| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from turboshaft:
(otoh's Reply)
"Sometimes Chrome for either - it's good, but I'm inherently suspicious of Google :|"
I'm suspicious too. :-)
They probably have an exhaustive record of every move I've ever made on the web, but I'd at least like to think they don't know everything about me!
|
08-13-11 06:58pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Monahan:
(otoh's Reply)
Ditto otoh.
I also use my laptop (with a 17" screen) as my desktop alternative. I plug in my large monitor when I'm near it and a regular mouse and it's good to go.
|
07-24-11 01:10pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from pinkerton:
(otoh's Reply)
Unfortunately, I'm sure the average porn producer would include Scooby himself, and maybe even Scrappy Doo.
|
07-20-11 07:48am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Monahan:
(otoh's Reply)
I also use VLC and find that all videos play equally well. I usually use WMV simply because it also plays well on WMP.
One exception is f4v. HD videos from Naughty America are in f4v format which does not play on VLC. Solution is to just change the extension from f4v to wmv and you're good to go.
|
07-09-11 07:45am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from S A Web:
(otoh's Reply)
Hi Otoh,
The difference between the 3 sites is as follows
Pantymaniacs offers daily updates alternating between pic / vid updates. the video quality / theme is identical to what appears on pantyamateur, though a movie that appears on one site is exclusive to that site and will not show on any of our other sites.
Pantyamateur offers daily videos, no pictures. The ethos behind this site was that some users expressed a preference for just video updates, daily, without picture set updates.
Hotpantyfun is a ruder version of pantyamateur, where the models are more explicit, pulling the panties aside, masturbating in panties and using toys and so on.
Hope that helps.
cheers
John
|
05-23-11 09:34am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from tangub:
(otoh's Reply)
I find my 8 meg connection quite fast enough, I already download stuff quicker than i have the time to view it so don't really want to move to a new faster package in case i lose my unlimited downloads.
|
03-31-11 12:38pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from pinkerton:
(otoh's Reply)
A dissertation would make interesting reading ;)
|
03-20-11 11:50pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from BadMrFrosty:
(otoh's Reply)
Well, if you are comfortable enough to install and configure Linux on a new PC I would bet my left testie that you are also able to build the PC yourself from the individual components.
|
02-25-11 05:17am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from BadMrFrosty:
(otoh's Reply)
I am not convinced Linux is ready to be used by the masses just yet, even something like Ubuntu which is one of the most friendly. I am a IT professional and using it still drives me nuts with the unnecessary complication of doing certain things and the lack of polish in certain areas. Add to that the fact that finding drivers for obscure / el cheapo hardware can eat a afternoon of your time with no guarantee you will get it running and you have a nightmare for mere mortal computer users :) And don't get me started on the Apple tax...
|
02-25-11 03:59am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(otoh's Reply)
I would time the foreplay, but wife misunderstands when I have sex and look at the clock too often :)
|
02-15-11 05:55am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from graymane:
(otoh's Reply)
Excellent choice, otoh. Thats the one department for which there's a dire need for improvment.
|
02-12-11 11:24am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ThePornoisseur:
(otoh's Reply)
I've actually done this quite a few times. Sites such as GlamourModelsGoneBad share large quantities of content with other sites. However, in the past (haven't been a member there in years so not sure of its current watermark status), they never had watermarks on their pics. Therefore, if a set was shared with another site, chances are GMGB would be watermark-free.
I've since become immune to watermarks (just as long as they aren't too distracting from the images) I choose resolution, color and quality over the presence of watermarks.
|
02-07-11 05:57am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Tree Rodent:
(otoh's Reply)
Otoh - I was looking at porn from the age of 8, which is 45 years ago (and look what it's done to me). Shaved was definitely not the norm, it was all bushy, except in early days when they couldn't show pubic hair at all. I remember having a conversation when I was 17 with another school friend about trimmed pussy. Even then I preferred the shaven look, but he preferred the natural look. I was ahead of my time! It's possible my preference comes from those old 50's and 60's pics where they couldn't show pubic hair.
|
02-02-11 06:20am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from james4096:
(otoh's Reply)
That's exactly how I feel. Just seeing a woman's dark bush is some kind of signal for my brain. Completely shaved chicks took some getting used to for me. Now I can appreciate the benefits of shaved pussy.
|
02-01-11 09:36am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from graymane:
(otoh's Reply)
Sorry about the duplication with my #2 and #3, otoh .... but I wasn't allowed to correct a mistake on my initial reply and got it screwed up trying...so this just happened in my attempt.
What I meant to convey as being somwhat moot really had to do with the fact almost all the girls doing porn have been and still are shaven. Even patches of hair is still rare.
|
02-01-11 02:54am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
That is what led to my situation.
'Oh I'll edit it later.'
Been doing that for about ten years.
Now I am actually tackling this mammoth task.
Been at it a few weeks now.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-29-11 02:53am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from mbaya:
(otoh's Reply)
That book cannot be for real. I thought I couldn't be grossed out by anything, but that really is too much.
|
01-26-11 01:19pm
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Jay G:
(otoh's Reply)
I'm an early "riser" too!!! :)
|
01-19-11 08:12am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from graymane:
(otoh's Reply)
Dreadful? A really clever and a fit application would better discribe it. "early riser".......GROOOAN! ingenious.
|
01-18-11 04:08pm
|
Reply
45
|
18 And Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from BradlyH:
(otoh's Reply)
I have down them all too, I need to start using it more. I usually use down them all when i cant get a zip file to work. Hahah about the instant 100, i wouldn't either, that was just frustrated writing.
|
09-21-11 02:01am
|
Reply
46
|
1Pondo.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(otoh's Reply)
yeah, that's what I'll probably try, I got an email address with my ISP a long-ass time ago, I just have to figure out what it was and what the password is and I suppose it will work.
|
03-05-11 01:03am
|
Reply
47
|
90s Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from RustyJ:
Well, to me 90's are like the golden years. 80's are retro but often too retro. 90's Private especially brings memories to my mind :)
|
03-02-12 09:12am
|
Reply
48
|
90s Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from atrapat:
Regardless of 90s being retro or not, the title seems a clever idea for recycling photos shot in the 90s. Guess it's reached a point where the same old galleries seen a 100 times no longer pass as new so why not recycle them as vintage?
|
03-02-12 07:57am
|
Reply
49
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RagingBuddhist:
(otoh's Reply)
It's funny you mentioned GOW. I'd thought about that myself, but I really didn't enjoy it the last time I was on the site. That kind of surprised me - As much as I'm into amateurs, that site is, for lack of a better phrase right now, a bit too coarse for my taste. But I definitely appreciate the suggestion!
|
02-05-13 10:05am
|
Reply
50
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from tomjones:
(otoh's Reply)
I understand why you are making the "it's an industry standard" argument, although I don't believe re-billing should stand in the remaining places that it continues to be tolerated. I might be more flexible in my views and rate them more highly for their product if AW was willing to rectify omissions and misunderstandings they can easily verify after the fact. They (so far) exhibit zero regret and deny any scintilla of culpability while asserting thus: "...we can assure you that Abbywinters does not engage in or tolerate deceptive billing practices or unfair treatment of their members in any way, shape, or form."
Nonsense.
|
09-04-11 12:23pm
|
