| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from marcdc1:
(otoh's Reply)
Perfectly said the hottest porn is always the stuff that gets the model off (the less acting the better). Fisting doesn't seem to be enjoyable. Amazing what the human body is capable of; but not pleasurable.
I too went with "not my cup of tea" (who I am I to judge what turns you on) - but like you not for me.
|
04-13-13 08:30am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(otoh's Reply)
I completely agree. Some sites give you the whole magilla (just short of actual downloadable content) so you can test navigation, check out the babes and get familiar with their content and quality. Right away that makes the site a great shot at getting my money.
|
04-11-13 06:58am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Jay G:
(otoh's Reply)
A very good point about unique material being worth the extra cash.
I certainly agree with that. Having shopped porn sites from the beginning of the Internet (yes, once upon a time you could buy a picture that seemed to take 3 minutes to show up on your screen), I am constantly hunting for new & interesting material and am more than willing to pay extra for it. The only thing I hate is paying extra and then finding out that, like a carnival sideshow, what is promised on the outside is not really on the inside.
Another reason why Porn Users is so valuable to me. A Porn User who already has been scammed will warn us!
|
04-10-13 05:47am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Monahan:
(otoh's Reply)
Ditto. I have "favorited" some sites that I forget about. Looking through the list I have checked em out again and actually signed up as a result.
|
03-05-13 08:31am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from cjd2004:
(otoh's Reply)
It really depends on the site and/or photographer - I have found a lot of sets on Twistys have it.
|
02-27-13 06:13am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from gaypornolover:
(otoh's Reply)
Me too!
|
02-01-13 03:36am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(otoh's Reply)
640 is usually OK but there's just enough extra sharpness to 1280x720 that I usually go for that. I agree with otoh that it's really tough to see what 1080 brings to the party especially when the files are huge and the download time, even with fast d/l speeds, is just not worth it.
When I watch some of the 320 stuff in my stash, there is enough discernable difference to even 640 to warrant the larger file sizes; but the difference to 1080 is minimal.
|
12-12-12 08:17am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Monahan:
(otoh's Reply)
Agree. If the site uses, say, CCBill an d the price is low, I might give the site a chance on a one month membership if the subject matter is otherwise of interest to me.
|
09-28-12 08:03am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from jberryl69:
(otoh's Reply)
haha... my poll answer was "doesn't do a thing for me" cause it's what I do for myself - perhaps my answer was a little obtuse.
|
09-20-12 08:33am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from jberryl69:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes both otoh, but definitely performance over looks for me.
|
09-03-12 12:52pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from rearadmiral:
(otoh's Reply)
Good point. I've never been to one and won't because of how I might get sucked in...
|
09-02-12 02:42pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from gaypornolover:
(otoh's Reply)
Heh heh I actually saw it used on a gay porno site just the other day! I actually find it kinda sexy! Not on Borat, though!
|
07-21-12 11:58am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from Cybertoad:
(otoh's Reply)
I like Linux and find Unbunto very porn friendly, the video players use the memory so much better.
If you want go ahead and shoot me an email and we can talk shop about the Os's.
CT
|
04-04-12 04:32pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from gaypornolover:
(otoh's Reply)
I know what you mean but what annoys me is that Apple are introducing "new versions" of OSX which really aren't major upgrades at all - they're basically the same thing with a few extra features - and they're cutting off support to older systems.
I have a friend who uses Leopard OSX and can't use the latest versions of Apple software - but his boyfriend who has an ancient Windows XP PC can! So Apple will support old versions of Windows, but not of OSX.
OSX Leopard only came out in 2007, Windows XP in 2001 - Apple will support XP but not Leopard.
|
04-03-12 02:44am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from RagingBuddhist:
(otoh's Reply)
Very well put, otoh!
|
03-30-12 12:36pm
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(otoh's Reply)
Not available as an answer but my starting point is the quality and structure of the preview site. If the site can't create a good preview site I can only conclude the actual site will be equally lousy.
However, once I've checked out the preview site I go immediately to PU. Hands down, a poor TBP and/or PU review is all I need to pass on a potential site, even if the preview site is spectacular.
|
03-19-12 10:22am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from turboshaft:
(otoh's Reply)
I don't think many lawmakers argue for "preserving mystique" when it comes to defending most legislation, especially public nudity/indecency laws. Granted, I personally think politicians are professional bullshitters so the issue is kind of moot. :-)
Still, beyond the standard squawks of the puritanical outragers I don't see any reasonable, rational argument for separate laws for the sexes in terms of public dress. I could understand more stringent laws for children for safety reasons but the opposite usually seems to be true (up to a point, of course). Try letting your girlfriend stroll around in a diaper or just totally nude down at a public beach and see what happens...
Private property is totally different so the sky--or your personal courage to get naked--is the limit in those places. Interestingly, in the U.S. it seems "public nudity" is really only legal in private places that explicitly allow it. Go figure.
|
02-24-12 01:28am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Khan:
(otoh's Reply)
otoh, to understand that you really need to look at the evolution of the site.
In the early days, trust ratings especially and polls to a lesser extent were seen as important for users. Later on, answering polls were dropped as one of the ways to earn raffle tickets (with the exception of the one badge earned after answering 50).
The forum was added quite a while after the site launched. It was at users' request and was a way for users to get to know one another and to discuss subjects related to their porn buying hobby.
But remember, the main function of the site is, and has always been, the reviews (and comments) about the pay sites we list. When you understand that PU was an outgrowth of TBP then that's easier to keep in mind.
So, while we won't rule out *ever* giving rewards for forum participation, we have no immediate plans to do so. The general feeling (when the subject comes up) is that offering raffle tickets just for posting would add more posts without really adding to the quality of the discussions in the forum.
Hope that helps you better understand the reasoning behind our decision.
|
01-04-12 02:24pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from gaypornolover:
(otoh's Reply)
LOL I hope so!
|
12-02-11 08:12pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(otoh's Reply)
I thought face at first, but your answer "eyes - a lascivious look " is much better.
|
12-02-11 04:03am
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Jay G:
(otoh's Reply)
I've done lots of stuff, sure ("Sofa" would be a great answer), but none of the things mentioned. Guess I just am not creative enough.....
|
11-06-11 01:51am
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Jay G:
(otoh's Reply)
"Sofa"....GOOD ANSWER!
|
11-05-11 04:14am
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from badandy400:
(otoh's Reply)
No not quite, but I certainly am trying.
|
09-30-11 08:33pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Jay G:
(otoh's Reply)
Porn is good fun. Not sure about clean, but then I don't mind getting a little dirty.
When I was younger I devoted way too much time and money to chasing women because it was fun. It was, however, a great way to throw money around with little return. If there's a worse way to get nothing for something, it can only be drug or gambling addictions.
|
09-30-11 07:39am
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Jay G:
(otoh's Reply)
I like your answer better than the other choices. If I had turned more to porn and not spent all my money chasing women in my youth I would be a very wealthy individual today. The pursuit of women is the most expensive hobby there is (not even counting alimony and property confiscation in divorces).
I'm only well off now because I haven't chased women for nearly two decades (and was lucky to settle down with one good woman who I don't really deserve, but whom I appreciate).
|
09-30-11 04:54am
|
