the site name manually in my browser to find that $9.95 join offer.
|
07-14-11 08:23am
|
Reply
112
|
Electro Films
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from DpornGuy:
(otoh's Reply)
well i don't like the fact that the majority of the models aren't that hot, there's not much consistency from what i see. That said the ones that are hot are certainly appealling and don't seem to have done work other then for that site.
|
10-08-11 05:40am
|
Reply
113
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BadMrFrosty:
(otoh's Reply)
Both eroberlin and femjoy feature a lot of sets taken outside in various locations but I would not consider these locations on either site to be public or risky. Think fields, empty beaches, deserted country roads etc
|
12-13-11 12:50am
|
Reply
114
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(otoh's Reply)
Read tangub's excellent review of The Life Erotic at PU, and that should give you a clear view of what the site offers, both plus and minus.
The Life Erotic is definitely more explict/racier than MetArt and Erotic Beauty. But like tangub implies, it might not satisfy you completely.
|
11-28-12 12:29am
|
Reply
115
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(otoh's Reply)
I've been a member of MetArt more times than I have of Erotic Beauty. But as far as I can tell, there was no reason to start or continue Erotic Beauty except as a marketing decision to make more money from 2 sites instead of 1.
There is, as far as I can tell, nothing to set Erotic Beauty apart from MetArt. Nothing in themes, nothing in explicitness. Any of the Erotic Beauty sets could easily be posted in the MetArt site. And vice versa.
MetArt has far more content than Erotic Beauty. The same high level of photographic excellence. The same softcore teen subjects. The same setup of 3 levels of definition for each photoset. And many (probably most) of the models that appear in Erotic Beauty are also found in MetArt.
As far as I can tell, even though both sites use many of the same models, the photosets of the model that appear at one site do not appear at the other site. Each site, as far as I can tell, has exclusive content at that site.
|
11-27-12 05:52pm
|
Reply
116
|
Erotic Wifes
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Jay G:
I agree. Poor English translations on many sites drive me crazy, but then I would be a poor writer in any other language myself.
|
06-18-11 07:29am
|
Reply
117
|
Erotic Wifes
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from pat362:
Not to mention that if the people behind this site can't be bothered to use proper grammar than what's to say that they don't apply that same mentality to the way they manage their site.
|
06-17-11 02:52pm
|
Reply
118
|
Erotic Wifes
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from messmer:
I'm with you, otoh! Another grammar pedant!
|
06-17-11 10:35am
|
Reply
119
|
Erotic Wifes
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
Another grammar casualty.
What concerns me more though, is that what with 'text speak' we seem to have developed an illiterate generation.
Cap'n. :0/
|
06-17-11 05:29am
|
Reply
120
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from MisterMark:
(otoh's Reply)
I think both sites lose that "spirit" in some of their sets and or there is a lack of enthusiasm. The bottom line is it both sites are soft. For me, FemJoy is a site I would check in with every two years but I am a photo buff but came away somewhat underwhelmed by the lates experience. It's a very streamlined site that would work better at 14.95 or so IMO. They don't offer the "Live" girls or search features that it's comp does. Of the three art nude photo type sites, it is clearly at the bottom of the list. There was a 99 bucks offer for year when canceled which is to me a waste of money. Like I said, I treurned after two years and found only a moderate amount of savable new material. If you are looking for explitiness, this site will disappoint and bore you quickly.
|
02-20-12 10:33am
|
Reply
121
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from xexbot:
(otoh's Reply)
Their "nylon sites" are pretty interesting. Frankly, those were usually some of the better videos. Basically there was a site for just solo models in lingerie with a focus on pantyhose, then that with two girls, which usually ended up with some fairly hardcore strapon sex or other toys (it's not just muff diving), then there was one for boy/girl action, and then it sort of splits off into other categories. There is a site with trannys in pantyhose, a gay site with men in pantyhose, and a femdom site with the men in the pantyhose get pounded by chicks with strapons. So, I can't say for sure this is what you would be looking for, but as you can see, it is very much the "buckshot approach" to the subject of nylons. they really do seem to be covering just about every human configuration, save for maybe the nylon orgy.
|
06-21-12 10:09am
|
Reply
122
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes, Eric the new photographer seems to be experimenting to find the required styles.
He has actually posted on my 'Striptease' thread.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-19-12 10:12am
|
Reply
123
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
Further to this...
Rather than addition it is substitution!
I have had to review my assessment of the content accordingly.
This site is now of no interest whatsoever to me!
A great shame!
Cap'n. :0(
|
03-09-12 06:25pm
|
Reply
124
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
Yes, otoh, you are correct there.
This from the members area:
'Published on 2 Dec 2011
Today we not only welcome new model Alexa, but this is our first set shot by our friend Eric. Please welcome both Alexa and Eric to FigureBaby. You'll be seeing alot more from both of them!'
I agree his work is so far a welcome addition!
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-16-12 11:34am
|
Reply
125
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BradlyH:
(otoh's Reply)
Thanks for the reply !
I used that Favorites feature more often then i thought i would. And i agree, it would be great if more sites had it for sure.
Maybe in a few months it might get a bit more "harder", i have noticed since i signed up the sets were getting more upfront and less shy.
|
05-14-11 10:24am
|
