Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : slategrey (0)  

Feedback:   All (285)  |   Reviews (10)  |   Comments (26)  |   Replies (249)

Other:   Replies Received (73)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 73 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Black Ice Pass

Black Ice Pass
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from pat362:

As far as I know. The studio is dead an has been for many months. They are part of those studios that didn't survive the bad economy.

02-26-12  10:15am

Reply
27
Visit Zero Tolerance On Demand

Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from messmer: (slategrey's Reply)

Hi slategrey, I agree with you about this being a good site. I like a lot of its features. I was just curious why all of a sudden no updates two days in a row, however in the meantime they have returned to a daily update. As to the strip tease, I guess our members' definitions as to what constitutes strip tease varies wildly. To me it has always meant a strip from fully clothed to fully naked and I haven't found any of that in any of the scenes so far.

02-26-12  09:58am

Reply
28
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from messmer: (slategrey's Reply)

Which is always a wise thing to do! :-)

01-30-12  10:37am

Reply
29
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from messmer: (slategrey's Reply)

Are you talking about rejoining for ONE MONTH through PU, slategrey? If you stay no longer than that this is indeed a good deal.
As to the fine print being hard to miss, I disagree. Many people only see the great deal on top and assume it is a fixed price for continued membership.

The only reason I looked more carefully was because I had received an email from Bangbros offering me one month at $ 14.95, this seemed like such a good deal that I looked a little bit more carefully and found that it was as I stated for one month only.

After that (this was only last week) I checked through PU when the price was still $ 17.95, but on a continuing basis, which would have made subscribing through this site the better deal.

Yesterday I discovered that the $ 17.95 was no longer listed here and that the deal offer through PU was now identical to that made by email.


01-30-12  10:13am

Reply
30
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from uscue:

I agree, a good network. Very big collection of content as well, more than you'll get through in a month.

01-23-12  11:23am

Reply
31
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from pat362: (slategrey's Reply)

I really hope you enjoy the network. The only negative that I can find is that the number of new anal scenes is way down from previous years. That may not be an issue for you but I love anal and that's why I haven't gotten a new membership in a long time and don't plan to until they film a lot more.

01-20-12  08:34pm

Reply
32
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from pat362:

I've joined Dogfart network a couple of times and I've never been disapointed with my membership. The most obvious thing about the content is that it's interracial porn. The network has many sites but the majority of these stopped updating a few years ago. The good news is that the network has been remastering the older content the dead sites so that it's still worth it for a first or even a returning customer. They have 2 gay sites included in the network but I've never checked them out and I assume that you aren't interested either so I'll limit my info to hetero content only.

If you visit the network then you'll see that only Blacks on Blondes, Gloryhole, Gloryhole-initiation(same as Gloryhole but the performers are Black girls), Cuckoldsession and interracial blowbang regularly update with new content. watching mom go black, watching my daughter go black and blacks on cougars still update with new content but their update schedule is not very regular. All the other sites may claim to have new content but I think it's all remastered oldewr stuff.

My favorite site is Blacks on Blondes because the content is all scenario porn with a decent amount of anal and even some dp's. They have a very good selection of models and they update with one new video per week.

My other two favorite sites are Spring Thomas and Katie Thomas. These are dead sites and have been for a couple of years but Dogfart started remastering the content and that was good news for me because I always liked the sex on both sites.

I have found a couple of good videos on blacks on cougars but they were older videos.


01-20-12  06:23pm

Reply
33
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from RustyJ:

It's very much worth joining, especially if you've never done it before. I guess the release schedule is what it is is because they have to sell those DVD's too. My biggest gripe with this site was sometimes insane file size. 4-5 gigabytes was the biggest ones I saw but then again some were quite nicely compressed so I guess they have many teams working on these releases.

01-19-12  03:44am

Reply
34
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from PinkPanther:

They do so much material that even though they post 3 scenes every day, they wind up being incredibly far behind the actual output, so they push out a ton of scenes periodically. It's a very good site - and if you've been a member once, you get amazing rejoin promos fairly often.

01-18-12  06:59pm

Reply
35
Visit Pornstar Network

Pornstar Network
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from RippedOff: (slategrey's Reply)

slategrey,

I totally agree. Pre-checked check boxes should always be illegal when the check box refers to the purchase of a good or service.

The only time pre-checked check boxes are ok is when they involve an advanced optional FREE feature of some sort. For instance I've been meaning to add pre-checked check boxes to sites of mine so publishers can receive emails when people post comments about their work by default, but that is just about the only case in which I would consider a pre-checked check box to be a benefit to the user. Although pre-checked check boxes on PSN next to "Don't charge my credit card under different names for stuff I'm not ordering" would be a nice touch.


01-17-12  01:59am

Reply
36
Visit Sex And Submission

Sex And Submission
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Review from rearadmiral:

I agree completely that Sex and Submission is really different from Fucking Machines in that it si so much easier for the directors to keep S+S fresh and interesting. The Sasha Grey scene and the Kat scene are still among my all-time favourite porn scenes.

Like you, I look for email discounts, but I think the site (and all Kink sites) are worth the $30 per month. The production values are much higher than most other sites.


01-09-12  05:25pm

Reply
37
Visit Sex And Submission

Sex And Submission
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Review from messmer:

Nice review, slategrey! Only one difference of opinion: I liked the "post" action interviews but despised the "pre."

I deleted every video that had a "before interview" because it ruined the fantasy. I simply can't see BDSM content that starts with "Gee, I just adore being tied and used and humiliated! and can't wait for us to get started! " :-) But that's me. Most others seemed to feel, just like you, that it was a plus. Cheers and again, good review!


01-09-12  03:22pm

Reply
38
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from slutty:

Download Them All works here, but watch out for the limit. I couldn't figure a way to save the queue if I got cut-off (but perhaps there is one).

01-02-12  11:22pm

Reply
39
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from rearadmiral:

I just took out a membership here today and I can't get Free Download Manager to work. I can't say with other managers, but my guess is that if they block one they block them all.

12-17-11  10:57am

Reply
40
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from Monahan:

The link from PU and TBP to the VideoBox site is broken. The only way to access the site is by going to Videobox.com from your browser.

When I did that I got the monthly price of $15.00...which is still a great beal, IMO.


12-17-11  10:10am

Reply
41
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from Cybertoad:

hey thats cool

12-07-11  08:16am

Reply
42
Visit Club Red Light

Club Red Light
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Review from careylowell:

$14.95? I guess I was snookered for just under thirty clams...which is too much for a site which hadn't any HD updates for seven months. Seven at the time of my m'ship & I see the digital drought continues.

12-06-11  09:40pm

Reply
43
Visit Elegant Angel

Elegant Angel
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Capn: (slategrey's Reply)

That makes more sense.

Cap'n. :0)


12-01-11  11:35pm

Reply
44
Visit Elegant Angel

Elegant Angel
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Review from Capn:

Your score seems high, if you are only rating the site average.

Should be mid 70s surely?

Cap'n. :0/


12-01-11  03:40pm

Reply
45
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from rearadmiral:

Oops... I meant to reply to your comment on Young Legal Porn but I accidentally replied to slutty's reply to you...

12-01-11  03:22pm

Reply
46
N/A REPLY TO #11 from slutty: (slategrey's Reply)

there are those that classify themselves as asexual, but it seems unlikely they'd frequent a porn review site. But perhaps they'd just be curious?

11-30-11  09:12pm

Reply
47
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from slutty:

If you click around a bit you can find thumbnails of most of their material, I'm not sure that you can get any additional trailers though aside from checking out sites that aren't supposed to be mentioned here.

It is a decent site, if you've never been on the network may be worth paying the $10 extra to get the whole network.


11-30-11  12:00am

Reply
48
Visit Gloryhole.com

Gloryhole.com
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from pat362: (slategrey's Reply)

A quick word of warning if you ever get an offer from them that says access for 19.99$. Be very careful because that could be a 3 month access for $19.99 per month so it's really a 60$ charge That's not a bad deal at all but only if you enjoy all their updates since you only get one update per week and not all their sites still update. I'm a past member and I got that offer at least once or twice but I quickly realised that they weren't talking about a month membership.

I think I've only taken a 1$ trial once for a site that I no longer remember and I got burned just like you.


11-20-11  06:30pm

Reply
49
N/A REPLY TO #11 from messmer: (slategrey's Reply)

I am not so sure about that when it comes to the males, slategrey. With a sex scene lasting about 20 - 25 minutes I am sure there are times when they have to force themselves to think of something outlandish and unpornish while they are laboring away or the scene would be over too quickly.

Add to that the director's constant orders, plus the lights, plus the annoyance of a squeaking bed/sofa, plus a camera in your face or near your genitals ... they might feel a certain pride after the fact thanks to viagra, but enjoyment? :-)


11-20-11  02:18pm

Reply
50
Visit Gloryhole.com

Gloryhole.com
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment from pat362:

My rule of thumb is that unless TBP says what you get with the trial then it's almost never worth it. This is especially true when sites are on the expensive side like this one. I really like some of the content these guys do but I only join about once a year because it's so expensive.

11-20-11  11:20am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 26-50 of 73 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 1.14 seconds.